George Gonçalves Dos Santos1, Luisa Queiroz Vasconcelos2, Suelen Cristina da Silva Poy3, Renata Dos Santos Almeida4, Aryon de Almeida Barbosa Júnior5, Silvia Rachel de Albuquerque Santos6, Alexandre Malta Rossi7, Fúlvio Borges Miguel8, Fabiana Paim Rosa9. 1. Master, Fellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Interactive Processes of Organs and Systems, Health Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador-BA, Brazil. Technical procedures, manuscript writing. 2. Master, Fellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Interactive Processes of Organs and Systems, Health Sciences Institute, UFBA, Salvador-BA, Brazil. Technical procedures. 3. Master, Faculdade Maria Milza (FAMAM), Mangabeira-BA, Brazil. Technical procedures, histological examinations. 4. PhD, Postgraduate Program in Interactive Processes of Organs and Systems, Health Sciences Institute, UFBA, Salvador-BA, Brazil. Histomorphometric examinations. 5. PhD, Researcher Collaborator, Laboratory of Tissue Bioengineering and Biomaterials (LBTB), Health Sciences Institute, UFBA, Salvador-BA, Brazil. Histopathological examinations. 6. Chemistry, LABIOMAT, Brazilian Center for Physics Research, CBPF, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil. Analysis, synthesis and physicochemical characterization of biomaterials. 7. PhD, LABIOMAT, Brazilian Center for Physics Research, CBPF, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil. Analysis, synthesis and physicochemical characterization of biomaterials. 8. PhD, Associate Professor, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), Santo Antonio de Jesus-BA, Brazil. Technical procedures, critical revision. 9. PhD, Associate Professor, Health Sciences Institute, UFBA, Salvador-BA, Brazil. Conception of the study, critical revision.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze, histomorphologically, the influence of the geometry of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and alginate (HAn/Alg) composites in the initial phase of the bone repair. METHODS: Fifteen rats were distributed to three groups: MiHA - bone defect filled with HAn/Alg microspheres; GrHA - bone defect filled with HAn/Alg granules; and DV - empty bone defect; evaluated after 15 days postoperatively. The experimental surgical model was the critical bone defect, ≅8.5 mm, in rat calvaria. After euthanasia the specimens were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, picrosirius and Masson-Goldner's trichrome. RESULTS: The histomorphologic analysis showed, in the MiHA, deposition of osteoid matrix within some microspheres and circumjacent to the others, near the bone edges. In GrHA, the deposition of this matrix was scarce inside and adjacent to the granules. In these two groups, chronic granulomatous inflammation was noted, more evident in GrHA. In the DV, it was observed bone neoformation restricted to the bone edges and formation of connective tissue with reduced thickness in relation to the bone edges, throughout the defect. CONCLUSION: The geometry of the biomaterials was determinant in the tissue response, since the microspheres showed more favorable to the bone regeneration in relation to the granules.
PURPOSE: To analyze, histomorphologically, the influence of the geometry of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and alginate (HAn/Alg) composites in the initial phase of the bone repair. METHODS: Fifteen rats were distributed to three groups: MiHA - bone defect filled with HAn/Alg microspheres; GrHA - bone defect filled with HAn/Alg granules; and DV - empty bone defect; evaluated after 15 days postoperatively. The experimental surgical model was the critical bone defect, ≅8.5 mm, in rat calvaria. After euthanasia the specimens were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, picrosirius and Masson-Goldner's trichrome. RESULTS: The histomorphologic analysis showed, in the MiHA, deposition of osteoid matrix within some microspheres and circumjacent to the others, near the bone edges. In GrHA, the deposition of this matrix was scarce inside and adjacent to the granules. In these two groups, chronic granulomatous inflammation was noted, more evident in GrHA. In the DV, it was observed bone neoformation restricted to the bone edges and formation of connective tissue with reduced thickness in relation to the bone edges, throughout the defect. CONCLUSION: The geometry of the biomaterials was determinant in the tissue response, since the microspheres showed more favorable to the bone regeneration in relation to the granules.
Researchers of the bone tissue bioengineering have sought to develop ideal
conditions for the repair and/or replacement of damaged or lost tissue through the
use of cellular elements, growth factors, regenerative techniques and biomaterials,
in order to provide the scaffold and essential requirements for
tissue neoformation
-
.The biomaterials can be synthesized from different substrates and processed in
different forms of presentation, namely: fiber, membrane, gel, powder, among others;
and different geometries such as plates, cylinders, microspheres and granules.
