Estimation and Validation of Dietary Nitrate and Nitrite Intake in Iranian Population.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was calibration of a nitrate (NO3)/nitrite (NO2) database for estimated its dietary intakes.
METHODS: Overall, 250 healthy Tehranian adults were assessed in 2015 for dietary intakes of NO3 and NO2 and its serum and urine concentration. Food composition values for NO3 and NO2 were derived from a recent survey conducted on frequently consumed food items among Iranians. The correlation of dietary intakes of NO3/NO2 and its urinary and serum values was evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean (±SD) intakes of dietary NO3 and NO2 were 505±160 and 7.7±2.2 mg/d, respectively. The correlation coefficient of intake and urinary NO3 was 0.83 (95% CI=0.56-0.91) and 0.57 (95% CI=0.49-0.67) in men and women, respectively. A moderate agreement was also observed between NO2 intake and its urinary levels (r=0.27, 95% CI=0.13-0.37, and 0.29, 95% CI=0.17-0.41, in men and women, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Using a national database of NO3 and NO2 content of food items along with a valid food frequency questionnaire could provide a valid estimation of dietary intakes of NO3 in the target population.

Introduction

Inorganic nitrate (NO3) and nitrite (NO2) are compounds occurring in both natural and industrially processed foods; vegetables and drinking water are major sources of dietary NO3 and vegetables especially green leafy vegetables, including lettuce and spinach, cabbage, rocket, red beet-root, and radish contribute approximately 80%–95% of the dietary intake of NO3, whereas major dietary NO2 intakes are usually from processed meat and animal food products (1, 2). Historically, there has been a long-term concern regarding adverse effects of dietary NO3 and NO2 due to its potential endogenous conversion to nitrosa-mines, and some acute and chronic toxicities such as methemoglobinemia, thyroid disorders and carcinogenesis (3–5). In contrast, recent research punctuates that dietary NO3/NO2 may induce several beneficial effects especially on cardiovascular system and metabolic pathways (6–8). There is also some evidence to support consideration inorganic NO3/NO2 as dietary nutrients (9). Despite growing agreement regarding an urgent need to clarify longitudinal risk-benefit assessment of NO3 and NO2 intakes on human health in the framework of population-based studies, there is a huge gap of knowledge in this regard (5, 10–12). Valid estimation of NO3 and NO2 exposure from diets seems to be a main challenging issue and important barrier to such investigations (13). Unlike other nutrients and food components, there is no valid applicable and comprehensive database such as the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) food composition table (FCT) for NO3 and NO2; substantial efforts have therefore been made during two past decades in several countries to develop such database (14–21).

Due to great variations in the NO3 and NO2 contents of foods, estimated dietary NO3 and NO2 intakes from FFQ needs to be confirmed by relevant serum or urine biomarkers (22). Serum and urinary NO3 and NO2 concentrations may be considered as reliable biomarkers of exogenous exposure to NO3 and NO2 and the majority of the urinary nitrate can be accounted for by dietary sources (23, 24); however, some confounders such as endogenous nitric oxide production, biological factors, physical activity, smoking, and some pathologic conditions may affect circulating levels of NO3 and NO2, an issue that need to be considered in the analysis (23).

To provide the opportunities for assessment of health related outcomes of dietary exposure to NO3 and NO2 in the framework of epidemiological studies and prospective cohorts, we recently developed a database for NO3 and NO2 contents of commonly consumed food items among Iranians (25).

Here, we described the performance of the database for estimation of NO3 and NO2, intake, in a representative Iranian adult population from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, and evaluate the estimated values in relation to serum and urinary NO3 and NO2 levels.

Methods

Study population

The current calibration study was conducted in the subset of cohort members of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), an ongoing community-based prospective study being conducted to investigate and prevent noncommunicable diseases, in a representative sample in the district 13 of Tehran, the capital city of Iran (26). Briefly, healthy non-smoker adults, aged 20–70 yr, free of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease and renal dysfunction, were consecutively recruited from the TLGS, between Jul to Oct 2015 (26). Participants who had under- or over-report of total energy intakes (<800 kcal/d or >4200 kcal/d) or had specific diet (including dietary recommendations for HTN, hyperlipidemia or diabetes) were excluded and final analysis was conducted on 251 men and women.

