Literature DB >> 30852313

Microplastic abundance, characteristics, and removal in wastewater treatment plants in a coastal city of China.

Zouxia Long1, Zhong Pan2, Wenling Wang2, Jianye Ren3, Xingguang Yu2, Liangyu Lin2, Hui Lin2, Hongzhe Chen2, Xianglong Jin4.   

Abstract

Studying the abundance, characteristics, and removal of microplastics (MPs) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in coastal cities is of great significance for understanding the impacts of human activities on the marine environment, but currently, little information on this topic is available in China. Therefore, the abundance, characteristics, and removal of MPs in seven WWTPs of Xiamen, a typical coastal city in China, are studied. Sixty samples were collected using an improved sampling method involving an electromagnetic flowmeter and a fast digital camera. The influent MPs concentration is 1.57-13.69 items/L, and it is reduced to 0.20-1.73 items/L in the effluent, indicating that 79.3-97.8% MPs is removed. Based on the daily effluent discharge and MPs removal rate, it is estimated that ∼6.5 × 108 MPs are released from the seven WWTPs into the Xiamen Bay each day. The light microscopic and micro-Raman spectroscopic analysis indicates that ∼62.68% of particles are plastic polymers, including polypropylene (31.6%), polyethylene (21.9%), polystyrene (10.1%), propylene/ethylene copolymer (9.2%), and polyethylene terephthalate (7.5%). The color of MPs is mainly composed of white (27.3%) and clears (25.8%). Our results show that granules (41.1%) are the dominant shape of MPs, followed by fragments (31.3%), fibers (23.7%), and pellet (3.9%). The characteristics of MPs such as sizes, shapes, and types affect the MPs removal in WWTPs. Our findings show that MPs concentration in the influent is positively correlated with the suspended solids (SS), however, in the effluent, it is associated with the WWTPs operating load, as reflected by obviously higher MP abundance in overloaded ones.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abundance; Characteristics; Microplastic; Removal; Wastewater treatment plant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852313     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions.

Authors:  Serena Cunsolo; John Williams; Michelle Hale; Daniel S Read; Fay Couceiro
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Applying the extended producer responsibility towards plastic waste in Asian developing countries for reducing marine plastic debris.

Authors:  Hendro Putra Johannes; Michikazu Kojima; Fusanori Iwasaki; Ellen Putri Edita
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2021-04-28

Review 3.  Detection and removal of microplastics in wastewater: evolution and impact.

Authors:  Thuhin K Dey; Md Elias Uddin; Mamun Jamal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Country-Specific Environmental Risks of Fragrance Encapsulates Used in Laundry Care Products.

Authors:  Yaping Cai; Jianming Lin; Sylvia Gimeno; Frédéric Begnaud; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.218

5.  Efficiency of Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) for Microplastic Removal: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antonio Cristaldi; Maria Fiore; Pietro Zuccarello; Gea Oliveri Conti; Alfina Grasso; Ilenia Nicolosi; Chiara Copat; Margherita Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Micro/nano-plastics occurrence, identification, risk analysis and mitigation: challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Boda Ravi Kiran; Harishankar Kopperi; S Venkata Mohan
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 14.284

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.