Literature DB >> 30846550

A cell type-selective apoptosis-inducing small molecule for the treatment of brain cancer.

Natasha C Lucki1, Genaro R Villa2,3, Naja Vergani1,4, Michael J Bollong4, Brittney A Beyer1,4, Jae Wook Lee4,5, Justin L Anglin1, Stephan H Spangenberg4, Emily N Chin4, Amandeep Sharma4, Kevin Johnson6, Philipp N Sander4, Perry Gordon6, Stephen L Skirboll7, Heiko Wurdak8, Peter G Schultz9,4, Paul S Mischel10, Luke L Lairson11.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; grade IV astrocytoma) is the most prevalent and aggressive form of primary brain cancer. A subpopulation of multipotent cells termed GBM cancer stem cells (CSCs) play a critical role in tumor initiation, tumor maintenance, metastasis, drug resistance, and recurrence following surgery. Here we report the identification of a small molecule, termed RIPGBM, from a cell-based chemical screen that selectively induces apoptosis in multiple primary patient-derived GBM CSC cultures. The cell type-dependent selectivity of this compound appears to arise at least in part from redox-dependent formation of a proapoptotic derivative, termed cRIPGBM, in GBM CSCs. cRIPGBM induces caspase 1-dependent apoptosis by binding to receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) and acting as a molecular switch, which reduces the formation of a prosurvival RIPK2/TAK1 complex and increases the formation of a proapoptotic RIPK2/caspase 1 complex. In an orthotopic intracranial GBM CSC tumor xenograft mouse model, RIPGBM was found to significantly suppress tumor formation in vivo. Our chemical genetics-based approach has identified a drug candidate and a potential drug target that provide an approach to the development of treatments for this devastating disease.
Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical genetics; glioblastoma; phenotypic drug screening; receptor-interacting protein kinase 2; target identification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846550      PMCID: PMC6442583          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816626116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Stem cell mechanisms have been established to play critical roles in the development, progression, and recurrence of multiple cancer types (1–5). One such case is the infiltrative brain cancer glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). For recurrent GBM, even with aggressive treatment, the median survival rate is presently 12–15 mo (6, 7). GBM cancer stem cells (CSCs) were among the first cancer stem cell populations to be isolated and characterized from solid tumors (8–11). These cells share features in common with neural stem cells (NPCs), namely the expression of NSC markers (e.g., Nestin and SOX2), the capacity for self-renewal, and the ability to differentiate and give rise to cell types of glial and neuronal lineages in response to inductive cues (8, 9, 11, 12). The highly infiltrative nature of GBM tumors is attributed to the ability of GBM CSCs to migrate within the brain, a feature also shared with NSCs (13). Further, GBM CSCs are thought to contribute to drug resistance (14, 15) and have even been demonstrated to have the potential to give rise to endothelial cells that enable tumor vascularization (16). Thus, efforts to develop new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of GBM have recently focused on targeting this stem cell population (17). Here we have used an unbiased large-scale screening approach to identify drug-like small molecules that induce apoptosis in GBM CSCs in a cell type-selective manner. The use of expanded populations of proliferative nonstem/multipotent GBM cells for such screens is of limited utility, as such cell lines fail to recapitulate the in vitro and in vivo properties, including drug sensitivity, of the original tumor (9, 18–22). In contrast, in vitro and in vivo preclinical models using cultured human tumor-derived GBM CSCs more accurately recapitulate the biology of the disease (9, 15, 23–26). Under defined serum-free adherent culture conditions, these patient-derived GBM CSCs can be expanded as stable cell lines that retain their in vitro differentiation potential, as well as their in vivo engraftment, tumor formation, and migration potential (17). In the present study, we have used patient-derived GBM CSC cultures to identify a potential drug candidate for the treatment of this devastating disease.

Results

RIPGBM Is a Selective Inducer of Apoptosis in GBM CSCs.

