Literature DB >> 25212836

Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit.

Ulrich Ronellenfitsch1, Sara Najmeh, Amin Andalib, Rushika M Perera, Mathieu C Rousseau, David S Mulder, Lorenzo E Ferri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best surgical approach for tumors of the proximal stomach remains controversial. For proximal gastrectomy (PG), the evidence regarding quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes is controversial. Moreover, there are limited data from non-Asian settings.
METHODS: All patients who underwent PG from September 2005 to July 2013 were identified from an institutional database. Demographic, perioperative and pathologic characteristics were retrieved. Symptom scores (0 = best/4 = worst) for reflux symptoms, dysphagia and validated QoL metrics (FACT scale, where a higher score is better) were assessed during early and late follow-up. Eligible patients for analysis were those with no evidence of recurrence.
RESULTS: Of 465 upper gastrointestinal cancer resections, 50 were PG for adenocarcinoma (42; 84%), neuroendocrine carcinoma (5; 10%) or other pathologies (3; 6%). R0 resection was achieved in 44 (89.8%) of 49 patients with malignant tumors. Median lymph node collection was 32 (range 7-57). QoL scores did not differ from preoperative to early follow-up but increased compared to both at late follow-up [preoperative, 125 (interquartile range 105-140); early follow-up, 122.5 (97-142); late follow-up, 147 (132-159); p < 0.05]. At early and late follow-up, 9 (21.4%) of 42 and 10 (33.3%) of 30 patients reported reflux symptoms, but most were mild. Endoscopic signs of esophagitis were found in 7 (29%) of 24 patients, but only two of these reported reflux symptoms. Conversely only three of eight patients with reflux symptoms had esophagitis on endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Global QoL is not reduced early after PG, and increases compared to baseline at late follow-up. Although reflux symptoms are reported by a quarter of patients, most are mild, and there is little correlation with esophagitis. PG should remain a viable option in the management of proximal gastric tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25212836     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4078-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michael D McCall; Peter J Graham; Oliver F Bathe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Can Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction Replace Total Gastrectomy? A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Ko; Ki Hyun Kim; Si-Hak Lee; Cheol Woong Choi; Su Jin Kim; Chang In Choi; Dae-Hwan Kim; Dong-Heon Kim; Sun-Hwi Hwang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: a review of the literature published from 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Masaki Nakamura; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Do Hyun Jung; Yoontaek Lee; Dong Wook Kim; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG).

Authors:  Fausto Rosa; Giuseppe Quero; Claudio Fiorillo; Massimiliano Bissolati; Chiara Cipollari; Stefano Rausei; Damiano Chiari; Laura Ruspi; Giovanni de Manzoni; Guido Costamagna; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Sergio Alfieri
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Naoki Hiki
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-25

7.  Gastrectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy: a North American Perspective.

Authors:  Alexandre Gosselin-Tardif; Jessica Lie; Ioana Nicolau; Juan Carlos Molina; Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Liane Feldman; Jonathan Spicer; Carmen Mueller; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Gastric cancer treatment: similarity and difference between China and Korea.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-04-28

9.  Current status of management of malignant disease: current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Jonathan Spicer; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction for Siewert type II-III adenocarcinomas of esophago-gastric junction: a retrospective observational study of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Xiaoyong Liu; Fei Ma; Liangqun Peng; Shuaibing Lu; Yonglei Zhang; Qi Ma; Sheqing Ji; Zhandong Zhang; Junhui Chai; Yawei Hua; Hui Wang; Qian Li; Suxia Luo; Xiaobing Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.