Literature DB >> 30833320

Multimorbidity of cardiometabolic diseases: prevalence and risk for mortality from one million Chinese adults in a longitudinal cohort study.

Dudan Zhang1, Xun Tang1, Peng Shen2, Yaqin Si1, Xiaofei Liu1, Zhe Xu1, Jinguo Wu3, Jingyi Zhang3, Ping Lu3, Hongbo Lin2, Pei Gao1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The evolution of multimorbidity describes the continuum from a healthy status to the development of a single disease and further progression to multimorbidity with additional diseases. We investigated the evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and risk for mortality in a Chinese population.
DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study using data from the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study, with 5.43 million person-years follow-up (median 5.16 years). PARTICIPANTS: Data for 1 038 704 adults (total 22 750 deaths) were analysed. EXPOSURE: Cardiometabolic multimorbidity was defined as ever being diagnosed with two or more of three diseases: hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HRs were calculated for all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: The cardiometabolic disease status of 105 209 (10.1%) individuals changed during the follow-up. The prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity increased from 2.41% (95% CI: 2.38% to 2.44%) to 5.94% (95% CI: 5.90% to 5.99%). Baseline multimorbidity status showed the HR (95% CI) was 1.37 (1.33 to 1.42) in those with one disease, 1.71 (1.64 to 1.79) in those with two diseases and 2.22 (2.00 to 2.46) in those with three diseases. The highest HRs were observed for CVD only (3.31, 95% CI: 3.05 to 3.59) or diabetes and CVD (3.12, 95% CI: 2.37 to 4.11). Those with hypertension only had the lowest HR (1.26, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.30). Longitudinal data showed the HRs (95% CI) in patients with one, two and three diseases were 1.36 (1.32 to 1.41), 2.03 (1.96 to 2.10) and 2.16 (2.05 to 2.29), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in a general Chinese population increased more than doubled over 5 years, indicating rapid evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity. A history of CVD dominates the risk for mortality. A complementary strategy for primary and secondary prevention of cardiometabolic diseases is needed in China. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; diabetes; hypertension; longitudinal; multimorbidity

Year:  2019        PMID: 30833320      PMCID: PMC6443196          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


This study is among the first to investigate the evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and risk for mortality in a general population in China. We used a longitudinal design with continuous surveillance of cardiometabolic disease status to provide a better understanding of aetiological associations and causality, in addition to using multimorbidity assessed only at baseline. The CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study is a large-scale natural population-based observational cohort study linking large data from integrated individual-level electronic health records; the study protocol of which was published in BMJ Open. The CHERRY study involves a regional cohort located in a developed area of China, and is, therefore, not nationally representative. This study had a relatively short follow-up period.

Introduction

Considerable improvements in medical interventions and healthcare management mean population ageing has become a major public health concern worldwide. Cardiometabolic multimorbidity is defined as the co-existence of two or more of three cardiometabolic disorders: hypertension, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardiometabolic multimorbidity is becoming progressively more common globally, and the public health impact has received increased attention during the past several years.1–3 The individual prevalence of each disease is increasing rapidly in China, along with significant changes in economic development and lifestyles.4–7 Although some studies have evaluated the prevalence of multimorbidity in China using cross-sectional designs,8–11 they have been limited by factors, such as small sample sizes, high risk of bias according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline, restriction to older adult populations (>60 years) or including other chronic diseases (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cancer) in the definition of multimorbidity. Moreover, multimorbidity is a continuum, covering the transition from healthy status to the development of a single disease and then progression to two or more diseases, with the possible addition of further diseases.12 The term ‘evolution of multimorbidity’ describes this process, which is generally evaluated from a longitudinal perspective. However, there have been limited studies on this topic, and none conducted among Chinese populations. Multimorbidity is associated with high risk for mortality.13–15 The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (ERFC) reported that mortality was similarly associated with a history of diabetes, stroke or myocardial infarction (MI), and a multiplicative mortality risk was observed for any combination of these conditions in Western populations.16 However, hypertension was not included in that evaluation, and time-varying exposure information to update multimorbidity status was not available. A study using a longitudinal design with continuous surveillance of cardiometabolic disease status in a general population in addition to using multimorbidity assessed at baseline may provide a better understanding of aetiological associations and causality. The CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) study is a longitudinal cohort study involving 1 038 704 adults (22 750 deaths) from 2010 to 2016. Using CHERRY data, we aimed to provide reliable estimates about the prevalence of cardiometabolic comorbidities, investigate the evolution of multimorbidity during the follow-up and assess the association with mortality in a Chinese population.