We have previously described an adapted system for the adherent in vitro expansion of patient-derived GBM CSCs that was successfully used to perform a kinomewide lentiviral RNAi screen in 384-well assay format (24). Importantly, these primary cell lines retain stem cell-like characteristics and differentiation properties, as well as the ability to engraft and form tumors that recapitulate the highly heterogeneous and infiltrative characteristics of high-grade gliomas in relevant rodent disease models (24). Here, we used one of these GBM CSC lines, termed GBM-1, to establish a robust 1,536-well format luciferase-based survival assay and completed a large-scale screen of ∼106 drug-like small molecules (1 μM) with the goal of identifying novel compounds that are selectively toxic to chemoresistant GBM CSCs (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

A cell-based phenotypic screening approach identifies the small molecule RIPGBM, which induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs in a cell type-selective manner. (A) Schematic representation of the screening approach used to identify molecules that selectively induce apoptosis in GBM CSCs and structure of RIPGBM. (B) Bright-field image of GBM CSCs (GBM-1) or nondiseased human NPCs treated with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 96 h. (C) Immunofluorescent analysis of caspase 3 cleavage in GBM CSCs (GBM-1) following treatment with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 24 h. (D) Cell survival curves for GBM CSCs (GBM-1), human NPCs, primary human astrocyte cells, and primary HLFs treated with RIPGBM for 48 h. Values shown are mean ± SD.

A cell-based phenotypic screening approach identifies the small molecule RIPGBM, which induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs in a cell type-selective manner. (A) Schematic representation of the screening approach used to identify molecules that selectively induce apoptosis in GBM CSCs and structure of RIPGBM. (B) Bright-field image of GBM CSCs (GBM-1) or nondiseased human NPCs treated with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 96 h. (C) Immunofluorescent analysis of caspase 3 cleavage in GBM CSCs (GBM-1) following treatment with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 24 h. (D) Cell survival curves for GBM CSCs (GBM-1), human NPCs, primary human astrocyte cells, and primary HLFs treated with RIPGBM for 48 h. Values shown are mean ± SD. Confirmed primary hits (∼8,000, plate-based robust Z-score ≤−3) were evaluated by using a laser scanning cytometer-based cell death imaging assay (Acumen eX3; TTP Labtech; Fig. 1). Selective cytotoxicity was determined by evaluating the primary hits at two concentrations (5 μM and 1 μM), using a panel of two patient-derived GBM CSC lines (GBM-1 and GBM-5, ref. 24) and 3 nondiseased cell types [primary human astrocytes, WA09 human ES cell-derived NPCs, and primary human lung fibroblasts (HLFs)]. Compounds found to kill GBM CSC lines with greater than fivefold toxicity index compared with control cell types were further characterized. A caspase 3/7 activation assay (Caspase-Glo 3/7; Promega) was used to evaluate the mechanism of induced cell death. The most potent and selective compound identified from these assays, termed RIPGBM (Fig. 1), was found to selectively induce apoptosis in GBM CSC cell lines with an observed EC50 of ≤500 nM and a selectivity index of at least fivefold compared with control cell types (Fig. 1 and ). For comparison, the observed EC50 for the standard-of-care drug temozolomide (TMZ) used to treat GBM is ≥20 μM for the same GBM CSC lines (). Moreover, human ES-derived NSCs are at least twofold more sensitive to TMZ than GBM CSCs (). The latter observation is in agreement with published data showing that GBM CSCs are resistant to chemotherapeutic agents (27, 28). We confirmed the ability of RIPGBM to induce apoptosis in GBM CSCs by immunofluorescent analysis using a cleaved caspase 3-recognizing antibody (Fig. 1).

RIPGBM Is Converted to an Apoptosis-Inducing Derivative Selectively in GBM CSCs.

