Literature DB >> 30842989

Mechanisms of Osteoblastic Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Role of Prostatic Acid Phosphatase.

Mariana Quiroz-Munoz1, Sudeh Izadmehr2,3, Dushyanthy Arumugam1, Beatrice Wong1, Alexander Kirschenbaum4, Alice C Levine1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) preferentially metastasizes to bone, leading to complications including severe pain, fractures, spinal cord compression, bone marrow suppression, and a mortality of ∼70%. In spite of recent advances in chemo-, hormonal, and radiation therapies, bone-metastatic, castrate-resistant PCa is incurable. PCa is somewhat unique among the solid tumors in its tendency to produce osteoblastic lesions composed of hypermineralized bone with multiple layers of poorly organized type I collagen fibrils that have reduced mechanical strength. Many of the signaling pathways that control normal bone homeostasis are at play in pathologic PCa bone metastases, including the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB/receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand/osteoprotegerin system. A number of PCa-derived soluble factors have been shown to induce the dysfunctional osteoblastic phenotype. However, therapies directed at these osteoblastic-stimulating proteins have yielded disappointing clinical results to date. One of the soluble factors expressed by PCa cells, particularly in bone metastases, is prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Human PAP is a prostate epithelium-specific secretory protein that was the first tumor marker ever described. Biologically, PAP exhibits both phosphatase activity and ecto-5'-nucleotidase activity, generating extracellular phosphate and adenosine as the final products. Accumulating evidence indicates that PAP plays a causal role in the osteoblastic phenotype and aberrant bone mineralization seen in bone-metastatic, castrate-resistant PCa. Targeting PAP may represent a therapeutic approach to improve morbidity and mortality from PCa osteoblastic bone metastases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone metastases; osteoblastic lesions; osteoblasts; prostate cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 30842989      PMCID: PMC6397422          DOI: 10.1210/js.2018-00425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocr Soc        ISSN: 2472-1972


Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed male malignancy in developed countries. Although the prevalence of PCa is high, only a fraction of these cases metastasizes and results in mortality [1]. Although the 5-year survival rate for localized PCa is close to 100%, metastatic, castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC) has a high mortality rate. Even with the use of newly approved chemo-, hormonal, and radioisotope therapies, ~30,000 deaths will be caused by mCRPC in 2018, according to the American Cancer Society [2]. Ninety percent of men with mCRPC have bone-metastatic disease (bmCRPC) [3]. PCa preferentially metastasizes to bone, leading to complications including severe pain, fractures, spinal cord compression, bone marrow suppression, and a mortality of ∼70% [4, 5]. In spite of recent advances in direct antitumor therapy for advanced disease, bmCRPC is presently an incurable disorder. Over the past several decades, bone-targeted therapies have been used to interrupt the crosstalk between PCa and bone cells. PCa bone lesions have an initial and ongoing osteolytic component similar to other solid tumor-bone metastases. PCa is somewhat unique in its tendency to produce osteoblastic (OB) lesions. Increased OB activity leads to increased bone formation; however, the process is erratic and culminates in a structurally weaker product that is more prone to pathological fractures [6, 7]. Osteoclast-targeting drugs are currently approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events associated with PCa bone metastases [8, 9]. However, these therapies have not been shown to prolong overall survival. A better understanding of the PCa and bone-derived factors that contribute to the lethal phenotype of bmCRPC, particularly those associated with OB lesions, is needed to develop treatments that will reduce morbidity and improve overall survival. Metastasis involves multiple steps including invasion, colonization, and proliferation of PCa cells in the bone microenvironment. As first described by Stephen Paget [10], the factors that control bone targeting and PCa growth in bone are derived from both the seed (PCa) and the soil (bone cells). Once PCa cells are established in bone, they interact with osteoclasts; osteoblasts and osteocytes set up a vicious cycle that ultimately results in OB lesions composed of hypermineralized bone with multiple layers of poorly organized type I collagen fibrils that have reduced mechanical strength [11]. Activated osteoblasts, in turn, stimulate PCa growth in bone. There are multiple secretory factors, steroid hormones, and steroid hormone receptors that influence this crosstalk [12]. In addition, secretory kinases and phosphatases may affect the aberrant mineralization seen in these lesions by increasing phosphate and calcium availability and/or modulating the activity of key proteins involved in bone mineralization.