Methods

Study design

The CHERRY study is a longitudinal population-based ambispective cohort study focused on cardiovascular care and outcomes research. Individual participant data were extracted from the regional health information system in Yinzhou, an eastern coastal area of China. A detailed description of the data sources and the cohort profile was published previously.17 Specific data sources essential to the present study included: (1) the population census and registered health insurance database for individuals’ general demographic characteristics; (2) health check databases, including health checks from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme, older adults and adults with hypertension and diabetes; (3) inpatient and outpatient electronic medical records (EMRs); (4) disease surveillance and management database that captured the incidence of CVD, hypertension and diabetes (where cases were required to be reported for disease management by local general practitioners on confirmation of diagnosis) and (5) death certificates database where attribution of death refers to the primary cause provided by cause-specific mortality. Individuals were included in the CHERRY study if they met all inclusion criteria: (1) aged≥18 years on 1 January 2009; (2) had complete information on date of birth and sex, and a valid healthcare identifier; (3) had been living in Yinzhou for at least 6 months and (4) had Chinese nationality. In total, 1 053 563 adults were originally enrolled in the CHERRY study. In this analysis, we choose 1 January 2010 as the date of inception to bypass the integration and preliminary test period of the EMR system and allow for better coverage of regional chronic disease management services. After excluding those who died in 2009 or entered the system after 2016, we included 1 038 704 participants in this study (online supplementary efigure 1). Follow-up in the health information system is generally continuous. CHERRY updates information for all cohort members annually from the health information system databases. Follow-up data through to 31 December 2016 were available for participants.

Cardiometabolic multimorbidities and outcomes

Cardiometabolic multimorbidity was defined as the presence of two or more of three diagnosed disorders: hypertension, diabetes or CVD (including coronary heart disease [CHD] and cerebrovascular diseases). We categorised participants into eight groups: (1) hypertension, (2) diabetes, (3) CVD, (4) hypertension and diabetes, (5) hypertension and CVD, (6) diabetes and CVD, (7) hypertension, diabetes and CVD, and (8) none of these diseases (reference group). Diagnosis of these cardiometabolic diseases (and date of diagnosis) were obtained from multiple sources: diseases management database (primary care), EMRs (hospital care) and disease surveillance database (disease registry). Date in disease surveillance was considered the gold standard for the date of diagnosis. Details of the comprehensive healthcare services for chronic disease surveillance and management provided in the study region were described previously.17 In addition to individuals’ baseline cardiometabolic disease status, longitudinal information for the exposure was also used. To evaluate the association between mortality and a history of hypertension, diabetes, CVD and their cardiometabolic multimorbidities, changes in cardiometabolic disease status that occurred ≤30 days before death were excluded, assuming that there was a direct connection between the change of cardiometabolic multimorbidity status and mortality within the acute phase. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during the follow-up. Death was confirmed by the death certificate in the health information system, as previously described.18 Diseases and deaths were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

Statistical analysis

Continuous and categorical baseline characteristics of participants were summarised by mean (SD) or numbers (percentage), respectively. Cardiometabolic multimorbidities were classified as eight combinations listed above. Numbers (and corresponding percentages) of participants who changed their cardiometabolic disease status during follow-up were summarised. Age- and sex-standardised prevalence and 95% CI for cardiometabolic multimorbidity at baseline and the last visit were estimated for the overall population (and the population aged≥40 years in a supplementary analysis) based on the distribution of the 2010 Chinese population census. A Poisson regression model adjusted for sex was used to calculate mortality rates, adjusted for age 60 years. To investigate the association between cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality, we first assessed the associations between the cardiometabolic multimorbidity groups at baseline and risk for death from any cause. Furthermore, cardiometabolic multimorbidity status was modelled as a time-dependent exposure to enable updating of multimorbidity status during the follow-up. HRs and 95% CI were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression models stratified by sex and adjusted for age in the primary analyses of the overall population, the population aged≥40 years, and subgroups (sex, age, location [urban/rural], smoking status and body mass index [BMI] category). To explore the extent to which conventional factors (BMI, smoking, education level and location) explained the associations between cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality, HRs adjusted for these additional factors were calculated for people with full information on these factors. Finally, population attributable fractions (PAFs) and 95% CI due to one, two or three cardiometabolic diseases were estimated by combining the proportional excess mortality (X1, X2 and X3; where X=HR−1) and SE in each category with the corresponding prevalence at baseline (P1, P2 and P3).19 The PAFs for one, two or three disorders are P1X1/k, P2X2/k and P3X3/k; where k=1+P1X1+P2X2+P3X3. PAFs were calculated based on: (1) the prevalence and HRs of cardiometabolic multimorbidity at baseline and (2) the prevalence at last visit and HRs using time-variant cardiometabolic multimorbidity status. All p-values were two-tailed and not adjusted for multiple testing. We used Stata (version 14.0) for all data analyses, with a statistical significance level of p<0.05.