Quinone-containing drugs represent a large and diverse class of antitumor agents approved for clinical use. For many of these drugs, cell type-selective reduction to reactive hydroquinone species has been shown to play a key role in their antitumor activity (29). As the naphthoquinone core of RIPGBM is found in various substrates for quinone oxidoreductase enzymes (e.g., NQO1), which generate hydroquinone or semihydroquinone species and are frequently up-regulated in various cancer cell types (30), we hypothesized that either of these events could lead to the selective formation of a proapoptotic species in GBM CSCs. We used an MS-based metabolite identification approach to evaluate whether RIPGBM undergoes selective conversion to a +1 (i.e., semihydroquinone) or +2 (i.e., hydroquinone) species in GBM CSCs. Cell pellets and growth media of GBM CSC and control cell types were extracted following drug treatment and subjected to quantitative high-resolution Orbitrap LC-MS analysis (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The formation of +1 or +2 species was not observed from samples derived from either cell type. However, RIPGBM was found to undergo significant conversion to a −18 species, potentially corresponding to a dehydration event, in GBM CSCs (∼50% in 24 h), and this conversion was found to occur selectively in diseased cells (Fig. 2). An accurate mass measurement of 411.1506 m/z () and MS2 fragmentation data () were consistent with the cyclized imidazolium species, termed cRIPGBM, shown in Fig. 2. In parallel experiments, it was found that, whereas RIPGBM is relatively stable in culture media (t1/2 > 4 d), addition of the reducing agent NaBH4 results in near-instantaneous formation of the −18 cRIPGBM species (). Presumably, reduction of the quinone moiety makes the benzylic amine more nucleophilic, resulting in its addition to the acetamido group and subsequent loss of water. The putative cyclic derivative was synthesized and evaluated against a panel of GBM CSCs and nondisease cell lines. The cyclized species cRIPGBM was found to induce apoptosis in GBM CSCs with enhanced potency compared with the parent compound following 48 h of drug treatment (e.g., EC50 = 68 nM vs. 220 nM in GBM-1), but with reduced selectivity compared with control cells (Fig. 2 and ). As such, the mechanism by which RIPGBM selectively induces cell death in GBM CSCs likely involves a redox-dependent prodrug-like process involving cell type-dependent formation of a proapoptotic species.
Fig. 2.

A metabolite of RIPGBM induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs by interacting with RIPK2. (A) Orbitrap MS-based metabolite identification studies in GBM-1 (GBM CSC) or primary HLF cells incubated with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 0, 12, 24, or 48 h. (B) Structure of the cyclized RIPGBM metabolite cRIPGBM generated in GBM CSCs. (C) Cell survival curves for GBM CSCs (GBM-1), human NPCs, primary human astrocyte cells, and HLFs treated with cRIPGBM for 48 h. (D) Structure of PAP reagent cRIPGBM-PAP. (E) In vitro binding of cRIPGBM-PAP to recombinant human full-length RIPK2 protein in the presence or absence of competition using underivatized cRIPGBM or RIPGBM. (F) Domain structure of RIPK2 and in vitro binding of cRIPGBM-PAP to recombinant full-length, truncated kinase domain, or truncated CARD domain human RIPK2 protein. (G) cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following shRNA-mediated RIPK2 gene knockdown. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, and ****P < 0.001).

A metabolite of RIPGBM induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs by interacting with RIPK2. (A) Orbitrap MS-based metabolite identification studies in GBM-1 (GBM CSC) or primary HLF cells incubated with RIPGBM (1 μM) for 0, 12, 24, or 48 h. (B) Structure of the cyclized RIPGBM metabolite cRIPGBM generated in GBM CSCs. (C) Cell survival curves for GBM CSCs (GBM-1), human NPCs, primary human astrocyte cells, and HLFs treated with cRIPGBM for 48 h. (D) Structure of PAP reagent cRIPGBM-PAP. (E) In vitro binding of cRIPGBM-PAP to recombinant human full-length RIPK2 protein in the presence or absence of competition using underivatized cRIPGBM or RIPGBM. (F) Domain structure of RIPK2 and in vitro binding of cRIPGBM-PAP to recombinant full-length, truncated kinase domain, or truncated CARD domain human RIPK2 protein. (G) cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following shRNA-mediated RIPK2 gene knockdown. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, and ****P < 0.001).

cRIPGBM Targets RIPK2 in GBM CSCs.

