Yang Yu1,2, Soeun Gim1,2, Dongyoon Kim1, Zohar A Arnon3, Ehud Gazit3,4, Peter H Seeberger1,2, Martina Delbianco1. 1. Department of Biomolecular Systems , Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces , Am Mühlenberg 1 , 14476 Potsdam , Germany. 2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Freie Universität Berlin , Arnimallee 22 , 14195 Berlin , Germany. 3. Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 6997801 , Israel. 4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering Iby and Aladar Fleischman Faculty of Engineering , Tel Aviv University , Tel Aviv 6997801 , Israel.
Abstract
Self-assembling peptides and oligonucleotides have given rise to synthetic materials with several applications in nanotechnology. Aggregation of synthetic oligosaccharides into well-defined architectures has not been reported even though natural polysaccharides, such as cellulose and chitin, are key structural components of biomaterials. Here, we report that six synthetic oligosaccharides, ranging from dimers to hexamers, self-assemble into nanostructures of varying morphologies and emit within the visible spectrum in an excitation-dependent manner. Well-defined differences in chain length, monomer modification, and aggregation methods yield glycomaterials with distinct shapes and properties. The excitation-dependent fluorescence in a broad range within the visible spectrum illustrates their potential for use in optical devices and imaging applications. We anticipate that our systematic approach of studying well-defined synthetic oligosaccharides will form the foundation of our understanding of carbohydrate interactions in nature.
Self-assembling peptides and oligonucleotides have given rise to synthetic materials with several applications in nanotechnology. Aggregation of synthetic oligosaccharides into well-defined architectures has not been reported even though natural polysaccharides, such as cellulose and chitin, are key structural components of biomaterials. Here, we report that six synthetic oligosaccharides, ranging from dimers to hexamers, self-assemble into nanostructures of varying morphologies and emit within the visible spectrum in an excitation-dependent manner. Well-defined differences in chain length, monomer modification, and aggregation methods yield glycomaterials with distinct shapes and properties. The excitation-dependent fluorescence in a broad range within the visible spectrum illustrates their potential for use in optical devices and imaging applications. We anticipate that our systematic approach of studying well-defined synthetic oligosaccharides will form the foundation of our understanding of carbohydrate interactions in nature.
Simple peptides[1] and nucleic acids[2] can spontaneously self-assemble to form defined
supramolecular patterns. These supramolecular architectures are the
essence of modern bionanotechnology, with implications in the medical[3] and energy[1d,4] fields. The discovery
that peptide dimers (i.e., diphenyl alanine) self-assemble provided
fundamental insights into the progression of important diseases.[5] The main limitation to the use of these systems
is often associated with the modest quantities that can be produced.
In contrast, natural polysaccharides comprise 80% of biomass, where
they serve mainly structural roles.[6] These
materials, including cellulose[7] and chitin,[8] have a strong tendency to aggregate in well-defined
architectures with different physical properties. Chemical modification
tunes polysaccharide properties[9] to serve
as biocompatible,[6,7c] cheap, and renewable self-assembling
materials for application in nanotechnology,[10] optical components,[7b,11] drug delivery systems,[12] and tissue engineering.[8a] However, the use of polysaccharide materials is limited by poor
quality control and reproducibility, owing to the polydispersity of
chain length and modifications. While synthetic oligosaccharides should
be able to self-assemble into tunable materials, this process has
not been observed for structurally defined oligosaccharides, as access
to pure glycans has been challenging. Chemical synthesis of oligosaccharides
provides an attractive alternative to the modification of natural
polysaccharides; however, it was extremely laborious prior to recent
advances in automated synthesis.[13] Rapid
access to synthetic oligo- and polysaccharides provided material for
systematic structural studies, showing that synthetic hexasaccharides
may adopt defined shapes in solution.[14]Here, we report that synthetic oligosaccharides self-assemble
into
defined structures. The systematic approach confirmed that differences
in chain length and modification yield glycomaterials with distinct
shapes and properties. This finding is particularly important in the
prospective of creating novel carbohydrate materials with tunable
properties. Moreover, these materials exhibit unexpected excitation-dependent
intrinsic optical properties that can expand the applications of these
materials even further and may result in new, cheap, and biocompatible
optical devices. The dramatic differences in the aggregate morphologies
stress the importance of a better knowledge of glycan presentation
in biological systems, where carbohydrate–carbohydrate interactions
regulate several cellular processes.[15] We
suggest that our approach, based on the study of the interaction of
well-defined synthetic oligosaccharides, could shed light upon the
rules that regulate cellular recognition and uptake.