Written informed consents were obtained from all participants, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Research Council of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 as revised in 1983.

Demographic and anthropometric measures

Trained interviewers collected information using standard questionnaires. Detailed measurements of variables in TLGS have been reported elsewhere (27). Weight was measured to the nearest 100 gr using digital scales, while the subjects were minimally clothed, without shoes. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm, in a standing position without shoes, using a tape meter. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by square of the height (m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, midway between the lower border of the ribs and the iliac crest at the widest portion, over light clothing, using a soft measuring tape, without any pressure to the body.

For measurements of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), after a 15-min rest in the sitting position, two measurements of blood pressure were taken on the right arm, during a standardized mercury sphygmomanometer; the mean of the two measurements was considered as the participant's blood pressure.

Biochemical measures

Blood and urine samples were taken after 12–14 h fasting from all study participants. Serum creatinine (Cr) levels were assayed by kinetic colorimetric Jaffe; the sensitivity of the assay was 0.2 mg/dL (range, 18–1330 μmol/L (0.2–15 mg/dL) (28). Serum and urine NO3 and NO2 concentrations were measured by a rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite (29). This method has been previously validated in our laboratory and a review paper regarding serum nitric oxide metabolites (NOx) measurement has been published by our group (30, 31). Inter- and Intra-assay coefficients of variations of the assays were 5.2% and 4.4%, respectively; the sensitivity of the assay was 2.0 μmol/L and its recovery was 93 ± 1.5 %.

To assess intra-individual variance, caused by biological variation and random measurement errors in the urinary and serum values of NO3 and NO2, two blood and urine samples were collected over a 2-week period, in a sub-sample of the participants (n=41); repeated measurements of urine nitrate may be useful to account for within person variation for validation of NO3 intake assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (22, 32).

Dietary assessment

A validated 168-item FFQ was used to assess typical food intakes over the previous year. Trained dietitians, with at least 5 yr of experience in the TLGS survey, asked participants to designate their intake frequency for each food item consumed during the past year on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. Portion sizes of consumed foods reported in household measures were then converted to grams (33). The validity of the food frequency questionnaire has previously been evaluated by comparing food groups and nutrient values determined from the questionnaire with values estimated from the average of twelve 24-h dietary recall surveys and the reliability has been assessed by comparing energy and nutrient in-takes from two FFQ; Pearson correlation coefficients and intra-class correlation for energy and nutrients showed acceptable agreements between FFQ and twelve 24-h dietary recall surveys, and FFQ1 and FFQ2 (34).

However since Iranian Food Composition Table is incomplete, and has limited data on nutrient content of raw foods and beverages, to analyze foods and beverages for their energy and nutrient content (except NO3 and NO2), the US Department of Agriculture Food Composition Table was used (4).

Estimation of NO3 and NO2 from diet

Food composition values for NO3 and NO2 were derived from a recent survey conducted on frequently consumed food items among Iranians (25). Briefly, we determined the NO3 and NO2 contents of 87 food items including grains, legumes, fruits and vegetables, dairy products, meats and processed meats using validated spectrophotometric methods (25). Dietary NO3 and NO2 intake of the participants, were estimated by multiplying the reported frequency of consumption and portion size of each FFQ item by its NO3 and NO2 content, and summing values across all food items. In addition to calculating dietary NO3 and NO2 from all foods, plant- and animal-based NO3 and NO2 were separately calculated. Additional, we computed contribution of NO3 and NO2 that came from individual food groups including vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, dairy, meats and processed meats.

Estimation of NO3 and NO2 from drinking water

NO3 and NO2 intakes from drinking water were derived by estimated daily water intakes of the participants, and measured values of NO3 and NO2 in tap water, using a spectrophotometric method (35).

