Patrick Martineau1,2, Vincent Finnerty3, Geneviève Giraldeau4, Sébastien Authier3, Francois Harel3, Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau5,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. 5. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. Matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org. 6. Department of Medical Imaging, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, 5000 Belanger, Montreal, QC, H1T1C8, Canada. Matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional nuclear imaging with bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has been shown to be a sensitive test for the detection of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR); however, to date, few data exist on the utility of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). METHODS: Myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac 18F-NaF PET/CT of 7 subjects with ATTR, four with light-chain CA (AL), and four controls were retrospectively reviewed. Qualitative interpretation and quantitative analyses with average left ventricular standardized uptake values (SUVmean) and target-to-background ratios (TBRmean) were performed. RESULTS: Average TBRmean was significantly increased in subjects with ATTR (0.98 ± 0.09) compared to AL (0.85 ± 0.08, P = .026) and CTL (0.82 ± 0.07, P = .020), while SUVmean was not (P = .14). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, with a sensitivity/specificity of 75%/100% for TBRmean using a cutoff value of 0.89 for the diagnosis of ATTR. Qualitative interpretation resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 57%/100% for ATTR. CONCLUSIONS: While 18F-NaF PET/CT demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for ATTR, particularly when using quantitative analysis, the low TBRmean values observed in ATTR indicate poor myocardial signal. 18F-NaF PET/CT is not yet ready for clinical use in CA until further comparison studies are performed with 99mTc-DPD/PYP.
BACKGROUND: Conventional nuclear imaging with bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has been shown to be a sensitive test for the detection of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR); however, to date, few data exist on the utility of 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) in subjects with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). METHODS: Myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac 18F-NaF PET/CT of 7 subjects with ATTR, four with light-chain CA (AL), and four controls were retrospectively reviewed. Qualitative interpretation and quantitative analyses with average left ventricular standardized uptake values (SUVmean) and target-to-background ratios (TBRmean) were performed. RESULTS: Average TBRmean was significantly increased in subjects with ATTR (0.98 ± 0.09) compared to AL (0.85 ± 0.08, P = .026) and CTL (0.82 ± 0.07, P = .020), while SUVmean was not (P = .14). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, with a sensitivity/specificity of 75%/100% for TBRmean using a cutoff value of 0.89 for the diagnosis of ATTR. Qualitative interpretation resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 57%/100% for ATTR. CONCLUSIONS: While 18F-NaF PET/CT demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for ATTR, particularly when using quantitative analysis, the low TBRmean values observed in ATTR indicate poor myocardial signal. 18F-NaF PET/CT is not yet ready for clinical use in CA until further comparison studies are performed with 99mTc-DPD/PYP.
Authors: David Adams; Alejandra Gonzalez-Duarte; William D O'Riordan; Chih-Chao Yang; Mitsuharu Ueda; Arnt V Kristen; Ivailo Tournev; Hartmut H Schmidt; Teresa Coelho; John L Berk; Kon-Ping Lin; Giuseppe Vita; Shahram Attarian; Violaine Planté-Bordeneuve; Michelle M Mezei; Josep M Campistol; Juan Buades; Thomas H Brannagan; Byoung J Kim; Jeeyoung Oh; Yesim Parman; Yoshiki Sekijima; Philip N Hawkins; Scott D Solomon; Michael Polydefkis; Peter J Dyck; Pritesh J Gandhi; Sunita Goyal; Jihong Chen; Andrew L Strahs; Saraswathy V Nochur; Marianne T Sweetser; Pushkal P Garg; Akshay K Vaishnaw; Jared A Gollob; Ole B Suhr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David F Hutt; Anne-Marie Quigley; Joanne Page; Margaret L Hall; Maria Burniston; Dorothea Gopaul; Thirusha Lane; Carol J Whelan; Helen J Lachmann; Julian D Gillmore; Philip N Hawkins; Ashutosh D Wechalekar Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julian D Gillmore; Mathew S Maurer; Rodney H Falk; Giampaolo Merlini; Thibaud Damy; Angela Dispenzieri; Ashutosh D Wechalekar; John L Berk; Candida C Quarta; Martha Grogan; Helen J Lachmann; Sabahat Bokhari; Adam Castano; Sharmila Dorbala; Geoff B Johnson; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Tamer Rezk; Marianna Fontana; Giovanni Palladini; Paolo Milani; Pierluigi L Guidalotti; Katarina Flatman; Thirusha Lane; Frederick W Vonberg; Carol J Whelan; James C Moon; Frederick L Ruberg; Edward J Miller; David F Hutt; Bouke P Hazenberg; Claudio Rapezzi; Philip N Hawkins Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; James T Thackeray; Johanna Diekmann; Desiree Weiberg; Johann Bauersachs; Frank M Bengel Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Weijia Li; Dipan Uppal; Yu-Chiang Wang; Xiaobo Xu; Damianos G Kokkinidis; Mark I Travin; James M Tauras Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-30
Authors: Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Olivier Gheysens; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Marc R Dweck; Gilbert Habib; Oliver Gaemperli; Antti Saraste; Alessia Gimelli; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Hein J Verberne; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Fabien Hyafil; Paola A Erba Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jack P M Andrews; Maria Giovanni Trivieri; Russell Everett; Nicholas Spath; Gillian MacNaught; Alastair J Moss; Mhairi K Doris; Tania Pawade; Edwin J R van Beek; Christophe Lucatelli; David E Newby; Philip Robson; Zahi A Fayad; Marc R Dweck Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 5.952