Microspheres have attracted great scientific interest due, in particular, to their
ability to promote the formation of interstices between them, which allows cell
migration, adhesion, proliferation and differentiation, mainly, mesenchymal and
osteoprogenitoring, liberation of growth factors, angiogenesis, diffusion of
nutrients and new extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis
. By turn the granules, in addition to having the aforementioned properties,
are widely used in clinical practice in the filling of defects and tissue lesions
with irregular shapes. Both microspheres and granules can be applied through
injectable systems in minimally invasive surgical procedures
.Among the substrates most used in the synthesis of biomaterials with the geometry of
microspheres and granules, bioceramics based on calcium phosphate (CaP) stand out,
mainly, the HA due to its biocompatibility, osteoconduction and bioactivity
. However, in spite of these fundamental properties, in the biological
interaction with the host, the HA presents a low in vivo
degradation rate which, in some applications, may limit its use
.In seeking to improve the physicochemical characteristics of HA, researchers have
developed this material on a nanometer scale, considering that the HA nanostructured
crystals (HAn) have higher biodegradation due to the smaller size of its particles
and larger surface area exposed to the biological environment, which accelerates the
speed of formation and growth of the biologically active apatite layer
,
. Another way to improve bioceramics is to associate them with natural or
synthetic polymers to produce biomaterials of the type composites
,
. These materials have, in the same scaffold,
physical-chemical properties of the ceramic and polymer, which are improved in
relation to the materials when used in an individual way and mimetize the inorganic
and organic phases of the natural bone
-
.In this perspective, the alginate is a natural polymer widely used, since this
material can alter the crystallinity, solubility, network parameters, thermal
stability, surface reactivity, bioactivity and adsorption properties of the HA
structure
,
,
. Therefore, the physicochemical characteristics of the composites vary
according to the polymer and its percentage used during the synthesis, as well as
the processing of the sample and the final geometry of the biomaterial produced.
Thus, these biomaterials, especially in the form of microspheres and granules are
configured as a promising alternative to bone substitution, particularly in
situations where damage and/or trauma reach critical dimensions which preclude
spontaneous bone regeneration and hinders the functional property or aesthetic of
the affected
,
.Given the above, parallel to the need, in worldwide level, to develop new
biomaterials, with national technology and affordable cost, most versatile, and
promising biological properties for use, especially in cases of extensive bone loss,
the present study aims to analyze the influence of the geometry of HAn and alginate
composites in the initial phase of bone repair.
Methods
Surgical procedures were performed according to the Ethical Standards of Researches
in Animals (Law No. 11,794 of 2008); the National Biosafety Standards and the
National Health Institute Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH
Publication No. 85-23, Rev. 1985), upon approval of the Ethics Committee on the Use
of Animals of the Health Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal da Bahia, protocol
038/2012.
Biomaterials
Synthesis and processing of the HAn and alginate microspheres and
granules
The biomaterials were synthesized, processed and characterized in the
LABIOMAT (Brazilian Center for Physical Research, CBPF, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil). The synthesis was realized by mixing a solution of ammonium
hydrogenphosphate [(NH4) 2HPO4], maintained
at pH 11, to a solution of calcium nitrate tetrahydrate
[Ca(NO3)2.4H2O] under constant
stirring, under synthesis temperature of 90oC.The precipitate resulting was filtered and washed until the pH of the wash
water was 7. Soon after, the solid obtained was dried by freeze-drying for
24h and then separated using sieves with a desired mesh
aperture. 15g of the obtained solid were weighed into
becker and added to a 1.5% w/v solution of sodium
alginate, vigorously mixed until obtain a homogeneous paste.To obtain the microspheres, this paste was extruded with the use of a
syringe in 0.15M calcium chloride solution at room temperature. Finally, the
microspheres were washed and dried in a glass-house at 50º C and then
submitted to the sieve with a granulometric range of 250-425 μm. In order to
obtain the granules, the obtained paste was dried in a glass-house and then
crushed and sieved in the granulometric range of 250-425 μm. The biomaterial
samples were conditioned in eppendorf tubes, properly
identified, and sterilized by gamma rays (Fig.
1). Each aliquot was used to fill the bone defect of,
approximately, four animals.
Figure 1
Macroscopic aspect of biomaterials.
Physical-chemical characterization of HAn powders
Superficial area
The characterization of the surface area by the BET method (ASAP 2020
- Micromeritics
®) showed that the HA evaluated in our study has a surface area
of 35.9501 m2/g, characteristic of manometric biomaterials.
