Literature DB >> 30832226

Low Temperature and Low UV Indexes Correlated with Peaks of Influenza Virus Activity in Northern Europe during 2010⁻2018.

Aleksandr Ianevski1, Eva Zusinaite2, Nastassia Shtaida3, Hannimari Kallio-Kokko4, Miia Valkonen5, Anu Kantele6, Kaidi Telling7, Irja Lutsar8, Pille Letjuka9, Natalja Metelitsa10, Valentyn Oksenych11, Uga Dumpis12, Astra Vitkauskiene13, Kestutis Stašaitis14, Christina Öhrmalm15, Kåre Bondeson16, Anders Bergqvist17, Rebecca J Cox18, Tanel Tenson19, Andres Merits20, Denis E Kainov21,22.   

Abstract

With the increasing pace of global warming, it is important to understand the role of meteorological factors in influenza virus (IV) epidemics. In this study, we investigated the impact of temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation on IV activity in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania during 2010⁻2018. Both correlation and machine learning analyses revealed that low temperature and UV indexes were the most predictive meteorological factors for IV epidemics in Northern Europe. Our in vitro experiments confirmed that low temperature and UV radiation preserved IV infectivity. Associations between these meteorological factors and IV activity could improve surveillance and promote development of accurate predictive models for future influenza outbreaks in the region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UV; epidemics; influenza; temperature; weather

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30832226      PMCID: PMC6466003          DOI: 10.3390/v11030207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.048


1. Introduction

Influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes) and B (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria lineages) viruses (IVs) cause yearly epidemics with a substantial number of infected individuals requiring primary healthcare services and hospitalization [1,2]. Up to 650,000 people are estimated to die each year from IV infections [3]. It is now becoming evident that meteorological factors are associated with seasonality of IV epidemics [4,5]. Low temperature and low humidity have been shown to enhance IV transmissibility in temperate climates at high latitudes, whereas high humidity favors outbreaks in low latitudes in tropical and subtropical zones. In mid-latitudes, semiannual outbreaks result from alternating cool and rainy conditions [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Solar or UV radiation has also been suggested to have an influence on the seasonal influenza epidemics in temperate climates [12,13]. In fact, temperature, humidity, and UV radiation among other factors (genetic and social) may be valuable indicators to include in influenza surveillance for accurate prediction of future influenza outbreaks in different climate zones. In this study, we explored the association between six meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, and pressure) and IV activity in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania during 2010–2018. In particular, we utilized correlation analysis and machine learning modeling as well as in vitro experiments to show that low temperature and UV indexes were the most predictive meteorological factors for high IV activity. Thus, our results highlighted an important role of temperature and UV index in influenza epidemics in Northern Europe.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The “NorthernFlu” Consortium

To better understand the etiology of influenza epidemics in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania a “NorthernFlu” consortium was established in 2017. It consists of epidemiologists, clinicians and researchers from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The consortium aims to determine the impact of meteorological, societal, and genetic factors on IV stability and transmissibility and to improve prediction, prevention and treatment of severe IV infections.

2.2. Data Collection

Weekly statistics of the specimens’ number positive for influenza across six analyzed countries were collected from the World Health Organization (WHO) website through a FluNet global web-based tool [14]. The virological data entered into FluNet were collected from National Influenza Centers (NICs) of the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) and other national influenza reference laboratories collaborating actively with GISRS, or were uploaded from the WHO regional databases. Daily statistics of five meteorological factors (temperature (°C), humidity (%), wind speed (mph), pressure (Hg), precipitation (cm)) were manually exported from the web-interface of the Weather Underground service for six capitals. The Weather Underground accumulates information from the National Weather Service (NWS), and over 250,000 personal weather stations (PWS). Time series (cloud-free erythemal) of UV index data were obtained from the operational Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service (TEMIS) ozone data archive.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The FluNet database provided weekly statistics of specimens positive for influenza viruses, whereas meteorological factor data were measured daily. Therefore, we adjusted each meteorological factor (median) per week. In order to investigate the potential relationship between meteorological factors and influenza activity (number of IV positive specimens) in all analyzed countries, correlation analysis and machine learning based modeling were applied. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between each meteorological factor and influenza activity was calculated using the “stats” R package with a threshold of significance, p = 0.05. For the machine learning modeling, Random Forest (RF) was optimized to find the most predictive meteorological factors of influenza activity. More specifically, for each country, the time-series measurements for all six meteorological factors were used as input features (explanatory variables) and the number of IV-positive specimens as an output variable for the model. The optimal Random Forest hyper-parameters, which are estimated from the data and used to train the most accurate model, were identified using Bayesian optimization (mlrMBO R-package, version: 1.1.1), with five times repeated 10-fold cross validation. The optimized RF model (with the lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE) from cross-validation) was used to estimate the contribution of each meteorological factor as a predictive performance of IV activity. This was done by random permutation of the measurements of one of the meteorological factors, while keeping measurements for all other factors constant, followed by estimation of the impact of this procedure on model accuracy (i.e., percentage mean decrease in accuracy). RF R-package version 4.6-14 was applied for the model training, with the following hyper-parameters used for optimization: Number of trees, number of randomly sampled features at each tree split (mtry), and minimum size of terminal nodes. To find correlation between colder winters and increases in the number of influenza-positive specimens for six countries, we applied the Cox–Stuart statistical test. In particular, the median winter temperatures (2010–2018) were calculated by taking a median of daily temperatures between 1st of December and the 28th of February. Then, the median winter temperatures were ordered by the number of total IV-positive specimens for each country each year. A Cox–Stuart statistical test was applied to the ordered median winter temperatures to find any significant increasing or decreasing trends (threshold of significance was set to p = 0.05).