1. Methods

A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar, up to 1 December 2018, to identify studies that investigated mechanisms of PAP, osteoblastic bone metastases and management in prostate cancer. The following keywords were used in the search: prostate cancer and bone metastases, osteoblastic, osteolytic, animal models, PAP, receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL), or osteoprotegerin (OPG). Search results were manually curated, evaluated for relevance, and recorded. Publications referenced were selected based on the quality scientific methodology and relevance.

2. Prostate Cancer Osteoblastic Bone Metastases

A. Models of PCa OB Bone Metastases

Preclinical models that faithfully reproduce PCa bone lesions are essential to gaining a functional understanding of bone-PCa interactions. Existing xenograft models of PCa bone metastases have been developed through a variety of injection approaches to study the processes of bone targeting (i.e., lateral tail vein, intracardiac, orthotopic, femoral artery injection) and PCa growth/bone reaction (i.e., intraosseous injection). The model systems that study bone targeting have been less successful than the intraosseous model that recapitulates the final phase of PCa disease progression. For example, PC3 cells have a 20% to 89% take rate in bone after intracardiac injection, and 19% after intravenous injection compared with 60% to 100% after intraosseous injection [13]. The intraosseous technique has proven to be a reproducible approach for studying tumor-bone interactions and factors governing the bone reaction. Table 1 summarizes the distinguishing features of human PCa xenograft models using intraosseous injection of bone metastases [14-20].
Table 1.

Intraosseous Xenograft Models of Prostate

Cell LineOriginType of Bone MetastasisAndrogen
SensitivePSAPAPCKModel SystemReferences
VCaPVertebral metastasis from 59-y-old Caucasian maleOsteoblasticYesYesYes8 and 18Intraosseous SCID modelsKorenchuk et al. [14]
LNCaPSupraclavicular lymph node metastasis from 50-y-old Caucasian maleOsteoblasticYesYesYes8 and 18Intracardiac, intraosseous, orthotopic NOD- SCID, and SCID modelsHoroszewicz et al. [15], Thalmann et al. [16], Wu et al. [17], Simmons et al. [18]
LNCaP-C4-2BHighly metastatic variant of LNCaP; isolated from LNCaP xenograft metastatic lesionOsteoblasticYesYesYes8Intraosseous and subcutaneous NOD-SCID and SCID modelsThalmann et al. [16], Wu et al., Simmons et al. [18]
DU145Brain metastasis from 69-y-old Caucasian maleOsteolyticNoNoYes8Intraosseous NOD-SCID and SCID modelsStone et al. [19]
PC3Bone metastasis from 62-y-old Caucasian maleOsteolyticNoNoNo7, 8, 18, 19Intracardiac, intraosseous, intravenous, orthotopic, and subcutaneous SCID and NOD-SCID modelsSimmons et al. [18], Kaighn et al. [20]
PC3MHighly metastatic variant of PC3; isolated from PC3 xenograft metastatic lesionOsteolyticNoNoNo18Intracardiac, orthotopic, and intraosseous NOD-SCID modelsSimmons et al. [18]
Intraosseous Xenograft Models of Prostate Of the available cell lines and xenograft models, the one that most closely reproduces bmCRPC in patients is intratibial inoculation of the VCaP cell line into immunocompromised mice. VCaP cells maintain androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) expression, and induce an OB phenotype [14]. In addition, VCaP cells harbor a chromosomal gene rearrangement of transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) that contains an androgen-responsive promoter and the ETS-related gene (ERG). This gene rearrangement leads to androgen-regulated expression of the oncogene ERG that has been demonstrated in >50% of human PCa cases. Several clinical studies suggest that TMPRSS2:ERG fusions are associated both with poorly differentiated samples (Gleason score >6) and with disease recurrence after surgery. Further, TMPRSS2:ERG fusion has been reported to enhance the ability of PCa cell lines to induce OB lesions by stimulating bone formation and inhibiting the osteolytic response [21].

