The electrical conduction system of the heart is essential for maintaining normal
heart rhythm and function. This is due to the presence of specialized cells that
generate electrical impulses that propagate throughout the heart tissue, quickly and
efficiently. This electrical impulse starts at the sinoatrial node (SAN) and
propagates sequentially to atrioventricular node (AVN), subsequently being
transmitted to the ventricles via specialized conduction pathways. The electrical
signals are conducted from cell to cell through a cardiomyocyte permeability control
system formed by proteins called connexins, and connexin-43 is the type found in the
heart and is associated with the formation of so-called gap junctions. By providing
the single electrical connection between the atria and the ventricles, AVN plays an
essential role in the dynamics of cardiac contraction. Clinically, when the PR
interval is observed in the electrocardiographic recordings, we can correlate the
electrical impulse conduction time from its generation in the SAN to the delay in
the AVN region, which is called "decremental conduction".[1] When prolongation of the PR interval or an AV block
occurs, which delays excessively or even eliminates the conduction of the electrical
impulse from the atria to the ventricles, will result in hemodynamic deterioration,
syncope and death, in case the patient is not submitted to the brand
heart.[2]Over the years, several studies have described the macrophages as cells of phagocytic
functions that would exclusively act in the immune system protecting the organism
against pathogens. However, more recently this paradigm was mainly questioned about
the origin of macrophages. Several studies have provided evidence that a
subpopulation of macrophages, which originated from embryonic development and do not
come from the bloodstream, reside and proliferate in virtually all body tissues and
apparently act specifically on each organ. For example, resident macrophages of
adipose tissue contribute to the regulation of thermogenesis,[3] iron recycling in the spleen and
liver,[4] and participate in
the process of synaptic maturation in the healthy brain.[5] Such non-canonical activities emphasize the
functional diversity of macrophages and their ability to perform specific tasks in
the various tissues, in addition to host defence.[6] In cardiac tissue, macrophages are intrinsic components of
the myocardium in normal functioning, where they appear as spindle cells
intercalated between cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells.[7]
Macrophages and the heartbeat
Cardiac function depends on the appropriate moment of contraction in several
distinct regions, as well as the heart rate.[8] Hulsmans et al.[9] observed that mice that had their macrophage fauna
weakened, had bradycardia and irregular beats. It is known that connexin-43 is
predominant in ventricles of humans and that its reduction promotes bradycardia
and AV block,[8] thus, in
observing specialized cells in non-muscular electrical conduction, they found
that macrophages are electrically coupled to cardiomyocytes and that these
resident macrophages facilitate electrical conduction through the AV node.Such conducting cells interleave with macrophages expressing connexin-43 forming
additional gap junctions between cardiomyocytes (Figure 1). The investigators observed that the animals that had a
reduction of resident macrophages, besides having bradycardia, had AV blockade
of 2nd and 3rd degrees (Figure
2),[9] whose cause
in humans is still unknown.[10]
Another intriguing point is that cardiac macrophages have a resting membrane
potential of -35 mV on average and depolarize in synchrony with cardiomyocytes.
This makes the membrane potential at the rest of the cardiomyocytes more
positive and according to the results obtained by computational simulation,
accelerate both depolarization and repolarization phases.[9] The cardioprotective role of
cardiac resident macrophages can go beyond the modulation of the
electrophysiological properties of the coupled cardiomyocytes. The perivascular
localization of cardiac macrophages makes them uniquely positioned to interpret
systemic signals in the bloodstream.[10]
Figure 1
The normal condition of macrophage-cardiomyocyte couplings.
Communications between cardiomyocytes and macrophages through
connexin-43 (A) promoting normal cardiac rhythm (B).
Figure 2
Reduction in the expression of connexins. The coupling between
macrophages and cardiomyocytes is decreased due to the reduction of
connexin-43 (A) expression promoting electrical conduction
pathologies (atrioventricular block of 3º degree - B).
The normal condition of macrophage-cardiomyocyte couplings.
Communications between cardiomyocytes and macrophages through
connexin-43 (A) promoting normal cardiac rhythm (B).Reduction in the expression of connexins. The coupling between
macrophages and cardiomyocytes is decreased due to the reduction of
connexin-43 (A) expression promoting electrical conduction
pathologies (atrioventricular block of 3º degree - B).