Structure–activity relationship studies revealed sites off the RIPGBM core tolerant of modification. This information was used to design and synthesize photoactivatable affinity probe (PAP) reagents. MS-based proteomic target identification studies involving incubation and photo-cross-linking with live GBM CSCs using cRIPGBM-PAP (Fig. 2), which retained activity (EC50) within fivefold of that of the parent molecule, resulted in the identification of receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 2 (RIPK2) as a candidate protein target for cRIPGBM (). Based on its known role in regulating apoptosis and the degree of identified peptide coverage observed for this potential biomolecular target (), RIPK2 was explored in detail to examine its role in the mechanism of cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis. In in vitro binding assays involving purified recombinant proteins, cRIPGBM- PAP was observed to interact with full-length RIPK2 protein in a concentration-dependent manner at concentrations of 100 nM and greater (apparent Kd of ∼2.3 µM; ). A 25-fold molar excess of cRIPGBM was found to inhibit this interaction, demonstrating the specificity of this interaction (Fig. 2). Consistent with playing a relevant role in the induction of apoptosis, RIPK2 consists of an N-terminal autophosphorylation kinase domain and a C-terminal caspase 1 recruitment CARD domain separated by a domain of unknown function (Fig. 2) (31). In vitro binding experiments suggest that cRIPGBM interacts with the kinase domain of this protein (Fig. 2). However, the compound was not found to inhibit kinase activity at concentrations lower than 10 µM in an RIPK2 enzymatic assay (). To further validate RIPK2 as the molecular target of cRIPGBM in GBM CSCs, we measured compound-induced cytotoxicity and caspase activation in cells in which RIPK2 levels were reduced by using shRNA. Consistent with the mechanistic relevance of this target, as demonstrated by the observed reduction of cRIPGBM-induced caspase 3/7 activation in GBM CSCs (Fig. 2), RIPK2 suppression resulted in a significant decrease in drug sensitivity. The acyclic parent compound RIPGBM was not found to interact with RIPK2 (Fig. 2). These results suggest that it is the cyclized derivative cRIPGBM that is responsible for RIPK2-dependent induction of apoptosis.

cRIPGBM Induces Caspase 1-Mediated Apoptosis.

To elucidate the downstream mechanism of action by which cRIPGBM induces apoptosis, we assessed caspase activation in GBM CSCs. Compound treatment (250 nM) resulted in a time-dependent activation of caspase 1, caspase 9, and caspase 7, as well as PARP cleavage (Fig. 3), providing further evidence that cRIPGBM induces cell death via an apoptotic mechanism. Correspondingly, the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK significantly reduced compound-mediated GBM CSC death (Fig. 3). PARP cleavage occurred in a time-dependent manner concomitant with the onset of DNA fragmentation as determined by using a TUNEL assay (). In addition, we established that caspase 1 activation is upstream of caspase 9, caspase 7, and PARP cleavage by observing that pretreatment with the caspase 1 inhibitor Ac-YVAD-CHO effectively blocks caspase 9 cleavage in cRIPGBM-treated GBM CSCs (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

cRIPGBM activates caspase 1-mediated apoptotic signaling in GBM CSCs by modulating the interaction of RIPK2 with TAK1 and caspase 1. (A) Time-dependent cRIPGBM (250 nM)-induced cleavage of caspase 1, caspase 9, caspase 7, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in GBM-1 GBM CSCs. (B) cRIPGBM-induced cell death in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD (20 μM). (C) cRIPGBM-induced (250 nM) caspase 9 cleavage in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with the caspase 1-selective inhibitor Ac-YVAD-CHO (20 μM). (D) Coimmunoprecipitation of cIAP1 and cIAP2 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM. (E) Coimmunoprecipitation of TAK1 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (F) Quantification of TAK1 levels coimmunoprecipitated by using an anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (G) Coimmunoprecipitation of caspase 1 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (H) Quantification of caspase 1 levels coimmunoprecipitated by using an anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (I) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism of action for cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis in GBMB CSCs. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, and ****P < 0.001).

