| Literature DB >> 27428900 |
Igor Theurl1,2,3, Ingo Hilgendorf1,2,4, Manfred Nairz1,2, Piotr Tymoszuk3, David Haschka3, Malte Asshoff3, Shun He1,2, Louisa M S Gerhardt1,2, Tobias A W Holderried5, Markus Seifert3, Sieghart Sopper6, Ashley M Fenn1,2, Atsushi Anzai1,2, Sara Rattik1,2, Cameron McAlpine1,2, Milan Theurl7, Peter Wieghofer8,9, Yoshiko Iwamoto1,2, Georg F Weber1,2, Nina K Harder1,2, Benjamin G Chousterman1,2, Tara L Arvedson10, Mary McKee1,11, Fudi Wang12, Oliver M D Lutz13, Emanuele Rezoagli14, Jodie L Babitt1,11, Lorenzo Berra14, Marco Prinz8,15, Matthias Nahrendorf1,2, Guenter Weiss3, Ralph Weissleder1,2,16, Herbert Y Lin1,11, Filip K Swirski1,2.
Abstract
Iron is an essential component of the erythrocyte protein hemoglobin and is crucial to oxygen transport in vertebrates. In the steady state, erythrocyte production is in equilibrium with erythrocyte removal. In various pathophysiological conditions, however, erythrocyte life span is compromised severely, which threatens the organism with anemia and iron toxicity. Here we identify an on-demand mechanism that clears erythrocytes and recycles iron. We show that monocytes that express high levels of lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus C1 (LY6C1, also known as Ly-6C) ingest stressed and senescent erythrocytes, accumulate in the liver via coordinated chemotactic cues, and differentiate into ferroportin 1 (FPN1, encoded by SLC40A1)-expressing macrophages that can deliver iron to hepatocytes. Monocyte-derived FPN1(+)Tim-4(neg) macrophages are transient, reside alongside embryonically derived T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain containing 4 (Timd4, also known as Tim-4)(high) Kupffer cells (KCs), and depend on the growth factor Csf1 and the transcription factor Nrf2 (encoded by Nfe2l2). The spleen, likewise, recruits iron-loaded Ly-6C(high) monocytes, but these do not differentiate into iron-recycling macrophages, owing to the suppressive action of Csf2. The accumulation of a transient macrophage population in the liver also occurs in mouse models of hemolytic anemia, anemia of inflammation, and sickle cell disease. Inhibition of monocyte recruitment to the liver during stressed erythrocyte delivery leads to kidney and liver damage. These observations identify the liver as the primary organ that supports rapid erythrocyte removal and iron recycling, and uncover a mechanism by which the body adapts to fluctuations in erythrocyte integrity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27428900 PMCID: PMC4957133 DOI: 10.1038/nm.4146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440
Figure 1Myeloid cells in the liver are the major scavengers of stressed erythrocytes
(a) Ex vivo labeling of isolated erythrocytes (Ter119+) and their identification (pkh26+) amongst all erythrocytes 0.01 h after i.v. injection into congenic recipients. Means ± SEM; [n = 5 per group]. (b) Total number of CD45+ WBC that have ingested pkh26-labeled sRBC 16 h after delivery. Means ± SEM; [n = 5 per group, except peritoneum n = 3; *** P < 0.001 compared to each of the other organs; Anova and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test]. (c) Representative dot plots (1 of 3 experiments) and (d) quantification showing the effects of splenectomy, hepatectomy, and a combination thereof on the distribution of pkh26+ Ter119+ CD45− cells in the circulation 0.01 h and 16 h after sRBC delivery. sRBC (white circles) or young RBC (yRBC, grey circles) were injected 1 d after surgery. Means ± SEM; [n = 4 for the yRBC, splenectomy and sham groups; n = 3 for hepatectomy and for hepatectomy combined with splenectomy; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 compared to young RBC (yRBC); Anova and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test]. (e) Representative dot plots (1 of 3 experiments) showing gating for F4/80high CD11bint KC, F4/80low CD11bhigh monocytes (Mo)/neutrophils (Neu) and F4/80high CD11bhigh tMΦ in the liver and F4/80high CD11bint/low RPM, F4/80low CD11bhigh Mo/Neu, and F4/80high CD11bhigh tMΦ in the spleen in steady state (0 h), 16 h, and 72 h after sRBC challenge. All cells gated as CD45+ Lin− (CD3, CD19, NK1.1) leukocytes in liver and spleen 16 h after ghost challenge (on the right). (f) Dynamics of indicated leukocyte populations in liver (left) and spleen (right) after sRBC challenge. Means ± SD; [n = 6 for time-point 0, n = 3 for all other time-points]. (g) Representative dot plots (1 of 3 experiments) showing uptake of pkh26+ sRBC in liver and spleen by KC, RPM, tMΦ, and Mo/Neu 16 h after delivery. (h) Cytoplasmic pkh26 staining in KC, RPM, and tMΦ sorted from the liver and spleen 16 h after sRBC delivery. Blue denotes nuclei with DAPI staining and red denotes pkh26-sRBC. (i) Dynamics of iron content measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in sorted leukocyte populations in liver (left) and spleen (right) after sRBC challenge (each sample pooled from 3–6 mice). (j) Transmission electron microscopy of a liver section, 16 h after sRBC challenge, showing peri-hepatocellular leukocyte infiltrate surrounding RBC (arrows).