B. The Role of the RANK/RANKL/Osteoprotegerin Signaling Pathway in PCa Bone Metastases

Many of the factors that control bone homeostasis are at play in pathologic PCa bone metastases. In normal bone remodeling, osteoblasts mediate osteoclast differentiation and function by secreting (i) RANKL, which induces osteoclast differentiation when bound to the RANK receptor on osteoclasts; and (ii) OPG, a decoy receptor that binds to RANKL and inhibits its activity. Previous reports demonstrate that PCa cells in bone express RANK, RANKL, and OPG and communicate directly with bone cells via this same signaling pathway [22]. High RANKL in the bone microenvironment favors osteolysis and promotes PCa growth in bone. Osteolysis releases PCa growth-promoting factors from the bone matrix including TGF-β, IGF-1, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), and platelet-derived growth factors (Fig. 1). The RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway is also involved in OB bone metastases. High levels of OPG are associated with end-stage OB bone metastases, and serum OPG levels are the most reliable indicator of such lesions (Fig. 2). Recently, it has been shown that maturing osteoclasts secrete vesicular RANK that binds to OB RANKL and promotes bone formation by triggering RANKL reverse signaling and activating Runt-related transcription factor 2 [23]. It is plausible that vesicular RANK derived from PCa cells in bone has a similar effect on pathologic bone formation in OB PCa metastases.
Figure 1.

Key players in the osteolytic phase of PCa bone metastases. Prostate cancer tumor cells interact with all of the components of bone including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and bone matrix though paracrine (green arrow), autocrine (blue arrow), and inhibitory (red line) mechanisms. PCa cells secrete osteoclast-activating factors, such as RANKL, that activate bone resorption. Osteolysis releases PCa growth-promoting factors from the bone matrix, including TGF-β, IGF-1, MMPs, FGFs, BMPs, and PDGFs. A variety of other cancer-derived and bone cell–derived secretory factors contribute to the initial and ongoing osteolytic phase of PCa bone metastases. PAP secreted by PCa cells in bone indirectly inhibits osteoclasts by decreasing RANKL, while increasing OPG in the bone niche. PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor.

Figure 2.

Key players in the osteoblastic phase of prostate cancer bone metastases. In the osteoblastic phase, PCa cells continue to interact with all of the components of bone, although paracrine (green arrow) and autocrine (blue arrow) mechanisms as noted. A number of PCa-derived soluble factors such as ET-1, WNTs, TGF-β, uPA, IGF-1, FGFs, and BMPs have been shown to induce the dysfunctional osteoblastic phenotype. High levels of OPG are associated with end-stage OB bone metastases. PAP secreted by PCa cells in bone has both autocrine and paracrine effects that coordinately result in higher OPG/RANKL in the bone niche, resulting in osteoblastic lesions. ET-1, endothelin-1.

Key players in the osteolytic phase of PCa bone metastases. Prostate cancer tumor cells interact with all of the components of bone including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and bone matrix though paracrine (green arrow), autocrine (blue arrow), and inhibitory (red line) mechanisms. PCa cells secrete osteoclast-activating factors, such as RANKL, that activate bone resorption. Osteolysis releases PCa growth-promoting factors from the bone matrix, including TGF-β, IGF-1, MMPs, FGFs, BMPs, and PDGFs. A variety of other cancer-derived and bone cell–derived secretory factors contribute to the initial and ongoing osteolytic phase of PCa bone metastases. PAP secreted by PCa cells in bone indirectly inhibits osteoclasts by decreasing RANKL, while increasing OPG in the bone niche. PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor. Key players in the osteoblastic phase of prostate cancer bone metastases. In the osteoblastic phase, PCa cells continue to interact with all of the components of bone, although paracrine (green arrow) and autocrine (blue arrow) mechanisms as noted. A number of PCa-derived soluble factors such as ET-1, WNTs, TGF-β, uPA, IGF-1, FGFs, and BMPs have been shown to induce the dysfunctional osteoblastic phenotype. High levels of OPG are associated with end-stage OB bone metastases. PAP secreted by PCa cells in bone has both autocrine and paracrine effects that coordinately result in higher OPG/RANKL in the bone niche, resulting in osteoblastic lesions. ET-1, endothelin-1.

C. PCa-Derived Factors That Promote the OB Phenotype

A number of PCa-derived soluble factors such as endothelin-1, IGF-1, WNTs, TGF-β, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), FGFs, and BMPs have been shown to induce the dysfunctional OB phenotype [24-30]. In addition, a high OPG state inhibits osteolysis and promotes PCa cell survival (Fig. 2). However, therapies directed at these OB-stimulating factors have yielded disappointing clinical results to date. Mortality from PCa can be directly linked to these OB lesions, both in terms of the stimulatory effect of activated osteoblasts on PCa growth in bone as well as the destructive effect of hypermineralized bone on the bone marrow.

