Literature DB >> 30839600

Strategies for reducing speckle noise in digital holography.

Vittorio Bianco1, Pasquale Memmolo1, Marco Leo1, Silvio Montresor2, Cosimo Distante1, Melania Paturzo1, Pascal Picart2, Bahram Javidi3, Pietro Ferraro1.   

Abstract

Digital holography (DH) has emerged as one of the most effective coherent imaging technologies. The technological developments of digital sensors and optical elements have made DH the primary approach in several research fields, from quantitative phase imaging to optical metrology and 3D display technologies, to name a few. Like many other digital imaging techniques, DH must cope with the issue of speckle artifacts, due to the coherent nature of the required light sources. Despite the complexity of the recently proposed de-speckling methods, many have not yet attained the required level of effectiveness. That is, a universal denoising strategy for completely suppressing holographic noise has not yet been established. Thus the removal of speckle noise from holographic images represents a bottleneck for the entire optics and photonics scientific community. This review article provides a broad discussion about the noise issue in DH, with the aim of covering the best-performing noise reduction approaches that have been proposed so far. Quantitative comparisons among these approaches will be presented.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30839600      PMCID: PMC6106996          DOI: 10.1038/s41377-018-0050-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Light Sci Appl        ISSN: 2047-7538            Impact factor:   17.782


  77 in total

1.  Speckle-reduced three-dimensional volume holographic display by use of integral imaging.

Authors:  Seung-Ho Shin; Bahram Javidi
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Windowed Fourier transform for fringe pattern analysis.

Authors:  Qian Kemao
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for digital holography.

Authors:  Saowapak Sotthivirat; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Speckle removal using a maximum-likelihood technique with isoline gray-level regularization.

Authors:  Nicolas Bertaux; Yann Frauel; Philippe Réfrégier; Bahram Javidi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Effects of quantization in phase-shifting digital holography.

Authors:  Godfrey A Mills; Ichirou Yamaguchi
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation.

Authors:  Minh N Do; Martin Vetterli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 7.  Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics.

Authors:  Demetri Psaltis; Stephen R Quake; Changhuei Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Improvement of accuracy in digital holography by use of multiple holograms.

Authors:  Torsten Baumbach; Ervin Kolenovic; Volker Kebbel; Werner Jüptner
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 1.980

9.  Digital holography with ultimate sensitivity.

Authors:  M Gross; M Atlan
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Phase unwrapping via graph cuts.

Authors:  José M Bioucas-Dias; Gonçalo Valadão
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.856

View more
  18 in total

1.  Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines.

Authors:  Van K Lam; Thanh Nguyen; Thuc Phan; Byung-Min Chung; George Nehmetallah; Christopher B Raub
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of subcellular compartments with fluorescence specificity.

Authors:  Raimund Schlüßler; Kyoohyun Kim; Martin Nötzel; Anna Taubenberger; Shada Abuhattum; Timon Beck; Paul Müller; Shovamaye Maharana; Gheorghe Cojoc; Salvatore Girardo; Andreas Hermann; Simon Alberti; Jochen Guck
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Multiple-scattering suppressive refractive index tomography for the label-free quantitative assessment of multicellular spheroids.

Authors:  Osamu Yasuhiko; Kozo Takeuchi; Hidenao Yamada; Yukio Ueda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Real-time 3D imaging of ocean algae with crosstalk suppressed single-shot digital holographic microscopy.

Authors:  Ming Tang; Hao He; Longkun Yu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Deep Learning Network for Speckle De-Noising in Severe Conditions.

Authors:  Marie Tahon; Silvio Montrésor; Pascal Picart
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Dual wavelength digital holographic imaging of layered structures.

Authors:  Ting Chean Khoo; Anna Sharikova; Alexander Khmaladze
Journal:  Opt Commun       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Bragg-Berry flat reflectors for transparent computer-generated holograms and waveguide holography with visible color playback capability.

Authors:  Seong Yong Cho; Masaru Ono; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Masanori Ozaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Deep learning in holography and coherent imaging.

Authors:  Yair Rivenson; Yichen Wu; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 17.782

9.  Effect of Residual Stress on Thermal Deformation Behavior.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sasaki; Sanichiro Yoshida; Tadashi Ogawa; Jun Shitaka; Conor McGibboney
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Variational Hilbert Quantitative Phase Imaging.

Authors:  Maciej Trusiak; Maria Cywińska; Vicente Micó; José Ángel Picazo-Bueno; Chao Zuo; Piotr Zdańkowski; Krzysztof Patorski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.