| Literature DB >> 30847119 |
Irushika T Fernando1, Kumudu I Perera1, Senarath B P Athauda1, Ramiah Sivakanesan1, Nimal Savitri Kumar2, Lalith Jayasinghe2.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of boiling on the inhibitory action of spices on digestive enzymes. Unboiled extracts of Trigonella foenum-graecum (seed) (25.42%), Myristica fragrans (seed) (22.70%), and Cuminum cyminum (seed) (19.17%) showed significantly (p < 0.05) a higher lipase inhibitory activity than their respective boiled extracts (20.23%, 15.74%, and 12.57%). Unboiled extracts of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (stem bark) (-16.98%) and Foeniculum officinale (seed) (-16.05%) showed an activation of lipase enzyme, and boiling significantly (p < 0.05) changed the activity into lipase inhibition as 8.47% and 9.54%, respectively. Unboiled extracts of Coriandrm sativum (seed), C. cyminum, and Elettaria cardamomum (seed) showed an activation of amylase enzyme, and boiling these extracts significantly reduced the enzyme activation. The other unboiled extracts showed a higher amylase inhibition than the boiled extracts, whereas the boiled extracts of C.longa (rhizome) and Syzygium aromaticum (flower) exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) lower values. Unboiled extracts of C. zeylanicum, M. fragrans, and S. aromaticum showed an insignificantly higher glucosidase inhibitory activity than the boiled extracts. Inhibition of digestive enzymes by nutritional intervention is one avenue to be considered in treating diet-induced obesity and in the management of postprandial hyperglycemia. Spices, used as food additives, could be a potential source of digestive enzyme inhibitors. The current study revealed that unboiled extracts of T. foenum-graecum (seed), C. cyminum (seed), and M. fragrans (seed) are more effective than the boiled extracts as an antiobesity therapy. Moreover, it endorses the use of infusion of T. foenum-graecum seeds as an antiobesity therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Spices; boiling; glucosidase inhibition; lipase inhibition; α‐amylase inhibition
Year: 2019 PMID: 30847119 PMCID: PMC6393038 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Percentage yield (%) of crude methanol extracts of spices
| Scientific name | Local name | Plant part used | Yield (%W/W) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Aba | Seed | 3.5 |
|
| Kurundu | Stem bark | 3.0 |
|
| Kottamalli | Seed | 2.7 |
|
| Suduru | Seed | 5.7 |
|
| Kaha | Rhizome | 8.0 |
|
| Ensal | Seed | 2.1 |
|
| Ma'duru | Seed | 4.8 |
|
| Sadikka | Seed | 6.8 |
|
| Karabu | Flower | 4.7 |
|
| Ulu‐hal | Seed | 8.4 |
Yield (%) of MeOH extracts of dry weight of plant material. Percentage extract yield (w/w) was calculated as (dry extract weight/dry starting material weight × 100).
Figure 1Linearity evaluation. Reaction mixtures were prepared with different amounts (0.004, 0.008, and 0.016 mM) of 2,3‐dimercapto‐1‐propanol tributyrate (DMPTB) and incubated with porcine pancreatic lipase at 37°C. The absorbances were recorded for 30 min at 412 nm
Percentage lipase inhibitory activity of unboiled and boiled crude methanol extracts of spices
| Plant species | % Inhibition activity unboiled | % Inhibition activity boiled |
|---|---|---|
|
| 8.80 ± 1.56 | 6.96 ± 1.76 |
|
| −16.98 ± 1.34 | 8.47 ± 1.43 |
|
| 6.19 ± 1.15 | 4.03 ± 1.21 |
|
| 19.17 ± 1.54 | 12.57 ± 1.87 |
|
| −8.4 ± 1.54 | −6.79 ± 1.34 |
|
| 11.76 ± 1.55 | 8.74 ± 1.54 |
|
| −16.05 ± 1.63 | 9.54 ± 1.31 |
|
| 22.7 ± 1.45 | 15.74 ± 1.44 |
|
| 0.12 ± 1.13 | 0.15 ± 1.12 |
|
| 25.42 ± 1.32 | 20.23 ± 1.78 |
| Orlistat | 98.8 ± 0.91 | NA |
2,3‐Dimercapto‐1‐propanol tributyrate (DMPTB) was used as the substrate, and the final concentration of the crude extracts was at 1 mg/ml. The amount of thiol released was measured after the incubation for 6 mins at 37°C with 412 nm. Orlistat is taken as standard inhibitor. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and mean was taken as the average of three readings of three different experiments. “‐” indicates a promotion of pancreatic lipase activity.
