| Literature DB >> 30837522 |
Yue Pan1, Jeong-Hyeon Choi2, Huidong Shi2, Liwen Zhang3, Shaoyong Su1, Xiaoling Wang4.
Abstract
Obesity is accompanied by low-grade systemic inflammation that etiologically contributes to obesity-induced cardiovascular disease (CVD). Growing evidence supports that neutrophil, the most abundant type of leukocytes in human, is most likely to be the target peripheral leukocyte subtype initiating the inflammatory cascade in obesity. However, few studies have systematically assessed the genome wide changes in neutrophils associated with obesity. In this study, a hypothesis-free OMIC approach (i.e. the discovery phase) and a target approach (i.e. the validation phase) were used to identify obesity related neutrophil activation markers and their roles on CVD risks. In the discovery phase, genome wide DNA methylation, RNA-sequencing and quantitative proteomics were obtained from purified neutrophils (12 obese vs. 12 lean). In the validation phase, gene expression levels of the promising genes from the OMIC platforms were measured in 81 obese cases vs. 83 lean controls, and the association between the expression levels and CVD risks were evaluated. Significant difference was found for one gene, alkaline phosphatase, liver/bone/kidney (ALPL), across 3 OMIC platforms. In the validation phase, the gene expression levels of ALPL in leukocytes were significantly higher in obese compared with lean subjects (p < 0.05). Within the obese population, we observed that ALPL expression level showed significantly positive association with CVD risk factors (p < 0.05) including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, carotid intima-media thickness and borderline significance with fasting insulin (p = 0.08). This study identified one novel marker ALPL of neutrophil activation in response to obesity and provided evidence that obesity induced change in ALPL expression was associated with CVD risk factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30837522 PMCID: PMC6400958 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39764-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
General characteristics of the subjects in the OMIC study.
| Lean | Obese | P valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 12 | 12 | — |
| Age (years) | 17.5 ± 1.3 | 17 ± 1.5 | NS |
| Age range (years) | 15.9–19.7 | 15.1–19.1 | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18.5 ± 1.3 | 41.7 ± 5.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI range (kg/m2) | 16.6–20.7 | 36.4–51.3 | — |
| BMI-percentile (%) | 12.4 ± 10.6 | 99.6 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| BMI-percentile range (%) | 0.6–29.4 | 99.4–99.9 | — |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 118.9 ± 8.8 | 119.4 ± 15.2 | NS |
| SBP-percentile (%) | 45.3 ± 28.5 | 47.1 ± 36.5 | NS |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 65.0 ± 4.0 | 64.7 ± 5.4 | NS |
| DBP-percentile (%) | 31.8 ± 16.3 | 37.4 ± 20.1 | NS |
| Insulin (µu/mL) | 8.6 ± 3.1 | 24.7 ± 11.3 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 93.0 ± 5.8 | 94.3 ± 8.8 | NS |
| TG (mg/dL) | 62.1 ± 22.5 | 97.8 ± 36.5 | <0.01 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 136.8 ± 25.7 | 176.9 ± 32.6 | <0.01 |
| HDLC (mg/dL) | 54.0 ± 8.7 | 51.8 ± 6.0 | NS |
| LDLC (mg/dL) | 116 ± 27.8 | 157.4 ± 32.2 | <0.01 |
Data are means ± SD. aP-value adjusted for age (if applicable). BMI, body mass index (Obese: BMI-percentile ≥ 95th). SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure (Hypertension: SBP-percentile ≥ 95th or DBP-percentile ≥ 95th); TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDLC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLC, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. According to the 2011 Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents[37], dyslipidemia can be defined as a presence of ≥1 of the following levels (mg/dL): TC ≥ 200, LDLC ≥ 130, HDLC < 40, and TG ≥ 130. Normal range of glucose: 70–120 mg/dl.
Integration of proteomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic results. P value < 0.05.
| Gene name | Transcriptomics | Proteomics | DNA Methylation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | Direction* | P | Direction* | CpG site | P | Direction* | |
|
| 0.000058 | + | 0.002671 | + | cg18789685 | 0.009252 | − |
| cg24722348 | 0.015466 | − | |||||
| cg08727996 | 0.033684 | − | |||||
| cg01037895 | 0.000595 | − | |||||
| cg06346857 | 0.040962 | − | |||||
*Direction: +, up-regulated in obese cases compare with lean controls; −, down-regulated in obese cases compare with lean controls.
General characteristics of the subjects in the validation phase.
| Lean | Obese | P-valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 83 | 81 | — |
| Female (%) | 50.6 | 54.3 | NS |
| Age (years) | 17.7 ± 1.7 | 17.8 ± 1.7 | NS |
| Age range (years) | 14.0–20.9 | 14.2–21.0 | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18.8 ± 1.4 | 39.8 ± 7.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI range (kg/m2) | 15.0–21.7 | 28.1–70.1 | — |
| BMI-percentile (%) | 19.1 ± 11.4 | 98.7 ± 1.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI-percentile range (%) | 0–41.7 | 95.0–99.9 | — |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 107.3 ± 8.9 | 121.6 ± 17.4 | <0.001 |
| SBP-percentile (%) | 28.3 ± 21.6 | 59.3 ± 33.7 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 64.1 ± 6.9 | 63.2 ± 8.7 | NS |
| DBP-percentile (%) | 39 ± 21.2 | 35.7 ± 24.6 | NS |
| Insulin (µu/mL) | 9.5 ± 5.1 | 24.3 ± 14.5 | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 86.8 ± 8.2 | 88.9 ± 7.9 | NS |
| TG (mg/dL) | 58.8 ± 20.6 | 68.9 ± 27.0 | <0.01 |
| TC (mg/dL) | 151.5 ± 26.0 | 155.4 ± 32.9 | NS |
| HDLC (mg/dL) | 56.1 ± 11.9 | 44.0 ± 10.2 | <0.001 |
| LDLC (mg/dL) | 83.7 ± 24.0 | 97.4 ± 30.6 | <0.01 |
| Mean IMT* | 0.52 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | NS |
| Maximum IMT* | 0.63 ± 0.06 | 0.65 ± 0.07 | <0.05 |
*The numbers of subjects with carotid IMT measurements were 58 cases vs. 46 controls. Data are means ± SD. aP-value adjusted for age (if applicable). BMI, body mass index. SBP, systolic blood pressure. DBP, diastolic blood pressure. TG, triglycerides. TC, total cholesterol. HDLC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. LDLC, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1ALPL expression level between obese cases and lean controls (n = 164).
Figure 2Correlations between ALPL expression level and CVD risk factors within obese population. The values of SBP, DBP, MAP, insulin, and maximum IMT were log-transformed.