Literature DB >> 30848090

Microbial community composition in alpine lake sediments from the Hengduan Mountains.

Binqiang Liao1, Xiaoxin Yan2, Jiang Zhang1, Ming Chen3, Yanling Li4, Jiafeng Huang1, Ming Lei1, Hailun He1, Jun Wang1,3.   

Abstract

Microbial communities in sediments play an important role in alpine lake ecosystems. However, the microbial diversity and community composition of alpine lake sediments from the Hengduan Mountains remain largely unknown. Therefore, based on the Illumina MiSeq platform, high-throughput sequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA gene was performed on 15 alpine lake sediments collected at different locations in the Hengduan Mountains. The abundance-based coverage estimate (ACE), Chao1, and Shannon indices indicated that the microbial abundance and diversity of these sediments were high. There are some differences in the composition of microbial communities among sediments. However, in general, Proteobacteria accounted for the largest proportion of all sediments (22.3%-67.6%) and was the dominant phylum. Followed by Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Planctomycetes. In addition, the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) interactions network had modular structures and suggested more cooperation than competition in the microbial community. Besides, we also found that temperature has a significant contribution to the sample-environment relationship. This study revealed the diversity and composition of microbial communities in alpine lake sediments from the Hengduan Mountains, and describe the correlation between microbial community structure and different environmental variables.
© 2019 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Illumina MiSeq platform; alpine lake sediments; microbial community composition; microbial diversity; the Hengduan Mountains

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30848090      PMCID: PMC6741133          DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiologyopen        ISSN: 2045-8827            Impact factor:   3.139


INTRODUCTION

Alpine lakes are remote, hard to reach, and not impacted by human activities, so they are primitive ecosystems. Their geographic locations include many environmental conditions that are extreme for life (Catalan et al., 2006). Harsh conditions such as low temperatures, high ultraviolet radiation, and low concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and oligotrophy are characterized in these alpine environments (Čuperová, Holzer, Salka, Sommaruga, & Koblízek, 2013; Rose, Williamson, Saros, Sommaruga, & Fischer, 2009; Seufferheld, Alvarez, & Farias, 2008). These harsh conditions alter the hydrology and structure of the lake and may affect the microbial community composition and biogeochemical functions (Liu et al., 2017; Rose et al., 2009; Wasserstrom et al., 2017). Since alpine lakes have been reported to be early indicators of environmental change, the function of microorganisms in the related processes has attracted new research interest (Shafi, Kamili, Shah, Parray, & Bandh, 2017). Microorganisms are rich in genetic diversity and an essential part of aquatic ecosystems and play important roles in global biogeochemical cycles (Newton, Jones, Eiler, Mcmahon, & Bertilsson, 2011). In alpine lake ecosystems, performing these roles is supported by different microbial communities, ensuring that carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur are recycled back to the water column (Compte‐Port et al., 2018). Furthermore, extreme environmental variables of alpine lakes may result in species or taxon sorting that is unique to these ecosystems (Sommaruga & Casamayor, 2009). However, microbial diversity and community composition in alpine lake sediments and the associated regulatory variables need further study. Therefore, to study the diverse microbial communities of alpine lake sediments, we can understand the biogeochemical processes and ecological mechanisms that underlie ecosystem function (Liu, Yang, Yu, & Wilkinson, 2015). The Hengduan Mountains is the general name for a series of north–south parallel mountains in Sichuan, Yunnan, and eastern Tibet in China and extending into northernmost Myanmar. There are numerous alternating ridges and deep valleys with altitudes ranging from 2,000 to 6,000 m (Oh, Wang, Wang, Liu, & Hur, 2014). These mountains are recognized as one of the 35 biodiversity hotspots in the world and the most biologically temperate region in the world (Jiménez, Long, Shevock, & Guerra, 2016). There are many lakes of different sizes in the mountain range, which are ideal places to study the microbial diversity of water bodies in the Hengduan Mountains. However, to date, there has been only sporadic knowledge of microbial communities in the area (Chen et al., 2018). Thus, profiles of the microbial diversity and community composition in alpine lake sediments of the Hengduan Mountains remain largely unknown. In addition, the correlation between microbial diversity and altitude and environmental variables in these alpine lake ecosystems remains to be studied. In this study, we adopted integrated geochemical and molecular biological technology to analyze the microbial diversity and spatial distribution of microbial communities in remote alpine lakes. Our aims were to characterize the microbial community structure and composition in alpine lakes of the Hengduan Mountains and explore the correlation between microbial structure and different environmental variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collections and in situ measurements

