Literature DB >> 21561478

Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface.

N Donos1, S Hamlet, N P Lang, G E Salvi, G Huynh-Ba, D D Bosshardt, S Ivanovski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the gene expression profile of osseointegration associated with a moderately rough and a chemically modified hydrophilic moderately rough surface in a human model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen solid screw-type cylindrical titanium implants, 4 mm long and 2.8 mm wide, with either a moderately rough (SLA) or a chemically modified moderately rough (SLActive) surface were surgically inserted in the retromolar area of nine human volunteers. The devices were removed using a trephine following 4, 7 and 14 days of healing. The tissue surrounding the implant was harvested, total RNA was extracted and microarray analysis was carried out to identify the differences in the transcriptome between the SLA and SLActive surfaces at days 4, 7 and 14.
RESULTS: There were no functionally relevant gene ontology categories that were over-represented in the list of genes that were differentially expressed at day 4. However, by day 7, osteogenesis- and angiogenesis-associated gene expression were up-regulated on the SLActive surface. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis appeared to be regulated by BMP and VEGF signalling, respectively. By day 14, VEGF signalling remains up-regulated on the SLActive surface, while BMP signalling was up-regulated on the SLA surface in what appeared to be a delayed compensatory response. Furthermore, neurogenesis was a prominent biological process within the list of differentially expressed genes, and it was influenced by both surfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SLA, SLActive exerts a pro-osteogenic and pro-angiogenic influence on gene expression at day 7 following implant insertion, which may be responsible for the superior osseointegrative properties of this surface.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  28 in total

1.  Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  Keng-Liang Ou; Heng-Jui Hsu; Tzu-Sen Yang; Yun-Ho Lin; Chin-Sung Chen; Pei-Wen Peng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The response of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells to micro- and nano-textured, hydrophilic and bioactive titanium surfaces.

Authors:  S Lumetti; E Manfredi; S Ferraris; S Spriano; G Passeri; G Ghiacci; G Macaluso; C Galli
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Genetic networks in osseointegration.

Authors:  I Nishimura
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Osteoblast maturation on microtextured titanium involves paracrine regulation of bone morphogenetic protein signaling.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Qingfen Pan; Ginger Dunn; Joseph K Williams; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 5.  Dental implants in patients affected by systemic diseases.

Authors:  N Donos; E Calciolari
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

7.  Square prism micropillars on poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces modulate the morphology and differentiation of human dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Onur Hasturk; Menekse Ermis; Utkan Demirci; Nesrin Hasirci; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.268

8.  Gene expression profiling and histomorphometric analyses of the early bone healing response around nanotextured implants.

Authors:  Rima M Wazen; Shingo Kuroda; Clarice Nishio; Karine Sellin; John B Brunski; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Surface characteristics on commercial dental implants differentially activate macrophages in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Jefferson O Abaricia; Arth H Shah; Marissa N Ruzga; Rene Olivares-Navarrete
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface.

Authors:  Ann Wennerberg; Silvia Galli; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.