Literature DB >> 30840714

Signal template generation from acquired images for model observer-based image quality analysis in mammography.

Christiana Balta1,2, Ramona W Bouwman1, Wouter J H Veldkamp3, Mireille J M Broeders1,4, Ioannis Sechopoulos1,2, Ruben E van Engen1.   

Abstract

Mammography images undergo vendor-specific processing, which may be nonlinear, before radiologist interpretation. Therefore, to test the entire imaging chain, the effect of image processing should be included in the assessment of image quality, which is not current practice. For this purpose, model observers (MOs), in combination with anthropomorphic breast phantoms, are proposed to evaluate image quality in mammography. In this study, the nonprewhitening MO with eye filter and the channelized Hotelling observer were investigated. The goal of this study was to optimize the efficiency of the procedure to obtain the expected signal template from acquired images for the detection of a 0.25-mm diameter disk. Two approaches were followed: using acquired images with homogeneous backgrounds (approach 1) and images from an anthropomorphic breast phantom (approach 2). For quality control purposes, a straightforward procedure using a single exposure of a single disk was found adequate for both approaches. However, only approach 2 can yield templates from processed images since, due to its nonlinearity, image postprocessing cannot be evaluated using images of homogeneous phantoms. Based on the results of the current study, a phantom should be designed, which can be used for the objective assessment of image quality.

Keywords:  channelized Hotelling observer; image quality; mammography; model observers; nonprewhitening model observer; template

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840714      PMCID: PMC6129177          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.035503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  19 in total

1.  Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.

Authors:  I Hernandez-Giron; J Geleijns; A Calzado; W J H Veldkamp
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.

Authors:  Robert M Gagne; Brandon D Gallas; Kyle J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Channelized Hotelling observers for the assessment of volumetric imaging data sets.

Authors:  Ljiljana Platiša; Bart Goossens; Ewout Vansteenkiste; Subok Park; Brandon D Gallas; Aldo Badano; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Derivation of an Observer Model Adapted to Irregular Signals Based on Convolution Channels.

Authors:  Ivan Diaz; Craig K Abbey; Pontus A S Timberg; Miguel P Eckstein; Francis R Verdun; Cyril Castella; Francois O Bochud
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.

Authors:  Lucy M Warren; Alistair Mackenzie; Julie Cooke; Rosalind M Given-Wilson; Matthew G Wallis; Dev P Chakraborty; David R Dance; Hilde Bosmans; Kenneth C Young
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.

Authors:  Federica Zanca; Jurgen Jacobs; Chantal Van Ongeval; Filip Claus; Valerie Celis; Catherine Geniets; Veerle Provost; Herman Pauwels; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Prediction of human observer performance in a 2-alternative forced choice low-contrast detection task using channelized Hotelling observer: impact of radiation dose and reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Shuai Leng; Lingyun Chen; James M Kofler; Rickey E Carter; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Increase in perceived case suspiciousness due to local contrast optimisation in digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Roelant Visser; Wouter J H Veldkamp; David Beijerinck; Petra A M Bun; Jan J M Deurenberg; Mechli W Imhof-Tas; Klaas H Schuur; Miranda M Snoeren; Gerard J den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.