Literature DB >> 30830511

Toward versatile cooperative surgical robotics: a review and future challenges.

Philipp Schleer1, Sergey Drobinsky2, Matias de la Fuente2, Klaus Radermacher2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical robotics has developed throughout the past 30 years resulting in more than 5000 different approaches proposed for various surgical disciplines supporting different surgical task sequences and differing ways of human-machine cooperation or degrees of automation. However, this diversity of systems influences cost as well as usability and might hinder their widespread adoption. In combination with the current trend toward open and modular "plug and play" dynamic networks of medical devices and IT systems in the operating room, a modular human-robot system design with versatile access to cooperative functions with varying degrees of automation on demand is desirable. Therefore, standardized robotic device profiles describing essential functional characteristics of cooperative robotic systems are mandatory.
METHODS: Surgical robotics is analyzed from a human-machine interaction perspective to identify generic cooperative robotic device profiles, features and use cases. Therefore, cooperative aspects are introduced from a general point of view. Relevant communication channels used for human-machine interaction are then analyzed, referenced by surgical scenarios. Subsequently, proposed classifications of surgical task sequences and surgical robotic systems are analyzed with a focus on a modular design for cooperative robotics in surgery.
RESULTS: Considerations based on cooperative guidelines are given and features are identified and summarized in a classification scheme used to define distinct generic cooperative robotic device profiles. The latter can be the basis for a modular architecture of future surgical robot systems.
CONCLUSION: Modular system design can be expanded toward functionalities or different degrees of autonomy, shared or manual control. The proposed device profiles of cooperative surgical robots could lay the foundation for integration into open and modular dynamic "plug and play" networks in the operating room to enhance versatility, benefit-to-cost ratio and, thereby, market spread of surgical robotics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haptics; Human–machine interaction; Robotic manipulators; Shared control; Surgical robotics; Synergistic systems

Year:  2019        PMID: 30830511     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01927-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  26 in total

1.  A six-degree-of-freedom passive arm with dynamic constraints (PADyC) for cardiac surgery application: preliminary experiments.

Authors:  O Schneider; J Troccaz
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2001

Review 2.  The ZEUS robotic system: experimental and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jacques Marescaux; Francesco Rubino
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  The voice-controlled robotic assist scope holder AESOP for the endoscopic approach to the sella.

Authors:  Cherie-Ann O Nathan; Vinaya Chakradeo; Kavita Malhotra; Horacio D'Agostino; Ravish Patwardhan
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2006-08

Review 4.  Integrating an image-guided robot with intraoperative MRI: a review of the design and construction of neuroArm.

Authors:  Garnette R Sutherland; Isabelle Latour; Alexander D Greer
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2008 May-Jun

Review 5.  Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G P Moustris; S C Hiridis; K M Deliparaschos; K M Konstantinidis
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Haptic Shared Control in Tele-Manipulation: Effects of Inaccuracies in Guidance on Task Execution.

Authors:  Jeroen van Oosterhout; Jeroen G W Wildenbeest; Henri Boessenkool; Cock J M Heemskerk; Marco R de Baar; Frans C T van der Helm; David A Abbink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery.

Authors:  Y S Kwoh; J Hou; E A Jonckheere; S Hayati
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Navigated control in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  G Strauss; K Koulechov; R Richter; A Dietz; C Trantakis; T Lüth
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 9.  Navigation in surgery.

Authors:  Uli Mezger; Claudia Jendrewski; Michael Bartels
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Robot-Assisted Navigation versus Computer-Assisted Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Efficiency and Accuracy.

Authors:  Tanner C Clark; Frank H Schmidt
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-06-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Digitalization in surgery : What surgeons currently think and know about it-results of an online survey].

Authors:  D Wilhelm; M Kranzfelder; D Ostler; A Stier; H J Meyer; H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery.

Authors:  Philipp Schleer; Philipp Kaiser; Sergey Drobinsky; Klaus Radermacher
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Design and validation of a medical robotic device system to control two collaborative robots for ultrasound-guided needle insertions.

Authors:  Johann Berger; Michael Unger; Johannes Keller; C Martin Reich; Thomas Neumuth; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-09-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.