Results and Discussion
Self-Assemby
Hexamer 4 (Figure A) proved so poorly soluble
in many organic solvents that further chemical manipulations are impossible,
while a similar compound that carries fewer benzyl ethers (i.e., hexamer 5) encountered fewer solubility and reactivity issues.[14] These differences likely are a consequence of
the formation of supramolecular structures due to strong intermolecular
interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, together with π–π
interactions of the benzyl ether modification. Exploiting such interactions
to drive the self-assembly should give rise to novel oligosaccharide
materials. Three dimers (1–3) as
well as one additional hexasaccharide (6) were prepared
to probe the influence of chain length, linkage, and modification
on self-assembly (Figure A). Supramolecular aggregation was induced by slow dialysis
(D) or fast solvent switch (S).[16] Oligosaccharides
dissolved in a dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/water mixture and dialyzed
against water aggregated into nanoparticles with diameters of 40–60
nm (Figure A, a–f).
These particles exist in solution, as confirmed by cryo-SEM of 2-D (Figure S1) and dynamic light
scattering (DLS) measurements (Figure S2). Direct injection of water into a glycan solution in HFIP (fast
solvent switch) results in faster mixing, higher oligosaccharide concentration,
and altered self-assembly behavior (Figure A, g–l).[17] Needle-like structures were found for 2-S-HFIP (5–10
μm length, 10–50 nm height, and 100–500 nm width, Figure A, h, and Figure S3) and a spheroidal architecture (1–2
μm diameter) for the hexamer 5-S-HFIP analogue
(Figure A, k). These
supramolecular structures were stable for 1 month under ambient conditions
and resisted dilution and sonication (Figure S4). 1-S-HFIP assembled into a mixture of rods and toroid
structures (Figure A, g), while 4-S-DMAc formed clusters of nanoparticles
(Figure A, j). Differences
in oligosaccharide structure such as linkage and modification patterns
fundamentally affect the material morphology as 3-S-HFIP (Figure A, i) and 6-S-DMAc (Figure A, l) aggregated randomly and did not form any ordered supramolecular
structure. Compounds 3 and 6 are based on
a fairly rigid 1,4 glycosidic linkage (secondary alcohol) and therefore
can adopt a limited number of conformations in solution. The flexibility
of the 1,6 linkage allows for higher conformational diversity, permitting
the formation of fundamentally different nanostructures.
Figure 1
Chemical structure
of well-defined oligosaccharides (A) and illustration
of sample preparation methods (B). The sample names indicate the sugar
oligomer (e.g., 2), the assembly method (D, S, or F),
and the solvent used (e.g., HFIP). For example, 2-S-HFIP means compound 2 prepared by the solvent switch method
with HFIP as good solvent.
Figure 2
(A) Supramolecular structure formation with two different methods.
(a–f) TEM images (scale bars: 100 nm) of samples prepared by
the dialysis method (0.1 mg mL–1) for (a) 1-D, (b) 2-D, (c) 3-D, (d) 4-D*, (e) 5-D, and (f) 6-D*. *0.01
mg mL–1 due to poor solubility of the starting material.
(g–l) SEM images (scale bars: 2 μm) of samples prepared
by the solvent switch method for (g) 1-S-HFIP-low (0.1
mg mL–1), (h) 2-S-HFIP, (i) 3-S-HFIP, (j) 4-S-DMAc, (k) 5-S-HFIP, and (l) 6-S-DMAc. (B) Screening of assembly conditions for compound 2. (a) TEM image (scale bar: 500 nm) for 2-D-high (2 mg mL–1). (b–f) SEM images (scale bars:
2 μm) for (b) 2-S-HFIP-low (0.1 mg mL–1), (c) 2-S-HFIP-20%, (d) 2-S-, (e) 2-S-DMAc, and (f) 2-S-Ace-20%. If not mentioned, the standard concentration for the solvent switch
method (S) is 2 mg mL–1 and the content of organic
solvent is 2%.
Chemical structure
of well-defined oligosaccharides (A) and illustration
of sample preparation methods (B). The sample names indicate the sugar
oligomer (e.g., 2), the assembly method (D, S, or F),
and the solvent used (e.g., HFIP). For example, 2-S-HFIP means compound 2 prepared by the solvent switch method
with HFIP as good solvent.(A) Supramolecular structure formation with two different methods.
(a–f) TEM images (scale bars: 100 nm) of samples prepared by
the dialysis method (0.1 mg mL–1) for (a) 1-D, (b) 2-D, (c) 3-D, (d) 4-D*, (e) 5-D, and (f) 6-D*. *0.01
mg mL–1 due to poor solubility of the starting material.
