| Literature DB >> 30829006 |
Eduardo Vieira Neto1,2, Francisco Laranjeira3, Dulce Quelhas3,4, Isaura Ribeiro3,4, Alexandre Seabra3,5, Nicole Mineiro3, Lilian M Carvalho6, Lúcia Lacerda3, Márcia G Ribeiro2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic heterogeneity and compound heterozygosis give rise to a continuous spectrum of phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency and metabolic phenotypes in phenylketonuria (PKU). The most used parameters for evaluating phenotype in PKU are pretreatment phenylalanine (Phe) levels, tolerance for dietary Phe, and Phe overloading test. Phenotype can vary from a "classic" (severe) form to mild hyperphenylalaninemia, which does not require dietary treatment. A subset of patients is responsive to treatment by the cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4 ). Genotypes of PKU patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, were compared to predicted and observed phenotypes. Genotype-based estimations of responsiveness to BH4 were also conducted.Entities:
Keywords: Brazil; genetic association studies; genotype; hyperphenylalaninemia; phenotype; phenylalanine hydroxylase; phenylketonuria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30829006 PMCID: PMC6503030 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Causative mutations in the PAH gene found in patients participating in this study, their predicted phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) residual activity according to Himmelreich et al. (2018), arbitrary assigned values (AV) of Guldberg et al. (1998), and estimated BH4 responsiveness as listed in the BIOPKU database and stated by Zurfluh et al. (2008)
| Mutation | Mutation type | PAH residual activity (%) | AV | Estimated BH4 responsiveness | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotide change | Amino acid change (trivial name) | BIOPKU database | Zurfluh et al. ( | |||
| c.1055delG | p.G352Vfs*48 | Frameshift Deletion | 0 | 1 | NR | UNK |
| c.165delT | p.F55Lfs*6 | Frameshift Deletion | 0 | 1 | NR | UNC |
| c.503delA | p.Y168Sfs*27 | Frameshift Deletion | 0 | 1 | NR | UNK |
| c.116_118delTCT | p.F39del | In‐frame Deletion | 20 | 1 | NR | R |
| c.967_969delACA | p.T323del | In‐frame Deletion | UNK | 1 | UNK | UNK |
| c.442‐?_509+?del | ? | Large Deletion | 0 | 1 | UNK | UNK |
| c.1042C>G | p.L348V | Missense | 32 | 2 | R | R |
| c.1045T>C | p.S349P | Missense | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.1162G>A | p.V388M | Missense | 47 | 2 | R | R |
| c.1222C>T | p.R408W | Missense | 2 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.1223G>A | p.R408Q | Missense | 53 | 4 | R | R |
| c.1241A>G | p.Y414C | Missense | 53 | 4 | R | R |
| c.1243G>A | p.D415N | Missense | 72 | 8 | R | R |
| c.136G>A | p.G46S | Missense | 16 | UNC | R | NR |
| c.143T>C | p.L48S | Missense | 47 | 4 | R | R |
| c.194T>C | p.I65T | Missense | 33 | 2 | R | R |
| c.204A>T | p.R68S | Missense | 61 | 4 | R | R |
| c.250G>T | p.D84Y | Missense | UNK | UNK | UNK | UNK |
| c.473G>A | p.R158Q | Missense | 13 | 1 | NR | R |
| c.561G>C | p.W187C | Missense | 1 | 1 | UNK | UNK |
| c.745C>T | p.L249F | Missense | 51 | 4 | NR | NR |
| c.754C>T | p.R252W | Missense | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.782G>A | p.R261Q | Missense | 34 | 2 | R | R |
| c.809G>A | p.R270K | Missense | 11 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.842C>T | p.P281L | Missense | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.934G>T | p.G312C | Missense | New mutation | New mutation | New mutation | New mutation |
| c.994G>A | p.G332R | Missense | UNK | UNK | UNK | UNK |
| c.498C>G | p.Y166 | Nonsense | 0 | 1 | NR | UNK |
| c.526C>T | p.R176 | Nonsense | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.618C>G | p.Y206 | Nonsense | 0 | 1 | UNK | UNK |
| c.781C>T | p.R261 | Nonsense | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.1066‐11G>A | p.Q355_Y356insGLQ (IVS10‐11G>A) | Splicing | 0 | 1 | NR | UNC |
| c.1199+17G>A | ? (IVS11+17G>A) | Splicing | UNK | UNK | UNK | UNK |
| c.1315+1G>A | ? (IVS12+1G>A) | Splicing | 0 | 1 | NR | NR |
| c.168+5G>C | ? (IVS2+5G>C) | Splicing | 0 | 1 | NR | UNC |
| c.441+5G>T | ? (IVS4+5G>T) | Splicing | UNK | 1 | NR | UNC |
| c.842+1G>A | ? (IVS7+1G>A) | Splicing | 0 | 1 | NR | UNC |
NR: non‐responsive; R: responsive; UNC: uncertain; UNK: unknown.
