| Literature DB >> 30839723 |
Grace Y Stokes1, Evangelea N DiCicco2, Trevor J Moore1, Vivian C Cheng3, Kira Y Wheeler2, John Soghigian4, Richard P Barber2, Janice S Edgerly3.
Abstract
Insects from the order Embioptera (webspinners) spin silk fibres which are less than 200 nm in diameter. In this work, we characterized and compared the diameters of single silk fibres from nine species-Antipaluria urichi, Pararhagadochir trinitatis, Saussurembia calypso, Diradius vandykei, Aposthonia ceylonica, Haploembia solieri, H. tarsalis, Oligotoma nigra and O. saundersii. Silk from seven of these species have not been previously quantified. Our studies cover five of the 10 named taxonomic families and represent about one third of the known taxonomic family-level diversity in the order Embioptera. Naturally spun silk varied in diameter from 43.6 ± 1.7 nm for D. vandykei to 122.4 ± 3.2 nm for An. urichi. Mean fibre diameter did not correlate with adult female body length. Fibre diameter is more similar in closely related species than in more distantly related species. Field observations indicated that silk appears shiny and smooth when exposed to rainwater. We therefore measured contact angles to learn more about interactions between silk and water. Higher contact angles were measured for silks with wider fibre diameter and higher quantity of hydrophobic amino acids. High static contact angles (ranging up to 122° ± 3° for An. urichi) indicated that silken sheets spun by four arboreal, webspinner species were hydrophobic. A second contact angle measurement made on a previously wetted patch of silk resulted in a lower contact angle (average difference was greater than 27°) for all four species. Our studies suggest that silk fibres which had been previously exposed to water exhibited irreversible changes in hydrophobicity and water adhesion properties. Our results are in alignment with the 'super-pinning' site hypothesis by Yarger and co-workers to describe the hydrophobic, yet water adhesive, properties exhibited by webspinner silk fibres. The physical and chemical insights gained here may inform the synthesis and development of smaller diameter silk fibres with unique water adhesion properties.Entities:
Keywords: Embioptera; contact angle; embiids; silk; water adhesion; webspinners
Year: 2018 PMID: 30839723 PMCID: PMC6170577 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.180893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.(a) SEM image of Pararhagadochir trinitatis naturally spun silk fibres with aluminium coating—note the difference in diameter of fibre bundles and single fibres. (b) Adult female P. trinitatis. (c) Pararhagadochir trinitatis silk in its natural environment—note the shiny patches apparently due to interactions with rainwater.
Figure 2.(a) SEM image of Pararhagadochir trinitatis fibres as spun onto a graphite rod. The scale bar designates 1 μm. (b) Fibre diameter (mean ± s.e.) determined from SEM images of silk spun onto graphite rods by nine species. Phylogenetic tree aligned along the horizontal axis shows the evolutionary relationships between these species.
Figure 3.SEM images of (a) one single Antipaluria urichi fibre on a graphite rod that was previously wetted—note the dark region is outlined with dashed white line indicating the residue from the dissolved protein core (see manuscript for details), (b) a region of P. trinitatis ‘film’ formed from dried fibre core residue—note the apparent remnants of silk fibres supporting this film (in order to reveal the underlying structure this sample was not metallized, leading to a poorer image quality), and (c) an example of a metallized P. trinitatis film where the fibre remnants are visible and in this case not obscured by the coating. The scale bars all designate 1 μm.
Figure 4.(a) Mean ± s.e. of static contact angles (open circles, graphed on left axis) and mean ± s.e. of fibre diameters (filled squares, graphed on right axis) from SEM images of silk from four arboreal, tropical webspinner species. For fibre diameter measurements, sample sizes for each species are shown in electronic supplementary material, table S2. Comparisons were made to PDMS and rose petal. Different upper-case letters (A, B or C) above each bar indicate significant differences in contact angles based on the results of an analysis of variance. Where these letters are the same, the samples are considered not statistically different. For example, average contact angles for rose and An. urichi are not considered statistically different, and thus the letter A appears above both values. All other silk samples yielded contact angles different from rose. Numbers below each bar represent sample size for contact angle measurements. (b) Static contact angles (mean ± s.e.) versus species for both dry (right) and previously wetted (left) silk. Numbers above each bar represent sample size. INSET: water droplet on dry (right) and previously wetted (left) Ap. ceylonica silk.