Patient and public involvement

Patients were not involved in the development of the research question or measures, or the design, recruitment or conduct of this study. The results of this study will be disseminated to study participants and the public via this publication and the CHERRY study website (http://www.cherry-study.org).

Results

The present cohort was established using the procedures listed in online supplementary efigure 1. We began with 1.28 million permanent residents in Yinzhou, China with a valid personal identifier. After excluding subjects younger than 18 years old as at January 1, 2010, those that died before that date and those entered into the system after December 31, 2016, the present analyses included 1 038 704 CHERRY study participants aged≥18 years. Table 1 presents participants’ baseline characteristics. Among all participants, 1 025 542 (98.7%) had information on living location, 858 413 (82.6%) had information on education level, 905 987 (87.2%) had at least one BMI measurement and 920 849 (88.7%) had at least one smoking status measurement. The mean±SD age at baseline was 42.5±14.8 years (51.4% women). The mean BMI was 22.5±2.5 kg/m2. According to Asian-specific BMI cutoffs, 24.1% were overweight (23–25 kg/m2) and 13.9% were obese (BMI≥25 kg/m2). At the last visit during the follow-up, the mean BMI was 22.5±2.6 kg/m2; 23.9% were overweight and 14.8% were obese. From baseline to the last visit, the proportion of former smokers changed from 2.2% to 2.4% and current smokers changed from 18.9% to 20.0%.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants at baseline

Participants ≥18 yearsParticipants ≥40 years
Participants, n1 038 704545 632
Age (at baseline), mean (SD)42.51 (14.84)53.58 (11.63)
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD)22.48 (2.53)22.94 (2.66)
BMI (kg/m2 Asian-specific cutoffs)
 <23 (normal)562 106 (62.04)264 283 (53.65)
 23 to <25 (overweight)218 019 (24.06)134 411 (27.29)
 ≥25 (obese)125 862 (13.89)93 869 (19.06)
Gender, n (%)
 Male504 525 (48.57)275 382 (50.47)
 Female534 179 (51.43)270 250 (49.53)
Location, n (%)
 Urban316 900 (30.90)168 208 (31.18)
 Rural708 642 (69.10)371 311 (68.82)
Education levels, n (%)
 Primary school or lower249 881 (29.11)219 934 (45.78)
 Middle school547 890 (63.83)248 425 (51.71)
 College or higher60 642 (7.06)12 046 (2.51)
Smoking status (current), n (%)
 Never726 241 (78.87)388 223 (77.15)
 Former smoker20 524 (2.23)17 678 (3.51)
 Current smoker174 084 (18.90)97 328 (19.34)
Characteristics of participants at baseline

Prevalence and evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity

At baseline, 85 684 participants had one diagnosed cardiometabolic disease, 22 871 had two diseases and 2203 had three diseases. The standardised prevalence rates were 9.32% (95% CI: 9.26% to 9.37%) for one disease, 2.57% (95% CI: 2.54% to 2.60%) for two diseases and 0.26% (95% CI: 0.25% to 0.27%) for three diseases (table 2). The estimated prevalence of diagnosed cardiometabolic multimorbidity increased with age and was higher in women than men (figure 1). Among the population aged≥40 years, the standardised prevalence rates were 16.82% (95% CI: 16.72% to 16.92%) for one disease, 4.69% (95% CI: 4.65% to 4.75%) for two diseases and 0.47% (95% CI: 0.45% to 0.49%) for three diseases (online supplementary etable 1). In the population aged≥60 years, the prevalence rates increased to 31.90% (95% CI: 31.65% to 32.14%), 10.41% (95% CI: 10.25% to 10.57%) and 1.20% (95% CI: 1.14% to 1.26%) for one, two, and three diseases, respectively (online supplementary etable 2).
Table 2