3. The Role of PAP in Osteoblastic Bone Metastases

A. PAP and Osteoblast Activation

One of the soluble factors expressed by PCa cells, particularly in bone metastases, is PAP. Human PAP is a prostate epithelium-specific secretory protein that is found in large amounts in seminal fluid (1 mg/mL). The precise physiologic function of PAP has not been delineated, although given the very high levels in seminal fluid, it is thought to play a role in male reproduction. PAP was the first human tumor marker ever described in 1936 [31] in a publication that demonstrated high PAP levels in patients with PCa OB bone metastases. Huggins and Hodges [32] reported that castration dramatically reduced PCa OB bone metastases and concomitantly lowered serum PAP levels. Although PSA has largely replaced PAP as a tumor marker, PAP has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in advanced PCa [33, 34]. PAP is a phosphotyrosyl-protein phosphatase [35] with multiple phosphomonoester substrates that functions at an optimum pH range of 4.0 to 6.0 [36]. There are two different isoforms of PAP that result from alternate splicing of the same gene product: (i) a secreted isoform and (ii) a transmembrane isoform [37]. The secreted enzyme PAP is a glycoprotein, nonspecific tyrosine phosphatase, constituted in its active form as a 100-kDa dimer composed of two subunits of 50 kDa [38]. Biologically, PAP exhibits both phosphatase activity [39] and ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity [40], generating extracellular phosphate [41] and adenosine [42] as the final products. A possible causal role for PAP in OB bone metastases was postulated when it was demonstrated that PAP stimulated collagen synthesis and alkaline phosphatase content of isolated bone cells [43]. Our group demonstrated that PAP is highly expressed in human PCa bone metastases, even after castration therapy, and stimulates preosteoblast proliferation and differentiation [44]. Our data further indicate that PAP effects on bone metastases are mediated in an autocrine and paracrine fashion by modulation of the RANK/RANKL/OPG system. Knockdown or overexpression of PAP in VCaP or PC3M cell lines, respectively, altered the bone phenotype and tumor growth in bone by disrupting the balance between OPG/RANKL in favor of OPG, resulting in an OB bone reaction. These findings suggest that PAP secreted by PCa cells in bone has both autocrine and paracrine effects that coordinately result in OB lesions [45].

B. PAP and Mineralization

The PAP gene, acid phosphatase prostate, is expressed in various tissues, including the testes and oviducts of chickens. Eggshell formation occurs in the specialized shell gland region of the chicken oviduct. The process of shell mineralization in hens is very similar to that of bone mineralization in humans, occurring in stages that include the formation of calcium carbonate depositions, its aggregation as crystals, and its organization by organic matrix. Comparison of gene expression in the shell glands from juvenile and laying hens demonstrated genes for which there was no a priori expectation of differential gene expression including the PAP gene acid phosphatase prostate [46]. In addition, quantitative proteomics to study key stages of shell mineralization revealed that PAP protein expression was overabundant throughout the process of shell formation [47]. Similarly, PAP induced calcium deposit formation in a human osteoblast cell line [48], suggesting that PAP directly stimulates bone mineralization.

C. Possible Mechanisms Underlying PAP Effects on Bone Mineralization

Bone formation involves the synthesis of collagenous organic matrix (by osteoblasts) followed by mineralization of the matrix [49] through formation of hydroxyapatite-based mineral (calcium and phosphate). Small integrin-binding ligand, N-linked glycoproteins (SIBLING) proteins generally serve to inhibit bone mineralization. The SIBLING proteins include osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, dentin matrix protein 1, dentin sialophosphoprotein, and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein [50]. When SIBLING proteins are phosphorylated by the secretory kinase FAM20C [51], mineralization is suppressed. The inactivation of FAM20C kinase leads to dephosphorylation of SIBLING proteins, resulting in abnormal bone mineralization [52]. Inactivation of a secretory kinase (e.g., FAM20C) might produce the same phenotype as increased activity of a secretory phosphatase (e.g., PAP): dephosphorylation of key sites on SIBLING proteins leading to increased bone mineralization. In addition, via its ecto-5′-nucleotidase activity, PAP generates both extracellular phosphate and adenosine as final products. Adenosine has been reported to increase bone formation via G-protein coupled receptors on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, specifically adenosine receptor types 2A and 2B [53, 54]. Taken together, there are at least three possible mechanisms whereby increased PAP in the OB niche might lead to aberrantly mineralized bone: (i) increased generation of extracellular adenosine that stimulates bone formation via adenosine receptor types 2A and 2B; (ii) increased availability of local phosphate; and (iii) dephosphorylation of key sites on SIBLING proteins. All of these would serve to increase formation of hydroxyapatite, inducing bone formation [55] and mineralization [56], and additionally restricting bone resorption [57].