NA, not applicable.
The inhibitory activity in boiled extract is significantly (p < 0.05) different to the corresponding unboiled extract.
Percentage amylase inhibitory activity of unboiled and boiled crude methanol extracts of spices
| Plant species | % Inhibition activity unboiled | % Inhibition activity boiled |
|---|---|---|
|
| 20.1 ± 1.50 | 16.6 ± 1.67 |
|
| 32.39 ± 1.91 | 28.59 ± 1.78 |
|
| −33.33 ± 1.43 | −23.98 ± 1.27 |
|
| −7.14 ± 1.12 | 1.16 ± 1.14 |
|
| 52.2 ± 1.65 | 47.78 ± 1.98 |
|
| −33.33 ± 1.67 | −26.89 ± 1.67 |
|
| 28.79 ± 1.22 | 26.73 ± 1.75 |
|
| −5.81 ± 1.45 | −5.74 ± 1.44 |
|
| 58.10 ± 1.24 | 52.82 ± 1.45 |
|
| 8.69 ± 1.35 | 7.78 ± 1.19 |
| Acarbose | 87.67 ± 1.76 | NA |
Preincubation chromogenic method from Geethalakshmi et al. (2010) was adapted, and the final concentrations of the crude extracts were 1 mg/ml. The amylase inhibition was analyzed by amount of maltose production from starch at 517 nm after incubation at 37°C. Acarbose was used as the standard inhibitor. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and mean was taken as the average of three readings of three different experiments. “‐” indicates a promotion of pancreatic amylase activity.
NA, not applicable.
The inhibitory activity in boiled extract is significantly (p < 0.05) different to the corresponding unboiled extract.
Percentage glucosidase inhibitory activity of unboiled and boiled crude methanol extracts of spices
| Plant species | % Inhibition activity unboiled | % Inhibition activity boiled |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 96.78 ± 12.45 | 95.64 ± 1.47 |
|
| 2.58 ± 1.76 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 3.72 ± 1.62 | 1.78 ± 0.98 |
|
| 22.87 ± 1.98 | 21.90 ± 1.01 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 90.64 ± 1.23 | 89.65 ± 1.31 |
|
| 88.91 ± 1.12 | 86.89 ± 1.98 |
|
| 3.2 ± 1.76 | 2.54 ± 1.21 |
| Acarbose | 99.52 ± 0.54 | NA |
p‐nitrophenyl‐α‐D‐glucopyranoside was used as the substrate, and the final concentrations of the crude extracts were at 1 mg/ml. The amount of p‐nitro phenol released was measured after the incubation for 15 mins at 37°C with 405 nm. Acarbose was used as the standard inhibitor. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and mean was taken as the average of three readings of three different experiments.
NA, not applicable.
Percentage antioxidant activity of unboiled and boiled crude methanol extracts of spices
| Plant species | % Scavenging activity unboiled | % Scavenging activity boiled |
|---|---|---|
|
| 59.01 ± 1.10 | 61.23 ± 1.54 |
|
| 83.41 ± 1.30 | 76.97 ± 1.89 |
|
| 94.80 ± 1.15 | 96.56 ± 1.12 |
|
| 92.92 ± 1.13 | 93.43 ± 1.34 |
|
| 76.55 ± 1.13 | 71.45 ± 1.23 |
|
| 91.61 ± 1.32 | 93.87 ± 1.15 |
|
| 90.11 ± 1.22 | 91.23 ± 1.51 |
|
| 83.41 ± 1.21 | 89.76 ± 1.56 |
|
| 89.25 ± 1.24 | 90.53 ± 1.23 |
|
| 90.76 ± 1.22 | 84.67 ± 1.13 |
| BHA | 94.97 ± 1.01 | NA |
2,2‐Diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay, by measuring the absorbance at 517 nm after incubation for 30 min in the dark. The final concentrations of the crude extracts were at 1 mg/ml. BHA was used as the standard. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and mean was taken as the average of three readings of three different experiments.
NA, not applicable.
The inhibitory activity in boiled extract is significantly (p < 0.05) different to the corresponding unboiled extract.