| Literature DB >> 30830468 |
Izabella Surowiec1, Raymond Noordam1,2, Kate Bennett1, Marian Beekman3, P Eline Slagboom3, Torbjörn Lundstedt1, Diana van Heemst4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify novel metabolite and lipid signatures connected with the metabolic syndrome in a Dutch middle-aged population.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiology; Lipidomics; Metabolic syndrome; Metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 30830468 PMCID: PMC6373335 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-019-1484-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Characteristics of the study population
| Metabolic syndrome (N = 50) | Controls (N = 65) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 64.4 (6.1) | 62.0 (6.5) |
| Men, N (%) | 26 (52.0) | 34 (52.3) |
| Alcohol intake in glasses/week, number (IQR) | 6.0 (0.0, 14.0) | 9.0 (3.0, 14.0) |
| Current smoking, N (%) | 3 (6.0) | 9 (13.8) |
| Total caloric intake in kCal/day, median (IQR)a | 1774 (1498, 2053) | 1987 (1656, 2491) |
| Waist circumference in cm, mean (SD) | 106.4 (10.3) | 95.9 (11.7) |
| Triglyceride concentration in mmol/L, mean (SD) | 2.34 (1.29) | 1.17 (0.53) |
| HDL cholesterol in mmol/L, mean (SD) | 1.13 (0.30) | 1.59 (0.41) |
| Glucose in mmol/L, mean (SD) | 6.9 (3.1) | 5.4 (1.3) |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus, N (%) | 11 (22.0) | 5 (7.7) |
| Systolic blood pressure in mmHg, mean (SD) | 147.3 (17.8) | 129.7 (18.0) |
| Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg, mean (SD) | 84.6 (9.1) | 76.3 (8.8) |
| Use of antihypertensive agents, N (%) | 26 (52.0) | 5 (7.7) |
|
| ||
| Waist circumference, N (%) | 42 (84.0) | 24 (36.9) |
| Triglycerides, N (%) | 35 (70.0) | 7 (10.8) |
| HDL cholesterol, N (%) | 31 (62.0) | 2 (3.1) |
| Glucose, N (%) | 28 (56.0) | 10 (15.4) |
| Blood pressure, N (%) | 46 (92.0) | 28 (43.1) |
| HbA1c in %, mean (SD)b | 5.8 (1.3) | 5.2 (0.6) |
| High-sensitivity C-reactive protein in mg/dL, median (IQR) | 1.9 (0.6, 3.5) | 1.0 (0.6, 1.9) |
| Alanine transaminase in U/L, median (IQR) | 18.0 (14.0, 23.5) | 16.0 (12.0, 18.5) |
| Aspartate transaminase in U/L, median (IQR) | 22.0 (17.0, 28.0) | 19.0 (17.5, 23.5) |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase in U/L, median (IQR) | 27.0 (19.8, 53.0) | 22.0 (13.0, 36.5) |
HDL high-density lipoprotein, IQR interquartile range, N number of participants, SD standard deviation
aAssessed in 42 metabolic syndrome cases and 49 control participants
bMeasured in 42 metabolic syndrome cases and 56 control participants.
Fig. 1Metabolite profiling. a PCA score plot on metabolic data with samples colored according to their respective groups: blue dots signify individuals with the metabolic syndrome (metabolic syndrome score 3–5) and green dots individuals without metabolic syndrome (metabolic syndrome score 0–2); x axis – t[1] first score (R2X = 0.146), y axis—t[2], second score (R2X = 0.110). b Metabolite predictive loading vector (p(corr)) from the OPLS model with the metabolic syndrome score as the Y variable; metabolites are colored according to their chemical classes; p(corr) values indicate when a compound is positively (positive p(corr) value) or negatively (negative p(corr) value) correlated with the metabolic syndrome score
Metabolites connected to the metabolic syndrome score
| Chemical class | p(corr) vector | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| PC(P-16:0/0:0) or PC(0–16:1/0:0) | LysoPC | − 0.42 |
| Hydroxypalmitic acid | Fatty acid | − 0.53 |
| 2-Hydroxyhexadecanoic acid | Fatty acid | − 0.52 |
| Sphingosine-1-phosphate | Spinholipid | − 0.32 |
| PE(18:1(9Z)/0:0) | LysoPE | − 0.46 |
| Glyceric acid | Organic acid | − 0.46 |
| Campesterol | Sterol | − 0.23 |
| Cholesterol | Sterol | − 0.39 |
| 1,5-Anhydro- | Carbohydrate | − 0.33 |
|
| ||
| Kynurenine | Amino acid | 0.30 |
| Butyryl-carnitine | Acylcarnitine | 0.44 |
| Isovaleryl-carnitine | Acylcarnitine | 0.50 |
| Valeryl-carnitine | Acylcarnitine | 0.65 |
| Gamma-Glu-Leu | Dipeptide | 0.46 |
| Indoxylsulfuric acid | Organic acid | 0.24 |
| Deoxycholic acid | Cholic acid | 0.23 |
| Lactic acid | Organic acid | 0.44 |
| 2-Oxobutyric acid | Organic acid | 0.73 |
| Alpha-ketoglutaric acid | Organic acid | 0.57 |
| 2-Oxoisocaproic acid | Organic acid | 0.40 |
| Alanine | Amino acid | 0.60 |
