Aparecida Maria Catai1, Carlos Marcelo Pastre2, Moacir Fernades de Godoy3, Ester da Silva4, Anielle Christine de Medeiros Takahashi4, Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei2. 1. Cardiovascular Physical Therapy Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: mcatai@ufscar.br. 2. School of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil. 3. Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto (FAMERP), São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. 4. Cardiovascular Physical Therapy Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability is used as an assessment method for cardiac autonomic modulation. Since the Task Force's publication on heart rate variability in 1996, the European Heart Rhythm Association Position Paper in 2015 and a recent publication in 2017, attention has been paid to recommendations on using heart rate variability analysis methods, as well as their applications in different physiological conditions and clinical studies. This analysis has proved to be useful as a complementary tool for clinical evaluation and to assess the effect of non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions, such as physical exercise programmes, on cardiac autonomic modulation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to make recommendations and to develop a checklist of normalisation procedures regarding the use of heart rate variability data collection and analysis methodology, focusing on the cardiology area and cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: Based on previous heart rate variability publications, this paper provides a description of the most common shortcomings of using the analysis methods and considers recommendations and suggestions on how to minimise these occurrences by using a specific checklist. CONCLUSIONS: This article includes recommendations and a checklist regarding the use of heart rate variability collection and analysis methods. This work could help improve reporting on clinical evaluation and therapeutic intervention results and consequently, disseminate heart rate variability knowledge.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability is used as an assessment method for cardiac autonomic modulation. Since the Task Force's publication on heart rate variability in 1996, the European Heart Rhythm Association Position Paper in 2015 and a recent publication in 2017, attention has been paid to recommendations on using heart rate variability analysis methods, as well as their applications in different physiological conditions and clinical studies. This analysis has proved to be useful as a complementary tool for clinical evaluation and to assess the effect of non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions, such as physical exercise programmes, on cardiac autonomic modulation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to make recommendations and to develop a checklist of normalisation procedures regarding the use of heart rate variability data collection and analysis methodology, focusing on the cardiology area and cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: Based on previous heart rate variability publications, this paper provides a description of the most common shortcomings of using the analysis methods and considers recommendations and suggestions on how to minimise these occurrences by using a specific checklist. CONCLUSIONS: This article includes recommendations and a checklist regarding the use of heart rate variability collection and analysis methods. This work could help improve reporting on clinical evaluation and therapeutic intervention results and consequently, disseminate heart rate variability knowledge.
Authors: Aline C Almeida; Aryane F Machado; Maíra C Albuquerque; Lara M Netto; Franciele M Vanderlei; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Jayme Netto Junior; Carlos M Pastre Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: U Rajendra Acharya; K Paul Joseph; N Kannathal; Choo Min Lim; Jasjit S Suri Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2006-11-17 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Denise Felber Dietrich; Christian Schindler; Joel Schwartz; Jean-Claude Barthélémy; Jean-Marie Tschopp; Frédéric Roche; Arnold von Eckardstein; Otto Brändli; Philipppe Leuenberger; Diane R Gold; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Ursula Ackermann-Liebrich Journal: Europace Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Axel Bauer; A John Camm; Sergio Cerutti; Przemyslaw Guzik; Heikki Huikuri; Federico Lombardi; Marek Malik; Chung-Kang Peng; Alberto Porta; Roberto Sassi; Georg Schmidt; Peter J Schwartz; Phyllis K Stein; Yoshiharu Yamamoto Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Stefano Guzzetti; Ester Borroni; Pietro E Garbelli; Elisa Ceriani; Paolo Della Bella; Nicola Montano; Chiara Cogliati; Virend K Somers; Alberto Malliani; Alberto Mallani; Alberto Porta Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marcio Clementino de Souza Santos; Luiz Carlos de Lima Silveira; Sílvia Cristina Garcia Moura-Tonello; Alberto Porta; Aparecida Maria Catai; Givago da Silva Souza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Clara Campagnolo Real Gonçalves Toledo; Allysiê Priscilla de Souza Cavina; Isadora Stefen Seixas; Letícia Rosa de Jesus; Maria Eduarda Leonel Silva; Bruna Garcia Corral de Araújo; Franciele Marques Vanderlei Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: Tatiana Dias de Carvalho; Alex Rey Norberto; Fernando Rocha Oliveira; Laercio da Silva Paiva; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Maria Soares Júnior; Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei; Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso Journal: Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 1.712
Authors: Juan M García-Ceberino; Juan Pedro Fuentes-García; Santos Villafaina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yanan Xu; Zongwei Ye; Benfang Wang; Long Tang; Jun Sun; Xuedong Chen; Yi Yang; Jun Wang Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 7.310
Authors: William R Tebar; Raphael M Ritti-Dias; Jorge Mota; Bruna T C Saraiva; Tatiana M Damato; Leandro D Delfino; Breno Q Farah; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Diego G D Christofaro Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Ridwan M Alomri; Gerard A Kennedy; Siraj Omar Wali; Faris Alhejaili; Stephen R Robinson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 4.379