(g–l) SEM images (scale bars: 2 μm) of samples prepared
by the solvent switch method for (g) 1-S-HFIP-low (0.1
mg mL–1), (h) 2-S-HFIP, (i) 3-S-HFIP, (j) 4-S-DMAc, (k) 5-S-HFIP, and (l) 6-S-DMAc. (B) Screening of assembly conditions for compound 2. (a) TEM image (scale bar: 500 nm) for 2-D-high (2 mg mL–1). (b–f) SEM images (scale bars:
2 μm) for (b) 2-S-HFIP-low (0.1 mg mL–1), (c) 2-S-HFIP-20%, (d) 2-S-, (e) 2-S-DMAc, and (f) 2-S-Ace-20%. If not mentioned, the standard concentration for the solvent switch
method (S) is 2 mg mL–1 and the content of organic
solvent is 2%.The effects of assembly
conditions on structure were studied in
detail using dimer 2 that forms well-defined, disperse,
and stable needle-like structures (Figure B). 2-S-HFIP presents an ordered
morphology, as it showed intense birefringence under polarized light,
typical of anisotropic materials (Figure S7). Moreover, staining with Congo red,[18] a commonly used dye to detect highly ordered amyloid fibrils, gave
intense gold-green birefringence (Figure S8). Dialysis using a higher concentration of 2 (2 mg
mL–1) led to the formation of nanofibers (Figure B, a), likely due
to the further association of the spherical particles existing in
the diluted solution. The solvent exchange method generated longer
needles when a lower concentration of compound 2 was
employed (0.1 mg mL–1) (Figure B, b). A higher HFIP content (20%) did not
change the shape or length of the supramolecular structures (Figure B, c). In this case,
the selective solvation properties of HFIP, in a HFIP–H2O system,[19] result in a similar
local HFIP concentration, limiting aggregation diversity. A similar
elongated morphology was obtained when isopropyl alcohol was used
instead of HFIP (Figure B, d) and a gel-like microwire material was obtained in acetone (Figure B, f). The diversity
observed is ascribed to the different conformations adopted by compound 2, when solvated by different solvents. In particular, the
well-known ability of HFIP to cluster the hydrophobic regions of peptides
and affect their folding (HFIP-induced enhancement of the hydrophobic
effect)[19,20] is responsible for the dramatic differences
of the generated nanostructures.
Real-Time Measurement
The self-assembly of 2-S-HFIP was captured in real-time
using bright-field microscopy (Figure , movie S1) by injecting
a freshly prepared solution into a
cell counting slide. Needle-like structures diffuse from the HFIP
droplets containing the oligosaccharide into the surrounding water.
The contact between the needles and a second HFIP droplet (Figure , time 06:52) disrupts
the droplet to release the oligosaccharide and results in further
needle growth. Surprisingly, glycan-containing HFIP droplets are intensely
fluorescent. We believe that this phenomenon is the result of the
formation of supramolecular chromophores within the material, as previously
observed for self-assembled peptides, nucleic acids, and amino acids.[17,21] An extended π-conjugation system and/or charge delocalization
through a dense hydrogen-bonding network are generally responsible
for this behavior.[21b]
Figure 3
Real-time merged bright-field
(scale of gray) and fluorescence
(magenta) images illustrating the self-assembly process for 2-S-HFIP. Excitation wavelength at 405 nm and detection range
410–676 nm (scale bar: 20 μm).
Real-time merged bright-field
(scale of gray) and fluorescence
(magenta) images illustrating the self-assembly process for 2-S-HFIP. Excitation wavelength at 405 nm and detection range
410–676 nm (scale bar: 20 μm).
Photophysical Characterization
Confocal microscopy
analysis of different morphologies revealed that thin films prepared
by direct evaporation of a glycan solution in HFIP on a slide glass
(2-F-HFIP) emit strongly in four different channels (Figure A) upon visible light
irradiation. Films prepared in other organic solvents showed a similar
fluorescence behavior (Figure S10). Aggregates
obtained via the solvent switch method are only weakly emissive (Figure A). This observation
agrees with the supramolecular chromophore hypothesis, since emission
intensity is strong in organic solvents, where a dense H-bonding network
is favored and quenching occurs when the H-bonding pattern is disrupted
by water. The morphology of these materials was further probed with
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) (Figure B). 2-S-HFIP exhibited sharp peaks, as
typical for crystalline structures; in contrast, 2-F-HFIP shows broad peaks. This confirms the drastic change in morphology
upon interaction with water (2-S-HFIP). To better evaluate
the causes of this phenomenon, compounds 7–11 were prepared. To probe the importance of aromatic groups
for the emissive behavior, compound 7 was synthesized.
This amphiphilic, partially methylated analogue allows for the formation
of a dense hydrogen bonding network, in the absence of aromatic groups.
Upon film formation (7-F-HFIP), compound 7 showed a similar optical behavior, confirming that the optical properties
are not merely a result of π–π stacking.
Figure 4
(A) Confocal
microscopy images of 2 prepared by HFIP
film forming F (scale bars: 100 μm),
solvent switch S (scale bars: 10 μm), and compounds 7–11 prepared by the film-forming method
(scale bars: 100 μm) in four different channels (blue(ex/em),
405/451 nm; green, 488/529 nm; yellow, 561/597 nm; red, 633/709 nm).