Statistical analysis

Dietary intakes of NO3 and NO2 were adjusted for total energy intake, according to residuals methods (36). Log-transformed of the variables with non-normal distribution (serum and urine NO3 and NO2) were used in the analyses. Mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median and inter-quartile range (IQR) was reported for the variables with normal and non-normal distribution, respectively. Pearson correlation and partial correlation test with adjustment of age, sex, body mass index and serum creatinine levels were used to estimate the correlation of dietary NO3 and NO2 intakes and their urinary and serum levels. The ratio of intra- to inter-individual variance (λ), calculated using the intra class correlation coefficient (ICC), was used for further adjustment of the correlation coefficients (22, 32). The λ was 1.98, 2.12 for urinary and serum NO3, 1.95 and 1.85 urinary and serum NO2.

All statistical analysis were conducted using SPSS (ver. 16.0, Chicago, IL, USA), and P<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Mean age of the participants was 41.5±12.4 yr and 31.5% were men. General characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. A significant higher serum levels of creatinine was observed in men (104 vs. 88.1 μmol/l, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in urinary and serum values of NO3 and NO2 between men and women.

Table 1:

Characteristics of the study participants

Variables	Men (n=79)	Women (n=172)	Total population (n=251)
Age (yr)	40.8±12.3	41.8±12.5	41.5±12.4
Body mass index (kg/m 2 )	27.0±3.8	27.1±4.8	27.1±4.5
Waist circumference (cm)	94.4±10.0	89.2±12.3	90.9±11.8
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)	109±9.5	105±11.5	107.0±11.1
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)	75.7±5.7	72.1±7.1	73.2±6.9
Serum creatinine (μmol/l)	104±9.4	88.1±9.0	93.1±11.8
Urinary NO 3 (μmol/l)	805 (342–1150)	718 (425–1096)	730 (396–1110)
Urinary NO 2 (μmol/l)	132 (70.0–140)	130 (69.4–142)	131 (69.4–142)
Serum NO 3 (μmol/l)	41.9 (21.6–74.5)	43.4 (23.1–65.4)	43.2 (22.6–67.8)
Serum NO 2 (μmol/l)	15.3 (10.4–19.3)	15.0 (11.8–18.8)	15.1 (11.7–19.0)

Mean ±SD (median and inter-quartile range)

Estimated daily consumption of NO3 and NO2, from total dietary intake, individual food groups, and drinking water are shown in Table 2. Mean (±SD) intakes of dietary NO3 and NO2 were 505±160 and 7.7±2.2 mg/d, respectively.

Table 2:

Estimated daily consumption of nitrate and nitrite in the study population

Variables	Nitrate (mg/d)		Nitrite (mg/d)
	Men (n=79)	Women (n=172)	Men (n=79)	Women (n=172)
Total	532±184	535±221	9.1±3.6	8.3±3.2
Plan-based	498±166	515±216 *	5.5±2.0	5.4±2.2
Animal-based	16.0±11.1	13.7±8.3 *	3.3±2.3	2.8±1.8 *
Legumes	9.5±6.0	9.3±6.2	0.26±0.16	0.25±0.17
Grains	190±86.3	137±71.1 *	2.6±1.6	1.9±1.0 *
Vegetables	242±125	303±173 *	1.3±0.7	1.6±1.1
Fruits	56.4±41.9	65.5±49.5	1.4±1.0	1.7±1.2
Dairy products	9.2±8.8	7.9±6.5	0.7±0.7	0.6±0.5
Meats	5.9±6.0	5.2±4.6	2.1±2.0	1.8±1.6
Processed meats	0.9±1.1	0.6±0.8	0.5±0.4	0.5±0.3
Drinking water	40.2±11.9	34.9±11.0	3.1±0.93	2.7±0.86

Data are mean ±SD

P <0.05 (independent t-test was used)

Mean intakes (±SD) of NO3 and NO2 from drinking water were 36.6±11.5 and 2.8±0.9 mg/d. There was no significant difference in daily consumption of NO3 and NO2 from diet and drinking water, between men and women. A significant higher intake of plant-based NO3 as well as NO3 intakes from vegetables was observed in women (P<0.05). In men, compared to women, a higher intake of animal-based NO3 and NO3 in-take from grains was observed (P<0.05).