Standardised prevalence of cardiometabolic disease status at baseline

Overall (n=1 038 704)Male (n=504 525)Female (n=534 179)
No of cases% (95% CI)No of cases% (95% CI)No of cases% (95% CI)
One disease85 6849.32 (9.26 to 9.37)40 8838.64 (8.57 to 8.72)44 80110.01 (9.93 to 10.09)
 HT69 4067.60 (7.55 to 7.65)32 6976.96 (6.89 to 7.02)36 7098.25 (8.18 to 8.33)
 DM14 1271.49 (1.46 to 1.51)69921.43 (1.40 to 1.47)71351.54 (1.51 to 1.58)
 CVD21510.23 (0.22 to 0.24)11940.25 (0.24 to 0.27)9570.21 (0.20 to 0.23)
Two diseases22 8712.57 (2.54 to 2.60)10 3492.24 (2.20 to 2.29)12 5222.90 (2.85 to 2.95)
 HT+DM11 0731.26 (1.24 to 1.29)47221.03 (1.00 to 1.06)63511.50 (1.46 to 1.53)
 HT+CVD11 5401.28 (1.25 to 1.30)54811.18 (1.15 to 1.21)60591.38 (1.34 to 1.41)
 DM+CVD2580.03 (0.02 to 0.03)1460.03 (0.03 to 0.04)1120.03 (0.02 to 0.03)
Three diseases22030.26 (0.25 to 0.27)8410.19 (0.17 to 0.20)13620.33 (0.31 to 0.35)

CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension.

Figure 1

Prevalence of cardiometabolic disease according to age groups. CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension.

Prevalence of cardiometabolic disease according to age groups. CVD, cardiovascular diseaseDM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension. Standardised prevalence of cardiometabolic disease status at baseline CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension. In total, 105 209 participants (10.1%) changed their cardiometabolic multimorbidity status during the (median) 5 years follow-up (online supplementary etable 3). Regarding the history of CVD, 50 458 (94.4%) of all 53 473 patients have information on the type of CVD. Within these patients, 26 282 had CHD, 23 538 had cerebrovascular diseases and 638 had both CHD and cerebrovascular diseases. The crude prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity increased from 2.41% (95% CI: 2.38% to 2.44%) to 5.94% (95% CI: 5.90% to 5.99%) (figure 2 & online supplementary etable 3). Four disease groups (72 104 participants; 68.5%) lead all transitions during the follow-up: 47 903 healthy subjects developed hypertension only; 8388 healthy subjects developed diabetes only; 9279 patients with hypertension developed CVD and 6534 patients with hypertension and diabetes developed CVD. Among 927 946 participants without any diagnosed cardiometabolic disease at baseline, 73 303 (7.9%) developed one or more cardiometabolic diseases, of which 47 903 (5.2%) developed hypertension only. Among 85 684 participants with one disease at baseline, 24 041 (28.1%) developed additional diseases. Of 69 406 participants with hypertension at baseline, 12 711 (18.31%) had an incidence of CVD during the follow-up. Of 14 127 participants with diabetes at baseline, 5386 (38.13%) had an incidence of CVD during the follow-up. Finally, 7865 (34.39%) of 22 871 participants with two diseases developed all three diseases during the follow-up. The number of participants with all three diseases increased from 2203 at baseline to 18 547 by the end of the study (online supplementary etable 3).
Figure 2

Evolution of cardiometabolic disease status during follow-up. Note: *Crude prevalence. CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension.

Evolution of cardiometabolic disease status during follow-up. Note: *Crude prevalence. CVD, cardiovascular diseaseDM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension.

Associations with mortality

There were 22 750 deaths during the 5.43 million person–years of follow-up (median follow-up time, 5.16 years). The sex-adjusted all-cause mortality rate at age 60 years was 5.68 per 1000 person– years (6.50 in men and 4.91 in women). In the analysis using baseline cardiometabolic multimorbidity status, the age- and sex-adjusted HRs for mortality were 1.37 (95% CI: 1.33 to 1.42) for one disease, 1.71 (95% CI: 1.64 to 1.79) for two diseases and 2.22 (95% CI: 2.00 to 2.46) for three diseases, compared with participants without any disease (figure 3). The highest HRs were observed in patients with either a history of CVD only (3.31, 95% CI: 3.05 to 3.59) or diabetes and CVD (3.12, 95% CI: 2.37 to 4.11). Patients with hypertension only had lowest HR (1.26, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.30). HRs for cardiometabolic multimorbidity were broadly similar in men and women, higher in younger participants (aged<40 years) and higher in those living in urban areas (online supplementary etable 4). The result of sensitivity analysis using baseline status excluding the initial 1 year of follow-up was broadly similar (online supplementary efigure 5).
Figure 3

Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HRs (95%) for all-cause mortality by cardiometabolic disease status. CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HT, hypertension.

Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted HRs (95%) for all-cause mortality by cardiometabolic disease status. CVD, cardiovascular diseaseDM, diabetes mellitusHT, hypertension. The longitudinal data for cardiometabolic multimorbidity showed the age- and sex-adjusted HRs for mortality were broadly similar in those with one disease (1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.41), higher in those with two diseases (2.03, 95% CI 1.96 to 2.10), and similar in those with all three diseases (2.16, 95% CI 2.05 to 2.29) compared with participants without any disease at the last visit (figure 3). Although the pattern of HRs within each multimorbidity combination was broadly similar to the analysis using baseline status, the HR in participants with hypertension only reduced to 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.10), whereas that for those with a history of CVD increased to 4.80 (95% CI: 4.55 to 5.07). The HR in those with hypertension and diabetes was attenuated to 1.30 (95% CI: 1.22 to 1.39), whereas that for participants with hypertension and CVD increased to 2.36 (95% CI: 2.27 to 2.45). Broadly similar association were observed among the 788 703 participants with full information on additional risk factors (BMI, smoking, education level and location) after further adjustment for those factors (online supplementary etable 6).

Population attributable fractions

Using the prevalence and the HRs for cardiometabolic disease status at baseline, the PAFs for all-cause mortality in the overall population aged≥18 years due to one, two and three cardiometabolic diseases were 3.30% (95% CI: 2.95% to 3.65%), 1.73% (95% CI: 1.56% to 1.90%) and 0.30% (95% CI: 0.25% to 0.36%), respectively (table 3). In people aged≥40 years, the PAF increased to 5.10% (95% CI: 4.52% to 5.68%) for one disease, 2.85% (95% CI: 2.56% to 3.14%) for two diseases and 0.50% (95% CI: 0.40% to 0.59%) for three diseases. Using the prevalence at the last visit and the HRs for time-variant cardiometabolic disease status, PAFs were 4.17% (95% CI: 3.70% to 4.63%) for one disease, 4.36% (95% CI: 4.07% to 4.65%) for two diseases and 2.13% (95% CI: 1.92% to 2.35%) for three diseases. The overall PAF increased from 5.34% (95% CI: 4.96% to 5.72%) to 10.66% (95% CI: 10.11% to 11.21%).
Table 3

Population attributable fractions for cardiometabolic multimorbidity

Multimorbidity, % (95% CI)Total
One diseaseTwo diseases≥Three diseases
Using the prevalence and the HRs of cardiometabolic multimorbidity at baseline
 Participants ≥18 years3.30 (2.95 to 3.65)1.73 (1.56 to 1.90)0.30 (0.25 to 0.36)5.34 (4.96 to 5.72)
 Men3.10 (2.65 to 3.54)1.45 (1.24 to 1.65)0.18 (0.12 to 0.24)4.72 (4.24 to 5.21)
 Women3.68 (3.13 to 4.22)2.11 (1.83 to 2.39)0.44 (0.35 to 0.54)6.23 (5.62 to 6.83)
 Participants ≥40 years5.10 (4.52 to 5.68)2.85 (2.56 to 3.14)0.50 (0.40 to 0.59)8.44 (7.82 to 9.07)
 Participants ≥60 years6.11 (5.07 to 7.16)4.60 (4.01 to 5.18)0.96 (0.75 to 1.17)11.67 (10.54 to 12.81)
Using the prevalence at the last visit and the HRs using time-variant cardiometabolic multimorbidity status
 Participants ≥18 years4.17 (3.70 to 4.63)4.36 (4.07 to 4.65)2.13 (1.92 to 2.35)10.66 (10.11 to 11.21)
 Men4.19 (3.57 to 4.82)4.14 (3.76 to 4.52)1.69 (1.43 to 1.94)10.02 (9.30 to 10.75)
 Women4.33 (3.62 to 5.05)4.75 (4.30 to 5.20)2.71 (2.35 to 3.07)11.80 (10.95 to 12.64)
 Participants ≥40 years5.92 (5.18 to 6.65)6.95 (6.48 to 7.41)3.49 (3.13 to 3.84)16.35 (15.52 to 17.18)
 Participants ≥60 years6.47 (5.36 to 7.58)11.03 (10.19 to 11.88)5.75 (5.09 to 6.41)23.25 (21.98 to 24.53)
Population attributable fractions for cardiometabolic multimorbidity

