| Literature DB >> 30832226 |
Aleksandr Ianevski1, Eva Zusinaite2, Nastassia Shtaida3, Hannimari Kallio-Kokko4, Miia Valkonen5, Anu Kantele6, Kaidi Telling7, Irja Lutsar8, Pille Letjuka9, Natalja Metelitsa10, Valentyn Oksenych11, Uga Dumpis12, Astra Vitkauskiene13, Kestutis Stašaitis14, Christina Öhrmalm15, Kåre Bondeson16, Anders Bergqvist17, Rebecca J Cox18, Tanel Tenson19, Andres Merits20, Denis E Kainov21,22.
Abstract
With the increasing pace of global warming, it is important to understand the role of meteorological factors in influenza virus (IV) epidemics. In this study, we investigated the impact of temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation on IV activity in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania during 2010⁻2018. Both correlation and machine learning analyses revealed that low temperature and UV indexes were the most predictive meteorological factors for IV epidemics in Northern Europe. Our in vitro experiments confirmed that low temperature and UV radiation preserved IV infectivity. Associations between these meteorological factors and IV activity could improve surveillance and promote development of accurate predictive models for future influenza outbreaks in the region.Entities:
Keywords: UV; epidemics; influenza; temperature; weather
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30832226 PMCID: PMC6466003 DOI: 10.3390/v11030207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Weekly number of detections of influenza viruses in six Northern European countries, 2017–2018. (A). Map showing six Northern European countries included in the analysis. A blank map of Europe in SVG format from Wikimedia Commons, was used as a template. (B) Stacked bar chart representing the number of influenza-positive specimens distributed across six countries between week 35 of 2017 and week 34 of 2018. Each country is shown as a bar in the same color as (A).
Figure 2Association between six meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, and pressure) and influenza activity in six Northern Europe countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) between week 35 of 2017 and week 34 of 2018. (A) Contribution of each meteorological factor to predictive performance of a machine learning Random Forest model trained to predict influenza activity. The contribution is measured as percentage mean decrease in accuracy (the higher the bar, the more important the factor). (B) Correlation between meteorological factors and influenza activity. Absolute values of Pearson correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) are shown.
Figure 3Association between meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, and pressure) and influenza activity in six Northern Europe countries averaged for the period from week 35 of 2010 and week 34 of 2017. (Left) Correlation analysis between meteorological factors and influenza activity. (Right) Contribution of each meteorological factor to predictive performance of machine-learning Random Forest models trained to predict the influenza virus (IV) activity in six Northern European countries. Contribution is measured as percentage mean decrease in accuracy (the higher the bar, the more important the feature is). Both metrics are averaged for the period from 2010 to 2017 epidemic seasons. Each error bar shows a 95% confidence interval for the mean of six countries (n = 6).
Figure 4Effect of temperature and UV radiation on infectivity of GFP-encoding influenza A virus (PR8-GFP). (A) PR8-GFP was incubated at indicated temperatures for 48 h or exposed to UVB or UVC radiation for the indicated times. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase-immortalized retinal pigment (RPE) cells were subsequently infected with the virus. GFP expression was visualized using fluorescent microscopy. The size of each image corresponds to 1000 × 1250 μM2. (B) Viruses were obtained and RPE cells were infected as for (A). Viability of cells were measured using Cell Titer Glow assay. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (C) Viruses were obtained and RPE cells were infected as for panel A. Death of cells were measured using Cell Tox Green assay. Mean ± SD, n = 3.