Pearson correlation coefficients between total intakes and urinary and serum concentrations of NO3 and NO2 are reported in Table 3. Crude correlation between intake and urinary levels of NO3 was 0.39 (P=0.013) and 0.19 (P=0.026) in men and women, respectively. Adjusting the relationship for age, body mass index and serum creatinine levels, resulted in a higher partial correlation coefficient (r=0.42, and r=0.29, P=0.001 in men and women, respectively). After correction for intra- and inter-individual variance, a stronger correlation between NO3 intake and its urinary levels (r=0.83, 95% CI=0.56, 0.91, r=0.57, 95%CI=0.49–0.67, in men and women, respectively), was observed. A moderate agreement was observed between NO2 intake and its urinary levels (r=0.27 and 0.29, in men and women). There was no significant association between dietary NO2 intake and its serum levels, neither in men (corrected r=0.07, 95% CI= −0.08–0.19) or women (corrected r=0.09, 95% CI= −0.03, 0.23). Dietary intakes and serum levels of NO3 and NO2 had a relatively week correlation in both men and women.

Table 3:

Pearson correlation coefficients between total intakes and urinary and serum concentrations of nitrate and nitrite

Variables	Men			Women
	Crude R (P-value)	Partial R (P-value) 1	Corrected R (95% CI) 2	Crude R (P-value)	Partial R (P-value) 1	Corrected R (95% CI) 2
Nitrate
Urine	0.39 (0.001)	0.42 (0.002)	0.83 (0.56–0.91)	0.19 (0.026)	0.29 (0.001)	0.57 (0.49, 0.67)
Serum	0.12 (0.35)	0.17 (0.42)	0.36 (0.24–0.46)	0.08 (0.31)	0.09 (0.17)	0.19 (0.07, 0.32)
Nitrite
Urine	0.13 (0.25)	0.14 (0.30)	0.27 (0.13–0.37)	0.16 (0.055)	0.15 (0.023)	0.29 (0.17, 0.41)
Serum	0.02 (0.88)	0.04 (0.77)	0.07 (−0.08–0.19)	0.08 (0.31)	0.05 (0.48)	0.09 (−0.03, 0.23)

Adjusted for age, body mass index and serum creatinine levels.

Corrected for intra to inter-individual variance ratio (λ); λ was 1.98, 2.12 for urinary and serum NO 3 , 1.95 and 1.85 urinary and serum NO 2

Discussion

In this study, conducted in the framework of a national population-based cohort, relatively high intakes of NO3 and NO2 (505±160 and 7.7±2.2 mg/d, respectively) were observed among Iranian population. A great association was observed between dietary NO3 intakes with its urinary levels, especially in men, however the association was relatively weak for NO3 intakes and its serum levels.

Dietary intakes of NO3 and NO2 were higher than other reports from different population; the major contributors to nitrate intakes were vegetables including cucumber, green leafy vegetables, lettuce, and tomato, and grains including traditional breads and white rice. The major contributors to NO2 intake were lamb and chicken meats, white rice, processed meats, and vegetables such as cucumber and tomato. Compared to other population, grains were the considerable source of plant-based NO3 intake in our population, whereas green leafy vegetables such as spinach or other vegetables such as beetroot had a little contribution in our NO3 intakes.

Median (inter quartile ranges) intakes of NO3 and NO2 were reported 309 (215–413) and 1.4 (1.1–1.8) mg/d in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study (37). Median NO3 intakes in NIH-AAPR Diet and Health Study were 68.9 and 74.1 mg/d, and NO2 intakes were 1.3 and 1.0 mg/d, in men and women, respectively (38). Moreover, our in-takes was approximately twofold of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) values, defined as 3.7 and 0.06 mg/kg body weight for NO3 and NO2, respectively. In our population, the major contributors to NO3 intakes were vegetables (51.2%) and grains (30.7%). Due to a relatively high NO3 concentration in our traditional and industrial breads (50.0 mg 100 g−1) (25), and high proportion of breads (320 g/d) in dietary pattern of Iranian population (39), NO3 exposure from this food group was considerable. We previously reported that mean NO3 content of lettuce, potato, radish, and cabbage samples was more than the maximum limits legislated by European countries; moreover, mean NO2 contents of fruit samples were also relatively high (25). Dietary intakes of NO2 from animal sources accounted for 34.4% of daily mean intake of NO2 and the remainder of NO2 intake was derived from plant sources. The major contributors to NO2 intake were lamb and chicken meats, white rice, processed meats, and vegetables such as cucumber and tomato. High content of NO3/NO2 in Iranian foods or high intake of NO3/NO2-containing foods may be contributed in high NO3/NO2 diet in our population.