2.4. Experimental Validation

Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin mixture (Lonza, Cologne, Germany), 2 mM l-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Lonza, Cologne, Germany). The virus growth medium (VGM) contained 0.2% BSA, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1 μg/mL l-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-trypsin (TPCK)-trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) in DMEM. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase-immortalized retinal pigment (RPE) cells were grown in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin mixture, 2 mM l-glutamine, 10% FBS, and 0.25% sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) as described previously [15]. The virus growth medium (VGM) contained 0.2% BSA, 2 mM l-glutamine, 0.35% NaHCO3, and 1 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich) in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, Paisley, Scotland). Human primary macrophages were derived from leukocyte-rich buffy coats from healthy blood donors. In particular, monocytes were isolated as described previously [16]. Monocytes were seeded in 96- or 6-well plates and cultured in serum free macrophage media (Gibco, Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 10 ng/mL granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin mixture at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 7 days, polarizing the monocytes into macrophages of the acute pro-inflammatory M1-phenotype. Before stimulation, the media was replaced with fresh GM-CSF free macrophage media. GFP-expressing influenza A/PR8-NS116-GFP strain (PR8-GFP) was purified by centrifugation in sucrose gradient as previously described [17,18]. The purified virus was incubated at different temperatures for 48 h. Alternatively, the virus was exposed to UVC (λ = 254 nm) or to UVB (λ = 302 nm) using Hoefer UVC 500 Ultraviolet Crosslinker (20 J/cm2) or VM25/30/GX trans-illuminator as UV sources, respectively. Resulting viruses were titered on MDCK cells using plaque assay as described previously [15]. The virus titers were determined by calculating the plaque forming units (PFU) for each sample and were expressed as PFU/mL. RPE cells were infected with the viruses at a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 1. After 24 h GFP expression was measured in infected cells using a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss Observer Z1, Zaventem, Belgium). Viability of cells were measured using Cell Titer Glow assay (Promega, Madison, USA). The luminescence was read with a PHERAstar FS plate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The A/Helsinki/P18/2009(pdm09) virus was isolated from nasopharyngeal aspirates of Finnish patients in 2009 [19]. The viral genome was sequenced (GeneBank accession numbers: JQ173161–JQ173168). The virus was exposed to different temperatures, UVB or UVC radiation. Resulting viruses were titered on MDCK cells using plaque assay as described previously [15]. The virus titers were determined by calculating the plaque forming units (PFU) for each sample and expressed as PFU/mL. Macrophages were infected with mock, temperature/UV-treated or untreated viruses for 36 h. The viability of cells were measured using Cell Titer Glow assay using a PHERAstar FS plate reader.

3. Results

3.1. Influenza Virus Activity during 2017–2018 Season

A total of 62,296 IV-positive specimens were collected from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2018 (Figure 1). The highest number of IV-positive specimens was collected from Norway (34,895), whereas the lowest number of samples was from Finland (231). Among positive specimens in six countries, only 11% were classified: 3744 were influenza A viruses (71% of A/H3 and 29% of A/H1) and 2866 were influenza B viruses (97% of B/Yamagata and 3% of B/Victoria). Most IVs were detected between the 1st and 14th weeks of 2018 (Figure 1), while the peak of influenza occurred between 29 January, 2018 and 11 March, 2018 (5th to 10th weeks). The only exception was Latvia, where the peak of influenza activity occurred between the 9th and 12th weeks (Figure S1).
Figure 1

Weekly number of detections of influenza viruses in six Northern European countries, 2017–2018. (A). Map showing six Northern European countries included in the analysis. A blank map of Europe in SVG format from Wikimedia Commons, was used as a template. (B) Stacked bar chart representing the number of influenza-positive specimens distributed across six countries between week 35 of 2017 and week 34 of 2018. Each country is shown as a bar in the same color as (A).