Discussion

Our analyses of more than one million Chinese adults (22 750 deaths during the follow-up) in a longitudinal cohort provided estimates of the prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (hypertension, diabetes and CVD) in a general population under real-world circumstances. This study also described the evolution of cardiometabolic diseases in this population over 5 years and evaluated associations with risk for all-cause mortality. Each of our main findings has potential implications. First, 12.2% of Chinese adults aged≥18 years in a real-world general population had at least one diagnosed cardiometabolic disease, and nearly 3% had cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Hypertension was the dominant diagnosis in the group with one disease. The prevalence of multimorbidity at baseline increased with age, and was 5.2% and 11.6% in the population aged ≥40 and ≥60 years, respectively. One in four patients with any cardiometabolic disease had multimorbidity. This proportion was consistent in different age groups. Moreover, the proportion of patients with multimorbidity increased more than doubled during the (median) 5 years follow-up. The proportion of patients with all three diseases increased to ninefold from the baseline prevalence (0.2% to 1.8%). Nearly 60% of patients with both hypertension and diabetes at baseline had an incidence of CVD during the follow-up. Over 50% of patients with diabetes and 20% of patients with hypertension developed cardiometabolic multimorbidity. These findings highlighted the rapid progression of cardiometabolic diseases. Limited publications are available on the epidemiology of multimorbidity in a general Chinese population. A systematic review of nine published studies in China reported the prevalence of multimorbidity among those aged≥60 years ranged from 6.4% (95% CI: 5.1 to 8.0) to 76.5% (95% CI: 73.6 to 79.2).10 However, most of the included studies considered morbidities in addition to cardiometabolic diseases and only reported prevalence based on the number of diseases, which prevented us from making direct comparisons. The estimated prevalence of single diagnosed diseases in our study was broadly consistent with estimates from national surveillance. For example, although the estimate of the prevalence of diabetes in China reached 10.9% in 2013, the national prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was only 4%.4 Because our population was located in a developed area of China, our estimate of 3% is consistent with expectations, as the prevalence in this region is lower than the national estimate, even in traditional epidemiological surveys. Compared with developed countries, about 0.52% of participants aged≥40 years (mean age 53.6±11.6 years) in our cohort had multimorbidity of diabetes and CVD (regardless of hypertension, 0.47%+0.05%=0.52%, online supplementary etable 1), which was similar as 0.7% reported in the UK Biobank (mean age 56.7±8.1 years).16 About 1.3% of participants aged≥60 years in our cohort had multimorbidity of diabetes and CVD, compared with 5% from a recent US survey involving people aged≥65 years.20 Previous studies in China and other countries have also shown that the prevalence of multimorbidity increased significantly with age.9 21 Older adults should, therefore, be a major population targeted for cardiometabolic multimorbidity prevention, considering population ageing. Second, over the 5-year follow-up, we observed about a one-third higher mortality risk in patients with one condition at baseline, a two-thirds higher risk in patients with two diseases and just over a two-fold higher risk in patients with all three diseases. Although these results may suggest that associations between mortality and hypertension, diabetes and CVD were additive in this population, we found significant heterogeneities within each disease combination. Patients with only hypertension at baseline had the lowest HR (1.26) and those with CVD only at baseline had an HR of 3.31. This pattern was aggravated by applying longitudinal cardiometabolic disease status information. The HR of patients with hypertension only reduced to 1.07 and that of patients with CVD only increased to 4.8. Among around 70 000 patients with hypertension at baseline, 15 000 developed additional cardiometabolic diseases, and therefore, changed their disease status category. In addition, there were around 100 000 (10%) patients with hypertension in this study, and nearly half were identified during the follow-up (ie, suggesting that they were newly diagnosed). Therefore, the analysis using longitudinal disease status information showed that patients with hypertension had a lower HR than that using baseline status. In contrast, there was a small number of patients (just over 2000) with CVD only at baseline. Most patients with a history of CVD also had diabetes or hypertension. Around 4000 healthy participants at baseline developed CVD during follow-up. We speculated that the increment of the HR from 3.3 (baseline status) to 4.8 (longitudinal data) may be partly attributable to the relative short-term high risk after a first-ever CVD event. Similarly, we found an increased risk for those with both hypertension and CVD in the longitudinal analysis compared with that using baseline status. Regardless of the existence of other diseases, a history of CVD tended to dominate risk for mortality, especially over the 5 years of follow-up. Among patients with any cardiometabolic disease, patients with CVD only had the highest risk, which may reflect a short-term effect of newly diagnosed CVD. Alternatively, it may also indicate that patients with other cardiometabolic diseases (eg, hypertension or diabetes) were likely to be more aware of their health condition. Moreover, among those with cardiometabolic multimorbidity, only patients with hypertension and diabetes had significantly lower HR, whereas other groups (ie, all with CVD) were broadly similar, even those with all three diseases. Regarding the HRs for mortality from our study, we compared our findings with other studies. In ERFC study (involving 91 cohort studies, mainly Western populations),16 the estimated HR for mortality was about two in participants with one cardiometabolic multimorbidity condition (type 2 diabetes, CHD and stroke) and the association was multiplicative. However, they did not include hypertension and only used baseline disease status. We observed a broadly similar HR for patients with diabetes. The higher HR for patients with CVD (stroke or MI) in our population might be explained by differences in the overall healthcare services across countries with different economic levels. The estimated HR for patients with CVD and diabetes (regardless of hypertension) in our study was around 2.5, which was lower than the ERFC estimate (around 3.5–4), but consistent with the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (at 2.4).22 This may imply that ethnic disparity could explain the differences. We also showed that cardiometabolic multimorbidity had a more serious impact on those living in urban areas compared with rural areas. This suggests that it is important to consider location differences in developing strategies to improve public health. The strength of this study was that it was a large-scale, comprehensive study under real-world circumstances. We used longitudinal data for cardiometabolic disease status to assess the prevalence and evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity during follow-up. However, this study also had several limitations. First, the CHERRY study is based on a regional population in a developed area of China and is not nationally representative. Second, this study had a relatively short follow-up period and the long-term effect of cardiometabolic multimorbidity needs to be further evaluated. Third, the accurate time of disease onset, especially hypertension and diabetes, were not available. We could only approximate this information using the first diagnosis time for these diseases. Information on medication use and risk control was also not available. Finally, our laboratory data sources included lipids measurements for only 25%–30% of the population, which prevented us from model adjustment for conventional lipids risk factors. However, the ERFC results showed broadly similar HRs for cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality after further adjustment for smoking, BMI, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, socioeconomic status and diet.16

