Literature DB >> 30846524

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed surgical valves.

Matheus Simonato1, Danny Dvir2.   

Abstract

Aortic valve-in-valve is a less invasive alternative to surgical redo in the treatment of failed bioprosthetic valves. While only inoperable patients underwent the procedure before, operators currently offer it to those at lower risk and worldwide experience is in the thousands. Early mortality has diminished in recent analyses and improvements in symptoms and quality of life have been documented. Main considerations with aortic valve-in-valve include elevated postprocedural gradients, coronary obstruction and leaflet thrombosis. Risk factors for each of these adverse events have been described at length. Aortic valve-in-valve offers a safe and effective option in the management of failed bioprosthetic valves. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bicuspid aortic valve; transcatheter valve interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846524     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  2 in total

1.  Impact of BASILICA on Sinus and Neo-Sinus Hemodynamics after Valve-in-Valve with and without Coronary Flow.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Pablo Maureira; Scott Lilly; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-06-29

2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a Failed Perceval Sutureless Valve, Complicated by Aortic Annular Rupture.

Authors:  Robert T Kay; Hatem Linjawi; Craig Butler; Anoop Mathew; Isabelle Vonder Muhll; Sayra Khandekar; Benjamin D Tyrrell; Jeevan Nagendran; Dylan Taylor; Robert C Welsh
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2022-02-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.