(B) XRD profiles of 2-F-HFIP (red) and 2-S-HFIP (black) and compounds 7–11.
(A) Confocal
microscopy images of 2 prepared by HFIP
film forming F (scale bars: 100 μm),
solvent switch S (scale bars: 10 μm), and compounds 7–11 prepared by the film-forming method
(scale bars: 100 μm) in four different channels (blue(ex/em),
405/451 nm; green, 488/529 nm; yellow, 561/597 nm; red, 633/709 nm).
(B) XRD profiles of 2-F-HFIP (red) and 2-S-HFIP (black) and compounds 7–11.Compounds 8–10 are fully functionalized,
blocking the formation of a dense hydrogen bonding network within
the material. Different substituents (Bn vs Me vs Ac) were tested.
Surprisingly, confocal microscopy analysis showed emissive behavior
for compounds 8-F-HFIP and 9-F-HFIP. We
suspect that such compounds, even in the absence of a strong hydrogen
bonding network, maintain a self-organization tendency. On the other
hand, the per-acetylated analogue 10 as well as the fully
deprotected compound 11 showed no emission. XRD analysis
of all of the materials suggested a correlation between the broad
XRD profile and the emissive behavior. Similarly, the appearance of
sharp peaks in the XRD profiles, indicating high crystallinity, is
associated with emission quenching.Further photophysical characterization
showed a broad absorption
band for compound 2-F-HFIP, associated with the formation
of new self-assembled entities upon film formation. The broadening
of the absorption spectrum is not observed for compound 2 in solution, nor for the low emissive, crystalline sample 2-S-HFIP (Figure A). Excitation spectra (Figures S13 and S14) confirmed that the emissive species are linked to this
spectral region (350–500 nm). Emission quantum yield was calculated
for 2-F-HFIP (Φ(λ = 0.85 ± 0.01%). Moreover, unlike commonly used dyes, where
the emission peak position is independent of the excitation wavelength,
the emission spectrum of 2-F-HFIP is drastically affected
by the excitation wavelength (Figure B). A broad fluorescence emission profile was observed
with maxima shifting from 410 to 490 nm as the excitation is changed
from 340 to 410 nm. This red edge excitation shift (REES) is a common
phenomenon observed in graphene oxide,[21c] ionic liquids,[21d] and highly ordered
assemblies,[17] suggesting potential applications
of self-assembling oligosaccharides for optical devices, semiconductors,
and nanotechnology.[1d,17,21a,21b]
Figure 5
(A) Absorption spectra of 2-F-HFIP, 2-S-HFIP (recorded for the solid samples), and compound 2 in
HFIP solution. (B) Normalized emission spectra of 2-F-HFIP at excitation wavelengths of 340, 350, 360, 370, 380, 390, 400,
and 410, showing the red shifting of the emission maxima. Spectra
acquired at RT.
(A) Absorption spectra of 2-F-HFIP, 2-S-HFIP (recorded for the solid samples), and compound 2 in
HFIP solution. (B) Normalized emission spectra of 2-F-HFIP at excitation wavelengths of 340, 350, 360, 370, 380, 390, 400,
and 410, showing the red shifting of the emission maxima. Spectra
acquired at RT.
Conclusions
In
conclusion, we successfully generated supramolecular structures
from fully synthetic well-defined oligosaccharides and demonstrated
that the fine-tuning of the oligosaccharide structure has a tremendous
effect on the material morphology. The three dimer and hexamer analogues
with different glycosidic linkages and protective group patterns form
similar nanospheres when generated by the slow dialysis method, whereas
distinctive microstructures are obtained with the fast solvent switch
method. These compounds show unique optical properties such as broad
emission profiles and red edge excitation shift. Further studies to
modulate the fluorescent properties of such materials are currently
underway, with potential applications for optical devices and nanotechnology.
These findings suggest that synthetic oligosaccharides are viable
substrates for the fundamental study of the forces that guide the
polysaccharide aggregation in nature. For example, tuning glycomaterial
properties through the synthesis of well-defined structures will be
relevant for drug delivery systems, where carbohydrate–carbohydrate
interactions play a significant role in cellular uptake.
Authors: Eric M Bachelder; Tristan T Beaudette; Kyle E Broaders; Jesse Dashe; Jean M J Fréchet Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Vasantha Basavalingappa; Santu Bera; Bin Xue; Joseph O'Donnell; Sarah Guerin; Pierre-Andre Cazade; Hui Yuan; Ehtsham Ul Haq; Christophe Silien; Kai Tao; Linda J W Shimon; Syed A M Tofail; Damien Thompson; Sofiya Kolusheva; Rusen Yang; Yi Cao; Ehud Gazit Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 15.881