Conclusions

The prevalence of patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity in a general population in China increased more than doubled over 5 years, indicating a rapid evolution of cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Among all combinations, history of CVD leads the risk for mortality. Our findings highlight the need for a complementary strategy for primary and secondary prevention of cardiometabolic diseases in China.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Status of prevalence study on multimorbidity of chronic disease in China: systematic review.

Authors:  Xiaolan Hu; Juan Huang; Yaqi Lv; Guangxi Li; Xiaoxia Peng
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.730

2.  Rapid health transition in China, 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Gonghuan Yang; Yu Wang; Yixin Zeng; George F Gao; Xiaofeng Liang; Maigeng Zhou; Xia Wan; Shicheng Yu; Yuhong Jiang; Mohsen Naghavi; Theo Vos; Haidong Wang; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013.

Authors:  Limin Wang; Pei Gao; Mei Zhang; Zhengjing Huang; Dudan Zhang; Qian Deng; Yichong Li; Zhenping Zhao; Xueying Qin; Danyao Jin; Maigeng Zhou; Xun Tang; Yonghua Hu; Linhong Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-Based Survey of 480 687 Adults.

Authors:  Wenzhi Wang; Bin Jiang; Haixin Sun; Xiaojuan Ru; Dongling Sun; Linhong Wang; Limin Wang; Yong Jiang; Yichong Li; Yilong Wang; Zhenghong Chen; Shengping Wu; Yazhuo Zhang; David Wang; Yongjun Wang; Valery L Feigin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The Burden of Hypertension and Associated Risk for Cardiovascular Mortality in China.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Ben Lacey; Robert Clarke; Yu Guo; Xiang Ling Kong; Ling Yang; Yiping Chen; Zheng Bian; Junshi Chen; Jinhuai Meng; Youping Xiong; Tianyou He; Zengchang Pang; Shuo Zhang; Rory Collins; Richard Peto; Liming Li; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in northeastern China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S B Wang; C D'Arcy; Y Q Yu; B Li; Y W Liu; Y C Tao; Y H Wu; Q Q Zhang; Z Q Xu; Y L Fu; C G Kou
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.427

7.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karen Barnett; Stewart W Mercer; Michael Norbury; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Association Between Diabetes and Cause-Specific Mortality in Rural and Urban Areas of China.

Authors:  Fiona Bragg; Michael V Holmes; Andri Iona; Yu Guo; Huaidong Du; Yiping Chen; Zheng Bian; Ling Yang; William Herrington; Derrick Bennett; Iain Turnbull; Yongmei Liu; Shixian Feng; Junshi Chen; Robert Clarke; Rory Collins; Richard Peto; Liming Li; Zhengming Chen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Using big data to improve cardiovascular care and outcomes in China: a protocol for the CHinese Electronic health Records Research in Yinzhou (CHERRY) Study.

Authors:  Hongbo Lin; Xun Tang; Peng Shen; Dudan Zhang; Jinguo Wu; Jingyi Zhang; Ping Lu; Yaqin Si; Pei Gao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents.

