| Literature DB >> 19166627 |
Fereidoun Azizi1, Arash Ghanbarian, Amir Abbas Momenan, Farzad Hadaegh, Parvin Mirmiran, Mehdi Hedayati, Yadollah Mehrabi, Saleh Zahedi-Asl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) is a long term integrated community-based program for prevention of non-communicable disorders (NCD) by development of a healthy lifestyle and reduction of NCD risk factors. The study begun in 1999, is ongoing, to be continued for at least 20 years. A primary survey was done to collect baseline data in 15005 individuals, over 3 years of age, selected from cohorts of three medical heath centers. A questionnaire for past medical history and data was completed during interviews; blood pressure, pulse rate, and anthropometrical measurements and a limited physical examination were performed and lipid profiles, fasting blood sugar and 2-hours-postload-glucose challenge were measured. A DNA bank was also collected. For those subjects aged over 30 years, Rose questionnaire was completed and an electrocardiogram was taken. Data collected were directly stored in computers as database software- computer assisted system. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of lifestyle modification in preventing or postponing the development of NCD risk factors and outcomes in the TLGS population. DESIGN AND METHODS: In phase II of the TLGS, lifestyle interventions were implemented in 5630 people and 9375 individuals served as controls. Primary, secondary and tertiary interventions were designed based on specific target groups including schoolchildren, housewives, and high-risk persons. Officials of various sectors such as health, education, municipality, police, media, traders and community leaders were actively engaged as decision makers and collaborators. Interventional strategies were based on lifestyle modifications in diet, smoking and physical activity through face-to-face education, leaflets & brochures, school program alterations, training volunteers as health team and treating patients with NCD risk factors. Collection of demographic, clinical and laboratory data will be repeated every 3 years to assess the effects of different interventions in the intervention group as compared to control group.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19166627 PMCID: PMC2656492 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Characteristics of large non-communicable disease interventional studies *
| North Karelia (1997–1972) | Karolia state and Finland | Nutrition, Smoking, Low cholesterol and blood pressure | Intervention on nutrition, T.V program, interventions on work, schools, newspaper and posters | 20 years (every 5 years) | 8746-2312 (25–64 years) | Successful (reduced cholesterol and raised vegetables and fruits) |
| Singapore (1992–1998) | whole Society | Nutrition, Smoking and physical activity | Teaching and propaganda | 6 years | 4723 (18–69 years) | Successful in reduce smoking, unsuccessful in reduce cholesterol level |
| CINDI (1987) | 23 European and Canadian countries | nutrition, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption and stress | National Changes in food plan, availability of new food patterns | |||
| Eat for life (2001) | Dark-skinned Americans | Nutrition | Phone consulting | 861 (18–87 years) | Successful | |
| DISC (2001) | Children of 8–10 years with high serum LDL level | Nutrition | Teaching and consulting | 3 years | 663 (8–10 years) | Successful |
*The above studies are sited in references.
Figure 1The minimum and maximum distances between intervention and control groups are 1.5 and 5 kilometers, respectively. Map of areas of control (C) and intervention (I) groups.
Age distribution in study population, Tehran, and Iran urban inhabitants.
| Age group (year) | Study population (%) | Tehran urban inhabitants (%) | Iran urban inhabitants (%) |
| 0–9 | 15 | 18 | 22 |
| 10–19 | 22 | 25 | 27 |
| 20–29 | 18 | 19 | 17 |
| 30–39 | 16 | 16 | 14 |
| 40–49 | 11 | 11 | 9 |
| 50–59 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| 60–69 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics of the intervention and control subjects
| Age Group (years) | Characteristics | Control | Intervention | P Value |
| 3–9 | Male(%) | 48.9 | 49.2 | 0.90 |
| Literate (%)* | 80.1 | 79.0 | 0.69 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 6.4 | 6.4 | 0.54 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 0 | 0 | ----- | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 15.42 | 15.7 | 0.13 | |
| 10–19 | Male(%) | 46.3 | 48.8 | 0.16 |
| Literate (%) | 99.8 | 99.8 | 0.65 | |
| Employed (%) | 1.8 | 2.1 | 0.62 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.25 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 14.5 | 14.6 | 0.27 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0.12 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.2 | 20.1 | 0.45 | |
| 20–29 | Male(%) | 38.9 | 35.5 | 0.10 |
| Literate (%) | 99.7 | 99.8 | 0.83 | |
| Employed (%) | 30.8 | 32.5 | 0.40 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 48.4 | 51.3 | 0.12 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 24.3 | 24.4 | 0.29 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 6.7 | 7.5 | 0.06 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2 | 24.3 | 0.87 | |
| 30–39 | Male(%) | 43.1 | 41.8 | 0.50 |
| Literate (%) | 99.5 | 98.7 | < 0.05 | |
| Employed (%) | 50.3 | 50.0 | 0.86 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 90 | 86.0 | < 0.05 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 34.4 | 34.4 | 0.44 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 15.5 | 15.1 | 0.40 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.5 | 26.8 | 0.16 | |
| 40–49 | Male(%) | 40.5 | 42.8 | 0.32 |
| Literate (%) | 96.3 | 96.1 | 0.79 | |
| Employed (%) | 45.2 | 46.0 | 0.74 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 93.7 | 92.8 | 0.78 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 44.3 | 44.3 | 0.70 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 17.5 | 15.3 | 0.18 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.1 | 27.9 | 0.29 | |
| 50–59 | Male(%) | 41.3 | 37.6 | .014 |
| Literate (%) | 84.8 | 84.1 | 0.73 | |
| Employed (%) | 37.1 | 26.9 | < 0.05 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 91.9 | 90.3 | 0.51 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 54.2 | 54.3 | 0.24 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 12.3 | 9.2 | 0.17 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 28.3 | 28.6 | 0.17 | |
| 60–69 | Male(%) | 49.3 | 49.2 | 0.96 |
| Literate (%) | 65.8 | 66.2 | 0.87 | |
| Employed (%) | 18.1 | 19.0 | 0.68 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 82.9 | 81.9 | 0.59 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 64.0 | 64.2 | 0.18 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 9.5 | 8.2 | 0.26 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.4 | 27.8 | 0.13 | |
| ≥ 70 | Male(%) | 55.9 | 62.7 | 0.14 |
| Literate (%) | 44.1 | 59.5 | < 0.001 | |
| Employed (%) | 7.7 | 8.6 | 0.72 | |
| Marital status (Married %) | 70.6 | 76.2 | 0.58 | |
| Mean age (Year) | 74.1 | 74.1 | 0.86 | |
| Daily Cigarette smoker (%) | 7.6 | 9.8 | 0.83 | |
| Mean body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.5 | 25.9 | 0.18 |
* In children >6 years old.