Literature DB >> 30852030

Energy expenditure and caloric targets during continuous renal replacement therapy under regional citrate anticoagulation. A viewpoint.

J Jonckheer1, H Spapen2, M L N G Malbrain3, T Oschima4, E De Waele5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for measuring energy expenditure in critically ill patients However, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a formal contraindication for IC use. AIMS: To discuss specific issues that hamper or preclude an IC-based assessment of energy expenditure and correct caloric prescription in CRRT-treated patients.
METHODS: Narrative review of current literature.
RESULTS: Several relevant pitfalls for validation of IC during CRRT were identified. First, IC measures CO2 production (VCO2) and O2 consumption to calculate resting energy expenditure (REE) with the Weir equation. VCO2 measurements are influenced by CRRT because CO2 is exchanged during the blood purification process. CO2 exchange also depends on type of pre- and/or postdilution fluid(s). CO2 dissolves in different forms with dynamic but unpredictable impact on VCO2. Second, the effect of immunologic activation and heat loss on REE caused by extracorporeal circulation during CRRT is poorly documented. Third, caloric prescription should be adapted to CRRT-induced in- and efflux of different nutrients. Finally, citrate, which is the preferred anticoagulant for CRRT, is a caloric source that may influence IC measurements and REE.
CONCLUSION: Better understanding of CRRT-related processes is needed to assess REE and provide individualized nutritional therapy in this condition.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous renal replacement therapy; Indirect calorimetry; Nutrition; Regional citrate anticoagulation; Resting energy expenditure

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852030     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  4 in total

1.  Point-Counterpoint: Indirect Calorimetry Is Essential for Optimal Nutrition Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Paul E Wischmeyer; Jeroen Molinger; Krista Haines
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 2.  Indirect calorimetry in critical illness: a new standard of care?

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Joop Jonckheer; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Using indirect calorimetry in place of fixed energy prescription was feasible and energy targets were more closely met: do not forget an important limitation.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Leonel Barreto Gutierrez; Luc Kugener; Sebastien Redant; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry in critical illness and convalescence: current evidence and practical considerations.

Authors:  Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen; Karin Josephina Hubertina Beckers; Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.