*Stop codon.
aCompared with the wild‐type activity. bAV = 1, for classic‐PKU mutations; AV = 2, for moderate‐PKU mutations; AV = 4, for mild‐PKU mutations; and AV = 8, for MHP mutations. cHimmelreich et al. (2018), preferably average of data obtained from in vitro studies of PAH activity in COS cells systems, whenever available. dEstimation of the authors: AV = 1 regarding nonsense mutations, frameshift and large deletions whose PAH residual activities were not formerly reported. eEstimated by the authors as a null mutation. fFormerly reported as a null mutation by Guldberg et al. (1998), Pey et al. (2003, 2007), Eisensmith et al. (1996), and Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015). gBased on data from 26 patients in the BIOPKU database, 18 homozygotes and eight compound heterozygotes with a null mutation. hBased on data from five patients in the BIOPKU database, three homozygotes, and two compound heterozygotes with a null mutation. iZurfluh et al. (2008) consider this mutation as of uncertain BH4 responsiveness but in the BIOPKU database of the 107 homozygous patients tested, 101 did not respond and six responded slowly. jp.G46S is reported as “mild,” “severe‐mild,” or “severe” by different authors (Pey et al., 2003). kZurfluh et al. (2008) consider this mutation as of uncertain BH4 responsiveness but in the BIOPKU database all three homozygous patients tested did not respond. lBased on data from two homozygous patients in the BIOPKU database. mZurfluh et al. (2008) consider this mutation as of uncertain BH4 responsiveness but data from 21 homozygous patients in the BIOPKU database, which presented classic PKU, showed that all those tested (12) were BH4 nonresponsive. nZurfluh et al. (2008) consider this mutation as of uncertain BH4 responsiveness but data from nine patients in the BIOPKU database, two homozygotes and seven compound heterozygotes with a null mutation, showed they were BH4 nonresponsive, although two compound heterozygotes with a null mutation were slow responders. oData from Trunzo et al. (2016). pDescribed by our group (Vieira Neto et al., 2018). qData from Leandro, Simonsen, Saraste, Leandro, and Flatmark (2011) report it as nonreponsive. rBased on data from 29 homozygous patients in the BIOPKU database, which presented classic PKU, and those tested (18) were BH4 nonresponsive. sBased on data from 24 compound heterozygotes with a null mutation in the BIOPKU database that were tested, all of which were BH4 nonresponsive. tIn the BIOPKU database, one compound heterozygote with a null mutation was BH4 nonresponsive. uOne homozygous patient and five compound heterozygotes with a null mutation reported by Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al. (2016) and two compound heterozygotes with a null mutation reported by Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015) were BH4 nonresponsive. vIn the BIOPKU database, one compound heterozygote with a null mutation was BH4 responsive. wBased on data from 13 homozygous patients in the BIOPKU database that were tested, 12 of which were BH4 nonresponsive. xExpression in Escherichia coli. yPey et al. (2007). zExpression in TNT‐T7.