3.2. Temperature and UV Index Are the most Predictive Meteorological Factors of IV Epidemic in 2017–2018 in Northern Europe

We obtained daily statistics for six meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation) from the web-interface of Weather Underground and operational Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet services for Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2018 (Figures S1 and S2). We analyzed correlation between each meteorological factor and IV activity to find significant associations and to measure the strength of linear association between variables using the Pearson correlation coefficient. As the correlation analysis does not always provide an accurate picture of cause and effect, especially in nonlinear systems, where interdependence between variables is complex, we validated our results by optimizing a machine learning Random Forest model. The model was optimized for each of the analyzed countries with an average explained variation of 71%. Both correlation and machine learning analyses revealed that temperature was the most predictive meteorological factor of influenza activity in all six Northern European countries (Figure 2). UV index was the second most predictive in all countries, except Latvia. The humidity was the third most important factor associated with IV activity. Other meteorological factors, including wind speed, precipitation, and pressure showed low correlation with the peaks of IV activity and were not among the most predictive features of the machine learning Random Forest model.
Figure 2

Association between six meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, and pressure) and influenza activity in six Northern Europe countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) between week 35 of 2017 and week 34 of 2018. (A) Contribution of each meteorological factor to predictive performance of a machine learning Random Forest model trained to predict influenza activity. The contribution is measured as percentage mean decrease in accuracy (the higher the bar, the more important the factor). (B) Correlation between meteorological factors and influenza activity. Absolute values of Pearson correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) are shown.

3.3. Temperature and UV Index Are the Most Predictive Meteorological Factors of IV Epidemics in 2010–2017 in Northern Europe

To confirm our finding, we analyzed associations between six meteorological factors and IV activity in six European countries during 2010–2017. Both low temperature and low UV index remained the most predictive meteorological factors of IV activity peaks (Figure 3). Interestingly, the peaks of IV activity occurred on average at −1.9 °C (range −19.9 °C to 26.0 °C) and with a UV index of 0.7 (range 0.13 to 7.1). However, colder winters contributed to an increase of IV activity only in Finland and Lithuania (Figure S3).
Figure 3

Association between meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, precipitation, and pressure) and influenza activity in six Northern Europe countries averaged for the period from week 35 of 2010 and week 34 of 2017. (Left) Correlation analysis between meteorological factors and influenza activity. (Right) Contribution of each meteorological factor to predictive performance of machine-learning Random Forest models trained to predict the influenza virus (IV) activity in six Northern European countries. Contribution is measured as percentage mean decrease in accuracy (the higher the bar, the more important the feature is). Both metrics are averaged for the period from 2010 to 2017 epidemic seasons. Each error bar shows a 95% confidence interval for the mean of six countries (n = 6).

3.4. Low Temperature and Low UV Radiation Preserve IV Infectivity In Vitro

To validate the association between IV activity and low temperature and UV indexes, we performed in vitro experiments. Purified GFP-encoding influenza A/Puerto Rico/1934 virus (PR8-GFP) was incubated at different temperatures for 48 h or exposed to UVC or UVB radiation for different times. The resulting virus preparations were subjected to titration on MDCK cells. Exposure to high temperatures or prolonged UVC, but not UVB radiation, lowered virus infectivity (Figure S4A,B) Next, we infected human RPE cells with temperature-, UVB- or UVC-exposed viruses and monitored virus-mediated GFP expression. We observed that increasing temperature and prolonged exposure to UVC, but not UVB, reduced A/H1N1-mediated GFP expression in infected cells (Figure 4A). Moreover, viruses exposed to high temperature or prolonged UVC radiation were unable to kill RPE cells (Figure 4B,C).
Figure 4

Effect of temperature and UV radiation on infectivity of GFP-encoding influenza A virus (PR8-GFP). (A) PR8-GFP was incubated at indicated temperatures for 48 h or exposed to UVB or UVC radiation for the indicated times. Human telomerase reverse transcriptase-immortalized retinal pigment (RPE) cells were subsequently infected with the virus. GFP expression was visualized using fluorescent microscopy. The size of each image corresponds to 1000 × 1250 μM2. (B) Viruses were obtained and RPE cells were infected as for (A). Viability of cells were measured using Cell Titer Glow assay. Mean ± SD, n = 3. (C) Viruses were obtained and RPE cells were infected as for panel A. Death of cells were measured using Cell Tox Green assay. Mean ± SD, n = 3.