cRIPGBM activates caspase 1-mediated apoptotic signaling in GBM CSCs by modulating the interaction of RIPK2 with TAK1 and caspase 1. (A) Time-dependent cRIPGBM (250 nM)-induced cleavage of caspase 1, caspase 9, caspase 7, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in GBM-1 GBM CSCs. (B) cRIPGBM-induced cell death in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD (20 μM). (C) cRIPGBM-induced (250 nM) caspase 9 cleavage in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with the caspase 1-selective inhibitor Ac-YVAD-CHO (20 μM). (D) Coimmunoprecipitation of cIAP1 and cIAP2 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM. (E) Coimmunoprecipitation of TAK1 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (F) Quantification of TAK1 levels coimmunoprecipitated by using an anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (G) Coimmunoprecipitation of caspase 1 with anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (H) Quantification of caspase 1 levels coimmunoprecipitated by using an anti-RIPK2 antibody in GBM-1 GBM CSCs following treatment with cRIPGBM (250 nM). (I) Schematic representation of the proposed mechanism of action for cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis in GBMB CSCs. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, and ****P < 0.001). Ubiquitination is a known key modification that regulates the ability of RIPK2 to act as a prosurvival or proapoptotic molecule (32, 33). Specifically, K63-ubiquitinated RIPK functions as a scaffold for the assembly of protein complexes that activate prosurvival signaling pathways (34–36). The E3 ubiquitin ligases cIAP1 and cIAP2 have been previously shown to interact with and promote RIPK2 ubiquitination in various cell lines (33, 37, 38). Coimmunoprecipitation assays were used to determine if cRIPGBM treatment alters its interaction with cIAP1 and/or cIAP2 in GBM CSCs. Compound treatment reduced RIPK2 binding to cIAP1 (Fig. 3) and significantly reduced binding to cIAP2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3), which suggests that cIAP1 and cIAP2 are endogenous regulators of RIPK2 ubiquitination in GBM CSCs.

cRIPGBM Acts as a Molecular Switch That Modulates RIPK2 Binding Partners.

On the basis of these observations, as well as previously established mechanisms that have been established for RIPK2 (34, 35), we hypothesized that cRIPGBM promotes cell death by modulating RIPK2 ubiquitination status, which could impact its interactions with a prosurvival molecule to favor its interaction with a proapoptotic adaptor protein. To test this notion, we determined if compound treatment alters RIPK2 binding partners by using coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Previous studies have established that K63-ubiquitinated RIPK2 associates with the prosurvival TAK1 complex (34, 35). Consistently, TAK1 was found to coimmunoprecipitate with RIPK2 under basal conditions in GBM CSCs (Fig. 3). In cRIPGBM-treated cells, the interaction between RIPK2 and TAK1 was significantly decreased (Fig. 3 ). Conversely, because cRIPGBM treatment induces caspase 1-dependent cell death, we determined whether drug treatment correlated with an increased association between RIPK2 and caspase 1. Indeed, treatment with cRIPGBM for 6 h was found to result in a significant enhancement of RIPK2caspase 1 interaction (Fig. 3 ). Taken together, these data suggest that cRIPGBM induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs by a mechanism that involves its interaction with RIPK2 in a mode that results in decreased association with TAK1 and increased association with and activation of caspase 1, which can lead to downstream activation of a caspase 1-mediated apoptotic signaling cascade (Fig. 3). Additional future work will be required to determine a detailed understanding of how cRIPGBM/RIPK2 interaction impacts RIPK2 function in normal and disease cell types.

RIPGBM Inhibits Tumor Growth in a Patient-Derived GBM CSC Intracranial Xenograft Model.