Genotypes, observed phenotypes, predicted phenotypes, estimated genotype BH4 responsiveness, assignment as BH4 test candidate, and genotype‐phenotype inconsistencies of 102 phenylketonuria (PKU)/MHP patients from Rio de Janeiro, Southeast Brazil
| Number of patients (relative frequency %) | Genotype [allele 1];[allele 2] | Observed phenotypes | AV sum | Predicted phenotypes BIOPKU database | Predicted phenotypes AV sum | Estimated genotype BH4 responsiveness | BH4 test candidate | Inconsistencies | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cPKU | moPKU | miPKU | MHP | Allele 1 | Allele 2 | Genotype | BIOPKU | AV sum | Both | ||||||
| 4 (3.92) | p.[S349P];[V388M] | 1 | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | N | Y | UNC | Y | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 (2.94) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 3 | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 (2.94) | p.[R261Q];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 2 | 1 | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 3 (2.94) | p.[R261Q];[S349P] | 1 | 2 | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 (2.94) | p.[R261Q];[R261Q] | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU/miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[V388M] | 1 | — | 1 | — | 3 | miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[F39del];[V388M] | 2 | — | — | — | 3 | — | moPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 2 | 2 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[W187C];[V388M] | — | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | — | moPKU | UNK | Y | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[R252W];[V388M] | 1 | — | 1 | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | N | Y | N | Y | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[P281L];[V388M] | 2 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | N | Y | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[T323del];[V388M] | 1 | 1 | — | — | UNK | cPKU | UNK | UNK | Y | UNK | Y | 1 | UNK | 1 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[G352Vfs*48];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[P281L];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[I65T];[R261Q] | — | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU/miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[I65T];c.[1315+1G>A] | 2 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[G312C];c.[1315+1G>A] | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | UNK | N | UNK | Y | — | — | — |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[R252W];[R261Q] | — | — | 2 | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | N | Y | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[L348V];[S349P] | 1 | 1 | — | — | 3 | — | moPKU | Y | N | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 2 (1.96) | p.[R261Q];[Y414C] | — | — | 2 | — | 6 | miPKU/MHP | miPKU | Y | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L348V];[V388M] | — | 1 | — | — | 4 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU/miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R261Q];[V388M] | — | — | 1 | — | 4 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU/miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[V388M];[V388M] | 1 | — | — | — | 4 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU/miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[G332R];[V388M] | 1 | — | — | — | UNK | — | UNK | UNK | Y | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[G46S];[V388M] | 1 | — | — | — | UNC | — | UNC | Y | Y | UNK | Y | — | UNC | UNC |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Q355_Y356insGLQ];[V388M] | — | 1 | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | N | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R176 | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R270K];[V388M] | — | 1 | — | — | 3 | — | moPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R158Q];[V388M] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | N | Y | N | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[G46S];c.[442‐?_509+?del] | — | 1 | — | — | UNC | — | UNC | Y | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNC | UNC |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[442‐?_509+?del];p.[R261Q] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | UNK | Y | UNK | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[441+5G>T];[442‐?_509+?del] | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Y166 | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Y168Sfs*27];[Y168Sfs*27] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[F55Lfs*6];[R261 | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];[R270K] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R176 | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[I65T];[S349P] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | N | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[S349P] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];[S349P] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[T323del];[S349P] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | UNK | N | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Q355_Y356insGLQ];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L348V];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | — | 1 | — | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | Y | N | N | Y | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[I65T];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | — | — | 1 | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[D84Y];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | — | 1 | — | — | UNK | — | UNK | UNK | N | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L48S];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 1 | — | — | — | 5 | cPKU/miPKU | miPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L249F];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | — | 1 | — | — | 5 | — | miPKU | N | N | N | N | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[T323del];[Q355_Y356insGLQ] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | UNK | N | UNK | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L249F];[R261Q] | — | — | 1 | — | 6 | — | miPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];[168+5G>C] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Q355_Y356insGLQ];c.[1199+17G>A] | — | 1 | — | — | UNK | — | UNK | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[D84Y];c.