The sampling sites are located at alpine lakes in the Hengduan Mountains (27°31′40″–28°14′31.2″N and 98°12′49.2″–100°4′1.2″E), which are under the conditions of low temperature and hypoxia throughout the year. A total of 15 alpine lake sediment samples were collected using a stainless steel grab sampler at different locations in the Hengduan Mountains in 2015 (Figure 1). GS2‐1, GS2‐2, GS3‐1, GS3‐2, GS3‐3, GS4‐2, and GS4‐3 were collected in October or November; while DK, DV, GGC, NB, NB‐1, SL, WD‐2, and ZN were acquired in May or June. Samples (upper 3 cm) from each station were pooled, homogenized, collected in sterile 50 ml tubes, and immediately stored at −20°C until DNA extraction was undertaken in our laboratory. We classified the sample number based on the sampling order. At each station, depth and sediment temperature (T) were profiled by a SeaBird CTD (SBE37 MicroCAT, SeaBird), and altitude was determined by GPS. The pH was detected using a pH meter (Ohaus, NJ), and dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured by a DO meter (HQ30D, HACH). Sediment water content (SWC) (10 g of each sample) was determined as gravimetric weight loss after drying the sediment at 105°C until constant weight (Guo et al., 2015).
Figure 1

Map of the study area, showing the location of the sampling stations (a, b)

Map of the study area, showing the location of the sampling stations (a, b)

DNA extraction and PCR

We used next‐generation technology (16S rRNA gene‐based tag‐encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing, bTEFAP®) to characterize the microbial diversity and community composition of alpine lake sediments (Dowd, Sun, Wolcott, Domingo, & Carroll, 2008; Jacob, Hussein, Shakhatreh, & Cornelison, 2017; Swanson et al., 2011). The genomic DNA of 15 alpine lake sediments was extracted from 1 g of the sample using an E.A.N.A. Soil DNA Kit (OMEGA, Georgia, GA) as indicated in the instructions (Peng, Zi, & Wang, 2015). The V4 region of 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using primers 515F (5′‐GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA‐3′) and 806R (5′‐GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT‐ 3′) (Sun et al., 2015, 2017). The primer pair has been shown to generate optimal community clustering with the sequence length in the V4 region (Caporaso et al., 2011). Before sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform, we amplified the V4 region by adding sample‐specific 10‐base barcodes and universal sequencing tags by sample‐specific PCR protocol. Amplicon libraries were pooled with an equal volume of each barcoded product, purified using an Agencourt AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, CA), and the product size distribution was checked on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. Purified libraries were quantified using a Qubit® dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies, CA) and then used for sequencing analysis.

MiSeq Illumina sequencing and data analysis

16S rRNA gene libraries were constructed using an Illumina MiSeq (San Diego, CA) platform. Filtered clean reads were analyzed using the Uparse (http://drive5.com/uparse/, version 7.1) and mothur pipelines (Version 1.35.1) (Deng, Cui, Hernández, & Dumont, 2014). All statistical analyses were carried out using the R language. The sequencing reads were classified into operational taxonomic units (OTUs; sequences with similarity ≥97% were defined as one OTU) (Peng et al., 2015). The OTU annotations were based on the Silva (Silva_119_release_aligned) database (Quast et al., 2013). Microbial α‐diversity estimates (abundance‐based coverage estimate [ACE], Chao1 and Shannon index) were calculated by the mothur program according to the OTU assignment (Star, Haverkamp, Jentoft, & Jakobsen, 2013). The relative abundance (i.e., the proportion of sequences from a phylum/class relative to the total number of sequences in the sample) was calculated. We performed a heatmap analysis using drawing tools on the BMKCloud platform (www.biocloud.net). Rarefaction curves, hierarchical clustering analysis, and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) were performed using Past3 software (Version 3.22) (Aguilar, Acosta, Dorador, & Sommaruga, 2016). The relationship between microbial communities and individual environmental factors was analyzed by a correlation test using redundancy analysis (RDA; Canoco 5). OTU interactive network analysis was performed on the MENA website (http://ieg4.rccc.ou.edu/MENA/). The obtained sample OTU matrix distribution, according to the random matrix theory method, was used to generate the OTU interactive relationship, and further construct an ecological network (set the OTU to appear in at least nine samples). All network connection curves were in agreement with the power law model (R 2 = 0.937). Fast greedy modularity optimization was chosen to construct the module. Cytoscape software (Version 3.6.1) was used to show the network diagram, which was presented in attribute circle layout (circle by No. module) (Deng et al., 2012).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Site descriptions and environmental variables

A total of 15 alpine lake sediment samples from different geographical locations were included in this study. The geographic location and environment variables data for each sample site are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. These sites are located in the mountains of Yunnan and Tibet in Southwest China. All samples were collected at altitudes above 3,500 m, ZN had the highest altitude at 4,636 m, and the water depth ranged from 2.4 to 53.8 m for all sites. The temperature of most samples ranged from 7.1 to 14.6°C, except for ZN, which had the lowest temperature at 3.5°C. The sediment pH ranged from 6.03 to 9.57. Individual samples (GS2‐2, GS3‐3, and GS4‐3) had pH values below 7.0, while the other samples were neutral or alkaline. The highest DO concentration in all samples was 7.94 mg/L for GS4‐3 and the concentration in the remaining samples was approximately 7.0 mg/L. The SWC varied from 14.06% to 95.23%.
Table 1

