Literature DB >> 30826553

Square prism micropillars on poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces modulate the morphology and differentiation of human dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells.

Onur Hasturk1, Menekse Ermis2, Utkan Demirci3, Nesrin Hasirci4, Vasif Hasirci5.   

Abstract

Use of soluble factors is the most common strategy to induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro, but it may raise potential side effects in vivo. The topographies of the substrate surfaces affect cell behavior, and this could be a promising approach to guide stem cell differentiation. Micropillars have been reported to modulate cellular and subcellular shape, and it is particularly interesting to investigate whether these changes in cell morphology can modulate gene expression and lineage commitment without chemical induction. In this study, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films were decorated with square prism micropillars with different lateral dimensions (4, 8 and 16 μm), and the surface wettability of the substrates was altered by oxygen plasma treatment. Both, pattern dimensions and hydrophilicity, were found to affect the attachment, proliferation, and most importantly, gene expression of human dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs). Decreasing the pillar width and interpillar spacing of the square prism pillars enhanced cell attachment, cell elongation, and deformation of nuclei, but reduced early proliferation rate. Surfaces with 4 or 8 μm wide pillars/gaps upregulated the expression of early bone-marker genes and mineralization over 28 days of culture. Exposure to oxygen plasma increased wettability and promoted cell attachment and proliferation but delayed osteogenesis. Our findings showed that surface topography and chemistry are very useful tools in controlling cell behavior on substrates and they can also help create better implants. The most important finding is that hydrophobic micropillars on polymeric substrate surfaces can be exploited in inducing osteogenic differentiation of MSCs without any differentiation supplements.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell morphology; Dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells; Micropillars; Osteogenic differentiation; Proliferation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826553      PMCID: PMC7805346          DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  101 in total

1.  The effect of culture conditions on the adipogenic and osteogenic inductions of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned surfaces.

Authors:  Rong Peng; Xiang Yao; Bin Cao; Jian Tang; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration.

Authors:  Marion Ghibaudo; Léa Trichet; Jimmy Le Digabel; Alain Richert; Pascal Hersen; Benoît Ladoux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface.

Authors:  N Donos; S Hamlet; N P Lang; G E Salvi; G Huynh-Ba; D D Bosshardt; S Ivanovski
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Cell Type and Nuclear Size Dependence of the Nuclear Deformation of Cells on a Micropillar Array.

Authors:  Ruili Liu; Qiong Liu; Zhen Pan; Xiangnan Liu; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Effects of aspect ratios of stem cells on lineage commitments with and without induction media.

Authors:  Xiang Yao; Rong Peng; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  A surface-modified poly(ɛ-caprolactone) scaffold comprising variable nanosized surface-roughness using a plasma treatment.

Authors:  HoJun Jeon; Hyeongjin Lee; GeunHyung Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Systematically organized nanopillar arrays reveal differences in adhesion and alignment properties of BMSC and Saos-2 cells.

Authors:  Hayriye Özçelik; Celestino Padeste; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 8.  Biomaterial Cues Regulate Epigenetic State and Cell Functions-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Longwei Lv; Yiman Tang; Ping Zhang; Yunsong Liu; Xiangsong Bai; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Nakashima; Xin Zhou; Gary Kunkel; Zhaoping Zhang; Jian Min Deng; Richard R Behringer; Benoit de Crombrugghe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Chondrocyte behaviors on poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) membranes containing hydroxyl, amide or carboxyl groups.

Authors:  Zuwei Ma; Changyou Gao; Yihong Gong; Jiacong Shen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  7 in total

1.  Silk degumming time controls horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed hydrogel properties.

Authors:  Jugal Kishore Sahoo; Jaewon Choi; Onur Hasturk; Isabel Laubach; Marc L Descoteaux; Shreyas Mosurkal; Boyang Wang; Nina Zhang; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.843

2.  Topographic cues of a novel bilayered scaffold modulate dental pulp stem cells differentiation by regulating YAP signalling through cytoskeleton adjustments.

Authors:  Yu Du; Carolina Montoya; Santiago Orrego; Xi Wei; Junqi Ling; Peter I Lelkes; Maobin Yang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 3.  Effect of Controlled Microtopography on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chengxin Chen; Yuanjing Zhu; Ran Wang; Yu Han; Hongbo Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 4.  A critical review of in vitro research methodologies used to study mineralization in human dental pulp cell cultures.

Authors:  Shelly Arora; Paul R Cooper; Jithendra T Ratnayake; Lara T Friedlander; Shakila B Rizwan; Benedict Seo; Haizal M Hussaini
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 5.  Effect of microtopography on osseointegration of implantable biomaterials and its modification strategies.

Authors:  Yingying Zhang; Zhenmin Fan; Yanghui Xing; Shaowei Jia; Zhongjun Mo; He Gong
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-26

6.  Sub-Micropillar Spacing Modulates the Spatial Arrangement of Mouse MC3T3-E1 Osteoblastic Cells.

Authors:  Benedetta Ghezzi; Paola Lagonegro; Naoki Fukata; Ludovica Parisi; Davide Calestani; Carlo Galli; Giancarlo Salviati; Guido M Macaluso; Francesca Rossi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  A Cell Culture Chip with Transparent, Micropillar-Decorated Bottom for Live Cell Imaging and Screening of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Menekse Ermis; Ezgi Antmen; Ozgur Kuren; Utkan Demirci; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.