Literature DB >> 30842934

An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Megan Fracol1, Lauren N Feld1, Wen-Kuan Chiu2,3, John Y S Kim1.   

Abstract

Animation deformity is an unsightly complication after sub-pectoral breast reconstruction characterized by implant displacement with pectoralis muscle contraction. Recent increased awareness of this phenomenon has driven interest in pre-pectoral breast reconstruction but research is limited regarding the causes and implications of animation deformity. Specifically, no patient-specific risk factors have been identified as contributing to animation deformity. Placement in a sub-pectoral plane and division of the pectoralis are the only peri-operative factors associated with severity of animation deformity. Our own quantitative analysis of animation deformity has further refined our understanding of this phenomenon, which we present here along with a review of current grading scales. We also more broadly review the current literature surrounding animation deformity, including its causes, risk factors, impact on patient outcomes and current treatment options. Overall, patients find this to be an emotionally distressing complication and most patients would like to be educated on alternative surgical options to avoid animation deformity. Treatment options range from conversion to a pre-pectoral plane to muscle-splitting techniques to selective nerve ablation to Botox injections. Further research into causes, implications and ways to enhance pre-pectoral reconstruction are needed to improve patient outcomes with this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animation deformity; breast animation; breast reconstruction; pre-pectoral

Year:  2019        PMID: 30842934      PMCID: PMC6378247          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.09.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  17 in total

1.  Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distortion and double-bubble deformity.

Authors:  Richard A Baxter
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Endoscopic Thoracodorsal Neurectomy for Correction of Animation Deformity following Latissimus Dorsi-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael V DeFazio; Troy A Pittman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  High transverse capsuloplasty for the correction of malpositioned implants following augmentation mammoplasty in partial submuscular plane.

Authors:  Umar Daraz Khan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  M K Kim; T Kim; H G Moon; U S Jin; K Kim; J Kim; J W Lee; J Kim; E Lee; T K Yoo; D-Y Noh; K W Minn; W Han
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with pocket change to the subcutaneous position.

Authors:  Dennis C Hammond; William P Schmitt; Elizabeth A O'Connor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Muscle-splitting breast augmentation: a new pocket in a different plane.

Authors:  Umar D Khan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Jaime Schwartz; Joseph H Dayan; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Treatment of muscular contraction deformities with botulinum toxin type A after latissimus dorsi flap and sub-pectoral implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Figus; Marco Mazzocchi; Luca Andrea Dessy; Giuseppe Curinga; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Subfascial breast augmentation: theme and variations.

Authors:  Richard A Baxter
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.283

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cost analysis of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Sachin Chinta; Daniel J Koh; Nikhil Sobti; Kathryn Packowski; Nikki Rosado; William Austen; Rachel B Jimenez; Michelle Specht; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Diana Lydia Dyrberg; Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Camilla Bille; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-15

3.  A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Kim; Seung Eun Hong
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Quality of Life After Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Simultaneous Reconstruction Using Pre-Pectoral Silicone Implants.

Authors:  Nick Spindler; Franziska Ebel; Susanne Briest; Sandra Wallochny; Stefan Langer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 5.  Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bulent Citgez; Banu Yigit; Soysal Bas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Use of Botox for Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Irene T Ma; Pooja Yesantharao; Halley M Darrach; Jennifer G Seither; Hui He; Dung H Nguyen
Journal:  Arch Clin Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-10-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.