Site descriptions and environmental variables

Sample IDLongitude (E)Latitude (N)Depth (m)Altitude (m) T (°C)pHDO (mg/L)SWC, %
GS2‐198°33′25.2″27°57′32.4″27.34,0237.78.7627.5614.26
GS2‐298°14′34.8″28°0′43.2″324,1017.16.7187.5828.21
GS3‐198°23′20.2″27°31′40.3″18.73,50011.37.0987.340.39
GS3‐298°12′49.2″28°3′45.63,70910.37.347.41834.43
GS3‐398°28′1.2″27°45′18″9.33,66110.36.0347.3414.06
GS4‐298°28′33.6″27°47′45.6″53.83,8488.87.1627.5852.94
GS4‐398°28′55.2″27°47′45.6″53,7587.66.6687.9484.12
DK99°57′18″28°14′38.4″8.14,10410.18.3687.4626.13
DV100°4′1.2″28°1′1.2″2.43,97012.99.6987.2936.71
GGC99°55′1.2″28°7′58.8″37.54,21412.58.6586.9495.23
NB100°1′58.8″28°3′32.34,01411.98.3187.0122.46
NB‐1100°1′1.2″28°2′34.8″3.44,2717.88.4567.2481.78
SL100°2′52.8″28°1′58.8″3.83,96412.59.5737.3527.67
WD‐299°58′1.2″28°13′58.8″9.53,84314.68.9886.9838.03
ZN99°56′16.8″28°14′31.2″314,6363.58.367.3628.94

SWC: sediment water content; DO: dissolved oxygen.

Site descriptions and environmental variables SWC: sediment water content; DO: dissolved oxygen.

Microbial richness and diversity

The raw sequencing data were rigorously processed using mothur and exceeded 562,240 high‐quality partial 16S rRNA sequences that completely spanned the V4 region. After filtering, the sequence library of each sample contained 8,379–20,615 sequences (Table 2). The species abundance levels (D = 0.03) totaled of 15,828 OTUs in the complete data set, varying from 508 to 1,785 OTUs among sediment sample locations. The range of ACE was 1,210–2,844, while the range of Chao1 was 877–2,558, which were known as richness indices. GS4‐3 had the largest number of OTUs, correspondingly, the ACE and Chao1 index levels were also very high. In addition, NB‐1 had the fewest OTUs, and the levels of ACE and Chao1 were also low. The rarefaction curves of the OTUs indicated that diversity was completely sampled in all 15 sediments (Appendix Figure A1). The Shannon index, calculated to evaluate and compare microbial diversity among sites, was 3.62–6.54. In addition to high community richness, station GS4‐3 also had the highest microbial diversity among all sites. By comparing the two index values, we found that the diversity index was usually positively related to the richness index.
Table 2

Richness and diversity estimates for Illumina libraries from alpine lake sediments of the Hengduan Mountains

SampleNumber of sequencesObserved OTUACEChao1Shannon index
GS2‐119,9348181,2121,1685.37
GS2‐219,0991,2392,2531,8435.93
GS3‐18,3797021,3001,0754.71
GS3‐219,7289621,8111,4864.61
GS3‐320,6158171,5141,1944.19
GS4‐219,3149791,4011,3095.42
GS4‐316,3371,7852,7252,5586.54
DK16,2061,3432,6022,0885.92
DV14,7978311,2281,1624.72
GGC12,5231,2331,8281,7905.71
NB16,7681,1042,0651,6915.53
NB‐118,9555081,2108773.62
SL20,0371,5262,8442,3136.24
WD‐218,3301,0311,4841,4405.48
ZN15,8089501,3871,3175.37
Figure A1

Rarefaction curves obtained from pyrosequencing data of 15 alpine lake sediments

Richness and diversity estimates for Illumina libraries from alpine lake sediments of the Hengduan Mountains The results of this study indicate that the microbial abundance and diversity of the alpine lake sediments in the Hengduan Mountains are quite high. The ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices were higher than those in previous studies in the Gossenköllesee alpine lake in Austria (Rofner et al., 2017). This suggests that the sediments from alpine lakes in the Hengduan Mountains contain more microbial diversity than we expected, and sediment microorganisms in alpine lakes have a large reservoir of genetic variability.

