Literature DB >> 30838793

Suitability of lattice Boltzmann inlet and outlet boundary conditions for simulating flow in image-derived vasculature.

Bradley Feiger1, Madhurima Vardhan1, John Gounley1, Matthew Mortensen2, Priya Nair2, Rafeed Chaudhury2, David Frakes2, Amanda Randles1.   

Abstract

The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is a popular alternative to solving the Navier-Stokes equations for modeling blood flow. When simulating flow using the LBM, several choices for inlet and outlet boundary conditions exist. While boundary conditions in the LBM have been evaluated in idealized geometries, there have been no extensive comparisons in image-derived vasculature, where the geometries are highly complex. In this study, the Zou-He (ZH) and finite difference (FD) boundary conditions were evaluated in image-derived vascular geometries by comparing their stability, accuracy, and run times. The boundary conditions were compared in four arteries: a coarctation of the aorta, dissected aorta, femoral artery, and left coronary artery. The FD boundary condition was more stable than ZH in all four geometries. In general, simulations using the ZH and FD method showed similar convergence rates within each geometry. However, the ZH method proved to be slightly more accurate compared with experimental flow using three-dimensional printed vasculature. The total run times necessary for simulations using the ZH boundary condition were significantly higher as the ZH method required a larger relaxation time, grid resolution, and number of time steps for a simulation representing the same physiological time. Finally, a new inlet velocity profile algorithm is presented for complex inlet geometries. Overall, results indicated that the FD method should generally be used for large-scale blood flow simulations in image-derived vasculature geometries. This study can serve as a guide to researchers interested in using the LBM to simulate blood flow.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Zou-He; boundary conditions; finite difference; hemodynamics; image-derived vasculature; lattice Boltzmann method

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838793      PMCID: PMC7605305          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  31 in total

1.  Application and validation of the lattice Boltzmann method for modelling flow-related clotting.

Authors:  S E Harrison; S M Smith; J Bernsdorf; D R Hose; P V Lawford
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Initial and boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann method.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1993-12

3.  Choice of boundary condition for lattice-Boltzmann simulation of moderate-Reynolds-number flow in complex domains.

Authors:  Rupert W Nash; Hywel B Carver; Miguel O Bernabeu; James Hetherington; Derek Groen; Timm Krüger; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-02-18

4.  Numerical accuracy comparison of two boundary conditions commonly used to approximate shear stress distributions in tissue engineering scaffolds cultured under flow perfusion.

Authors:  Olufemi E Kadri; Cortes Williams; Vassilios Sikavitsas; Roman S Voronov
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  The Vascular Model Repository: A Public Resource of Medical Imaging Data and Blood Flow Simulation Results.

Authors:  Nathan M Wilson; Ana K Ortiz; Allison B Johnson
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 0.582

6.  Viscoelastic study of aggregation of red blood cells.

Authors:  E Fukada; M Kaibara
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.875

7.  The impact of MRI-based inflow for the hemodynamic evaluation of aortic coarctation.

Authors:  L Goubergrits; R Mevert; P Yevtushenko; J Schaller; U Kertzscher; S Meier; S Schubert; E Riesenkampff; T Kuehne
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Comparison of patient-specific inlet boundary conditions in the numerical modelling of blood flow in abdominal aortic aneurysm disease.

Authors:  David Hardman; Scott I Semple; Jennifer M J Richards; Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 9.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis.

Authors:  Charles A Taylor; Timothy A Fonte; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Modeling Patient-Specific Magnetic Drug Targeting Within the Intracranial Vasculature.

Authors:  Alexander Patronis; Robin A Richardson; Sebastian Schmieschek; Brian J N Wylie; Rupert W Nash; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  4 in total

1.  Propagation pattern for moment representation of the lattice Boltzmann method.

Authors:  John Gounley; Madhurima Vardhan; Erik W Draeger; Pedro Valero-Lara; Shirley V Moore; Amanda Randles
Journal:  IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.757

2.  Investigating the Interaction Between Circulating Tumor Cells and Local Hydrodynamics via Experiment and Simulations.

Authors:  Marianna Pepona; Peter Balogh; Daniel F Puleri; William F Hynes; Claire Robertson; Karen Dubbin; Javier Alvarado; Monica L Moya; Amanda Randles
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  Multiscale modeling of blood flow to assess neurological complications in patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Bradley Feiger; Adebayo Adebiyi; Amanda Randles
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Non-invasive characterization of complex coronary lesions.

Authors:  Madhurima Vardhan; John Gounley; S James Chen; Eric C Chi; Andrew M Kahn; Jane A Leopold; Amanda Randles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.