[1199+17G>A] | — | — | 1 | — | UNK | — | UNK | UNK | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];[1199+17G>A] | — | — | — | 1 | UNK | — | UNK | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];c.[1199+17G>A] | — | — | — | 1 | UNK | — | UNK | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[Q355_Y356insGLQ];[Y414C] | — | 1 | — | — | 5 | miPKU | miPKU | N | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R261Q];[R408W] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU/miPKU | moPKU | Y | N | N | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R408W];[R408Q] | — | — | 1 | — | 5 | miPKU | miPKU | N | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R158Q];[Y206 | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R158Q];[L348V] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | miPKU | moPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R158Q];[R158Q] | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | cPKU/miPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];[L348V] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | N | Y | UNC | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];[P281L] | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | N | N | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[P281L] | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | cPKU | cPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[L249F] | 1 | — | — | — | 5 | — | miPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R261Q];[G352Vfs*48] | — | — | 1 | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | Y | N | N | Y | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[G352Vfs*48];[D415N] | — | — | 1 | — | 9 | — | MHP | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[D415N] | — | — | — | 1 | 9 | — | MHP | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R252W];[Y414C] | — | 1 | — | — | 5 | miPKU | miPKU | N | Y | Y | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[G352Vfs*48];[Y414C] | — | — | 1 | — | 5 | — | miPKU | N | Y | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[I65T];[R68S] | 1 | — | — | — | 6 | miPKU | miPKU | Y | Y | UNC | Y | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[I65T];c.[842+1G>A] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | cPKU | moPKU | Y | N | N | Y | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R68S];c.[1315+1G>A] | 1 | — | — | — | 5 | miPKU | miPKU | Y | N | UNC | Y | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[L249F];c.[1315+1G>A] | 1 | — | — | — | 5 | — | miPKU | N | N | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[I65T];[T323del] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | — | moPKU | Y | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[D84Y];[T323del] | — | — | 1 | — | UNK | — | UNK | UNK | UNK | UNK | Y | — | UNK | UNK |
| 1 (0.98) | c.[168+5G>C];p.[T323del] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[P281L];[T323del] | 1 | — | — | — | 2 | — | cPKU | N | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (0.98) | p.[R261Q];[T323del] | 1 | — | — | — | 3 | — | moPKU | Y | UNK | UNK | Y | — | 1 | 1 |
*Stop codon.
aBased on pretreatment phenylalanine levels: cPKU: classic PKU; moPKU: moderate PKU; miPKU: mild PKU; MHP: mild hyperphenylalaninemia. bBIOPKU database (http://www.biopku.org). cAV sum method of Guldberg et al. (1998). dAccording to Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al. (2016), Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015), Scala et al. (2015), Couce et al. (2013), Karacic et al. (2009), or in the BIOPKU database. eUNK = unknown; UNC = uncertain; Y = yes; N = no. fBoth the phenotypes predicted by AV Sum or reported at the BIOPKU database were regarded as consistent with the genotypic combination. gBIOPKU database mild PKU category was considered as representing both moderate and mild PKU. hNew genotypic combination. iThe number of patients tested for BH4 responsiveness was less than 30% of the total of patients with this genotype at the BIOPKU database. jOne (11,1%) patient reported by Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al. (2016) as responsive out of a total of nine patients from the same authors, BIOPKU database, and Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015). kTwo (4,3%) patients reported at the BIOPKU database as responsive out of a total of 46 patients from this same database, Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al. (2016), and Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015). lOne (6.7%) patient reported at the BIOPKU database as responsive out of a total of 15 patients from this same database, Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al. (2016), and Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al. (2015).
Observed phenotypes based on pretreatment phenylalanine levels (85 patients) or clinical evaluation (four patients) versus expected phenotypes according to the sum of the arbitrary assigned values (AV) for each genotype, according to the phenotype prediction system of Guldberg et al. (1998) for patients with PKU or mild hyperphenylalaninemia (MHP) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| AV sum | Expected phenotype | Observed phenotype | Total (expected) | Perfect matches, % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic | Moderate | Mild | MHP | ||||
| 2 | Classic | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0 | ||
| 3 | Moderate | 23 | 10 | 8 | 41 | 24.4 | |
| 4 | Moderate/mild | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 75.0 | |
| 5 and 6 | Mild | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 38.5 | |
| 9 | MHP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | ||
| Total (observed) | 51 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 89 | 48.3 | |
Figure 1Comparison of the inverse of pretreatment phenylalanine (Phe) levels (mg/dl) with the predicted phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) enzyme activity for a total of 81 patients for which mutant PAH residual activity (PRA) for both alleles and pretreatment Phe levels were both known. Mean PRA for each genotype was established by data in BIOPKU database and previously published articles (Aldamiz‐Echevarria et al., 2016; Eisensmith et al., 1996; Guldberg et al., 1998; Jeannesson‐Thivisol et al., 2015; Pey et al., 2003; Trunzo et al., 2016). A significant correlation (t = 4.79, p < 0.0001) was found by linear regression analysis: y = 0.0007x + 0.0379, R 2 = 0.225