Microbial community taxonomic composition

The sequences within each Illumina MiSeq library were classified using mothur at a threshold of 45.7% to characterize the microbial community composition in each sediment sample. A total of 256,830 sequences were classified and assigned to 32 microbial phyla, 18 of which were present in each sediment sample (Figure 2; Appendix Table A1). “Rare Phyla” account for 1.45%–18.67%. OTUs that could not be assigned to a class were defined as unclassified microorganisms and were ubiquitous in all sediments but only accounted for 0.43%–3.25%. Proteobacteria (22.27%–64.48%) was the dominant phylum in all sediments, followed by Bacteroidetes (4.40%–30.85%), Acidobacteria (2.47%–12.32%), Chloroflexi (1.13%–9.82%), and Planctomycetes (0.87%–12.78%), which accounted for a large proportion of the phyla in most sampling stations. This result is similar to the results of microbial diversity studies in surface sediments of Qinghai Lake, Tibet (Yang, Ma, Jiang, Wu, & Dong, 2016). At the class level, Betaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Sphingobacteria were dominant, and appeared in almost all samples Appendix Figure A2).
Figure 2

Relative abundance of phylum‐level microbial community composition for fifteen sediment samples. “Rare Phyla” include all phyla comprising <1% of the total microbial community composition

Table A1

Alpine lake sediment samples species abundance (%) at the phylum level

 GS2‐1GS2‐2GS3‐1GS3‐2GS3‐3GS4‐2GS4‐3DKDVGGCNBNB‐1SLWD‐2ZN
Unclassified1.163.661.012.050.631.931.110.471.953.251.930.370.430.722.49
Proteobacteria32.6524.1138.2334.7242.225.944.3139.0532.3464.4837.4326.9241.545.0922.27
Bacteroidetes9.8116.116.956.669.944.485.9714.315.556.497.184.430.857.787.82
Acidobacteria6.783.339.098.087.1412.327.288.13.322.479.445.194.957.388.46
Cyanobacteria2.491.696.60.851.485.392.957.497.670.114.7932.412.2924.220.1
Chloroflexi7.479.826.466.876.895.757.616.63.781.138.326.355.192.415.73
Planctomycetes7.456.419.3197.275.369.761.415.240.876.1912.781.341.16.87
Verrucomicrobia11.224.676.4210.366.34.085.426.133.80.234.244.52.222.212.69
Euryarchaeota3.613.771.171.382.430.130.480.0515.650.91.110.440.180.3915.04
Actinobacteria3.842.431.962.862.111.912.465.720.537.043.392.463.591.692.54
Nitrospirae3.80.334.773.623.437.885.280.970.210.183.850.980.041.693.83
Gemmatimonadetes0.990.431.251.661.94.682.17.050.30.392.41.182.20.921.58
Chlorobi1.971.951.841.923.171.521.620.554.420.272.260.540.541.443
Other0.51.420.290.970.560.420.370.110.610.240.750.060.130.451.27
Aminicenantes0.060.370.080.040.0400.100.240.170.140.0400.070.92
Armatimonadetes0.210.420.230.370.210.570.330.010.20.120.60.180.420.020.53
Candidate_division_OP30.430.240.180.250.260.210.100.560.250.60.0400.060.7
Elusimicrobia0.390.230.20.550.350.420.130.060.110.010.180.140.540.050.06
Firmicutes0.110.680.120.020.080.010.10.120.21.860.140.073.070.160.21
Latescibacteria0.251.110.490.180.191.210.680.061.110.211.240.30.070.510.91
Lentisphaerae0.581.110.50.160.170.020.2300.270.020.170.010.010.130.2
Miscellaneous_Crenarchaeotic_Group0.210.130.020.140.200.1100.020.491.320.0200.026.52
Miscellaneous_Euryarchaeotic_Group0.020.2300.0100000.010.050.050000.57
Omnitrophica0.260.180.140.510.350.190.0800.10.020.23000.160.23
Parcubacteria0.611.270.240.820.490.410.230.250.160.050.2900.110.380.32
Saccharibacteria0.190.170.110.410.130.370.141.440.187.420.30.320.110.010.02
Spirochaetae0.810.790.210.360.080.160.1700.420.080.230.0500.320.76
TA060.040.640.010.020.010.040.0200.180.060.11000.130.61
TM60.10.180.040.510.10.050.050.040.050.040.210.010.0500.16
Thaumarchaeota0.670.240.822.410.3313.390.190.010.120.040.23000.071.1
WCHB1‐600.250.20.420.841.430.020.1800.020.010.110.20.190.080.06
Woesearchaeota_(DHVEG‐6)1.061.670.821.380.111.180.4400.691.030.580.0100.332.45
Figure A2

Heatmap showing the relative abundance and distribution of OTU Illumina reads. The color code indicates relative abundance, ranging from blue (low abundance) to yellow to red (high abundance). Data in Double hierarchical dendrogram were performed log10 transformation

