Literature DB >> 34405270

Cryolipolysis Does not Modify the Behavior and Recovery of Cardiac Autonomic Modulation.

Ana Clara Campagnolo Real Gonçalves Toledo1,2, Allysiê Priscilla de Souza Cavina3, Isadora Stefen Seixas4, Letícia Rosa de Jesus4, Maria Eduarda Leonel Silva4, Bruna Garcia Corral de Araújo2, Franciele Marques Vanderlei5,6.   

Abstract

The desire to reduce and remodel undesirable fatty deposits has increased the popularity and use of aesthetic procedures, among them, cryolipolysis. However, repercussions on the autonomic nervous system must be considered, since the decrease in cutaneous body temperature can have repercussions on sympathetic and parasympathetic components. The aim was to evaluate the behavior of cardiac autonomic modulation during and after a single application of cryolipolysis. A single-arm, prospective interventional study evaluated data from 13 women with a mean age of 22.38 ± 2.95 years, who had an accumulation of abdominal fat of at least 1.5 mm, were using oral contraceptives, and were sedentary. A professional applied cryolipolysis in a single 40-min session. RR intervals were collected by means of a cardiofrequency meter, at rest prior to the technique for 10 min, during the performance of the technique, and immediately after the end of the technique for a period of 50 min. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed using time, frequency, and Poincaré plot indices. For the mean RR, SDNN, rMSSD, SD1, SD2, and LF [ms2] indices, the values increased during the execution of cryolipolysis when compared to rest. In the recovery period, increases in the mean values of the RR, SDNN, rMSSD, SD1, SD2, HF [ms2], LF [nu], and HF [nu] indices were also observed when compared to the baseline moment. Both during the technique and in the recovery period, there were changes in the behavior of HRV characterized by an increase in global and vagal indices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic equipment; Autonomic nervous system; Esthetics; Heart rate; Heart rate variability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34405270     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02522-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  29 in total

1.  Effect of pursed-lip breathing in patients with COPD: Linear and nonlinear analysis of cardiac autonomic modulation.

Authors:  Renata Claudino Rossi; Franciele Marques Vanderlei; Aline Fernanda Bernardo; Naiara Maria de Souza; Ana Clara Campagnolo Real Goncalves; Ercy Mara Cipulo Ramos; Carlos Marcelo Pastre; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Luiz Carlos Marques Vanderlei
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.409

2.  Comparative thermographic analysis at pre- and postcryolipolysis treatment: Clinical case report.

Authors:  Paloma de S Oliveira; Mylana A de Carvalho; Mariana A Braga; Márcia M P Leite; Alena P Medrado
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock; A Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Cell death: a review of the major forms of apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy.

Authors:  Mark S D'Arcy
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests.

Authors:  Kenneth B Klein; Brian Zelickson; Jeffrey G Riopelle; Eric Okamoto; Eric P Bachelor; Rosemary S Harry; Jessica A Preciado
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  The efficacy of cryolipolysis treatment on arms and inner thighs.

Authors:  Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Angkana Sathaworawong; Woraphong Manuskiatti
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Response of cardiac autonomic modulation after a single exposure to musical auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Lucas L Ferreira; Luiz Carlos M Vanderlei; Heraldo L Guida; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; David M Garner; Franciele M Vanderlei; Celso Ferreira; Vitor E Valenti
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Multiple same day cryolipolysis treatments for the reduction of subcutaneous fat are safe and do not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests.

Authors:  Kenneth B Klein; Eric P Bachelor; Edward V Becker; Leyda E Bowes
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction.

Authors:  Brian D Zelickson; A Jay Burns; Suzanne L Kilmer
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Cryolipolysis: Clinical Best Practices and Other Nonclinical Considerations.

Authors:  Julius Few; Renato Saltz; Mark Beaty; Michael Kelly; Kiya Movassaghi; Keith A Marcus; David Sieber; A Jay Burns; Sara Sangha
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2020-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.