We performed similar experiment using clinical A/H1N1(pdm09) influenza isolate and human PBMC-derived macrophages. Viruses exposed to high temperature or UVC radiation were neither viable nor able to kill macrophages, consistent with above results (Figure S4C,D). Altogether, these results suggest that low temperature and UV radiation preserved IV infectivity.

4. Discussion

Previous studies have shown that absolute humidity and temperature are major determinants of IV activity in temperate climates [7,20]. In this study, we used correlation and machine learning analyses to quantify the impact of six meteorological factors (temperature, UV index, humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation) on the IV activity in six Northern European countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) during 2010–2018. We demonstrated that low temperature, UV indexes and humidity were associated with annual peaks of IV activity. Humidity was a less important predictor of IV activity compared to temperature and UV index. These results could be due to a statistical anomaly (UV and humidity were very close in their indices of association) or a specific phenomenon caused by the long and dark winters of Northern Europe. Our experiments with UVB-, UVC- or temperature-exposed viruses showed that low temperature and UVB preserved infectivity of IV in vitro. It should be noted, that exposure to UVC radiation inactivated the virus. However, UVC, by contrast to UVB, is absorbed by atmosphere and, therefore, could not reach the earth surface and affect IV-host interaction. Previous association studies showed that warmer winters could contribute to the decrease in IV activity in Europe and the US [21,22]. In particular, mild epidemics were associated with warm winters, which were followed by cold winters with severe IV outbreaks with early onset. It was proposed that fewer people were infected with influenza during warm winters, thereby leaving an unnaturally large fraction of susceptible individuals in the population going into the next season leading to early and severe epidemics. Our study does not support an association between warmer winters and a decrease in IV activity, because such a trend was observed only for two of six analyzed countries for the period from 2010 to 2018. Hence, there must be other factors such as host age and immune competence that influence IV activity, which are outside of the scope of this study. It was shown that low winter temperatures correlated with both influenza incidence and global mortality, which mainly affected those aged 65 and older [21,23,24]. Low UV indexes could also be associated with global mortality. Indeed, data from six Northern European countries reported to the EuroMOMO project showed an excess mortality from all causes between the beginning of Januaries and the end of Februaries in 2010–2018, and coincided with IV epidemic peaks, low temperature and low UV indexes.

5. Conclusions

Inclusion of temperature, UV index and other meteorological parameters in IV surveillance systems could further our understanding of virus stability and transmissibility in the world, and help to develop accurate predictive models of influenza epidemics. Moreover, the combination of epidemiological, meteorological and genetic studies could unravel the evolution of influenza viruses and, consequently, improve early intervention and long-term control strategies of future influenza outbreaks.
  19 in total

1.  Effect of environmental factors on the spatio-temporal patterns of influenza spread.

Authors:  K M L Charland; D L Buckeridge; J L Sturtevant; F Melton; B Y Reis; K D Mandl; J S Brownstein
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 2.  The role of viral, host, and secondary bacterial factors in influenza pathogenesis.

Authors:  John C Kash; Jeffery K Taubenberger
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Obatoclax, saliphenylhalamide, and gemcitabine inhibit influenza a virus infection.

Authors:  Oxana V Denisova; Laura Kakkola; Lin Feng; Jakob Stenman; Ashwini Nagaraj; Johanna Lampe; Bhagwan Yadav; Tero Aittokallio; Pasi Kaukinen; Tero Ahola; Suvi Kuivanen; Olli Vapalahti; Anu Kantele; Janne Tynell; Ilkka Julkunen; Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; Henrik Paavilainen; Veijo Hukkanen; Richard M Elliott; Jef K De Brabander; Xavier Saelens; Denis E Kainov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Inactivation of influenza virus by solar radiation.

Authors:  Jose-Luis Sagripanti; C David Lytle
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Rescue of influenza virus expressing GFP from the NS1 reading frame.

Authors:  Christian Kittel; Sabine Sereinig; Boris Ferko; Jana Stasakova; Julia Romanova; Andrea Wolkerstorfer; Hermann Katinger; Andrej Egorov
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: a modelling study.

