E Bulut1, J Karakaya2, S Salama3, M Levy4, T A G M Huisman5, I Izbudak6. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (E.B.) drelifbulut@yahoo.com. 2. Statistics (J.K.), Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Neurology and Psychiatry (S.S.), University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. 4. Department of Neurology (M.L.), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Edward B. Singleton Chair of Radiology (T.A.G.M.H.), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas. 6. Section of Pediatric Neuroradiology (I.I.), Division of Neuroradiology, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differentiating pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis could be challenging, especially in cases presenting with only brain manifestations. Our purpose was to investigate brain MR imaging features that may help distinguish these 2 entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined initial brain MR imaging studies of 10 patients with pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (female/male ratio, 7:3) and 10 patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (female/male ratio, 2:8). The mean age of the patients was 10.3 ± 5.6 and 8.7 ± 5.3 years, respectively. Brain lesions were evaluated with respect to location, extent, expansion, T1 hypointensity, contrast enhancement/pattern, and diffusion characteristics. The χ2 test (Yates or Fisher exact χ2tests) was used to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: Cerebral subcortical ± juxtacortical and pons ± middle cerebellar peduncle were the most frequent locations involved in both neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (n = 5 and 4, respectively) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 9 and 7, respectively). Thalamic lesions were more frequent in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (P = .020) and were detected only in 1 patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. None of the patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder had hypothalamic, internal capsule, or cortical lesions. The internal capsule involvement was found to be significantly different between groups (P = .033). There was no significant difference in terms of extent, expansion, T1 hypointensity, contrast enhancement/pattern, and diffusion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a considerable overlap in brain MR imaging findings, thalamic and internal capsule involvement could be used to differentiate pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differentiating pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis could be challenging, especially in cases presenting with only brain manifestations. Our purpose was to investigate brain MR imaging features that may help distinguish these 2 entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined initial brain MR imaging studies of 10 patients with pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (female/male ratio, 7:3) and 10 patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (female/male ratio, 2:8). The mean age of the patients was 10.3 ± 5.6 and 8.7 ± 5.3 years, respectively. Brain lesions were evaluated with respect to location, extent, expansion, T1 hypointensity, contrast enhancement/pattern, and diffusion characteristics. The χ2 test (Yates or Fisher exact χ2tests) was used to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: Cerebral subcortical ± juxtacortical and pons ± middle cerebellar peduncle were the most frequent locations involved in both neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (n = 5 and 4, respectively) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 9 and 7, respectively). Thalamic lesions were more frequent in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (P = .020) and were detected only in 1 patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. None of the patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder had hypothalamic, internal capsule, or cortical lesions. The internal capsule involvement was found to be significantly different between groups (P = .033). There was no significant difference in terms of extent, expansion, T1 hypointensity, contrast enhancement/pattern, and diffusion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a considerable overlap in brain MR imaging findings, thalamic and internal capsule involvement could be used to differentiate pediatric-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
Authors: Woojun Kim; Min Su Park; Sang Hyun Lee; Su-Hyun Kim; In Ja Jung; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Tatsuro Misu; Kazuo Fujihara; Ho Jin Kim Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Vanda A Lennon; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Sean J Pittock; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey L Bennett; Philippe Cabre; William Carroll; Tanuja Chitnis; Jérôme de Seze; Kazuo Fujihara; Benjamin Greenberg; Anu Jacob; Sven Jarius; Marco Lana-Peixoto; Michael Levy; Jack H Simon; Silvia Tenembaum; Anthony L Traboulsee; Patrick Waters; Kay E Wellik; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 9.910