Literature DB >> 30830704

Mixed-methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.

Geoffrey L Dickens1, Emma Lamont1, Jo Mullen2, Nadine MacArthur3, Fiona J Stirling1.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses' responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).
BACKGROUND: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of BPD. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert by experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.
DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective within-subjects cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.
METHODS: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a diagnosis of BPD at pre- and postintervention (N = 28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants' experiences of the intervention (N = 11).
RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert by experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert by experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; borderline personality disorder; mental health nurses; mixed methods; pre-post-survey design; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30830704     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of educational interventions on modifying health practitioners' attitudes and practice in treating people with borderline personality disorder: an integrative review.

Authors:  Pauline Klein; A Kate Fairweather; Sharon Lawn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  A model for psychiatric nurses to facilitate the mental health of women living with borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Nompumelelo Ntshingila; Annie Temane; Marie Poggenpoel; Chris Myburgh
Journal:  Curationis       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Stigma towards Mental Disorders among Nursing Students and Professionals: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Concepción Martínez-Martínez; Francisca Esteve-Claramunt; Blanca Prieto-Callejero; Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Structural stigma and its impact on healthcare for borderline personality disorder: a scoping review.

Authors:  Pauline Klein; A Kate Fairweather; Sharon Lawn
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2022-09-29

5.  Repeated Police Mental Health Act Detentions in England and Wales: Trauma and Recurrent Suicidality.

Authors:  Claire Warrington
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.

Authors:  Marta Marsilio; Floriana Fusco; Eleonora Gheduzzi; Chiara Guglielmetti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.