| Cysteine | Amino acid | 0.43 |
| Lysine | Amino acid | 0.65 |
| Cystine | Amino acid | 0.58 |
| Glutamic acid | Amino acid | 0.51 |
| Valine | Amino acid | 0.67 |
| Proline | Amino acid | 0.43 |
| Aspartic acid | Organic acid | 0.60 |
| Tryptophan | Amino acid | 0.56 |
| Tyrosine | Amino acid | 0.75 |
| Phenylalanine | Amino acid | 0.58 |
| Urea | Urea | 0.49 |
| Uric acid | Purine | 0.65 |
| Pyruvic acid | Organic acid | 0.42 |
| Sorbitol | Polyol | 0.78 |
P(corr) values obtained from the OPLS model with metabolic syndrome score as Y variable. Statistical significance determined with jackknife confidence intervals
Fig. 2Lipid profiling. a PCA score plot on lipidomics data with samples colored according to their respective groups: blue dots signify individuals with the metabolic syndrome (metabolic syndrome score 3–5) and green dots individuals without metabolic syndrome (metabolic syndrome score 0–2); x axis – t[1] first score (R2X = 0.304), y axis – t[2], second score (R2X = 0.155). b Lipidomics predictive loading values (p(corr)) from the OPLS model with the metabolic syndrome score as the Y variable; metabolites are colored according to their chemical classes; p(corr) values indicate when a compound is positively (positive p(corr) value) or negatively (negative p(corr) value) correlated with the metabolic syndrome score
Lipids connected to the metabolic syndrome score
| Lipid class | p(corr) vector | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| PE(O-38:5) | Phosphatidylethanolamine | − 0.57 |
| PG(36:3) | Phosphatidylglycerol | − 0.57 |
| PG(38:3) | Phosphatidylglycerol | − 0.26 |
| PC(31:0) | Phosphatidylcholine | − 0.61 |
| PC(O-34:2) | Phosphatidylcholine | − 0.47 |
| PC(O-36:2) | Phosphatidylcholine | − 0.62 |
| PC(O-38:7) | Phosphatidylcholine | − 0.33 |
| SM(d18:0/17:0) | Sphingomyelin | − 0.58 |
| TG(53:2) | Triglyceride | − 0.50 |
|
| ||
| PI(32:1) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.25 |
| PI(34:2) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.31 |
| PI(38:3) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.42 |
| PI(36:4) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.42 |
| Sulfatide(d18:0/18:0) | Sulfatide | 0.24 |
| Sulfatide(d18:0/22:0) | Sulfatide | 0.32 |
| Sulfatide(d18:1/22:1) | Sulfatide | 0.38 |
| PE(38:4) | Phosphatidylethanolamine | 0.68 |
| PE(38:6) | Phosphatidylethanolamine | 0.57 |
| PC(32:1) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.26 |
| PC(38:3) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.46 |
| PC(36:4) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.38 |
| PC(38:4) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.38 |
| PC(40:4) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.37 |
| PC(40:5) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.33 |
| PC(40:6) | Phosphatidylcholine | 0.25 |
| DG(34:1) | Diglyceride | 0.63 |
| DG(36:2) | Diglyceride | 0.67 |
| Cer(d18:0/22:0) | Ceramide | 0.51 |
| Cer(d18:0/23:0) | Ceramide | 0.39 |
| Cer(d18:0/24:0) | Ceramide | 0.52 |
| Cer(d18:1/20:0) | Ceramide | 0.48 |
| Cer(d18:1/22:0) | Ceramide | 0.39 |
| GalCer(d18:1/18:1) | Galactoceramide | 0.36 |
| PI(32:1) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.25 |
| PI(34:2) | Phosphatidylinositol | 0.31 |
P(corr) values obtained from the OPLS model with metabolic syndrome score as Y variable. Statistical significance determined with jackknife confidence intervals. Results for the triacylglycerides with positive p(corr) vectors are not presented
Fig. 3Univariate metabolite and lipids analyses. a Univariate metabolite analyses on the metabolic syndrome. b Univariate lipid analyses on the metabolic syndrome. Analyses can be interpreted as the difference in metabolite/lipid level in standard deviation in cases of the metabolic syndrome as compared to controls. The difference between cases of the metabolic syndrome (in standard deviation) is presented on the x-axis; the − log(p-value) of the comparison is presented on the y-axis. Metabolites/lipids that were labelled in the figures were those that remained significant after correction for multiple testing; compounds with a p-value < 0.05 are presented as solid black dots in the plot. In our dataset, there were 67 independent metabolites (p-value cut-off = 7.46 × 10−4) and 73 independent lipids (p-value cut-off = 6.85 × 10−4)