Literature DB >> 30846519

Minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement.

Marjan Jahangiri1, Azhar Hussain1, Enoch Akowuah2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is defined as a surgical aortic valve replacement which involves smaller chest incisions as opposed to full sternotomy. It is performed using cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest. It benefits from potential advantages of a less invasive procedure. To date, over 14 000 MIAVR have been reported in the literature. Due to heterogeneity of the studies, different surgical techniques and mainly the non-randomised nature of these studies comparing MIAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. The two main techniques of MIAVR are mini-sternotomy and right anterior mini-thoracotomy. Both techniques with other less common forms of MIAVR will be discussed in this review. The advantages, disadvantages and surgical pitfalls will be discussed. Some of the advantages include shorter intensive care and hospital stay, reduced perioperative blood loss, less pain, improved respiratory function and cosmesis. The possible disadvantage of longer bypass and cross-clamp times may be counter balanced by the recent sutureless and rapid deployment valves. Despite some of the benefits, MIAVR has not been adopted by a significant proportion of the surgeons possibly related to the learning curve and requirements for re-training. As MIAVR becomes more common, randomised trials comparing this technique with transcatheter aortic valve implantation is warranted. In addition, assessing quality of life including return to work and functional capacity is needed. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; aortic surgery; transcatheter valve interventions; valve disease surgery; valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846519     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  3 in total

1.  An ex vivo evaluation of two different suture techniques for the Ozaki aortic neocuspidization procedure.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Michael Scharfschwerdt; Tim Schaller; Jan Christian Reil; Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Anas Aboud
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  How the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a single cardiac center experience.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Perek; Anna Olasinska-Wisniewska; Marcin Misterski; Mateusz Puslecki; Marek Grygier; Piotr Buczkowski; Maciej Lesiak; Tomasz Stankowski; Lukasz Szarpak; Kurt Ruetzler; Oguz Turan; Marek Jemielity
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Converging rapid deployment prostheses with minimal access surgery: analysis of early outcomes.

Authors:  M Yousuf Salmasi; Kristo Papa; David Mozalbat; Muhammad Ashraf; Alicja Zientara; Ishaan Chauhan; Nikoleta Karadatkou; Thanos Athanasiou; Isabelle Roussin; Cesare Quarto; George Asimakopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 1.637

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.