Authors:  Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; David Wormser; Pei Gao; Stephen Kaptoge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Benjamin Cairns; Rachel Huxley; Chandra Jackson; Grace Joshy; Sarah Lewington; JoAnn Manson; Neil Murphy; Alpa Patel; Jonathan Samet; Mark Woodward; Wei Zheng; Maigen Zhou; Narinder Bansal; Aurelio Barricarte; Brian Carter; James Cerhan; George Smith; Xianghua Fang; Oscar Franco; Jane Green; Jim Halsey; Janet Hildebrand; Keum Jung; Rosemary Korda; Dale McLerran; Steven Moore; Linda O'Keeffe; Ellie Paige; Anna Ramond; Gillian Reeves; Betsy Rolland; Carlotta Sacerdote; Naveed Sattar; Eleni Sofianopoulou; June Stevens; Michael Thun; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Ling Yang; Young Yun; Peter Willeit; Emily Banks; Valerie Beral; Zhengming Chen; Susan Gapstur; Marc Gunter; Patricia Hartge; Sun Jee; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Peto; John Potter; Walter Willett; Simon Thompson; John Danesh; Frank Hu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  26 in total

1.  Is polypharmacy beneficial or detrimental for older adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity? Pooled analysis of studies from Hong Kong and Europe.

Authors:  Johnny T K Cheung; Ruby Yu; Jean Woo
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Do replicable profiles of multimorbidity exist? Systematic review and synthesis.

Authors:  Ljoudmila Busija; Karen Lim; Cassandra Szoeke; Kerrie M Sanders; Marita P McCabe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Longitudinal bidirectional associations between internalizing mental disorders and cardiometabolic disorders in the general adult population.

Authors:  Jasper Nuyen; Elisabeth H Bos; Peter de Jonge; Saskia van Dorsselaer; Marlous Tuithof; Marloes Kleinjan; Ron de Graaf; Margreet Ten Have
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Trends in the Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in the United States, 1999-2018.

Authors:  Xunjie Cheng; Tianqi Ma; Feiyun Ouyang; Guogang Zhang; Yongping Bai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Frequency and types of clusters of major chronic diseases in 0.5 million adults in urban and rural China.

Authors:  Parisa Hariri; Robert Clarke; Fiona Bragg; Yiping Chen; Yu Guo; Ling Yang; Jun Lv; Canqing Yu; Liming Li; Zhengming Chen; Derrick A Bennett
Journal:  J Multimorb Comorb       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  Association of Healthy Lifestyle and Life Expectancy in Patients With Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: A Prospective Cohort Study of UK Biobank.

Authors:  Xunjie Cheng; Feiyun Ouyang; Tianqi Ma; Yi Luo; Jinghua Yin; Jinchen Li; Guogang Zhang; Yongping Bai
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 7.  The effect of green coffee extract supplementation on cardio metabolic risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Morvaridi; Elham Rayyani; Malihe Jaafari; Alireza Khiabani; Mehran Rahimlou
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2020-05-15

8.  The Effects of Social, Personal, and Behavioral Risk Factors and PM2.5 on Cardio-Metabolic Disparities in a Cohort of Community Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Paul D Juarez; Mohammad Tabatabai; Robert Burciaga Valdez; Darryl B Hood; Wansoo Im; Charles Mouton; Cynthia Colen; Mohammad Z Al-Hamdan; Patricia Matthews-Juarez; Maureen Y Lichtveld; Daniel Sarpong; Aramandla Ramesh; Michael A Langston; Gary L Rogers; Charles A Phillips; John F Reichard; Macarius M Donneyong; William Blot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Physical activity trends and metabolic health outcomes in people living with HIV in the US, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Amanda L Willig; Allison R Webel; Andrew O Westfall; Emily B Levitan; Heidi M Crane; Thomas W Buford; Greer A Burkholder; James H Willig; Aaron J Blashill; Richard D Moore; W Christopher Mathews; Anne Zinski; Josh Muhammad; Elvin H Geng; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron; Benigno Rodriguez; Marcas M Bamman; E Turner Overton
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 8.194

10.  Cardiometabolic multimorbidity is associated with a worse Covid-19 prognosis than individual cardiometabolic risk factors: a multicentre retrospective study (CoViDiab II).

Authors:  Ernesto Maddaloni; Luca D'Onofrio; Francesco Alessandri; Carmen Mignogna; Gaetano Leto; Giuseppe Pascarella; Ivano Mezzaroma; Miriam Lichtner; Paolo Pozzilli; Felice Eugenio Agrò; Monica Rocco; Francesco Pugliese; Andrea Lenzi; Rury R Holman; Claudio Maria Mastroianni; Raffaella Buzzetti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.