Literature DB >> 30837099

Synovial Fluid Viscosity Test is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Jun Fu1, Ming Ni1, Wei Chai1, Xiang Li1, Libo Hao1, Jiying Chen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: So far there is no "gold standard" test for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), compelling clinicians to rely on several serological and synovial fluid tests with no 100% accuracy. Synovial fluid viscosity is one of the parameters defining the rheology properties of synovial fluid. We hypothesized that patients with PJI may have a different level of synovial fluid viscosity and aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid viscosity in detecting PJI.
METHODS: This prospective study was initiated to enroll patients undergoing primary and revision arthroplasty. Our cohort consisted of 45 patients undergoing revision for PJI (n = 15), revision for aseptic failure (n = 15), and primary arthroplasty (n = 15). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, synovial fluid viscosity, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma d-dimer levels were measured preoperatively.
RESULTS: The synovial fluid viscosity level was significantly lower (P = .0011) in patients with PJI (7.93 mPa·s, range 3.0-15.0) than in patients with aseptic failure (13.11 mPa·s, range 6.3-20.4). Using Youden's index, 11.80 mPa·s was determined as the optimal threshold value for synovial fluid viscosity for the diagnosis of PJI. Synovial fluid viscosity outperformed CRP, ESR, and plasma d-dimer, with a sensitivity of 93.33% and a specificity of 66.67%.
CONCLUSION: Synovial fluid viscosity seems to be on the same level of accuracy with CRP, ESR, and d-dimer regarding PJI detection and to be a promising marker for the diagnosis of PJI.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic test; periprosthetic joint infection; synovial fluid; total joint arthroplasty; viscosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30837099     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Different diagnostic performance of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Wenwei Qian; Xisheng Weng; Jin Lin; Jin Jin; Yiou Wang; Shibai Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  What Is the Optimal Timing for Reading the Leukocyte Esterase Strip for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Authors:  Qing-Yuan Zheng; Rui Li; Ming Ni; Peng Ren; Quan-Bo Ji; Jing-Yang Sun; Jun-Cheng Li; Ji-Ying Chen; Guo-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Angela Hewlett; Carlos A Higuera; Jesse E Otero; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  Plasma fibrinogen in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Chenyu Zhao; Rong Huang; Hui Ma; Xiaohe Wang; Guodong Wang; Xiaowei Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The poor accuracy of D-dimer for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection but its potential usefulness in early postoperative infections following revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  M Fernandez-Sampedro; I Sanlés-González; C García-Ibarbia; N Fañanás-Rodríquez; M Fakkas-Fernández; M C Fariñas
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 6.  The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renwei Wang; Hui Zhang; Peng Ding; Qiang Jiao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangxu Lu; Tong Li; Haoqi Ye; Shujin Liu; Peng Zhang; Wenliang Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haitao Zhang; Xiaobo Sun; Pengfei Xin; Xingyang Zhu; Ke Jie; Houran Cao; Wenjun Feng; Yuqing Zeng; Yan Lv; Jinlun Chen; Jie Li; Jianchun Zeng; Yirong Zeng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Meta-analysis of serum and/or plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Donara Margaryan; Cristina Ojeda-Thies; Carsten Perka; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.