| Literature DB >> 25388404 |
X Xu1, S Su1, X Wang1, V Barnes1, C De Miguel2, D Ownby3, J Pollock2, H Snieder4, W Chen5, X Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is emerging evidence suggesting the role of peripheral blood leukocytes in the pathogenesis of obesity and related diseases. However, few studies have taken a genome-wide approach to investigating gene expression profiles in peripheral leukocytes between obese and lean individuals with the consideration of obesity-related shifts in leukocyte types.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25388404 PMCID: PMC4286492 DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2014.194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) ISSN: 0307-0565 Impact factor: 5.095
General characteristics of all participants in genome-wide gene expression analysis using mRNA from peripheral leukocytes (n=95)
| General character | Male participants | Female participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean (n=24) | Obese (n=22) | P-value[ | Lean (n=25) | Obese (n=24) | P-value[ | |
| Age (years) | 17.42±1.91 | 17.58±1.96 | 0.78 | 17.91±1.72 | 17.35±1.49 | 0.23 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.34±1.34 | 39.11±6.95 | <0.001 | 18.57±1.16 | 44.43±7.52 | <0.001 |
| BMI percentile (%) | 22.47±12.57 | 99.15±0.73 | <0.001 | 19.05±9.84 | 99.07±0.46 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 110.78±9.63 | 127.24±14.02 | <0.001 | 103.69±5.81 | 129.16±19.69 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 64.54±7.74 | 63.88±6.57 | 0.73 | 63.27±5.09 | 67.19±10.77 | 0.06 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 60.57±26.94 | 67.76±24.54 | 0.19 | 54.60±22.99 | 61.54±19.40 | 0.15 |
| HDLC (mg/dl) | 56.09±13.17 | 44.67±11.53 | <0.001 | 61.24±15.01 | 47.67±8.84 | <0.001 |
| Fasting insulin (uU/ml) | 8.23±3.40 | 19.44±9.94 | <0.001 | 12.71±7.25 | 30.52±14.95 | <0.001 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 88.83±7.70 | 90.48±7.71 | 0.60 | 83.80±6.99 | 88.08±9.07 | 0.11 |
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglycerides; HDLC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
P-value adjusted for age (if applicable)
Complete blood count with differential (mean ± standard deviation)
| Blood cell composition | Male participants | Female participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean | Obese | P-value[ | Lean | Obese | P-value[ | |
| Neutrophils (%) | 46.45±11.15 | 52.95±9.74 |
| 55.92±10.77 | 54.18±10.30 | 0.63 |
| Lymphocytes (%) | 40.63±10.70 | 35.72±9.32 | 0.11 | 33.72±9.47 | 35.68±8.65 | 0.50 |
| Monocytes (%) | 9.29±2.79 | 7.95±1.53 | 0.06 | 7.80±3.20 | 7.64±2.11 | 0.81 |
| Eosinophils (%) | 3.29±1.78 | 2.55±1.79 | 0.18 | 1.96±1.90 | 2.27±2.43 | 0.55 |
| Basophils (%) | 0.63±0.49 | 0.81±0.66 | 0.29 | 0.60±0.58 | 0.55±0.60 | 0.85 |
| White blood cell (1000/mm3) | 4.97±1.57 | 6.03±1.62 | 0.05 | 5.51±1.41 | 6.20±1.47 | 0.13 |
| Neutrophils (1000/mm3) | 2.39±1.14 | 3.33±1.62 |
| 3.18±1.19 | 3.48±1.34 | 0.46 |
| Lymphocytes (1000/mm3) | 1.95±0.71 | 2.03±0.59 | 0.51 | 1.80±0.55 | 2.13±0.33 |
|
| Monocytes (1000/mm3) | 0.45±0.16 | 0.46±0.12 | 0.80 | 0.40±0.16 | 0.48±0.16 | 0.15 |
| Eosinophils (1000/mm3) | 0.19±0.15 | 0.17±0.13 | 0.81 | 0.11±0.10 | 0.13±0.11 | 0.34 |
| Basophils (1000/mm3) | 0.01±0.04 | 0.05±0.08 | 0.08 | 0.03±0.05 | 0.03±0.05 | 0.86 |
P-value adjusted for age
Figure 1Volcano plot of obesity related differentially expressed genes in males and females
(A) Volcano plot of the log2 fold change of gene expression levels (X-axis) against the –log10 P-value (Y-axis) comparing obese and lean males.