Chemical analysis
The chemical analysis of the X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
(PW2400-Philips
®) demonstrated that HA evaluated in this work presents Ca/P
molar ratio of 1.67 (Table 1).
Table 1
XRF analysis.
Sample
Ca %
mol do Ca
P %
mol do P
Ratio Ca/P
HA
35.70
0.8908
16.40
0.52948
1.6823
HA
36.00
0.8982
16.60
0.53593
1.6760
HA
37.12
0.9262
17.20
0.55530
1.6679
Mean
1.6754
Ca % = Percent of Calcium. mol of Ca = Calcium Concentration.
P % = Percent of Phosphate. mol of P = Phosphate
Concentration. Ratio Ca/P = ratio of calcium and
phosphate.
Ca % = Percent of Calcium. mol of Ca = Calcium Concentration.
P % = Percent of Phosphate. mol of P = Phosphate
Concentration. Ratio Ca/P = ratio of calcium and
phosphate.
X-ray diffraction (X-RD) analysis
The analysis of X-ray diffraction was performed using the high-resolution
diffractometer HZG4 (Zeiss
®) with CuKa radiation (l = 1.5418 Å) and angular scanning of
10-80o(2ɵ), with step of 0.05/s, time 160 seconds, with
reference to the standard PCPDFWIN 09.0432 (International Centre for
Diffraction Data - ICDD)
,
. The diffractogram evidenced peaks corresponding to the crystalline
profile of a standard HA (Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Peaks corresponding to the crystallinity of a standard HA are
noted.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
The FTIR analysis evidenced vibrational spectra corresponding to those of a
standard HA
,
, it is noted in the regions of 3430 and 1646 cm-1 intense
and wide water bands. In the regions 1462 to 1414 cm-1 are found
the characteristic bands of the carbonate ions, showing that the alginate is
present in the sample. The other bands observed in 1038, 961, 602 and 560
cm-1 are characteristic of phosphate ions present in HA. Even
the sample containing a large amount of water, it was possible to identify
the hydroxyl bands in 3570 and 635 cm-1 (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Vibrational spectra of Infrared of the sample prepared at 90º
C. It is observed that the spectra revealed characteristic bands
of HA for phosphate (PO4
3-), water (H2O) and hydroxyl
(OH1-).
Experimental phase
Fifteen male wistar albino adult rats with body weight between
350 and 400 g were randomly distributed to compose three experimental groups,
with 5 animals in each group: MiHA - bone defect filled with HAn microspheres
and alginate; GrHA - bone defect filled with HAn granules and alginate; DV -
bone defect without implantation of biomaterial.
Surgical procedure
The surgical technique used was the same described by Miguel et
al.
. However, in the present study, the 8.0 mm trephinedrill used in the
confection of the critical bone defect was with a diameter of ≅8.5 mm and ≅0.8
mm of thickness. After removal of the bone fragment, it was procedered the
implantation of the biomaterials, according to each experimental group. In the
control group (DV) the bone defect remained empty, without biomaterial. Finally,
the tissue flap was repositioned and sutured with simple points (Fig. 4).
Figure 4
Steps of the surgical procedure. a) Removal of the
bone fragment with trephine drill. b) Critical bone
defect. c) Implanted Biomaterial. d)
Tissue flap repositioned and sutured.
Histological processing and histomorphological analysis
After 15 days post surgery, the animals were euthanized and the calvaria
removed. The obtained specimens were fixed formaldehyde 4% for 48 hours,
included in paraffin and subsequently cut to 5μm of thickness and stained with
hematoxylin-eosin (HE), picrosirius-red (PIFG) and Masson-Goldner trichrome
(GOLD) and analyzed under an optical microscope (DM1000 -
Leica
®). The images were captured using a digital camera (DFC310FX
-
Leica
®). For morphometric analyses, the Leica Application Suite (version
4.12 - Leica
®) and optical microscope (DM6 B -
Leica
®) were used. To compare the differences between the groups the
Kruskal-Wallis test was applied using the software SPSS version 20.0
(IBM
SPSS
®), at a 5% level of significance (p≤0.05).
Results
The histomorphologic analysis evidenced neoformation of osteoid matrix restricted to
the borders of the bone defect with formation of fibrous connective tissue in the
remaining area, in all experimental groups. When compared to the bone edge, the
tissue thickness produced in the defect region remained proportional in the groups
with implantation of microspheres and granules, and significantly reduced in the
group without implantation of biomaterials (Fig.
5).
Figure 5
a) MiHA - Microspheres distributed along the bone defect.
