Literature DB >> 30842166

Extensive Lymph Node Dissection Around the Left Laryngeal Nerve Achieved With Robot-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy.

Satoru Motoyama1,2,3, Yusuke Sato4,2, Akiyuki Wakita4,2, Yuta Kawakita4,2, Yushi Nagaki4,2, Kazuhiro Imai2, Yoshihiro Minamiya2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The potential advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) have yet to be verified. This study focused on the degree of lymph node dissection around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 consecutive patients who received RATE (RATE group) and 38 who received conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) (TE group), both with extended lymphadenectomy, for thoracic squamous cell esophageal carcinoma, were enrolled in this study. We compared the numbers of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, especially around the left RLN.
RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes dissected from around the left RLN was 6 in the RATE group and 4 in the TE group, and the ratio of the dissected lymph nodes around the left RLN to all lymph nodes was significantly higher in the RATE group (p=0.048).
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a robot-assisted surgical system enables for more extensive dissection of lymph nodes around the left RLN. Copyright
© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; lymph node dissection; robot-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30842166     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  9 in total

1.  Prevention of intra-thoracic recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Masahiro Niihara; Hideki Ushiku; Hiroki Harada; Mikiko Sakuraya; Marie Washio; Keishi Yamashita; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Perioperative Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Duo Jiang; Xian-Ben Liu; Wen-Qun Xing; Shi-Lei Liu; Pei-Nan Chen; Peng Li; Ya-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Surgical management of growing teratoma syndrome: robotic-assisted thoracoscopic resection of mediastinal teratoma.

Authors:  Richard Zheng; Courtney L Devin; Thomas O'Malley; Francesco Palazzo; Nathaniel R Evans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcomes after total robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched comparison with hybrid robotic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kwon Joong Na; Samina Park; In Kyu Park; Young Tae Kim; Chang Hyun Kang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Essential Updates 2018/2019: Essential Updates for esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-02-18

6.  Lymph node dissection around left recurrent laryngeal nerve: robot-assisted vs. video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Duan; Jie Yue; Chuangui Chen; Lei Gong; Zhao Ma; Xiaobin Shang; Zhentao Yu; Hongjing Jiang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Zheng; Xiao-Kun Li; Chi Zhang; Hai Zhou; Sai-Guang Ji; Ji-Hong Zhong; Yang Xu; Zhuang-Zhuang Cong; Gao-Ming Wang; Wen-Jie Wu; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yiyang Liu; Hao Peng; Rongchun Wang; Kang Wang; Demin Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241

9.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Mederos; Michael J de Virgilio; Rivfka Shenoy; Linda Ye; Paul A Toste; Selene S Mak; Marika S Booth; Meron M Begashaw; Mark Wilson; William Gunnar; Paul G Shekelle; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Mark D Girgis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.