Macrophages and cardiovascular diseases
Monnerat et al.[11] demonstrated
that inflammation caused by type I diabetes causes resident macrophages to
secrete interleukin 1β (IL-1β), acting in a paracrine manner,
increasing oxidative stress in the surrounding cells and destabilizing the
electrical activity of cardiomyocytes provoking lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
Moreover, atherosclerotic lesions are currently understood as inducers of
important inflammatory processes, which comprise components of the innate and
acquired immune systems. Clinical data showed that increased leukocyte count,
interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and IL-1β were at risk
of more severe cardiovascular events.In fact, IL-6 is locally regulated during the coronary occlusion process in
patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.[12-14]Thus, a possible bias is one in which macrophages contribute to the arrhythmic
complications of infectious, atherosclerotic and septicemic diseases, in which
their inflammatory responses may interfere with their role in modulating
electrical conduction of the cardiomyocyte.[11,12,15] Research has shown that sepsis
is associated with an increased risk of acute and fatal coronary disease, but
its cause is still a matter of debate, and acute coronary disease prevention may
be an important consideration in post-sepsis medical care.[16,17]Despite significant advances in prevention and treatment, cardiovascular diseases
(CVD) continue to be the most common cause of death in the world. In fact,
severe heart failure is more prevalent than cancer.[18] Several studies have demonstrated that
pathological cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in heart failure are accompanied
by a systemic inflammatory response, infiltration and activation of cells of the
immune system.[19] In view of
this, immunotherapies for cardiovascular diseases are on the rise.The first cardiovascular immunotherapy was developed for the treatment of
hypercholesterolemia and its positive results paved the way for the clinical
evaluation of anti-inflammatory immunotherapy directed to interleukin 1β.
CANTOS (Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study) has shown that
subcutaneous injections of canakinumab (ACZ885), a human monoclonal antibody
that selectively neutralizes IL-1β, significantly reduced levels of
systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients after acute myocardial infarction,
reducing risk cardiovascular disease in patients with previous heart attack and
inflammatory atherosclerosis.[20] Another study using CANTOS reinforces this idea and
provides strong evidence that the modulation of the IL-6-induced signaling
pathway induced by IL-1α is associated with reduced rates of
cardiovascular changes and mortality.[13]It is clear that further studies should be performed to address the actual
involvement of resident macrophages in heart diseases. If alterations in
macrophages' function are linked to these clinical conditions, immunotherapy
with macrophage reprogramming in situ could be a reliable form
of therapeutic strategy that could be applied to ensure normal cardiac rhythm in
patients with signs of arrhythmia.[20,21] However, what
we know so far is that resident macrophages act as "masters", orchestrating the
heart rate.
Authors: Henry E Wang; Justin X Moore; John P Donnelly; Emily B Levitan; Monika M Safford Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Gustavo Monnerat; Micaela L Alarcón; Luiz R Vasconcellos; Camila Hochman-Mendez; Guilherme Brasil; Rosana A Bassani; Oscar Casis; Daniela Malan; Leonardo H Travassos; Marisa Sepúlveda; Juan Ignacio Burgos; Martin Vila-Petroff; Fabiano F Dutra; Marcelo T Bozza; Claudia N Paiva; Adriana Bastos Carvalho; Adriana Bonomo; Bernd K Fleischmann; Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho; Emiliano Medei Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Claes Held; Harvey D White; Ralph A H Stewart; Andrzej Budaj; Christopher P Cannon; Judith S Hochman; Wolfgang Koenig; Agneta Siegbahn; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Joseph Soffer; W Douglas Weaver; Ollie Östlund; Lars Wallentin Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Michael J Davis; Tiffany M Tsang; Yafeng Qiu; Jeremy K Dayrit; Joudeh B Freij; Gary B Huffnagle; Michal A Olszewski Journal: MBio Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Igor Theurl; Ingo Hilgendorf; Manfred Nairz; Piotr Tymoszuk; David Haschka; Malte Asshoff; Shun He; Louisa M S Gerhardt; Tobias A W Holderried; Markus Seifert; Sieghart Sopper; Ashley M Fenn; Atsushi Anzai; Sara Rattik; Cameron McAlpine; Milan Theurl; Peter Wieghofer; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Georg F Weber; Nina K Harder; Benjamin G Chousterman; Tara L Arvedson; Mary McKee; Fudi Wang; Oliver M D Lutz; Emanuele Rezoagli; Jodie L Babitt; Lorenzo Berra; Marco Prinz; Matthias Nahrendorf; Guenter Weiss; Ralph Weissleder; Herbert Y Lin; Filip K Swirski Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 53.440