PIFG. Bar: 1 mm. b) GrHA - Granules arranged along the bone
defect. HE. 1 mm bar. c) DV - Deposition of conjunctive
tissue throughout the bone defect. HE. Bar: 200 μm. Microspheres (Mi),
granules (Gr), loose connective tissue (LCT), central vein (CV) and dura
mater region (DM).
In the MiHA, the biomaterials were arranged in monolayer, with small variation of
microspheres size, throughout the extent of the bone defect. The majority remained
intact and some presented partial and/or total fragmentation with neoformation of
osteoid matrix within the scaffold. In this group, it was observed
the presence of mononuclear inflammatory cells and multinucleated giant cells,
characteristic of chronic granulomatous inflammatory response, discreetly noticed
around the microspheres, especially those located at the periphery of the bone
defect. In GrHA, the granules were distributed in mono and multilayer, throughout
the extent of the bone defect. In this group the chronic granulomatous inflammatory
reaction observed was more evident than in the MiHA. Most of the granules remained
intact, while others presented partial fragmentation, less accentuated in relation
to the microspheres, without osteoid neoformation inside of the biomaterials. In
both groups with implantation of biomaterials, it was noticed abundant proliferation
of blood capillaries around the particles (Fig.
6).
Figure 6
a) MiHA - Neoformation osteoid within the microsphere and
discrete circumferential chronic granulomatous inflammation. GOLD. Bar:
100 μm. b) MiHA - Microspheres partially degraded and
tissue neoformation within the particles. HE. Bar: 200 μm.
c) GrHA - integrity of granules and scarce neoformation
osteoid restricted to the bone edges. GOLD. Bar: 200 μm. d)
GrHA - Intense chronic granulomatous inflammation surrounding the
granules. HE. Bar: 100 μm. e) DV - Tissue thickness
significantly reduced along the central region of bone defect. HE. Bar:
100 μm. f) DV - Tissue thickness significantly reduced to
the bone edges. HE. Bar: 100 μm. Microspheres (Mi), granules (Gr), loose
conjunctive tissue (LCT), osteoid neoformation (ON), bone edge (BE),
blood capillary (yellow arrows), chronic granulomatous inflammation (red
stars), central vein (CV), dura mater region (DM).
The histomorphometric analysis measured the percentage of mineralized linear
extension (Table 2). The Kruskal-Wallis test
demonstrated statistically significant difference between the 3 groups (MiHA x GrHA
x DV - p=0.007) and between the experimental and control groups -
MiHA x DV (p=0.010) and GrHA x DV (p=0.046). In
the groups which the biomaterials were implanted the Kruskal-Wallis test did not
demonstrate statistically significant difference- MiHA x GrHA
(p=1.00).
Table 2
Histomorphometry of linear extension and mineralized linear
extension.
Groups
LE (mm) Mean(SD)
MLE (mm) Mean(SD)
MLE (%) Mean(SD)
MiHA
7.07(0.30)
1.87(0.69)
26.46(9.78)
GrHA
7.28(0.45)
1.46(0.73)
19.73(9,17)
DV
8.18(0.11)
0.76(0.09)
9.34(1.05)
LE = Linear extension. MLE = Mineralized Linear Extension. SD =
Standard Deviation.
LE = Linear extension. MLE = Mineralized Linear Extension. SD =
Standard Deviation.
Discussion
The bone repair mechanism is a dynamic, temporal and complex phenomenon that depends
on the presence of a three-dimensional scaffold and on the manner in which the bone,
undifferentiated mesenchymal and endothelial cells interact with each other and with
the microenvironment around them. Under the physiological conditions, this event is
consolidated by regeneration. On the other hand, when the tissue loss presents
critical dimensions, extension and morphology, there is impairment of this mechanism
and the tissue repair occurs by fibrosis
,
. Under these conditions, bone regeneration becomes limited, as observed in
the control group (DV) of our study and in other studies
-
. These results validate the simulation of extensive bone loss as it occurs
in cases of congenital pathologies, extensive surgical resections, trauma and severe
inflammatory diseases. In view of these inhospitable conditions, it is evidenced the
need for the use of bone substitutes that make feasible the complete tissue
regeneration.The spatial arrangement of the biomaterials and the neoformed tissues between and
around the particles, in the two implanted groups showed that the microspheres and
granules acted as scaffolds suitable to applications as fillers materials. However,
in view of the almost complete reduction of the neoformed interstitium between the
granules, it is noted that the spatial arrangement of these biomaterials, similar to
the mosaic, interfered in the migration of the cells between the particles during
bone repair. These findings were consonant those were evidenced by Ribeiro
et al.
