| Literature DB >> 30841883 |
Sujiao Zhang1, Dongliang Wang1, Yifan Jiang1, Zhoumian Li1, Yawen Zou1, Meng Li1, Haoyang Yu1, Kun Huang1, Yi Yang1, Naidong Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Porcine circovirus type 3 (PCV3), recently widely isolated from pigs with various clinical conditions, is likely globally epidemic. However, development of serological diagnosis for PCV3 in pigs is ongoing. Our objectives were to: 1) establish an indirect ELISA, using PCV3 capsid protein (Cap) prepared by Baculovirus Expression Vector System (BEVS) as a high-quality coating antigen for detection of PCV3-associated antibodies in serum samples; and 2) use this ELISA to conduct a serological survey for PCV3 in various regions of Hunan province, China.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic; ELISA; Pig; Porcine circovirus type 3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30841883 PMCID: PMC6404275 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1810-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Expression and purification of PCV3 Cap with a Baculovirus expression system. PCV3 Cap was expressed in Sf9 cells and purified with a Ni-NTA resin, separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue (a), and identified using western blot with swine PCV3-specifc positive serum (b) and anti-His tag antibody (c). M, protein marker in KDa. Lane 1: Total extract in non-infected SF9 cells. Lane 2: Total extract in Sf9 cells expressed PCV3 Cap; Lane 3 Ni-NTA affinity-purified Cap protein
Optimal dilutions of coating antigen and serum sample antibodies for ELISA
| Serum dilution | Concentration of coating antigen (X ± SD, μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 50× (+) | 1.043 ± 0.021 | 1.076 ± 0.028 | 1.306 ± 0.061 | 1.252 ± 0.068 | 1.288 ± 0.060 |
| 50× (−) | 0.189 ± 0.006 | 0.213 ± 0.002 | 0.293 ± 0.004 | 0.283 ± 0.012 | 0.352 ± 0.087 |
| P/N | 5.519 | 5.051 | 4.457 | 4.424 | 3.659 |
| 100× (+) | 0.812 ± 0.043 | 1.144 ± 0.032 | 1.223 ± 0.159 | 1.213 ± 0.086 | 1.086 ± 0.090 |
| 100× (−) | 0.186 ± 0.005 | 0.197 ± 0.023 | 0.269 ± 0.024 | 0.286 ± 0.050 | 0.323 ± 0.098 |
| P/N | 4.366 | 5.807 | 4.584 | 4.241 | 3.362 |
| 150× (+) | 0.800 ± 0.069 | 1.044 ± 0.076 | 0.922 ± 0.006 | 0.876 ± 0.048 | 0.986 ± 0.030 |
| 150× (−) | 0.173 ± 0.016 | 0.185 ± 0.033 | 0.235 ± 0.001 | 0.256 ± 0.023 | 0.313 ± 0.008 |
| P/N | 4.624 | 5.643 | 3.923 | 3.422 | 3.150 |
| 200× (+) | 0.742 ± 0.064 | 1.019 ± 0.146 | 0.776 ± 0.130 | 1.143 ± 0.073 | 1.125 ± 0.009 |
| 200× (−) | 0.163 ± 0.010 | 0.241 ± 0.051 | 0.225 ± 0.001 | 0.273 ± 0.002 | 0.276 ± 0.009 |
| P/N | 4.552 | 4.228 | 3.449 | 4.187 | 4.076 |
Fig. 2ELISA sensitivity using PCV3 Cap protein as coating antigen. Six PCV3 positive and one negative serum samples were serially titrated and tested for reactivity in the PCV3 Cap based ELISA.
Fig. 3Determination of cut-off value for PCV3 Cap ELISA. Cut-off values were evaluated by testing 48 negative control sera. Each value represented the mean absorbance at 450 nm obtained from three replicates of each serum sample tested. The cut-off value was defined as mean OD value of all tested negative control sera, plus three standard deviations. The cut-off value (0.541) was represented by dashed lines. Error bars indicated mean and SD
The PCV3 viral load of positive serum samples
| Group | Sample | PCV3 viral load (copies/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| High-level viremia | 9 | 1.15 × 105 |
| 74 | 1.53 × 105 | |
| 2 | 1.3 × 105 | |
| 13 | 1.27 × 105 | |
| 15 | 6.08 × 104 | |
| 6 | 4.14 × 104 | |
| 72 | 6.32 × 104 | |
| 18 | 5.13 × 104 | |
| 1–1 | 3.30 × 104 | |
| 78 | 3.78 × 104 | |
| 42–1 | 3.93 × 104 | |
| 24 | 3.36 × 105 | |
| 99 | 6.24 × 105 | |
| 231 | 7.34 × 105 | |
| 657 | 5.65 × 105 | |
| Low-level viremia | 113 | 2.05 × 103 |
| 001 | 6.49 × 102 | |
| 590–124 | 8.44 × 102 | |
| 2–1 | 7.17 × 102 | |
| 32 | 2.42 × 103 | |
| 79 | 1.1 × 103 | |
| 25 | 8.39 × 102 | |
| 55 | 1.01 × 103 | |
| 8 | 3.88 × 103 | |
| 13 | 4.66 × 103 | |
| 113 | 2.05 × 103 | |
| 92–1 | 5.38 × 103 | |
| 67 | 3.51 × 103 | |
| 23 | 5.84 × 103 | |
| 43 | 5.25 × 103 |
Fig. 4A PCV3 Cap ELISA was used to compare PCV3 antibody with viremia level of serum samples and determine PCV3 positive rate of healthy sows versus sows with RF (reproductive failure). (A and B) Comparisons of PCV3 antibody and viremia levels; (C) PCV3 positive rate of healthy sows and sows with RF
Fig. 5Map (produced in-house), with location of Hunan province in China highlighted in red and locations of various regions (grey indicates location with PCV3 positive samples) in Hunan province where porcine serum samples were collected from 2016 to 2018
Fig. 6PCV3 positive rates on farms in Hunan province
Origin of serum samples used in this study
| Regions | No. farms | No. samples tested | No. positive | Positive rate (%) (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chenzhou | 2 | 80 | 19 | 24 (14.2–33.3) |
| Hengyang | 4 | 80 | 59 | 74 (63.9–83.6) |
| Shaoyang | 3 | 214 | 107 | 50 (43.2–56.8) |
| Yueyang | 2 | 90 | 76 | 84 (76.8–92.1) |
| Changde | 1 | 263 | 149 | 57 (50.6–62.7) |
| Yiyang | 3 | 183 | 72 | 39 (32.2–46.5) |
| Loudi | 1 | 128 | 26 | 20 (13.2–27.4) |
| Total | 16 | 1038 | 508 | 49 (45.9–52) |