Morgan L McCloskey1, Susan L Johnson2, Traci A Bekelman2, Corby K Martin3, Laura L Bellows4. 1. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO. 3. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA. 4. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Electronic address: laura.bellows@colostate.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using an image-based food photography methodology (Remote Food Photography Method) in a rural, low-resource audience and use the photos to examine the context of family dinner. DESIGN: Parents used the SmartIntake app on study-issued tablets to take before and after photos of their and their child's dinner for about 7 nights and participated in a mini-focus group to discuss their experience with the Remote Food Photography Method. SETTING: Six Head Start/preschool centers in rural Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Mother-child dyads (n = 31). VARIABLES MEASURED: Number and quality of photos received, participant feedback, meal timing, concordance, location, preparation, and quality. ANALYSIS: The researchers assessed feasibility via practicality (percent photos received) and acceptability (general inductive approach used to analyze mini-focus group transcripts for participant feedback); time stamps, meal quality, and food preparation scales were used to analyze dinner photos. RESULTS: The majority of photographs (738 of 864) were received. Participants reacted favorably to the methodology; for some, it led to greater self-reflection about mealtime. Mother-child dyads usually ate dinner at the same time and often ate the same food. Children were frequently served protein and refined grains and were rarely served whole grains or fruit. Many families relied on convenience foods. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Digital food photography was feasible in this audience. Photos yielded a holistic picture of family dinnertime: meal timing, location, concordance in parent-child meals, level of preparation, and meal quality.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using an image-based food photography methodology (Remote Food Photography Method) in a rural, low-resource audience and use the photos to examine the context of family dinner. DESIGN: Parents used the SmartIntake app on study-issued tablets to take before and after photos of their and their child's dinner for about 7 nights and participated in a mini-focus group to discuss their experience with the Remote Food Photography Method. SETTING: Six Head Start/preschool centers in rural Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Mother-child dyads (n = 31). VARIABLES MEASURED: Number and quality of photos received, participant feedback, meal timing, concordance, location, preparation, and quality. ANALYSIS: The researchers assessed feasibility via practicality (percent photos received) and acceptability (general inductive approach used to analyze mini-focus group transcripts for participant feedback); time stamps, meal quality, and food preparation scales were used to analyze dinner photos. RESULTS: The majority of photographs (738 of 864) were received. Participants reacted favorably to the methodology; for some, it led to greater self-reflection about mealtime. Mother-child dyads usually ate dinner at the same time and often ate the same food. Children were frequently served protein and refined grains and were rarely served whole grains or fruit. Many families relied on convenience foods. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Digital food photography was feasible in this audience. Photos yielded a holistic picture of family dinnertime: meal timing, location, concordance in parent-child meals, level of preparation, and meal quality.
Authors: Donald A Williamson; Pamela Davis Martin; H Raymond Allen; Marlene M Most; Anthony J Alfonso; Vicky Thomas; Donna H Ryan Journal: Mil Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Corby K Martin; Robert L Newton; Stephen D Anton; H Raymond Allen; Anthony Alfonso; Hongmei Han; Tiffany Stewart; Melinda Sothern; Donald A Williamson Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2006-04-27
Authors: Corby K Martin; Jessica L Thomson; Monique M LeBlanc; Tiffany M Stewart; Robert L Newton; Hongmei Han; Alicia Sample; Catherine M Champagne; Donald A Williamson Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Corby K Martin; Hongmei Han; Sandra M Coulon; H Raymond Allen; Catherine M Champagne; Stephen D Anton Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2008-07-11 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Traci A Bekelman; Laura L Bellows; Morgan L McCloskey; Corby K Martin; Susan L Johnson Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Traci A Bekelman; Susan L Johnson; Rachel I Steinberg; Corby K Martin; Katherine A Sauder; Sophie Luckett-Cole; Deborah H Glueck; Daniel S Hsia; Dana Dabelea Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 5.234
Authors: Traci A Bekelman; Corby K Martin; Susan L Johnson; Deborah H Glueck; Katherine A Sauder; Kylie K Harrall; Rachel I Steinberg; Daniel S Hsia; Dana Dabelea Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Nuria Martínez-Lozano; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Rafael Ríos; Isabel Barón; Frank A J L Scheer; Marta Garaulet Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 5.717