Relative abundance of phylum‐level microbial community composition for fifteen sediment samples. “Rare Phyla” include all phyla comprising <1% of the total microbial community composition In this study, Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in all sediment samples. Many previous studies have shown that the predominance of Proteobacteria in various lake sediment (Aszalós et al., 2016; Dai et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). A variety of microorganisms from Proteobacteria participate in various biogeochemical processes in aquatic ecosystems (Zhang et al., 2015). Appendix Table A2 shows the 20 known proteobacterial genera detected in the 15 samples (Cheng, Zhang, Wang, Wang, & Xie, 2014). Anaeromyxobacter (Deltaproteobacteria) was found in 15 samples, and the number of sequences in most samples exceeded 50 (average 144). Microorganisms from genus Anaeromyxobacter are known as Fe(III) reducers (Chao, Kalinowski, Nyalwidhe, & Hansmeier, 2010), can reduce arsenate and 2‐chlorophenol (Liu, Zhang, Zhao, Zhang, & Xie, 2014), and maintain organohalide respiration (Richardson, 2013). Previous studies have shown that Alphaproteobacterial genera, such as Bradyrhizobium, Hyphomicrobium, Sphingomonas, Novosphingobium, and Rhodanobacter (Gammaproteobacteria) have the ability to degrade various environmental pollutants (Cheng et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2013). Therefore, we believe that these genera have multiple mechanisms involved in biogeochemical processes. Members of the genus Sulfuricurvum (Epsilonproteobacteria) have been considered associated with sulfur oxidation (Kodama & Watanabe, 2004). A large number of sequences classified as Sulfuricurvum appeared in GGC, indicating a strong sulfur oxidation process in this sediment.
Table A2

Distribution of the sequences affiliated with the identified proteobacterial genera in sediment samples

 GS2‐1GS2‐2GS3‐1GS3‐2GS3‐3GS4‐2GS4‐3DKDVGGCNBNB‐1SLWD‐2ZNTotalNmber
Alphaproteobacteria
Hyphomicrobium12031101202512423612
Bradyrhizobium000100103200041126
Sphingomonas010110090113162110811
Roseomonas311100205106005259
Rhodoplanes30011002000001085
Phenylobacterium0000000360003112255
Novosphingobium011145091220135065911
Defluviicoccus2108000846010222729
Betaproteobacteria
Massilia011201245223235126447025513
Vogesella000011900000000114
Gammaproteobacteria
Rhodanobacter000002310065470711118047
Methylocaldum00294011140323064212068410
Acinetobacter020001002000006114
Steroidobacter00000010000000011
Methylobacter00000001002020164
Deltaproteobacteria
Anaeromyxobacter607183116543671352636517938914182312,16215
Smithella4711450108520031211611
Geobacter500020000001030114
Syntrophorhabdus814651201386025200213712
Epsilonproteobacteria
Sulfuricurvum0000000001,013000111,0153
In addition, we know that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes mainly contribute to the community structure of alpine lakes (Rofner et al., 2017). Notably, members of the Acidobacteria are commonly found in freshwater sediments (Newton et al., 2011). Acidobacteria are oligotrophic bacteria and adapt to low nutrient concentrations through strategies such as high‐affinity substrate uptake systems, low growth rates, and slow population turnover rates (Fierer, Bradford, & Jackson, 2007; Männistö, Kurhela, Tiirola, & Häggblom, 2013). Similar to several previous studies, Bacteroidetes exhibited large phenotypic and metabolic diversity in lake sediments (Bai et al., 2012; Liu et al. 2014; Zhang et al., 2015). Most described isolates of Bacteroidetes are chemoorganotrophs, known as Cytophaga–Flavobacteria, which can play an important role in converting complex molecules into simpler compounds and are also known for their phototrophic capacity (Gómez‐Consarnau et al., 2007; González et al., 2008; Kirchman, 2002; Newton et al., 2011). The archaeal diversity was much lower and dominated by Euryarchaeota (0.13%–45.04%). Euryarchaeota was mainly composed of members of the Methanomicrobiales and Thermoplasmatales. These two orders are well‐known methanogens and are involved in the central process of carbon cycling in oligotrophic alpine lake sediments (Compte‐Port et al., 2018). Furthermore, phyla that were unique for each sampling site were observed (Appendix Table A1). For example, Thaumarchaeota (13.39%) was a unique dominant genus of GS4‐2, present at much higher levels than at other stations and in recent studies (Zhang et al., 2015). Thaumarchaeota plays an important role in ammonia oxidation, but the driving factors for its distribution in lake sediments remain unclear (Jung et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015). The ratio of Cyanobacteria at NB‐1 and WD‐2 was 32.41% and 24.22%, respectively. The unique dominant phylum in GGC was Saccharibacteria (7.42%). Therefore, the abundance and diversity of microorganisms in alpine lake sediments in the Hengduan Mountains are high, and there are some unique endemic species, indicating that these sediments represent promising ecosystems for the further study of biogeochemical processes.

Comparison of microbial community structure among sediment samples

An OTU matrix based hierarchical cluster using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean was generated (Figure 3a). The dendrogram showed that the 15 sediment samples could be divided into five groups. The members of the first group included only GGC; the second group included GS2‐2 and ZN; the third group consisted of GS4‐2, NB‐1, GS3‐2, GS3‐1, GS4‐3, GS2‐1, GS3‐3, and NB; DV alone was included in the fourth group; and DK, WD‐2, and SL were included in the fifth group (Figure 3a). Similar results were also found in the PCoA based on a Bray–Curtis similarity matrix (Figure 3b). As shown by the cluster analysis, the sediment samples (except for GS2‐2) distributed in Figure 1a are closely grouped compared to the samples distributed in Figure 1b. This grouping means that the microbial community structure of alpine lake sediments in different locations also has spatial heterogeneity, which is consistent with previous reports (Bai et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2015; Song, Li, Du, Wang, & Dinget al., 2015). This spatial heterogeneity may be related to scale; spatial distance plays an important role in the formation of microbial community composition differences in the range of 10–1,000 km (Martiny, Eisen, Penn, Allison, & Horner‐Devine, 2011; Martiny et al., 2006).
Figure 3

