Literature DB >> 30851888

Outcomes of robotic liver resections for colorectal liver metastases. A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive ultrasound-guided robotic surgery.

Francesco Guerra1, Simone Guadagni2, Benedetta Pesi3, Niccolò Furbetta2, Gregorio Di Franco2, Matteo Palmeri2, Mario Annecchiarico3, Emilio Eugeni4, Andrea Coratti3, Alberto Patriti4, Luca Morelli2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current evidence supporting robotics to perform minimally invasive liver resection is based on single center case series reporting surgical outcomes in heterogeneous groups of patients. On the contrary, relatively scarce data specifically focusing on secondary hepatic malignancies is available. The objective of this study is to assess short- and long-term outcomes following liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis on a multi-institutional series of patients.
METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastasis at three different tertiary hospitals over a 10-year time frame were included in this analysis. All patients received ultrasound-guided liver resection according to tumor location following the principle of parenchymal sparing surgery. Perioperative, clinicopathologic and oncological outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 59 patients underwent liver resection. There were 7 cases of conversion to open surgery. The postoperative complication rate was 27%, 5% being the rate of major morbidity. Overall, the mean postoperative hospital stay was 6 days and no mortality occurred. R0 resection was achieved for 92% of lesions. At a mean follow-up of 19 months, the 1-year and 3-year DFS was 83.5% and 41.9%, while the 1-year and 3-year OS was 90.4% and 66.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic liver surgery does not impair surgical outcome and oncological results in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal liver metastasis; Hepatectomy; Liver surgery; Minimally invasive liver surgery; Robotic liver surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30851888     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  6 in total

1.  Robotic hepatic resection in postero-superior region of liver.

Authors:  Zhiming Zhao; Zhuzeng Yin; Lichao Pan; Chenggang Li; Minggen Hu; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-08

2.  Minimally invasive treatment of colorectal liver metastases: does robotic surgery provide any technical advantages over laparoscopy? A multicenter analysis from the IGoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry.

Authors:  Michele Masetti; Guido Fallani; Luca Aldrighetti; Elio Jovine; Francesca Ratti; Alessandro Ferrero; Felice Giuliante; Umberto Cillo; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Guido Torzilli; Leonardo Vincenti; Giorgio Ercolani; Chiara Cipressi; Raffaele Lombardi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-01-31

3.  Usability of Indocyanine Green in Robot-Assisted Hepatic Surgery.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Mehdorn; Jan Henrik Beckmann; Felix Braun; Thomas Becker; Jan-Hendrik Egberts
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center.

Authors:  Mirhasan Rahimli; Aristotelis Perrakis; Vera Schellerer; Andrew Gumbs; Eric Lorenz; Mareike Franz; Jörg Arend; Victor-Radu Negrini; Roland Siegfried Croner
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 5.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew McGuirk; Mahir Gachabayov; Aram Rojas; Agon Kajmolli; Shekhar Gogna; Katie W Gu; Qian Qiuye; Xiang Da Dong
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.