(B) Volcano plot of the log2 fold change of gene expression levels (X-axis) against the –log10 P-value (Y-axis) comparing obese and lean females.
Top 20 differentially expressed genes sorted by P-value or Log2 fold changes
| Sorted by P-value | Sorted by Log2 fold changes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene Symbol | Log2 fold change | P-value[ | Gene Symbol | Log2 fold change | P-value[ |
|
| |||||
|
| 1.01 | 3.43E-05 |
| 1.19 | 1.66E-03 |
| PLEKHJ1 | 0.34 | 1.40E-04 | ALAS2 | 1.14 | 6.58E-04 |
| PID1 | −0.83 | 2.95E-04 |
| 1.14 | 5.10E-03 |
|
| 0.85 | 2.65E-04 |
| 1.01 | 3.43E-05 |
| C6orf97 | −0.37 | 2.68E-04 | IGJ | −1.00 | 5.16E-03 |
| HSD17B12 | −0.56 | 2.96E-04 |
| −0.99 | 2.39E-03 |
|
| 0.88 | 3.59E-04 |
| 0.98 | 4.70E-03 |
| SLC7A6OS | −0.26 | 4.51E-04 |
| 0.97 | 8.13E-03 |
|
| 0.47 | 4.77E-04 |
| 0.92 | 6.47E-04 |
| FGF18 | 0.27 | 4.88E-04 |
| 0.88 | 3.59E-04 |
| MRPL45 | −0.27 | 4.94E-04 |
| 0.85 | 2.65E-04 |
| TESSP5 | −0.28 | 5.56E-04 | PID1 | −0.83 | 1.95E-04 |
| WASH1 | 0.41 | 6.21E-04 | TNFRSF17 | −0.82 | 3.71E-03 |
|
| 0.92 | 6.47E-04 |
| 0.81 | 3.16E-03 |
| ALAS2 | 1.14 | 6.58E-04 | TXNDC5 | −0.80 | 7.41E-03 |
| C17orf67 | 0.47 | 7.51E-04 | RPS23 | −0.78 | 9.65E-03 |
| BRCC3 | −0.37 | 7.73E-04 | GLDC | −0.74 | 8.03E-03 |
| NCRNA00092 | 0.44 | 8.64E-04 | RPL12P6 | −0.68 | 9.43E-03 |
| CEP68 | −0.42 | 1.14E-03 |
| 0.68 | 3.50E-03 |
| ANKRD37 | −0.34 | 1.37E-03 | KIAA0101 | −0.61 | 9.05E-03 |
|
| |||||
| FAAH | −0.37 | 1.79E-05 | SLPI | 1.34 | 8.66E-03 |
| KIR3DL1 | −0.63 | 4.76E-05 | IL1B | 1.16 | 4.58E-03 |
| NRG1 | 0.78 | 8.22E-05 | CASP5 | 1.02 | 2.23E-03 |
| FLJ42627 | −0.45 | 1.38E-04 | TREML3 | 0.99 | 6.11E-03 |
| ITIH4 | −0.45 | 1.50E-04 | KIR2DL3 | −0.95 | 1.34E-03 |
| SYTL3 | −0.40 | 1.99E-04 | KIR2DL4 | −0.94 | 4.62E-04 |
| LIMD2 | −0.35 | 2.09E-04 | NAIP | 0.88 | 6.24E-03 |
| KLHL5 | 0.36 | 2.71E-04 | CCR1 | 0.80 | 4.83E-03 |
| ABCA2 | −0.46 | 2.88E-04 | DSC2 | 0.80 | 5.38E-03 |
| NCAM1 | −0.44 | 2.97E-04 | NRG1 | 0.78 | 8.22E-05 |
| GTF3C1 | −0.28 | 3.09E-04 | KLRC1 | −0.71 | 4.23E-03 |
| DACT1 | 0.45 | 3.73E-04 | THBD | 0.68 | 5.56E-03 |
| SNX1 | −0.23 | 4.01E-04 | MPL | 0.66 | 6.58E-03 |
| KIAA2026 | −0.23 | 4.51E-04 | C17orf97 | 0.66 | 6.51E-03 |
| KIR2DL4 | −0.94 | 4.61E-04 | PROS1 | 0.65 | 5.52E-03 |
| STAG3L4 | −0.32 | 4.66E-04 | EMR2 | 0.63 | 9.26E-03 |
| ZCCHC14 | −0.24 | 5.15E-04 | KIR3DL1 | −0.63 | 4.76E-05 |
| ANKRD20A1 | −0.57 | 6.77E-04 | KIR2DS5 | −0.63 | 1.70E-03 |
| GSTM2 | −0.38 | 7.56E-04 | KIR2DL1 | −0.61 | 2.94E-03 |
| CLK2 | −0.23 | 7.69E-04 | KIR3DL3 | −0.60 | 5.19E-03 |
P-value adjusted age
Bold genes were closely related to neutrophil activation
Pathway analysis of obesity related differentially expressed genes[*]
