Literature DB >> 30852643

Parents' experience with positive newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis.

Inken Brockow1, Uta Nennstiel2.   

Abstract

In Germany, screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is part of the newborn screening since September 2016. The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. We investigated the parents' perception of the CF screening process in Bavaria and the communication after positive screening results with a questionnaire. Until August 2018, 192 children went through a final diagnostic testing after a positive CF screening result, and 105 (54.7%) families completed the questionnaire. Of these, only 30 parents obtained information about the newborn screening by a physician, despite this being mandatory in Germany. Parents being informed by a CF specialist (28.6%) about the positive screening result were more satisfied with the given information (80.0 versus 50% informed by the maternity ward), and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. More than 3 days between the information about the screening result and the diagnostic testing was too long for 77.7% of the families.
Conclusion: Performing final diagnostic testing with only short delays and receiving satisfactory information is important. Therefore, parents should be informed directly by a CF center about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days. What is Known: • The risk of psychological harm due to false-positive screening results is a longstanding concern. • Satisfactory information about the positive CF screening result seem to reduce the parental stress. What is New: • Parents being informed directly by a CF specialist were more satisfied with the given information and the delay until the final diagnostic testing was shorter. • Our data support the concept that parents should better be informed directly by a CF specialist about positive screening results and only when sweat testing is possible within the next days to reduce parental stress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystic fibrosis; Newborn screening; Parental stress; Positive screening results

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852643     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03343-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  24 in total

1.  Psychological effects of false-positive results in cystic fibrosis newborn screening: a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Julie Beucher; Emmanuelle Leray; Eric Deneuville; Monique Roblin; Isabelle Pin; François Bremont; Dominique Turck; Jean-Louis Giniès; Pascal Foucaud; Gilles Rault; Jocelyne Derelle; Valérie David; Hubert Journel; Sophie Marchand; David Veillard; Michel Roussey
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Guidelines for implementation of cystic fibrosis newborn screening programs: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation workshop report.

Authors:  Anne Marie Comeau; Frank J Accurso; Terry B White; Preston W Campbell; Gary Hoffman; Richard B Parad; Benjamin S Wilfond; Margaret Rosenfeld; Marci K Sontag; John Massie; Philip M Farrell; Brian P O'Sullivan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The prevalence of cystic fibrosis in the European Union.

Authors:  Philip M Farrell
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A survey of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Europe.

Authors:  Kevin W Southern; Anne Munck; Rodney Pollitt; Georges Travert; Luisa Zanolla; Jeannette Dankert-Roelse; Carlo Castellani
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  A review of the psychosocial effects of false-positive results on parents and current communication practices in newborn screening.

Authors:  J Hewlett; S E Waisbren
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Psychosocial consequences of false-positive newborn screens for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Kate Murphy Orland; Laura Cavanagh
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-09-17

7.  Expanded newborn screening for biochemical disorders: the effect of a false-positive result.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gurian; Daniel D Kinnamon; Judith J Henry; Susan E Waisbren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Coleen A Boyle; Jeffrey R Botkin; Anne Marie Comeau; Martin Kharrazi; Margaret Rosenfeld; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2004-10-15

9.  Informing parents about positive newborn screen results: parents' recommendations.

Authors:  Natalie Salm; Elena Yetter; Audrey Tluczek
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 1.979

10.  European best practice guidelines for cystic fibrosis neonatal screening.

Authors:  Carlo Castellani; Kevin W Southern; Keith Brownlee; Jeannette Dankert Roelse; Alistair Duff; Michael Farrell; Anil Mehta; Anne Munck; Rodney Pollitt; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Bridget Wilcken; Manfred Ballmann; Carlo Corbetta; Isabelle de Monestrol; Philip Farrell; Maria Feilcke; Claude Férec; Silvia Gartner; Kevin Gaskin; Jutta Hammermann; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Gerard Loeber; Milan Macek; Gita Mehta; Andreas Reiman; Paolo Rizzotti; Alec Sammon; Dorota Sands; Alan Smyth; Olaf Sommerburg; Toni Torresani; Georges Travert; Annette Vernooij; Stuart Elborn
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Psychological Impact of NBS for CF.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Holly Chinnery
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 2.  The Role of Extended CFTR Gene Sequencing in Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Anne Bergougnoux; Maureen Lopez; Emmanuelle Girodon
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2020-03-21

3.  "We needed this": perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals involved in a pilot newborn screening program for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Didu S T Kariyawasam; Arlene M D'Silva; Janine Vetsch; Claire E Wakefield; Veronica Wiley; Michelle A Farrar
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Lynette Shakespeare; Pru Holder; Holly Chinnery; Gemma Hack; Tanya Gill; Rachel Gould; Kevin W Southern; Ellinor K Olander; Stephen Morris; James R Bonham; Alan Simpson; Louise Moody
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2022-07-27

5.  Being affiliated to a cystic fibrosis centre is important for parents' everyday life.

Authors:  Pia Bonde Nielsen; Hanne Vebert Olesen; Claus Sixtus Jensen
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective.

Authors:  Sietske Haitjema; Charlotte M A Lubout; Justine H M Zijlstra; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Francjan J van Spronsen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.706

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.