| Literature DB >> 30838039 |
Yanzhuo Liu1, Maozhu Yang2,3, Tao Jiang1, Chunbin Lan1, Hao Yuan1, Guiquan Li4, Guiqing Jia1,2, Kang Wang1,2, Gaoping Zhao1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) derived from tumors is a promising biomarker for monitoring tumor status and evaluating therapeutic effects and prognosis. We studied the plasma human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification in gastric cancer (GC) patients by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) during therapy with trastuzumab.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30838039 PMCID: PMC6374807 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1750329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract ISSN: 1687-6121 Impact factor: 2.260
Figure 1Enrollment of gastric cancer patients. Flow chart of patients in the study. GC: gastric cancer; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Clinicopathological characteristics of all patients.
| Patient ID | Age | Gender | Tumor location | Tumor size (cm) | Differentiation | Lymph node metastasis | Distant metastasis | Stage | TNM | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | Female | Antrum | 4 | Poor | Positive | Liver | IV | T4aNxM1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 2 | 36 | Male | Antrum | 4.5 | Poor | Positive | Peritoneum | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 3 | 64 | Female | Cardia | 4 | Moderate | Positive | Liver | IV | T4NxM1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 4 | 70 | Female | Cardia | 5 | Poor | Positive | Liver | IV | T4bNxM1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 5 | 71 | Male | Body | 6.5 | Poor | Positive | Liver | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 6 | 65 | Male | Body | 5.5 | Moderate | Positive | Peritoneum | IV | T4bN1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 7 | 79 | Male | Antrum | 4 | Moderate | Positive | Liver | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 8 | 72 | Male | Antrum | 5 | Poor | Positive | Liver | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 9 | 56 | Male | Cardia | 4 | Moderate | Positive | Peritoneum | IV | T4bN1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 10 | 59 | Female | Cardia | 5 | Moderate | Positive | Liver | IV | T4aNxM1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 11 | 64 | Female | Body | 4 | Poor | Positive | Peritoneum | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
| 12 | 72 | Male | Antrum | 4.5 | Moderate | Positive | Liver | IV | T4N1M1 | FOLFOX+trastuzumab |
FOLFOX = oxaliplatin (L-OHP)+calcium folinate (CF)+5-fluorouracil (5-Fu).
Dynamics of plasma HER2 ratios in GC patients by ddPCR during the follow-up period.
| Patient ID | HER2 ratios | Best response | PFS (months) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 months | 2 months | 4 months | 6 months | 8 months | 10 months | 12 months | |||
| 1 | 4.59 | 2.44 | 2.23 | 0.89 | 0.71 | 1.58 | 1.04 | PR | 12 |
| 2 | 2.84 | 1.55 | 1.34 |
| 3.56 | — | — | SD | 6 |
| 3 | 5.95 | 2.14 | 1.74 | 2.29 | 1.84 |
| 3.28 | PR | 10 |
| 4 | 6.25 | 1.61 | 1.12 | 1.52 | 1.05 | 0.78 | 1.28 | PR | 12 |
| 5 | 8.19 | 2.91 | 1.54 | 1.06 | 2.12 |
| 4.64 | PR | 10 |
| 6 | 5.34 | 1.18 | 2.06 | 3.13 |
| 6.14 | — | PR | 8 |
| 7 | 4.79 | 2.53 | 1.02 | 1.54 | 2.4 |
| 3.88 | PR | 10 |
| 8 | 5.17 | 1.52 | 1.44 | 0.73 | 1.03 | 1.13 | 0.86 | PR | 12 |
| 9 | 2.72 | 1.31 | 2.29 |
| 4.22 | — | — | SD | 6 |
| 10 | 3.17 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 1.06 | 1.45 | 1.06 | 1.11 | PR | 12 |
| 11 | 4.44 | 1.88 | 1.59 | 2.04 |
| 5.28 | — | PR | 8 |
| 12 | 3.48 | 1.42 | 1.89 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 1.22 | 1.08 | SD | 12 |
SD: stable disease; PR: partial response; PFS: progress free survival; ∗ means time to progressive disease.
Concordance of plasma and tumor tissue sample results for HER2 status from GC patients by ddPCR or IHC/FISH.
| HER2 in FFPE with ddPCR | Total | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||
| HER2 in FFPE with IHC/FISH | |||||
| Positive | 34 | 5 | 39 | 87.2% | 95.2% |
| Negative | 3 | 60 | 63 | ||
| HER2 in ctDNA with ddPCR | |||||
| Positive | 26 | 8 | 34 | 76.5% | 83.8% |
| Negative | 11 | 57 | 68 | ||
Figure 2Relationship between tumor characteristics and the plasma HER2 ratio in patients with GC. The correlation analysis was performed between the plasma HER2 ratio before receiving treatment and tumor characteristics including tumor size, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, using the Spearman or Pearson method. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Figure 3Monitoring plasma HER2 ratios during clinical courses of GC patients. Changes in plasma HER2 ratios during the 12 months of the follow-up period. Seven patients (cases 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11) were found to have progressive disease (PD), and four patients (cases 2, 6, 9, and 11) had died. The increases in their plasma HER2 ratios were observed at the time of PD, which was approximately 2.3-4.1 times higher than the cut-off value. The 0 month means presurgery. The horizontal dotted line represents the cut-off value of HER2 ratios (n = 1.2).