| Literature DB >> 30835200 |
Thomas Weitzel, Constanza Martínez-Valdebenito, Gerardo Acosta-Jamett, Ju Jiang, Allen L Richards, Katia Abarca.
Abstract
Endemic scrub typhus was recently detected on Chiloé Island in southern Chile. We report a series of cases, acquired over a wide geographical range in continental Chile during 2016-2018, demonstrating that this emerging rickettsial infection is also found on the mainland of South America.Entities:
Keywords: Chile; Orientia species; South America; bacteria; epidemiology; rickettsia; scrub typhus; vector-borne infections; zoonoses
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30835200 PMCID: PMC6537721 DOI: 10.3201/eid2506.181860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Demographic and epidemiologic data of 9 scrub typhus cases in continental Chile, 2016–2018
| Case no. | Age, y/sex | Month of probable exposure | Location of probable exposure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Site | |||
| 1 | 43/M | 2016 Mar | Aysén | Caleta Tortel |
| 2 | 56/M | 2017 Feb | Los Lagos | Pumalín |
| 3 | 25/M | 2017 Mar | Los Lagos | Cochamó |
| 4 | 69/M | 2018 Feb | Aysén | Queulat |
| 5 | 22/F | 2018 Feb | Los Lagos | Puelo |
| 6 | 25/M | 2018 Feb | Los Lagos | Puelo |
| 7 | 39/M | 2018 Feb | Los Lagos | Tagua Tagua |
| 8 | 28/M | 2018 Mar | Bío Bío | Alto Bío Bío |
| 9 | 21/F | 2018 Mar | Los Lagos | Cochamó |
FigureLocations of probable exposures (red circles) of 9 scrub typhus patients in continental Chile, 2016–2018. Inset map shows the study area (red box) and the location of Chile (gray shading) within South America.
Serologic and molecular diagnosis of scrub typhus cases in continental Chile, 2016–2018*
| Case no. | Serologic testing results | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFA IgG† | ELISA IgG‡ | ELISA IgM‡ | Eschar molecular testing results | |||||||||
| Acute | Conv | Acute | Conv | Acute | Conv | PCR | PCR 47kDa | qPCR | ||||
| 1 | 256 | 256 | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | |||
| 2 | 128 | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | ||||
| 3 | 64 | 512 | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | |||
| 4 | 128 | 256 | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | |||
| 5 | 128 | NA | + | NA | + | NA | + | + | + | |||
| 6 | 128 | NA | – | NA | – | NA | + | + | + | |||
| 7 | 128 | 256 | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| 8 | NA | + | NA | + | NA | + | + | + | ||||
| 9 | 64 | 256 | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | |||
*Acute, acute-phase; conv, convalescent-phase; NA, not available; qPCR, quantitative PCR; +, positive; –, negative. †Highest titer among 4 antigens. ‡Cutoff values calculated as mean optical density of negative local population + 3 SD.