Neha Verma1, Pankaj Sangwan2, Sanjay Tewari1, Jigyasa Duhan1. 1. Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. Electronic address: drps_1@yahoo.co.in.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on healing and postoperative pain after primary endodontic treatment. METHODS:One hundred mandibular molars with pulp necrosis and chronic apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: high-concentration (HC) 5% sodium hypochlorite and low-concentration (LC) 1% sodium hypochlorite. Root canal treatment was performed using a standardized protocol. Canals were prepared using equal volumes of respective irrigants after each instrument change. After chemomechanical preparation, the final flush was performed with 5 mL 17% EDTA solution followed by 5 mL 5% or 1% sodium hypochlorite depending on the group. All patients were asked to record the degree of pain on a visual analog scale every 24 hours for 1 week. At the second visit, canals were obturated, and the teeth were restored permanently. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed every 3 months for 12 months. The data collected were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-six teeth were available for evaluation at the 1-year follow-up. The overall healing rate observed was 76.7%. Greater healing was observed in the HC (81.4%) group compared with the LC group (72.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). No significant differences in pain incidence and pain scores were found between the 2 groups (P >.05), with lower values reported in the LC group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LC or HC sodium hypochlorite did not result in a significant difference in the clinical outcome.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on healing and postoperative pain after primary endodontic treatment. METHODS: One hundred mandibular molars with pulp necrosis and chronic apical periodontitis were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups: high-concentration (HC) 5% sodium hypochlorite and low-concentration (LC) 1% sodium hypochlorite. Root canal treatment was performed using a standardized protocol. Canals were prepared using equal volumes of respective irrigants after each instrument change. After chemomechanical preparation, the final flush was performed with 5 mL 17% EDTA solution followed by 5 mL 5% or 1% sodium hypochlorite depending on the group. All patients were asked to record the degree of pain on a visual analog scale every 24 hours for 1 week. At the second visit, canals were obturated, and the teeth were restored permanently. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed every 3 months for 12 months. The data collected were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-six teeth were available for evaluation at the 1-year follow-up. The overall healing rate observed was 76.7%. Greater healing was observed in the HC (81.4%) group compared with the LC group (72.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). No significant differences in pain incidence and pain scores were found between the 2 groups (P >.05), with lower values reported in the LC group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LC or HC sodium hypochlorite did not result in a significant difference in the clinical outcome.