(a) Similarity unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean dendrogram of OTU clustering analysis; (b) principal coordinate analysis based on a Bray–Curtis similarity matrix between sediment samples

(a) Similarity unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean dendrogram of OTU clustering analysis; (b) principal coordinate analysis based on a Bray–Curtis similarity matrix between sediment samples

Correlation network analysis of microbial communities

Addressing the interactions of microbial communities in the inland water ecosystem is a longstanding challenge in microbial community ecology (Cao et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2016). The sediment microbial network consisted of 167 nodes, and 256 edges (Figure 4; Appendix Table A3). The modularity value of the networks was 0.687(>0.50) (Appendix Table A3), and thus the networks had modular structures (Newman, 2006). Therefore, the interactions network of OTUs was divided according to the modules. Of the 256 interactions, 216 (84.4%) were positive and 40 (15.6%) were negative.
Figure 4

OTU interactions network according to the DNA data set of the alpine lake sediments. Each node is represented by an OTU indicating an individual species. The edge between each of the two nodes represents positive (blue) or negative (red) interactions between those two species. The colors of the nodes indicate the different major phyla and the size of each node is proportional to the number of connections (i.e., the degree). The circles consist of some nodes’ mean modules

Table A3

Network global properties of alpine lake sediment samples microbial communities

Network indexesAlpine lake sediment samples
Total nodes167
Total links256
R square of power‐law0.937
Average degree (avgK)3.066
Average clustering coefficient (avgCC)0.089
Average path distance (GD)6.584
Geodesic efficiency (E)0.218
Harmonic geodesic distance (HD)4.590
Maximal degree16
Nodes with max degreeOTU_4
Centralization of degree (CD)0.079
Maximal betweenness3,027.276
Nodes with max betweennessOTU_80
Centralization of betweenness (CB)0.199
Density (D)0.018
Reciprocity1
Transitivity (Trans)0.133
Connectedness (Con)0.695
Efficiency0.981
Hierarchy0
Lubness1
OTU interactions network according to the DNA data set of the alpine lake sediments. Each node is represented by an OTU indicating an individual species. The edge between each of the two nodes represents positive (blue) or negative (red) interactions between those two species. The colors of the nodes indicate the different major phyla and the size of each node is proportional to the number of connections (i.e., the degree). The circles consist of some nodes’ mean modules OTUs from the Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were almost universally present in all modules (Figure 4), which indicate that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes can accommodate different ecological environments, and this accommodation can also explain the reasons for their high abundance in all alpine lake sediments (Appendix Table A1). However, there was very little connection between Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes, and most of the connections were negative. As previous studies have shown, species with similar ecological niches may compete when resources are scarce (Cao et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2016). Notably, positive connections dominated the interactions in the OTUs‐based networks, suggesting more cooperation rather competition in the microbial community structure (Chow, Kim, Sachdeva, Caron, & Fuhrman, 2014; Yang et al., 2017; Zhang, Zhao, Dai, Jiao, & Herndl, 2014). In communities, positive associations may be the result of cooperation among microorganisms during long‐term coevolution, including the exchange of metabolites such as elements, nutrients, and electrons, or the coordinated decomposition of complex polymers by multiple microorganisms (Raes & Bork, 2008; Zhang et al., 2014). Due to the diverse metabolic mechanisms of Proteobacteria, metabolic cooperation with other microorganisms can occur. Moreover, Proteobacteria displayed tighter and more positive connections than the other microbial taxa, so we believe that Proteobacteria play a positive role in promoting the growth of the microbial community. To illustrate the topological roles of nodes a ZP‐plot was constructed. (Appendix Figure A3) (Deng et al., 2012; Olesen, Bascompte, Dupont, & Jordano, 2007). Here, most OTUs (97.0%) were peripheral, and most of their links were within their own modules. Only two nodes (OTU_168 and OTU_251) were connectors that “glue” modules together, which are important for network coherence (Olesen et al., 2007). They were derived from Candidatus Solibacter (Acidobacteria) and Saprospiraceae (Bacteroidetes). Three nodes (OTU_55, OTU_319, and OTU_4) were module hubs and important to the coherence of their own module. The three module hubs OTUs were derived from KD4‐96 (Chloroflexi), Subgroup_6 (Acidobacteria), and Chloroplast (Cyanobacteria). It is worth mentioning that OTU_4 (phylum‐Cyanobacteria) was identified as a module hub in the network of Module 4 and had the maximum number of connections (15 positive connections and one negative connection) (Figure 4), showing the importance of its microbial composition throughout the ecosystem. Cyanobacteria are generally considered to be oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria (Shylajanaciyar et al., 2015). OTU_4 may be highly connected with other microorganisms by providing oxygen to aerobic microorganisms, such as Planctomycetales (OTU_146 and OTU_99) and Xanthomonas (OTU_20 and OTU_99), and cooperates with other cyanobacteria to produce oxygen. This may be one reason why it was a network module hub, that is, highly connected species linked to many species within their own module (Olesen et al., 2007). Furthermore, modularity is an indicator of resistance in a system (Carpenter et al., 2012; Ding et al., 2015), and modularity is very important for the system stability of the network (Olesen et al., 2007), which might explain why microbial communities adapt to the extreme environments of high mountains.
Figure A3