4. Summary and Conclusions

bmCRPC is presently an incurable disease. The majority of bmCRPCs are OB with increased, aberrant bone mineralization. A variety of PCa and bone cell–derived factors have been demonstrated to play a role in the destructive crosstalk in advanced lesions, but targeting them has not led to improvements in overall survival. PAP, the first tumor marker ever described, is highly expressed in bmCRPC. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that PAP plays a causal role in OB bone metastases by increasing bone formation and mineralization. Because both secretory and transmembrane forms of PAP are highly expressed in advanced disease, PAP may be a viable therapeutic target in OB PCa bone metastases.
  54 in total

1.  Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. 1941.

Authors:  Charles Huggins; Clarence V Hodges
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Cooperative kinetics of human prostatic acid phosphatase.

Authors:  E Luchter-Wasylewska
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2001-08-13

3.  Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients.

Authors:  L Bubendorf; A Schöpfer; U Wagner; G Sauter; H Moch; N Willi; T C Gasser; M J Mihatsch
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Crystal structure of human prostatic acid phosphatase .

Authors:  C G Jakob; K Lewinski; R Kuciel; W Ostrowski; L Lebioda
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Skeletal metastases in carcinoma.

Authors:  H L ABRAMS
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  VCaP, a cell-based model system of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Korenchuk; J E Lehr; L MClean; Y G Lee; S Whitney; R Vessella; D L Lin; K J Pienta
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Osteoprotegerin inhibits prostate cancer-induced osteoclastogenesis and prevents prostate tumor growth in the bone.

Authors:  J Zhang; J Dai; Y Qi; D L Lin; P Smith; C Strayhorn; A Mizokami; Z Fu; J Westman; E T Keller
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  LNCaP progression model of human prostate cancer: androgen-independence and osseous metastasis.

Authors:  G N Thalmann; R A Sikes; T T Wu; A Degeorges; S M Chang; M Ozen; S Pathak; L W Chung
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 9.  The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in prostate cancer metastasis.

Authors:  S Sheng
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 10.  The endothelin axis: emerging role in cancer.

Authors:  Joel Nelson; Anna Bagnato; Bruno Battistini; Perry Nisen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  11 in total

1.  A novel miRNA inhibits metastasis of prostate cancer via decreasing CREBBP-mediated histone acetylation.

Authors:  Fubo Wang; Wei Zhang; Zijian Song; Maoyu Wang; Hanxiao Wu; Yang Yang; Rui Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Bone Remodeling and Bone Metastasis: Implications in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kalyani C Patil; Carolina Soekmadji
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Exploring the key communicator role of exosomes in cancer microenvironment through proteomics.

Authors:  HuiSu Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Je-Yoel Cho
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  EphA2 Is a Clinically Relevant Target for Breast Cancer Bone Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  David B Vaught; Alyssa R Merkel; Conor C Lynch; James Edwards; Mohammed Noor Tantawy; Timothy Hilliard; Shan Wang; Todd Peterson; Rachelle W Johnson; Julie A Sterling; Dana Brantley-Sieders
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells Secrete Methylglyoxal-Derived MG-H1 to Reprogram Human Osteoblasts into a Dedifferentiated, Malignant-like Phenotype: A Possible Novel Player in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Cinzia Antognelli; Lorella Marinucci; Roberta Frosini; Lara Macchioni; Vincenzo Nicola Talesa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT with fluoride PET/CT for detection of bone metastatic disease in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Naresh Regula; Vasileios Kostaras; Silvia Johansson; Carlos Trampal; Elin Lindström; Mark Lubberink; Victor Iyer; Irina Velikyan; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell Factor Regulates Prostate Cancer-Induced Shifts in Pre-Metastatic Niche Composition.

Authors:  Brittni M Foster; Lihong Shi; Koran S Harris; Chirayu Patel; Victoria E Surratt; Kendall L Langsten; Bethany A Kerr
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Liquid biopsies in primary and secondary bone cancers.

Authors:  Argia Ucci; Nadia Rucci; Marco Ponzetti
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 9.  Exploiting bone niches: progression of disseminated tumor cells to metastasis.

Authors:  Aaron M Muscarella; Sergio Aguirre; Xiaoxin Hao; Sarah M Waldvogel; Xiang H-F Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Necroptosis of osteoblasts was induced by breast cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Xiang Ji; Ruideng Wang; Hai Tang; Hao Chen; Li Bao; Fei Feng; Pu Jia
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.