Figure 2Ly-6Chigh monocytes differentiate to FPN1+ macrophages for transient erythrocyte removal
(a) Representative dot plots (1 of 3 experiments) showing FPN1 expression in steady state (4 panels on the left) in different WBC populations of the liver and spleen and 16 h after sRBC challenge (6 panels on the right), Means ± SEM; [n = 5 per group]. (b) Representative dot plot (1 of 2 experiments) overlays showing adoptively transferred GFP+ Ly-6Chigh (red) and Ly-6Clow (blue) monocytes differentiating in the liver and spleen at 16 h and 72 h after sRBC challenge. Gray dots represent endogenous populations in the overlay. An overlay of monocytes in the blood 0.01 h after transfer is shown on the left. (c) Parabiosis experiment outline and graphs showing time course of chimerism for circulating monocytes, KC, and RPM in steady state (control) and after sRBC challenge. Means ± SEM; [n = 4 per group and time point; * P < 0.05; Mann-Whitney test]). (d) Iron and immune-specific gene expression in sRBC-loaded and unloaded KC and liver tMΦ 16 h after sRBC challenge. Representative dot plots on the left show gating strategy for cell isolation. Green = low expression. Red = high expression. (e) Scheme and data of formal lineage tracing experiments involving Cx3cr1-CreERT2 females crossed with R26-tdT males. (f) Whole-genome expression profiling in mKC and eKC [n = 3 per group]. Volcano plot depicts -log10 Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p-value versus log2 fold-regulation for each gene. Genes significantly augmented (pBenjamini-Hochberg < 0.1 and fold regulation > 1.5) in mKC and eKC are highlighted in green and red, respectively. (g) Tim-4 cell surface expression in liver KC and monocytes in steady state (0 h) and 7 d after sRBC challenge. Representative dot plots (1 of 3 experiments).
Figure 3Csf1 and Nrf2 are essential to FPN1+ macrophage generation
(a) Csf1, (b) Csf2 mRNA expression, and (c) the ratio of Csf1 to Csf2 in liver and spleen in steady state and 6 h after challenge with either sRBC, ghosts or PBS control. Means ± SEM; [n = 8 control and sRBC, n = 6 ghosts; ***P < 0.001 Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test comparing all groups to controls]. (d) Slc40a1 mRNA expression on mouse Ly-6Chigh monocytes cultured with recombinant (r) Csf1, rCsf2, and sRBC. Means ± SEM; [n = 3 per group; *** P < 0.001 unpaired two-tailed t-test comparing Csf1 and Csf2-incubated monocytes for each condition]. Rps29 is the housekeeping gene. (e) SLC40A1 mRNA expression on human CD14high CD16− monocytes cultured with rCSF1, rCSF2, and sRBC. Means ± SEM;; [n = 6 per group; ***P < 0.001 Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test comparing Csf1 and Csf2-incubated monocytes for each condition]. (f) Slc40a1 mRNA expression on Ly-6Chigh monocytes cultured with rCsf1 and decreasing doses of rCsf2, with sRBC. Means ± SEM; [n = 5 per group, except Csf2 0.01 ng/ml group, n = 3; *** P < 0.001, **P < 0.01 compared to rCsf1-cultured monocytes; Anova and Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test]. (g) Slc40a1 mRNA expression on mouse Ly-6Chigh monocytes sorted from WT and Nrf2−/− mice and cultured with rCsf, rCsf2, and sRBC. Means ± SEM, ***P ≤ 0.001 compared to rCsf1-cultured monocytes for the same strain; Mann Whitney U test (n = 5 per group, except Nrf2−/− Csf2 group, n = 4). (h) Representative dot blots (1 of 3 experiments) and (i) quantification of KC and tMΦ in liver of WT mice in the steady state (white bars), and 16 h after sRBC challenge in WT mice, WT mice treated with the c-fms tyrosine kinase inhibitor Ki20227 (Csf1 inh.) and Nrf2−/− mice (grey bars). Means ± SEM; [n = 3 for WT control, WT sRBC, and WT sRBC/Ki20227; n = 4 for Nrf2−/− sRBC; ***P < 0.001 compared to sRBC-challenged WT mice; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test].
Figure 4The on-demand mechanism preserves homeostasis
(a) Ccl2 (left) and Ccl3 (right) mRNA levels in the liver and spleen in response to sRBC or PBS. Means ± SEM; [n = 6 per group; ***P < 0.001; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test]. (b) Quantification showing the effect of Ccr2 and Ccr5 antagonists (ant) on Ly-6Chigh monocyte and tMΦ numbers in liver, spleen, blood, and bone marrow 16 h after sRBC challenge. Means ± SEM; [n = 10 Ant, n = 9 (sRBC bone marrow), n = 10 (sRBC/ant bone marrow), n = 14 all other groups (liver, spleen, blood); ****P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and * P < 0.05; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test]. (c) Quantification showing the effect of Ccr2 and Ccr5 antagonist treatment on pkh26+ Ter119+ CD45− cell retention, as a fraction of the entire erythrocyte pool in the circulation 16 h after sRBC challenge. Means ± SEM; [n = 4 per group; *P < 0.05; Mann-Whitney U test]. (d) Effect of Ccr2 and Ccr5 antagonists (ant) on enhanced labile plasma iron (eLPI) levels in mice challenged with sRBC or controls. Means ± SEM; [n = 8 Ant, n = 9 sRBC, n = 7 sRBC/Ant; ** P < 0.001; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test]. (e) Effect of Ccr2 and Ccr5 antagonists (Ant) on hemopexin and haptoglobin mRNA levels in the livers of mice challenged with sRBC or controls. Means ± SEM; [n = 4 per group; * P < 0.05; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test]. (f) Effect of Ccr2 and Ccr5 antagonists (Ant) on liver transaminase ALT, AST, Amylase, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) activities and levels in serum 16 h after sRBC challenge. Means ± SEM; [n = 4 per group; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; Anova Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison test]. (g) Prussian blue staining on kidneys (nephron) from the three groups listed above. Iron depositions appear in blue, hemosiderin appears brown.