The observed lack of brain exposure for cRIPGBM following oral or i.p. dosing precluded characterization of its in vivo activity using a physiologically relevant intracranial tumor model. However, encouragingly, the parent acyclic cell type-selective prodrug form of the molecule (RIPGBM), which would likely be the preferred drug candidate based on its selectivity profile, was found to have reasonable brain exposure properties following oral administration (brain Cmax = 540 nM; brain t1/2 = 1.5 h; 20 mg/kg orally; ). Further, in a 1-wk mouse toxicity study, oral delivery of RIPGBM was well tolerated with no overt toxicity observed at doses as high as 100 mg/kg twice per day based on body weight loss () and terminal hematology (), blood chemistry (), and anatomical findings. Given the selectivity and pharmacologic properties of RIPGBM, we sought to assess its efficacy in vivo by using a clinically relevant, patient-derived GBM intracranial xenograft model. In contrast to non-CSC glioma cell lines, which fail to form tumors that recapitulate the heterogeneous highly infiltrative nature of the parent tumor (9, 21), intracranial xenotransplantation of CSCs derived from GBM tumors results in the formation of tumors that recapitulate the invasive nature of the human disease (8, 9, 24). A highly aggressive GBM patient-derived line (GBM-39), which robustly recapitulates the heterogeneous and highly infiltrative nature of GBM tumors in vivo (39, 40), was engineered to express the IR fluorescent protein 720 (IRFP720) to allow noninvasive and quantitative assessment of orthotopic tumor growth by fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) imaging. Oral administration of RIPGBM (50 mg/kg orally twice daily) to mice bearing GBM39 IRFP720 intracranial xenografts resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth, as monitored by FMT imaging (Fig. 4 ), which was grossly associated with decreased tumor size, as assessed by H&E staining (Fig. 4). Taken together, these results demonstrate that oral delivery of a well-tolerated dose of RIPGBM results in substantial anti-GBM activity in vivo. Thus, with improvements in potency and pharmacokinetic properties, this compound series has the potential to provide a new therapeutic approach for patients with GBM.
Fig. 4.

RIPGBM reduces GBM tumor growth in an orthotopic intracranial xenograft model. (A) GBM39 patient-derived neurosphere cells engineered to stably express the IR protein 720 (IRFP 720) were orthotopically injected into 5-wk-old nu/nu mice. Mice were treated with vehicle or RIPGBM 50 mg/kg orally twice daily (n = 8 for vehicle and n = 6 for RIPGBM). (B) Representative FMT images of mice at week 5. (C) Representative H&E stains of mouse brains from mice at week 5. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).

RIPGBM reduces GBM tumor growth in an orthotopic intracranial xenograft model. (A) GBM39 patient-derived neurosphere cells engineered to stably express the IR protein 720 (IRFP 720) were orthotopically injected into 5-wk-old nu/nu mice. Mice were treated with vehicle or RIPGBM 50 mg/kg orally twice daily (n = 8 for vehicle and n = 6 for RIPGBM). (B) Representative FMT images of mice at week 5. (C) Representative H&E stains of mouse brains from mice at week 5. Values shown are mean ± SD (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01).

Discussion

We have identified a small molecule, RIPGBM, that selectively induces apoptosis in GBM CSCs in vitro and significantly decreases tumor size in vivo in a physiologically relevant, patient-derived intracranial xenograft mouse model. The cell-type selectivity of this prodrug molecule appears to be derived, at least in part, from selective redox-dependent bioactivation in GBM CSCs, which leads to the formation of a proapoptotic molecule termed cRIPGBM, as well as sensitivity to RIPK2-induced apoptosis. Additional target identification studies have yet to reveal a potential activating enzyme for the RIPGBM prodrug molecule. As such, it remains unclear if cyclization is dependent on a cell type-specific enzymatic conversion or altered cellular redox potential. Indeed, antioxidant response pathways (e.g., NRF2-dependent pathways) are frequently found to be induced in diverse cancer cell types as a result of oxidative stress and mutations within the tumor microenvironment (41). Pharmacological data suggest that the mechanism of action of cRIPGBM-induced apoptosis involves its direct interaction with RIPK2. This results in decreased association with TAK1 and increased association with caspase 1, leading to downstream activation of a caspase 1-mediated apoptotic signaling cascade. Interestingly, RIPK2-dependent caspase 1-induced apoptosis has previously been demonstrated to play an essential role in hypoxia and ischemia-induced neuronal cell death (42), which is consistent with the ability of RIPK2 to act as a key molecular switch that can control prosurvival vs. proapoptotic signaling pathways in neural cell types including GBM CSCs. Given the high rate of GBM tumor relapse following surgery, which results from the therapeutic resistance of GBM CSCs, the observed sensitivity of GBM CSCs to RIPK2-induced apoptosis and the ability to control this molecular switch with an identified small molecule has significant implications for the development of new therapies for GBM. In theory, such a molecule could not only decrease the rate of tumor regrowth, but also spare nontarget cells, including normal neural cell populations, thus lowering the side effects observed with standard-of-care treatments for GBM.