, who evaluated granules of HA and alginate in the same biological point.The evident presence of neoformed blood vessels surrounding the biomaterials
demonstrates that the materials evaluated were biocompatible and osteoconductive,
independent of the geometric shape, and provided a structure favorable to migration,
adhesion and proliferation cellular, the release of growth factors, angiogenesis and
tissue neoformation
,
,
. Thus, the neoformed osteoid matrix was similarly consolidated in both
groups with implantation of biomaterials (p>0.05).The partial biodegradation of the biomaterials evaluated in this study, most
noticeable in the MiHA, demonstrated the influence of alginate on the materials
that, when coming into contact with fluids and living tissues, was dissolved by
local enzymes and biorreabsorbed. In this way, it induced the gradual release of the
inorganic components of the composite, mainly ions of Ca and PO4,
contained in the crystals of HA. These results contradict those observed by
Barreto
, in which the microspheres of HA and alginate did not undergo evident
biodegradation at the same biological point. This occurred due to the removal of the
polymer from the structure of the microspheres during the calcination process. This
finding can be attributed, in sum, to the size of the microspheres used by
Barreto
in relation to those used in our experiment, 400-600 μm and 250-425 μm,
respectively, because the smaller the particle of the biomaterial, the larger the
superficial area of the material exposed to the biological environment. In view of
these findings, it is noted that the calcination and sintering processes increase
crystallinity, since it favors crystal fusion, aggregation and growth particle,
making them resistant to biodegradation
. Corroborating with this analysis, in the study by Paula et
al.
, non calcined microspheres with 400μm showed partial biodegradation with
deposition of collagen fibers inside the particles. Conversely, in the study
realized by Rossi et al.
. the sintered HA microspheres, with the same size as those used in our
study, did not present expressive biodegradation, at the same biological point.One of the technological innovations presented by the biomaterials evaluated in this
study, in both geometric shape, was the conception of the HA at nanometric scale. As
observed in the MiHA, according to Valenzuela et al.
, the nanostructured HA crystals tend to dissolve (biodegrade) faster because
of the smaller particle size and the larger surface area exposed to the biological
environment.In our study, the chronic granulomatous inflammation, noted in both groups in which
biomaterials were implanted, was compatible with that expected every time a
biomaterial is implanted in the living organism
,
. This finding proves the biocompatibility of the biomaterials, since there
was no rejection by the organism, characterized by acute exacerbated
inflammation
,
. This potentiality can be attributed, mainly, to the physical-chemical
composition of the materials that mimic the inorganic and organic phases of the
natural bone tissue, by HAn and alginate, respectively. On the other hand, the more
evident chronic granulomatous inflammation in the GrHA, in comparison to the MiHA,
reveals that the irregular surface of the granules modulated the cellular response
in the interstice between the particles of the biomaterial
,
. These findings reveal that the geometry of the biomaterials interferes
directly in the tissue response to the presence of the particles
,
.In the study by Ribeiro et al.
the microspheres acted better as filling scaffold and the granules presented
superior osteoconductive potential, contrasting our results. It should be emphasized
which, in that study, the biomaterials had a diameter of 425-600 μm; the granules
contained 1% of alginate; and the biomaterials were synthesized by another way. In
our experiment, the percentage of alginate used was 1.5% and diameter of 250-425 μm,
which may have influenced the tissue response to granules
.Considering that the results of this study are related to the initial phase of the
bone repair mechanism (15 days) and can influence, significantly, subsequent
cellular events, it becomes pressing the need to develop new studies to observe this
response in the long term.
Conclusions
In the initial phase of bone repair, the geometry of the biomaterials influenced the
tissue response to the implantation of HAn and alginate composites. Both
biomaterials exhibited neoformation of osteoid matrix, although the microspheres
exhibited histological characteristics more favorable to bone regeneration than
granules.
Authors: Andre L Rossi; Isabela C Barreto; William Q Maciel; Fabiana P Rosa; Maria H Rocha-Leão; Jacques Werckmann; Alexandre M Rossi; Radovan Borojevic; Marcos Farina Journal: Bone Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Chan Ho Park; Hector F Rios; Qiming Jin; James V Sugai; Miguel Padial-Molina; Andrei D Taut; Colleen L Flanagan; Scott J Hollister; William V Giannobile Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Fúlvio B Miguel; Ana Karina M V Cardoso; Aryon A Barbosa; Elcio Marcantonio; Gilberto Goissis; Fabiana P Rosa Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.368