| Terms | Genes | P-value |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Defense response to bacterium | CTSG, DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4, LYZ | 1.0E-04 |
| Defense response to fungus | DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4 | 3.6E-04 |
| Response to other organism | CTSG, DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4, LCN2, LYZ | 3.9E-04 |
| Killing of cells of another organism | DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4 | 4.2E-04 |
| Response to bacterium | CTSG, DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4, LYZ | 8.0E-04 |
| Immune system process | ALAS2, CEACAM8, CTSG, DEFA1B, ELANE, IGJ, IL4R, TNFRSF17 | 1.1E-03 |
| Response to fungus | DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4 | 1.3E-03 |
| Cell killing | DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4 | 1.3E-03 |
| Response to biotic stimulus | CTSG, DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4, LCN2, LYZ | 1.4E-03 |
| Translational elongation | RPL12P6, RPL21, RPS21, RPS23 | 1.4E-03 |
|
| ||
| Immune response | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, KIR3DL1, KIR2DL1, KIR2DL3, KIR2DS5, SPON2 | 4.1E-05 |
| Immune system process | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, KIR3DL1, KIR2DL1, KIR2DL3, KIR2DS5, SPON2 | 4.2E-04 |
| Response to wounding | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, NRG1, PROS1, THBD | 9.0E-04 |
| Response to stimulus | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, KIR3DL2, KIR3DL1, KIR2DL1, KIR2DL3, KIR2DL4, KIR2DS5, NRG1, PROS1, SPON2, THBD | 1.6E-03 |
| Defense response | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, KIR3DL2, KIR2DL4, KIR2DS5 | 1.8E-03 |
| Response to stress | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, KIR3DL2, KIR2DL4, KIR2DS5, NRG1, PROS1, THBD | 2.0E-03 |
| Wound healing | IL1B, NRG1, PROS1, THBD | 2.7E-03 |
| Cellular defense response | KIR3DL2, KIR2DL4, KIR2DS5 | 3.7E-03 |
| Response to external stimulus | BMP6, CCR1, IL1B, NRG1, PROS1, THBD | 9.6E-03 |
| Anti-apoptosis | NAIP, IL1B, NRG1 | 3.7E-02 |
Genes were selected with p-value<0.01 and absolute log2 fold change > 0.5, and the human genome was chosen as background in the analysis
Figure 2Real time PCR replication of ELANE and MPO in neutrophils
(A) Histogram showing the gene expression levels of ELANE relative to β-actin (Y-axis, %) comparing obese and lean males (p=0.01 with age adjusted) and females (p=0.09 with age adjusted), respectively
(B) Histogram showing the gene expression levels of MPO relative to β-actin (Y-axis, %) comparing obese and lean males (p=0.02 with age adjusted) and females (p=0.20 with age adjusted), respectively