Literature DB >> 30832145

Effect of Irrigation and Soil Water Stress on Densities of Macrophomina phaseolina in Soil and Roots of Two Soybean Cultivars.

S R Kendig1, J C Rupe2, H D Scott3.   

Abstract

The effects of irrigation and soil water stress on Macrophomina phaseolina microsclerotial (MS) densities in the soil and roots of soybean were studied in 1988, 1989, and 1990. Soybean cvs. Davis and Lloyd received irrigation until flowering (TAR2), after flowering (IAR2), full season (FSI), or not at all (NI). Soil water matric potentials at 15- and 30-cm depths were recorded throughout the growing season and used to schedule irrigation. Soil MS densities were determined at the beginning of each season. Root MS densities were determined periodically throughout the growing season. Microsclerotia were present in the roots of irrigated as well as nonirrigated soybean within 6 weeks after planting. By vegetative growth stage V13, these densities reached relatively stable levels in the NI and FSI treatments (2.23 to 2.35 and 1.35 to 1.63 log [microsclerotia per gram of dry root], respectively) through reproductive growth stage R6. After R6, irrigation was discontinued and root densities of microsclerotia increased in all treatments. Initiation (IAR2) or termination (TAR2) of irrigation at R2 resulted in significant changes in root MS densities, with densities reaching levels intermediate between those of FSI and NI treatments. Year to year differences in root colonization reflected differences in soil moisture due to rainfall. The rate of root colonization in response to soil moisture stress decreased with plant age. Root colonization was significantly greater in Davis than Lloyd at R5 and R8. This was reflected in a trend toward higher soil densities of M. phaseolina at planting in plots planted with Davis than in plots planted with Lloyd. Although no charcoal rot symptoms in the plant were observed in this study, these results indicated that water management can limit, but not prevent, colonization of soybean by M. phaseolina, that cultivars differ in colonization, and that these differences may affect soil densities of the fungus.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 30832145     DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.8.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Dis        ISSN: 0191-2917            Impact factor:   4.438


  4 in total

Review 1.  Macrophomina phaseolina : General Characteristics of Pathogenicity and Methods of Control.

Authors:  Nathalie Marquez; María L Giachero; Stéphane Declerck; Daniel A Ducasse
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  A direct observation technique for evaluating sclerotium germination by Macrophomina phaseolina and effects of biocontrol materials on survival of sclerotia in soil.

Authors:  Robert G Pratt
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.785

3.  Toxin Production in Soybean (Glycine max L.) Plants with Charcoal Rot Disease and by Macrophomina phaseolina, the Fungus that Causes the Disease.

Authors:  Hamed K Abbas; Nacer Bellaloui; Cesare Accinelli; James R Smith; W Thomas Shier
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Temperature and Soil Moisture Stress Modulate the Host Defense Response in Chickpea During Dry Root Rot Incidence.

Authors:  U S Sharath Chandran; Avijit Tarafdar; H S Mahesha; Mamta Sharma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.