A critical overview of current literature shows a limited focus on valid estimation of NO3 and NO2 intakes (22, 40). Several models, including total diet study model, NO3/NO2 database model, NO3/NO2 core food model, the large database model, and a processed meat production model, have been suggested for assessment of dietary exposure of NO3 and NO2 in epidemiological studies (41). The core food approach, where the core foods are selected on the basis of their NO3 and NO2 content, seems the best model for estimating NO3 and NO2 intake from diet (41).

However serum and urine NO3 and NO2 are affected by endogenous NO production and some factors such as physical activity, using plasma NO3 and NO2 in epidemiologic studies found to be feasible and the within-person variability is comparable to commonly used biomarkers (42); use of repeated measurements of urine NO3 may be capture within person variation and may useful to evaluate the validity of NO3 intake assessed by FFQ (43). There was a constant relationship between NO3 intake and urinary excretion of NO3 and NO2 (β=0.6–0.8); increased NO3 concentration in the water potentiated the relationship (40). Dietary NO3 intake was significantly correlated with its urinary level (P=0.01; r2 = 0.07) following consumption of a diet with high-NO3 vegetables (44). A substantial correlation was reported between estimated intake of NO3 from FFQ and urinary excretion levels (r=0.59, 95% CI=0.03–0.87), after correction for within person variation and adjustment for sex and body mass index (22); the authors concluded that FFQ assessment of NO3 intake may provide valid information on usual NO3 intake (22). Cross-checking of FFQ with other dietary assessment method such as 24h- dietary recall, also the performance of FFQ in assessing dietary NO3 and NO2 intake was comparable to that for many other nutrients; in a recent calibration study in the NIH-AAPR Diet and Health Study, energy-adjusted correlation coefficients between FFQ and 24h-recal based values of dietary nitrate and nitrite, for men and women, respectively were 0.59 and 0.57 for nitrate, and 0.59 and 0.58 for nitrite (38).

Regardless of a good agreement of dietary NO3 and its urinary levels, observed in our study, the correlation for serum values was week. This observation can be explained by the fact that ∼ 90% of serum NO3 and NO2 in fasted state is derived from the L-arginine-NO pathway, and the half-lives of NO3 and NO2 are only 5–8 h and 20–45 min, respectively (45). Plasma NO3 and NO2 have observed to be returned to its baseline level within 24 h, after a high-NO3 diet (24). Serum NO3 and NO2 levels may therefore not accurately reflect dietary exposure and seems to be less useful for validation study.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first estimation of dietary NO3 and NO2 intakes among Iranian population, based on a comprehensive NO3 and NO2 database (25) and dietary information derived from a validated FFQ (34), in the framework of a national-cohort on a representative population (27). Our findings should be interpreted considering some strengths and limitations. Use of a validated comprehensive FFQ to assess regular dietary intakes of the participants and estimation of NO3/NO2 based on measured values in frequently consumed food items among our population (25), compared to other previous studies relied on historic literature values, may fully reflect the accurate NO3/NO2 exposure from diet. Moreover, all food items identified as major contributors to dietary NO3/NO2 intakes were on our FFQ.

Our estimation of NO3 and NO2 however did not capture cooking, peeling, pureeing, fermentation and other food processing methods may affect the NO3 and NO2 content. Moreover, data on storage time and condition, which can decrease NO3 content of foods, were not available.

Conclusion

We report here a valid estimation of dietary exposure of NO3 and NO2 in an Iranian population, for the first time. Dietary NO3 and NO2 intake, estimated using TLGS FFQ, were greatly correlated with their urinary values, as the accurate surrogate of dietary intake. Using a national database of the NO3 and NO2 contents of food items along with a valid and reliable FFQ could provide a valid estimation of dietary intakes of NO3 and NO2 in the target population

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.