Gary L O'Brien1, Cian O'Mahony2, Katie Cooke3, Ada Kinneally4, Sarah-Jo Sinnott5, Valerie Walshe6, Mark Mulcahy7, Stephen Byrne8. 1. Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: gary_obrien@umail.ucc.ie. 2. Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 3. Pharmacy Department, South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. 4. Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland. 5. Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 6. National Finance Division, Health Service Executive, Model Business Park, Cork, Ireland. 7. Department of Accounting, Finance and Information Systems, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 8. Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: stephen.byrne@ucc.ie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two large acute Irish University teaching hospitals changed the manner in which they treated human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-positive breast cancer patients by implementing the administration of trastuzumab via the subcutaneous (SC) route into their clinical practice. The study objective is to compare the trastuzumab SC and trastuzuamb intravenous (IV) treatment pathways in both hospitals and assess which route is more cost-effective and time saving in relation to active health care professional (HCP) time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study in the form of cost minimization analysis constituted the study design. Active HCP time for trastuzumab SC- and IV-related tasks were recorded. Staff costs were calculated using fully loaded salary costs. Loss of productivity costs for patients were calculated using the human capital method. RESULTS: On average, the total HCP time saved per trastuzumab SC treatment cycle relative to trastuzumab IV treatment cycle was 59.21 minutes. Time savings in favor of trastuzumab SC resulted from quicker drug reconstitution, no IV catheter installation/removal, and less HCP monitoring. Over a full treatment course of 17 cycles, average HCP time saved accumulates to 16.78 hours, with an estimated direct cost saving of €1609.99. Loss of productivity for patients receiving trastuzumab IV (2.15 days) was greater than that of trastuzumab SC (0.60 days) for a full treatment course. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab SC treatment has proven to be a more cost-effective option than trastuzumab IV treatment that generated greater HCP time savings in both study sites. Healthcare policymakers should consider replacing trastuzumab IV with trastuzumab SC treatment in all eligible patients.
BACKGROUND: Two large acute Irish University teaching hospitals changed the manner in which they treated humanepidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-positive breast cancerpatients by implementing the administration of trastuzumab via the subcutaneous (SC) route into their clinical practice. The study objective is to compare the trastuzumab SC and trastuzuamb intravenous (IV) treatment pathways in both hospitals and assess which route is more cost-effective and time saving in relation to active health care professional (HCP) time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study in the form of cost minimization analysis constituted the study design. Active HCP time for trastuzumab SC- and IV-related tasks were recorded. Staff costs were calculated using fully loaded salary costs. Loss of productivity costs for patients were calculated using the human capital method. RESULTS: On average, the total HCP time saved per trastuzumab SC treatment cycle relative to trastuzumab IV treatment cycle was 59.21 minutes. Time savings in favor of trastuzumab SC resulted from quicker drug reconstitution, no IV catheter installation/removal, and less HCP monitoring. Over a full treatment course of 17 cycles, average HCP time saved accumulates to 16.78 hours, with an estimated direct cost saving of €1609.99. Loss of productivity for patients receiving trastuzumab IV (2.15 days) was greater than that of trastuzumab SC (0.60 days) for a full treatment course. CONCLUSION:Trastuzumab SC treatment has proven to be a more cost-effective option than trastuzumab IV treatment that generated greater HCP time savings in both study sites. Healthcare policymakers should consider replacing trastuzumab IV with trastuzumab SC treatment in all eligible patients.
Authors: Helena Earl; Louise Hiller; Anne-Laure Vallier; Shrushma Loi; Karen McAdam; Luke Hughes-Davies; Daniel Rea; Donna Howe; Kerry Raynes; Helen B Higgins; Maggie Wilcox; Chris Plummer; Betania Mahler-Araujo; Elena Provenzano; Anita Chhabra; Sophie Gasson; Claire Balmer; Jean E Abraham; Carlos Caldas; Peter Hall; Bethany Shinkins; Christopher McCabe; Claire Hulme; David Miles; Andrew M Wardley; David A Cameron; Janet A Dunn Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Po-Hung Hsieh; Alec J Kacew; Marie Dreyer; Anthony V Serritella; Randall W Knoebel; Garth W Strohbehn; Mark J Ratain Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-03-14