Authors:  A Danielle Iuliano; Katherine M Roguski; Howard H Chang; David J Muscatello; Rakhee Palekar; Stefano Tempia; Cheryl Cohen; Jon Michael Gran; Dena Schanzer; Benjamin J Cowling; Peng Wu; Jan Kyncl; Li Wei Ang; Minah Park; Monika Redlberger-Fritz; Hongjie Yu; Laura Espenhain; Anand Krishnan; Gideon Emukule; Liselotte van Asten; Susana Pereira da Silva; Suchunya Aungkulanon; Udo Buchholz; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Joseph S Bresee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Quantifying the role of weather on seasonal influenza.

Authors:  Marion Roussel; Dominique Pontier; Jean-Marie Cohen; Bruno Lina; David Fouchet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Environmental predictors of seasonal influenza epidemics across temperate and tropical climates.

Authors:  James D Tamerius; Jeffrey Shaman; Wladimir J Alonso; Wladmir J Alonso; Kimberly Bloom-Feshbach; Christopher K Uejio; Andrew Comrie; Cécile Viboud
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Associations between Meteorological Parameters and Influenza Activity in Berlin (Germany), Ljubljana (Slovenia), Castile and León (Spain) and Israeli Districts.

Authors:  Radina P Soebiyanto; Diane Gross; Pernille Jorgensen; Silke Buda; Michal Bromberg; Zalman Kaufman; Katarina Prosenc; Maja Socan; Tomás Vega Alonso; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Richard K Kiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Full-Genome Sequences of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Viruses Isolated from Finnish Patients from 2009 to 2013.

Authors:  Triin Lakspere; Janne Tynell; Minttu Kaloinen; Maarten Vanlede; Alun Parsons; Niina Ikonen; Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; Anu Kantele; Pirkko Mattila; Henrikki Almusa; Ilkka Julkunen; Denis Kainov; Laura Kakkola
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-01-16
View more
  26 in total

1.  COVID-19 and climate: global evidence from 117 countries.

Authors:  Simiao Chen; Klaus Prettner; Michael Kuhn; Pascal Geldsetzer; Chen Wang; Till Bärnighausen; David E Bloom
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-06-05

2.  Eco-epidemiological assessment of the COVID-19 epidemic in China, January-February 2020.

Authors:  Peter Byass
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Solar UV-B/A radiation is highly effective in inactivating SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Fabrizio Nicastro; Giorgia Sironi; Elio Antonello; Andrea Bianco; Mara Biasin; John R Brucato; Ilaria Ermolli; Giovanni Pareschi; Marta Salvati; Paolo Tozzi; Daria Trabattoni; Mario Clerici
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The Effect of Ambient Environmental Conditions on COVID-19 Mortality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karla Romero Starke; René Mauer; Ethel Karskens; Anna Pretzsch; David Reissig; Albert Nienhaus; Anna Lene Seidler; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Potential Antiviral Options against SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Aleksandr Ianevski; Rouan Yao; Mona Høysæter Fenstad; Svetlana Biza; Eva Zusinaite; Tuuli Reisberg; Hilde Lysvand; Kirsti Løseth; Veslemøy Malm Landsem; Janne Fossum Malmring; Valentyn Oksenych; Sten Even Erlandsen; Per Arne Aas; Lars Hagen; Caroline H Pettersen; Tanel Tenson; Jan Egil Afset; Svein Arne Nordbø; Magnar Bjørås; Denis E Kainov
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  The higher temperature and ultraviolet, the lower COVID-19 prevalence-meta-regression of data from large US cities.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Toshiki Kuno; Yujiro Yokoyama; Hiroki Ueyama; Takuya Matsushiro; Yosuke Hari; Tomo Ando
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  No association of COVID-19 transmission with temperature or UV radiation in Chinese cities.

Authors:  Ye Yao; Jinhua Pan; Zhixi Liu; Xia Meng; Weidong Wang; Haidong Kan; Weibing Wang
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  On the global trends and spread of the COVID-19 outbreak: preliminary assessment of the potential relation between location-specific temperature and UV index.

Authors:  Sachin S Gunthe; Basudev Swain; Satya S Patra; Aneesh Amte
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 9.  Evidence Regarding Vitamin D and Risk of COVID-19 and Its Severity.

Authors:  Joseph Mercola; William B Grant; Carol L Wagner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Global to USA County Scale Analysis of Weather, Urban Density, Mobility, Homestay, and Mask Use on COVID-19.

Authors:  Sajad Jamshidi; Maryam Baniasad; Dev Niyogi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.