The Z–P plot showing node categories according to within‐module connectivity (Zi) and among‐module connectivity (Pi)

The relationship between the microbial community and environmental variables

To assess the relationship between microbial communities and environmental variables, RDA analysis was performed (Figure 5a). The total interpretable variation of the microbial community composition of the first two axes RDA1 and RDA2 reached 39.18%. RDA1 was affected mainly by DO, depth, temperature, and altitude. The pH and SWC had the largest effect on RDA2. Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria were projected in the positive direction of RDA1, so these microbial phyla are positively correlated with temperature, SWC, and pH, while negatively correlated with altitude, depth, and DO. However, the correlations of the other phyla (except the Bacteroidetes) were reversed. In addition, Bacteroidetes were positively related to pH but negatively related to SWC. However, Planctomycetes showed the opposite correlations. RDA also indicated that only temperature contributed significantly to the sample–environment relationship (p < 0.05), providing 18.4% of the RDA explanatory power (Figure 5b). Moreover, the three samples with the greatest temperature influence were GGC, WD‐2, and DV, and the least affected was ZN. Although not significant (p = 0.06), SWC also provided 11.6% of the explanatory power, and GGC, NB‐1, and GS3‐1 were the three most affected samples.
Figure 5

The redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationship between microbial phyla (a), samples (b) and sediment environmental variables. Environmental variables include depth, altitude, T, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and sediment water content. Microbial phyla include: Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Euryarchaeota, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia

The redundancy analysis (RDA) of the relationship between microbial phyla (a), samples (b) and sediment environmental variables. Environmental variables include depth, altitude, T, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and sediment water content. Microbial phyla include: Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Euryarchaeota, Gemmatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia To test and verify the relationship between environmental variables and microbial community composition, a correlation analysis between sediment environmental variables and the relative abundance of 10 abundant classes was performed (Xu et al., 2014) (Figure 6). The results indicated that the relative abundance of Nitrospira was negatively related to pH (Figure 6d). For SWC, the relative abundance of Deltaproteobacteria had a significant negative correlation, while SWC was positively correlated with Betaproteobacteria (Figure 6a,b). We also found that the relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria decreased significantly with increasing altitude (Figure 6c).
Figure 6

Relationships between the relative abundances of 10 dominant bacterial phyla and environmental variables (a–d). Linear or quadratic regressions were used to test the relationship between the taxa relative abundances and soil pH. Adjusted R 2 values with the associated p‐values are shown for each taxonomic group

Relationships between the relative abundances of 10 dominant bacterial phyla and environmental variables (a–d). Linear or quadratic regressions were used to test the relationship between the taxa relative abundances and soil pH. Adjusted R 2 values with the associated p‐values are shown for each taxonomic group The RDA results in this study suggest that temperature (p < 0.05) significantly influences the microbial community composition in the alpine lake sediments (Figure 5a). Zhou, Deng, et al. (2016) described the effect of temperature on increasing microbial richness and diversity and shaping microbial community composition. High temperatures mean high metabolic rates, growth rates, ecosystem productivity, ecological interactions, and population doubling times (Brown, Gillooly, Allen, Savage, & West, 2004; Chen, Landry, Huang, & Liu, 2012; Wang, Brown, Tang, & Fang, 2009; Zhou, Deng, et al., 2016). Concurrently, other environmental factors such as water, carbon, nutrient availability, and pH can also interact with temperature to indirectly affect biodiversity and microbial community composition (Zhou, Deng, et al., 2016). Consistent with our RDA results, temperature was positively correlated with Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria. We speculate that in higher temperature environments, due to the higher rates of metabolism and growth rates, the production and consumption of resources accelerates, so the abundance of Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria also increases, and the chemical cycle is more borne by these two microorganisms. This speculation agrees with previous reports that temperature is a crucial environmental variable that controls the distribution of nitrogen‐fixing microbial communities, such as N2‐fixing Cyanobacteria (Stal, 2009; Zhou, Dang, & Klotz, 2016). In addition, temperature also affects the O2 solubility in the pore water of the sediment (Zhou, Dang, et al., 2016). In low‐temperature environments, however, anaerobic and/or facultative anaerobic microorganisms with low oxygen demand such as Euryarchaeota, Chloroflexi, and Nitrospirae bacteria also participate in chemical cycles. Thus, the microbial composition of alpine lake sediments is affected. Sediment SWC (Guo et al., 2015), pH (Zhao et al., 2011), DO (Yadav, Khardenavis, & Kapley, 2014), depth (Zhang et al., 2015), and geographic factors such as altitude (Chen et al., 2017) can also influence the composition of microbial communities. From the sample–environment relationship (Figure 5b) we found that the two groups that are geographically close (DK, WD‐2, and ZN; NB‐1 and SL) are distributed far apart in the figure. The environmental variables in the groups are very different, especially temperature and SWC, which suggests that local environmental variables are critical for shaping microbial community composition on a small spatial scale (Aguilar et al., 2016).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, details of microbial diversity and community composition in 15 sediments from alpine lakes in the Hengduan Mountains were revealed. The composition of microbial communities in sediments of alpine lakes showed some specificity. In most sediment samples, Proteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi were abundant, while Cyanobacteria, Euryarchaeota, Actinobacteria, and Nitrospirae were only abundant in some alpine lake sediment samples. The profiles of the microbial communities in these alpine lake sediments are related to their hydrological and physicochemical properties. Temperature is one of the most critical environmental variables. Further research is necessary to clarify the relationship between environmental variables and microbial communities in alpine lake sediments.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION

H.H.L. and W.J. conceived and designed the experiments; L.Y.L. collected the samples; L.B.Q., Y.X.X., Z.J., and C.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; L.B.Q. and H.H.L. wrote most of the manuscript, and all the authors assisted in writing the manuscript, discussed the results, and commented on the manuscript.

ETHICS STATEMENT

None required.
  61 in total

1.  Modularity and community structure in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Mark A Bradford; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans related to temperature?

Authors:  Lucas J Stal
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 4.  A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria.

Authors:  Ryan J Newton; Stuart E Jones; Alexander Eiler; Katherine D McMahon; Stefan Bertilsson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Polar domains in lead titanate films under tensile strain.

Authors:  G Catalan; A Janssens; G Rispens; S Csiszar; O Seeck; G Rijnders; D H A Blank; B Noheda
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Diversity and distribution of autotrophic microbial community along environmental gradients in grassland soils on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Guangxia Guo; Weidong Kong; Jinbo Liu; Jingxue Zhao; Haodong Du; Xianzhou Zhang; Pinhua Xia
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Genome analysis of the proteorhodopsin-containing marine bacterium Polaribacter sp. MED152 (Flavobacteria).

Authors:  José M González; Beatriz Fernández-Gómez; Antoni Fernàndez-Guerra; Laura Gómez-Consarnau; Olga Sánchez; Montserrat Coll-Lladó; Javier Del Campo; Lorena Escudero; Raquel Rodríguez-Martínez; Laura Alonso-Sáez; Mikel Latasa; Ian Paulsen; Olga Nedashkovskaya; Itziar Lekunberri; Jarone Pinhassi; Carlos Pedrós-Alió
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Environmental Conditions Outweigh Geographical Contiguity in Determining the Similarity of nifH-Harboring Microbial Communities in Sediments of Two Disconnected Marginal Seas.

Authors:  Haixia Zhou; Hongyue Dang; Martin G Klotz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Bacterial community composition in costal dunes of the Mediterranean along a gradient from the sea shore to the inland.

Authors:  Haggai Wasserstrom; Susanne Kublik; Rachel Wasserstrom; Stefanie Schulz; Michael Schloter; Yosef Steinberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Myriophyllum aquaticum Constructed Wetland Effectively Removes Nitrogen in Swine Wastewater.

Authors:  Haishu Sun; Feng Liu; Shengjun Xu; Shanghua Wu; Guoqiang Zhuang; Ye Deng; Jinshui Wu; Xuliang Zhuang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Metagenomic views on taxonomic and functional profiles of the Himalayan Tsomgo cold lake and unveiling its deterzome potential.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar Singh; Megha Kumari; Nitish Sharma; Amit Kumar Rai; Sudhir P Singh
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Diversity and Effect of Increasing Temperature on the Activity of Methanotrophs in Sediments of Fildes Peninsula Freshwater Lakes, King George Island, Antarctica.

Authors:  Diego M Roldán; Daniel Carrizo; Laura Sánchez-García; Rodolfo Javier Menes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Environmental factors affecting the diversity of psychrophilic microbial community in the high altitude snow-fed lake Hemkund, India.

Authors:  Vidhu Gupta; Somashekar Chandran; Akash Deep; Rahul Kumar; Lalita Bisht
Journal:  Curr Res Microb Sci       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  Microbial Nitrogen Transformation Potential in Sediments of Two Contrasting Lakes Is Spatially Structured but Seasonally Stable.

Authors:  Kathrin B L Baumann; Raoul Thoma; Cameron M Callbeck; Robert Niederdorfer; Carsten J Schubert; Beat Müller; Mark A Lever; Helmut Bürgmann
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.389

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.