Methods

Cell Culture.

Deidentified tumor samples classified as GBM were obtained with informed consent from patients undergoing surgery at Stanford Medical Center in accordance with the institutional review boards at Stanford University and The Scripps Research Institute. Specimen-derived cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 conditions. GBM CSCs were maintained in Neurobasal medium supplemented with N2, B27, and human basic FGF (20 ng/mL; Life Technologies) and EGF (20 ng/mL; Life Technologies). WA09 human stem cell-derived NPCs (Aruna Biomedical) were cultured following the manufacturer’s instructions. HLFs (IMR-90; American Type Culture Collection CCL-186) were cultured in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotic/antimycotic agents. Human astrocytes isolated from the cerebral cortex (no. 1800; ScienCell) were cultured following the manufacturer’s instructions. Further details are provided in .

High-Throughput Screening.

GBM-1 GBM CSCs were plated in complete GBM media as described earlier at a density of 1,000 cells per well in 10 μL and screened (1 μM, 0.1% DMSO) in 1,536-well plates coated with poly-d-lysine (5 μg/mL; Sigma) and laminin (5 μg/mL; Life Technologies). Imaging-based assays were performed by using an Acumen eX3 laser scanning cytometer (TTP Labtech). Hit selection was performed by using plate-based analysis (robust Z-scores <−3 for GBM CSCs and >−2 for control cell types). Further details are provided in .

Metabolite Identification Studies.

GBM CSCs or control cells (200,000 per well) were incubated with RIPGBM (1 µM) for 0–48 h and subjected to LC-MS analysis as described in .

cRIPGBM Protein Target Identification.

GBM-1 GBM CSCs (∼106) were cultured in 100-mm dishes and treated with 100 nM cRIPGBM-PAP for 1 h in the presence or absence of 5 μM cRIPGBM. Bands selectively enriched in samples lacking competition were evaluated by using a previously described method (30). Further details are provided in .

In Vivo Xenograft Animal Model.

Five-week-old female athymic nu/nu mice (Harlan Sprague–Dawley) were intracranially injected with 1 × 105 GBM39 IRFP720 cells in 5 μL of PBS solution as described previously (43). Tumor growth was monitored by using an FMT 2500 Fluorescence Tomography System (PerkinElmer) weekly. Mice were treated with vehicle [10% M-Pyrol, 10% ethanol/Cremophor (1:1, vol/vol), and 80% saline solution] or 50 mg/kg of RIPGBM by oral gavage twice daily, 8 h apart, starting at day 7 postinjection. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the institutional animal use and care committee at the University of California, San Diego. Further details are provided in .

Synthesis.

All chemicals and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers (Acros and Aldrich) and used without further purification. Unless otherwise indicated, all reactions were run under argon gas. Anhydrous solvents were obtained by passage through an activated alumina column. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400- and 500-MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported relative to internal CDCl3 (Me4Si, δ 0.0), DMSO-d6 (Me4Si, δ 0.0), and CD3OD (Me4Si, δ 0.0). Further details are provided in .
  43 in total

Review 1.  Neural stem cells and the origin of gliomas.

Authors:  Nader Sanai; Arturo Alvarez-Buylla; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells.

