Reas S Khan1, Kimberly Dine, Howard Wessel, Larry Brown, Kenneth S Shindler. 1. Scheie Eye Institute (RSK, KD, KSS), FM Kirby Center for Molecular Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Noveome Biotherapeutics, Inc. (HW, LB), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that intranasally administered ST266, a novel biological secretome of amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells containing multiple growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines, attenuated visual dysfunction and prevented retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in experimental optic neuritis. Long-term effects and dose escalation studies examined here have not been reported previously. METHODS: Optic neuritis was induced in the multiple sclerosis model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). EAE and control mice were treated once or twice daily with intranasal placebo/vehicle or ST266 beginning after onset of optic neuritis for either 15 days or continuously until sacrifice. Visual function was assessed by optokinetic responses (OKRs). RGC survival and optic nerve inflammation and demyelination were measured. RESULTS: Both once and twice daily continuous intranasal ST266 treatment from disease onset to 56 days after EAE induction significantly increased OKR scores, decreased RGC loss, and reduced optic nerve inflammation and demyelination compared with placebo (saline, nonspecific protein solution, or cell culture media)-treated EAE mice. ST266 treatment given for just 15 days after disease onset, then discontinued, only delayed OKR decreases, and had limited effects on RGC survival and optic nerve inflammation 56 days after disease induction. CONCLUSIONS: ST266 is a potential neuroprotective therapy to prevent RGC damage, and intranasal delivery warrants further study as a novel mechanism to deliver protein therapies for optic neuropathies. Results suggest that once daily ST266 treatment is sufficient to sustain maximal benefits and demonstrate that neuroprotective effects promoted by ST266 are specific to the combination of factors present in this complex biologic therapy.
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have shown that intranasally administered ST266, a novel biological secretome of amnion-derived multipotent progenitor cells containing multiple growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines, attenuated visual dysfunction and prevented retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in experimental optic neuritis. Long-term effects and dose escalation studies examined here have not been reported previously. METHODS:Optic neuritis was induced in the multiple sclerosis model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). EAE and control mice were treated once or twice daily with intranasal placebo/vehicle or ST266 beginning after onset of optic neuritis for either 15 days or continuously until sacrifice. Visual function was assessed by optokinetic responses (OKRs). RGC survival and optic nerve inflammation and demyelination were measured. RESULTS: Both once and twice daily continuous intranasal ST266 treatment from disease onset to 56 days after EAE induction significantly increased OKR scores, decreased RGC loss, and reduced optic nerve inflammation and demyelination compared with placebo (saline, nonspecific protein solution, or cell culture media)-treated EAE mice. ST266 treatment given for just 15 days after disease onset, then discontinued, only delayed OKR decreases, and had limited effects on RGC survival and optic nerve inflammation 56 days after disease induction. CONCLUSIONS:ST266 is a potential neuroprotective therapy to prevent RGC damage, and intranasal delivery warrants further study as a novel mechanism to deliver protein therapies for optic neuropathies. Results suggest that once daily ST266 treatment is sufficient to sustain maximal benefits and demonstrate that neuroprotective effects promoted by ST266 are specific to the combination of factors present in this complex biologic therapy.
Authors: John J Chen; Eoin P Flanagan; Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan; Alfonso Sebastian S López-Chiriboga; James P Fryer; Jacqueline A Leavitt; Brian G Weinshenker; Andrew McKeon; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Vanda A Lennon; W Oliver Tobin; B Mark Keegan; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Orhun H Kantarci; Collin M McClelland; Michael S Lee; Jeffrey L Bennett; Victoria S Pelak; Yanjun Chen; Gregory VanStavern; Ore-Ofe O Adesina; Eric R Eggenberger; Marie D Acierno; Dean M Wingerchuk; Paul W Brazis; Jessica Sagen; Sean J Pittock Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Wyatt G Payne; Thomas L Wachtel; Charlotte A Smith; M Georgina Uberti; Francis Ko; Martin C Robson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: S Anand Trip; Patricio G Schlottmann; Stephen J Jones; Daniel R Altmann; David F Garway-Heath; Alan J Thompson; Gordon T Plant; David H Miller Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michael G Franz; Wyatt G Payne; Liyu Xing; D K Naidu; R E Salas; Vivienne S Marshall; C J Trumpower; Charlotte A Smith; David L Steed; M C Robson Journal: Eplasty Date: 2008-04-11
Authors: Keirnan Willett; Reas S Khan; Kimberly Dine; Howard Wessel; Ziv Z Kirshner; Jodie L Sauer; Ashley Ellis; Larry R Brown; Kenneth S Shindler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bennie H Jeng; Pedram Hamrah; Ziv Z Kirshner; Benjamin C Mendez; Howard C Wessel; Larry R Brown; David L Steed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Oliver W Gramlich; Alexander J Brown; Cheyanne R Godwin; Michael S Chimenti; Lauren K Boland; James A Ankrum; Randy H Kardon Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Nancy Farfán; Jaime Carril; Martina Redel; Marta Zamorano; Maureen Araya; Estephania Monzón; Raúl Alvarado; Norton Contreras; Andrea Tapia-Bustos; María Elena Quintanilla; Fernando Ezquer; José Luis Valdés; Yedy Israel; Mario Herrera-Marschitz; Paola Morales Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.923