Literature DB >> 30843475

Running biomechanics as measured by wearable sensors: effects of speed and surface.

Christina R Hollis1, Rachel M Koldenhoven2, Jacob E Resch2, Jay Hertel2.   

Abstract

Running biomechanics research has traditionally occurred in the laboratory, but with the advent of wearable sensors measurement of running biomechanics may shift outside the laboratory. The purpose was to determine if RunScribe™ wearable sensors could detect differences in kinematic, kinetic and spatiotemporal measures during runs at two speeds and on two different surfaces. Fifteen recreational runners (7 males, 8 females; age = 20.0 ± 3.1 years) participated. While wearing sensors on the heels of their shoes, participants completed four 1600 m runs on both track and grass surfaces. On each surface, the first 1600 m was at a self-selected slow speed followed by the second 1600 m at a self-selected fast pace. The sensors quantified several kinetic, kinematic and spatiotemporal measures. Repeated measures ANOVAs compared the effects of surface and speed. The spatiotemporal measures of stride length, cycle time and contact time were predictably affected by increased running speed and increased surface stiffness, as were the kinematic and kinetic measurements of maximum pronation velocity, maximum pronation excursion, impact g, and braking g (p < 0.050). The RunScribe™ sensors identified expected changes in running biomechanics measures at different speeds and on varying surfaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinematics; kinetics; pronation; spatiotemporal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30843475     DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2019.1579366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  6 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units on Lower Extremity Kinematics During Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Zeng; Yue Liu; Xiaoyue Hu; Meihua Tang; Lin Wang
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement.

Authors:  Max Lewin; Carina Price; Christopher Nester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Mechanical Power in Endurance Running: A Scoping Review on Sensors for Power Output Estimation during Running.

Authors:  Diego Jaén-Carrillo; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Antonio Cartón-Llorente; Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Neuromuscular, biomechanical, and energetic adjustments following repeated bouts of downhill running.

Authors:  Arash Khassetarash; Gianluca Vernillo; Renata L Krüger; W Brent Edwards; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 13.077

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.