Authors:  T Reya; S J Morrison; M F Clarke; I L Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Patient tumor EGFR and PDGFRA gene amplifications retained in an invasive intracranial xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Caterina Giannini; Jann N Sarkaria; Atsushi Saito; Joon H Uhm; Evanthia Galanis; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; C David James
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Contributions of human tumor xenografts to anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Edward A Sausville; Angelika M Burger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Fundamental role of the Rip2/caspase-1 pathway in hypoxia and ischemia-induced neuronal cell death.

Authors:  Wen-Hua Zhang; Xin Wang; Malini Narayanan; Yu Zhang; Chunfeng Huo; John C Reed; Robert M Friedlander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Brain tumor stem cells.

Authors:  Ichiro Nakano; Harley I Kornblum
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma.

Authors:  Rossella Galli; Elena Binda; Ugo Orfanelli; Barbara Cipelletti; Angela Gritti; Simona De Vitis; Roberta Fiocco; Chiara Foroni; Francesco Dimeco; Angelo Vescovi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Models for neuro-oncological preclinical studies: solid orthotopic and heterotopic grafts of human gliomas into nude mice.

Authors:  Luc Taillandier; Laurent Antunes; K S Angioi-Duprez
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Houman D Hemmati; Ichiro Nakano; Jorge A Lazareff; Michael Masterman-Smith; Daniel H Geschwind; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Harley I Kornblum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells.

Authors:  Sheila K Singh; Cynthia Hawkins; Ian D Clarke; Jeremy A Squire; Jane Bayani; Takuichiro Hide; R Mark Henkelman; Michael D Cusimano; Peter B Dirks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Modulating microenvironments for treating glioblastoma.

Authors:  LaDeidra Monet Roberts; Jennifer Munson
Journal:  Curr Tissue Microenviron Rep       Date:  2020-08-13

2.  Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Signature of Pyroptosis-Related lncRNAs in Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Guilong Tanzhu; Na Li; Zhanzhan Li; Rongrong Zhou; Liangfang Shen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Identification and Validation of Inflammatory Response-Related Gene Signatures to Predict the Prognosis of Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jiye Song; Liang Song; Zhenmei Lv; Jianke Liu; Xuan Feng; Song Zhang; Aiqin Song
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.758

4.  Pyroptosis-related prognosis model, immunocyte infiltration characterization, and competing endogenous RNA network of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Min-Rui Ding; Yan-Jie Qu; Xiao Peng; Jin-Fang Chen; Meng-Xue Zhang; Tong Zhang; Bing Hu; Hong-Mei An
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Valproic Acid Enhanced Apoptosis by Promoting Autophagy Via Akt/mTOR Signaling in Glioma.

Authors:  Wei Han; Fan Yu; Jiachao Cao; Bo Dong; Wei Guan; Jia Shi
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Limb-bud and heart development (LBH) contributes to glioma progression in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Luotong Liu; Qinglian Luo; Qian Xu; Yu Xiong; Huajiang Deng
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.693

7.  Wasl is crucial to maintain microglial core activities during glioblastoma initiation stages.

Authors:  Julie Mazzolini; Sigrid Le Clerc; Gregoire Morisse; Cédric Coulonges; Jean-François Zagury; Dirk Sieger
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 8.073

Review 8.  System-based approaches as prognostic tools for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Manuela Salvucci; Zaitun Zakaria; Steven Carberry; Amanda Tivnan; Volker Seifert; Donat Kögel; Brona M Murphy; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  A computational guided, functional validation of a novel therapeutic antibody proposes Notch signaling as a clinical relevant and druggable target in glioma.

Authors:  Dayana Herrera-Rios; Guanzhang Li; Dilaware Khan; Julia Tsiampali; Ann-Christin Nickel; Philippe Aretz; Michael Hewera; Abiagail Kora Suwala; Tao Jiang; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Marcel Alexander Kamp; Sajjad Muhammad; Daniel Hänggi; Jarek Maciaczyk; Wei Zhang; Ulf Dietrich Kahlert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.