PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) on the outcome of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy in diabetic macular oedema (DME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one eyes with cystoid macular oedema (CME) and SRD (study group) and 57 eyes with only CME (control group) that received pro re nata (PRN) IVR injections during a 6-month period were retrospectively evaluated. The outcome measures included changes in the central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and injection numbers. RESULTS: The mean initial CMT in the study and control groups was 467 ± 101 and 440 ± 89 µm, respectively. The mean BCVA in the study and control groups was 0.75 ± 0.38 and 0.59 ± 0.36 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR), respectively (p = 0.010). The study group received a mean of 2.2 ± 0.92 injections, whereas the control group received a mean of 2.54 ± 0.9 injections. The decrease in CMT was greater, but not significantly greater, in the study group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of SRD resulted in a less favourable visual acuity (VA) outcome with IVR. Disruption of the ellipsoid zone and abnormality of the foveal avascular zone at the baseline examination were correlated with a lower VA. Both of the pathologies occurred more frequently in the SRD group.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of serous retinal detachment (SRD) on the outcome of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy in diabetic macular oedema (DME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one eyes with cystoid macular oedema (CME) and SRD (study group) and 57 eyes with only CME (control group) that received pro re nata (PRN) IVR injections during a 6-month period were retrospectively evaluated. The outcome measures included changes in the central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and injection numbers. RESULTS: The mean initial CMT in the study and control groups was 467 ± 101 and 440 ± 89 µm, respectively. The mean BCVA in the study and control groups was 0.75 ± 0.38 and 0.59 ± 0.36 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR), respectively (p = 0.010). The study group received a mean of 2.2 ± 0.92 injections, whereas the control group received a mean of 2.54 ± 0.9 injections. The decrease in CMT was greater, but not significantly greater, in the study group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of SRD resulted in a less favourable visual acuity (VA) outcome with IVR. Disruption of the ellipsoid zone and abnormality of the foveal avascular zone at the baseline examination were correlated with a lower VA. Both of the pathologies occurred more frequently in the SRD group.