Literature DB >> 30830375

Alteration in lipid composition differentiates breast cancer tissues: a 1H HRMAS NMR metabolomic study.

Anup Paul1,2, Surendra Kumar3, Anubhav Raj4, Abhinav A Sonkar4, Sudha Jain2, Atin Singhai5, Raja Roy6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most frequent diagnosed cancer among women with a mortality rate of 15% of all cancer related deaths in women. Breast cancer is heterogeneous in nature and produces plethora of metabolites allowing its early detection using molecular diagnostic techniques like magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the variation in metabolic profile of breast cancer focusing on lipids as triglycerides (TG) and free fatty acids (FFA) that may alter in malignant breast tissues and lymph nodes from adjacent benign breast tissues by HRMAS 1H NMR spectroscopy.
METHODS: The 1H NMR spectra recorded on 173 tissue specimens comprising of breast tumor tissues, adjacent tissues, few lymph nodes and overlying skin tissues obtained from 67 patients suffering from breast cancer. Multivariate statistical analysis was employed to identify metabolites acting as major confounders for differentiation of malignancy. RESULT: Reduction in lipid content were observed in malignant breast tissues along with a higher fraction of FFA. Four small molecule metabolites e.g., choline containing compounds (Chocc), taurine, glycine, and glutamate were also identified as major confounders. The test set for prediction provided sensitivity and specificity of more than 90% excluding the lymph nodes and skin tissues.
CONCLUSION: Fatty acids composition in breast cancer using in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is gaining its importance in clinical settings (Coum et al. in Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 29:1-4, 2016). The present study may help in future for precise evaluation of lipid classification including small molecules as a source of early diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma by employing in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopic methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benign tissue; Breast cancer; HRMAS 1H NMR spectroscopy; MUFA; Malignant tumor tissue; Metabolic profiling; PUFA; SFA; Triglycerides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30830375     DOI: 10.1007/s11306-018-1411-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolomics        ISSN: 1573-3882            Impact factor:   4.290


  64 in total

1.  Is aspiration biopsy of breast cancer dangerous to the patient?

Authors:  G F ROBBINS; J H BROTHERS; W F EBERHART; S QUAN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Feasibility and reproducibility of free fatty acid profiling in abdominal adipose tissue with 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T: differences between lean and obese individuals.

Authors:  Ilse M Schrover; Tim Leiner; Dennis W J Klomp; Jannie P Wijnen; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Wilko Spiering; Frank L J Visseren
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Cancer cell metabolism: the essential role of the nonessential amino acid, glutamine.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Natalya N Pavlova; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  1H NMR analysis of choline metabolites in fine-needle-aspirate biopsies of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Mary C Mahoney; Jing-Huei Lee; Wen-Jang Chu; Kim M Cecil; Stephen M Strakowski; Richard A Komoroski
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  In vivo MR spectroscopy of human breast tissue: quantification of fatty acid composition at a clinical field strength (3 T).

Authors:  Amandine Coum; Lobna Ouldamer; Fanny Noury; Laurent Barantin; Aymeric Saint-Hilaire; Anne Vilde; Philippe Bougnoux; Giulio Gambarota
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Core-needle biopsy of breast cancer is associated with a higher rate of distant metastases 5 to 15 years after diagnosis than FNA biopsy.

Authors:  Roland B Sennerstam; Bo S H Franzén; Hans O T Wiksell; Gert U Auer
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Dysregulated lipid metabolism in cancer.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Guangwei Du
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-26

8.  Determination of lipidomic differences between human breast cancer and surrounding normal tissues using HILIC-HPLC/ESI-MS and multivariate data analysis.

Authors:  Eva Cífková; Michal Holčapek; Miroslav Lísa; David Vrána; Jiří Gatěk; Bohuslav Melichar
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Comparison of HR MAS MR spectroscopic profiles of breast cancer tissue with clinical parameters.

Authors:  Beathe Sitter; Steinar Lundgren; Tone F Bathen; Jostein Halgunset; Hans E Fjosne; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Serine and glycine metabolism in cancer.

Authors:  Ivano Amelio; Francesca Cutruzzolá; Alexey Antonov; Massimiliano Agostini; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 13.807

View more
  5 in total

1.  Malignancy prediction among tissues from Oral SCC patients including neck invasions: a 1H HRMAS NMR based metabolomic study.

Authors:  Anup Paul; Shatakshi Srivastava; Raja Roy; Akshay Anand; Kushagra Gaurav; Nuzhat Husain; Sudha Jain; Abhinav A Sonkar
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Clinical applications of breast cancer metabolomics using high-resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HRMAS 1H MRS): systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Johanna Goldberg; Katja Pinker; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Assessment of Tissue Specific Distribution and Seasonal Variation of Alkaloids in Alstonia scholaris.

Authors:  Rohit Mahar; Nagarajan Manivel; Sanjeev Kanojiya; Dipak K Mishra; Sanjeev K Shukla
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Lipidomic study of cell lines reveals differences between breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Finnur Freyr Eiriksson; Martha Kampp Nøhr; Margarida Costa; Sigridur Klara Bödvarsdottir; Helga Margret Ögmundsdottir; Margret Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hormone-Independent Mouse Mammary Adenocarcinomas with Different Metastatic Potential Exhibit Different Metabolic Signatures.

Authors:  Daniela Bispo; Victoria Fabris; Caroline A Lamb; Claudia Lanari; Luisa A Helguero; Ana M Gil
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-08-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.