Literature DB >> 3084547

Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative culture techniques for burn biopsy.

K Buchanan, D M Heimbach, B H Minshew, M B Coyle.   

Abstract

Accurate evaluation of bacterial colonization as a predictive index for wound sepsis has relied on a quantitative culture technique that provides exact colony counts per gram of tissue by culture of five serial dilutions of biopsy tissue homogenate. The method, while useful to the physician, is both labor intensive and expensive. In this study 78 eschar biopsies were cultured by a semiquantitative technique that involved the use of 0.1- and 0.01-ml samples of inocula and by the serial dilution method. Exact colony counts from the semiquantitative culture method were available only from cultures containing 10(4) to 10(6) CFU/g of tissue. Other colony counts were reported as less than 10(4) or greater than 10(6) CFU/g. Agreement by category of colony counts between the two methods was 96%. For prediction of wound sepsis, the semiquantitative procedure had a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 93.7%. This method also resulted in an approximately 30% reduction of work units (as defined by the College of American Pathologists) and a 60% reduction in the amount of media for specimen processing. Therefore, this semiquantitative culture technique provides accurate information to the physician while saving both time and materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3084547      PMCID: PMC268623          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.258-261.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  PSEUDOMONAS BURN WOUND SEPSIS. I PATHOGENESIS OF EXPERIMENTAL PSEUDOMONAS BURN WOUND SEPSIS.

Authors:  C TEPLITZ; D DAVIS; A D MASON; J A MONCRIEF
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.

Authors:  N S Levine; R B Lindberg; A D Mason; B A Pruitt
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1976-02

3.  Burn wound biopsy bacterial quantitation: a statistical analysis.

Authors:  F J Volenec; G M Clark; M M Mani; L J Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A rapid technic for quantitating wound bacterial count.

Authors:  C Magee; B Haury; G Rodeheaver; J Fox; M T Edgerton; R F Edlich
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The method of quantitative burn-wound biopsy cultures and its routine use in the care of the burned patient.

Authors:  E C Loebl; J A Marvin; E L Heck; P W Curreri; C R Baxter
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Quantitative assessment of bacterial contamination of open wounds by a slide techniue.

Authors:  J P Heggers; M C Robson; E T Doran
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 2.184

7.  The reclosure of postoperative incisional abscesses based on bacterial quantification of the wound.

Authors:  M C Robson; R C Shaw; J P Heggers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  An evaluation of burn wound quantitative microbiology. I. Quantitative eschar cultures.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; J M Fox; C O Quall
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Sepsis following burns, trauma, and intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  G T Shires; P Dineen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1982-10-25

10.  Quantitative wound cultures in upper extremity trauma.

Authors:  W P Cooney; R H Fitzgerald; J H Dobyns; J A Washington
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1982-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Jf Arnould; R Le Floch
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-03-31

2.  Burn wound biopsy techniques.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  J M Jones
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Nanoemulsion Therapy for Burn Wounds Is Effective as a Topical Antimicrobial Against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Authors:  Vladislav A Dolgachev; Susan M Ciotti; Rone Eisma; Stephen Gracon; J Erby Wilkinson; James R Baker; Mark R Hemmila
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 5.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Fungal infections in burns: Diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Malini R Capoor; Sujata Sarabahi; Vinay Kumar Tiwari; Ravi Prakash Narayanan
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-09

7.  Protocol for a systematic review of quantitative burn wound microbiology in the management of burns patients.

Authors:  Johnny Kwei; Fenella D Halstead; Janine Dretzke; Beryl A Oppenheim; Naiem S Moiemen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.